Re: [PD] Netsend

2008-05-21 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On May 20, 2008, at 10:45 PM, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: Hi, I'm not sure I understood the question right, but I do broadcast UDP packets to 192.168.1.255 with [netsend] in my every day life in UDP mode, i.e. [netsend 1]. Just send it a [connect 192.168.1.255 3000( message and use a

Re: [PD] pdp_qt on Mac OS X

2008-05-21 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On May 21, 2008, at 2:46 AM, marius schebella wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Of course, when I post this, the Mac/Intel build didn't happen... arg... i tested the pdp_qt and pdp_yqt (with a self compiled pdx version). I could load some files, but not all. pdp_yqt does not output

Re: [PD] pdp_qt on Mac OS X

2008-05-21 Thread marius schebella
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On May 21, 2008, at 2:46 AM, marius schebella wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Of course, when I post this, the Mac/Intel build didn't happen... arg... i tested the pdp_qt and pdp_yqt (with a self compiled pdx version). I could load some files, but not

[PD] essay with video examples: instrument design

2008-05-21 Thread Johannes Kreidler
hi list, eventually i compiled an essay out of a lecture held in 2005 about instrument design. additionally, there are a couple of videos included with works that i've programmed on pd. enjoy! (the essay is in german): http://www.kreidler-net.de/instrument-design.html greets, johannes

Re: [PD] pdp_qt on Mac OS X

2008-05-21 Thread marius schebella
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Of course, when I post this, the Mac/Intel build didn't happen... arg... i tested the pdp_qt and pdp_yqt (with a self compiled pdx version). I could load some files, but not all. pdp_yqt does not output sound. but with one file pd

Re: [PD] pdp_qt on Mac OS X

2008-05-21 Thread Jack
Le 21 mai 08 à 02:48, marius schebella a écrit : Jack wrote: Very nice ! That works ! No more problem with [pdp_yqt] nor [pdp_qt] on MacOSX. 4.11 on PowerBook G4. Great job Hans, thanx. ++ did you get sound out of pdp_yqt? because I didn't. I am on 10.5 and was running home brewed

Re: [PD] pdp_qt on Mac OS X

2008-05-21 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On May 21, 2008, at 3:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Of course, when I post this, the Mac/Intel build didn't happen... arg... i tested the pdp_qt and pdp_yqt (with a self compiled pdx version). I could load some files, but not all. pdp_yqt does not output

Re: [PD] pdp_qt on Mac OS X

2008-05-21 Thread chris clepper
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:58 AM, marius schebella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: libquicktime is poorly installed because apple does not want quicktime run good outside the quicktime player. even on the same machine a video can run good in the quicktime player but perform bad outside. it's one of

[PD] quick fix for help files

2008-05-21 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
So I found a quick fix with few painful downsides that I can see to allow the help files all to have working objects. Basically, I wrote a script that adds a line as the second line to the help patch: #X declare -lib libraryname This is the same line that would be created if there was a

Re: [PD] pdp_qt on Mac OS X

2008-05-21 Thread Jack
Le 21 mai 08 à 15:02, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit : On May 21, 2008, at 2:46 AM, marius schebella wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Of course, when I post this, the Mac/Intel build didn't happen... arg... i tested the pdp_qt and pdp_yqt (with a self compiled pdx version). I could

Re: [PD] pdp_qt on Mac OS X

2008-05-21 Thread ydegoyon
yves degoyon wrote: ola, I tried the video of the senegal workshop. http://www.craslab.org/interaction/files/videos/afropixel2008.mov this one is a bit tricky, with audio at 32000 kHz encoded with mp4a, pdp_yqt can only resample with a factor of type (int), meaning 1:2 , 1:3

Re: [PD] Lua: request for 'require'...

2008-05-21 Thread Mike McGonagle
self:dofile(myscript.lua). I tried this as the following: dofile(/absolute/path/to/myfile.lua) and this works... package.path = /my/pdlua/files/?.lua; .. package.path I also tried this as follows package.path = /absolute/path/to/?.lua; .. package.path require myfile.lua and this

Re: [PD] Lua: request for 'require'...

2008-05-21 Thread Mike McGonagle
Well, I also tried require /absolute/path/to/myfile and this worked, also... do note that there is no '.lua' at the end of the path/file name Mike On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Mike McGonagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: self:dofile(myscript.lua). I tried this as the following:

Re: [PD] help files was: Re: call for testing on the nightly builds!

