On 2010-04-29 01:30, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
My issue is that I've wound up spending quite some time putting [pipe]
objects between different parameters of gem chains in order for one to
change a set number of milliseconds after another. I basically want a
whole chain parameter pipe,
do you
- IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at a écrit :
safe value. 1 is not very safe (it triggers messages quite
often),
so i'd say something higher (20, 100, 1000?) or (as you seem to
suggest) nothing at all.
after reflexion, 1000 or even 500 (120 BPM) sounds like good default value for
On 2010-04-29 10:01, colet.patr...@free.fr wrote:
- IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at a écrit :
safe value. 1 is not very safe (it triggers messages quite
often),
so i'd say something higher (20, 100, 1000?) or (as you seem to
suggest) nothing at all.
after reflexion, 1000 or
I personnaly read the FLOSS manual first. I think it should be translated
first, because it's well referenced in google, and it's also concise but
quite comprehensive for beginners.
This is just my opinion. Should we vote?
Pierre
2010/4/28 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
On Wed, 28 Apr
not that i know of.
i've only ever been