2008-05-21 Thread Rich E
Both layout 1 and 2 would be nice to have, for different situations. Concerning patches that are included in pd extended, it seems best to use layout 1 that you mention, which is compatible on everyone's system, as of right now. [declare]/[import] seems like something for personal patches, where

Re: [PD] gop array in abstraction appears outside abstraction boundaries

2008-05-21 Thread Miller Puckette
OK... I think I have this fixed (to appear once tested on macwindows). A belated thanks for flagging this. Miller On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 05:05:58PM +0100, tim wrote: Hello, I was able to reproduce this on Pd 0.41-0 : pd_goptest1 the abstraction testt.pd contains an array, which appears in

Re: [PD] Send startup flag on osx

2008-05-21 Thread Miller Puckette
I think this is because on the Mac when you click-open a patch the OS doesn't tell Pd about the patch until after Pd is running (so the send was already tried.) A workaround would be to put the patch as well in the Pd command line. I don't know how to fix this in general. cheers Miller On Mon,

Re: [PD] UI developer volunteering to help - more suggestions

2008-05-21 Thread João Pais
Hmm, I can't reproduce this on Mac OS X 10.4.11/Intel with Pd-extended 0.40.3-20080517 I was playing a bit with it - it also works if a patch/subpatch window is closed and reopened. but anyway, if possible, an instant implementation would be the most desirable. only that way it would be

Re: [PD] wierd feedback popping with pd/freebob/jack/rt

2008-05-21 Thread Rich E
IIRC, Ubuntu RT kernel is not actually Real Time (i.e. with Ingo patches), just a desktop RT which is not very useful for audio and certainly not enough for JACK apps of any heft. Where are you getting this info from? This is not what I have read, but maybe I am missing something somewhere.

Re: [PD] wierd feedback popping with pd/freebob/jack/rt

2008-05-21 Thread Rich E
IIRC, Ubuntu RT kernel is not actually Real Time (i.e. with Ingo patches), just a desktop RT which is not very useful for audio and certainly not enough for JACK apps of any heft. Where are you getting this info from? This is not what I have read, but maybe I am missing something somewhere.

Re: [PD] wierd feedback popping with pd/freebob/jack/rt

2008-05-21 Thread Rich E
Hans, the patch here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1942258group_id=55736atid=478072 I tried the may 15th pd-extended and I don't have the problem, but I do with the may 16th one. Also, I just manually patched pd-0.40.3 with the diff file on that page and I again have

Re: [PD] wierd feedback popping with pd/freebob/jack/rt

2008-05-21 Thread Ken Restivo
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:23:20PM -0700, Rich E wrote: IIRC, Ubuntu RT kernel is not actually Real Time (i.e. with Ingo patches), just a desktop RT which is not very useful for audio and certainly not enough for JACK apps of any heft. Where are you getting this info from? This is

Re: [PD] wierd feedback popping with pd/freebob/jack/rt

2008-05-21 Thread Rich E
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Ken Restivo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:23:20PM -0700, Rich E wrote: IIRC, Ubuntu RT kernel is not actually Real Time (i.e. with Ingo patches), just a desktop RT which is not very useful for audio and certainly not enough for

Re: [PD] call for testing on the nightly builds!

2008-05-21 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Well, it seems that the new look is slower. I think it should be possible to speed things up, but not for this release. I've used this version a bit on a G4 867 and didn't see a big difference, do you have any specific details? .hc On May 21, 2008, at 11:09 PM, Achim Bornhoeft wrote:

Re: [PD] call for testing on the nightly builds!

2008-05-21 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I forgot to mention, on my old G4 800 PowerBook, everything ran much faster and smoother running Debian than running Mac OS X. It was really a big difference between the two. I recommend trying Ubuntu or Debian on your old G4. Pd runs better on GNU/Linux anyhow. .hc On May 21, 2008, at

Re: [PD] call for testing on the nightly builds!

2008-05-21 Thread Achim Bornhoeft
I had to switch to a current nightly-build because the pd-extended 0.39.3 is not willing ot work without clicks with jack and my old mbox under os 10.4.8. Compared to the older release all movements and draggings of objects (especially GUI an GOP objects) are clearly slower. When the CPU load

[PD] pdj binary for intel 10.4

2008-05-21 Thread marius schebella
hi, I am looking for a binary of pdj that is compiled for intel mac running OS x 10.4. I think the one on the website is a ppc version, and the one I have compiled only runs on 10.5. anyone? thanks ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

Re: [PD] Someone wants to program this?

2008-05-21 Thread Mike McGonagle
Hum, could you possibly save it as plain text instead of a Microsoft Word file? Thanks. On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Javier Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm interested in the object i have described in the document i have attached, but i don't have to much time to program it by

Re: [PD] Someone wants to program this?

2008-05-21 Thread Mike McGonagle
Or, if there are graphics in the file, maybe save it to a PDF file... On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Mike McGonagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hum, could you possibly save it as plain text instead of a Microsoft Word file? Thanks. On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Javier Garcia [EMAIL

Re: [PD] pdp_qt on Mac OS X

2008-05-21 Thread husk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pdp_yqt plays sounds ok on linux, thanks. Hi Yves, i'm curious about tools you're using... I'm on Ubuntu hardy and all seems to work well, but the only sound i get from pdp_yqt is from afropixel.mov video (with cuts and clicks). I use avidemux and cinerella for

Re: [PD] Someone wants to program this?

2008-05-21 Thread chris clepper
google docs opened it for me. you have the google right? On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Mike McGonagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hum, could you possibly save it as plain text instead of a Microsoft Word file? Thanks. On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Javier Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[PD] gem2pdp

2008-05-21 Thread ydegoyon
ola, i dunno if someone maintain it anymore too, but gem2pdp is absolutely broken, doesn't compile and the latests changes were not mine.. i still maintain a gem2pdp-0.5 that works with gem 0.90, can't do more.. ciao, sevy ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing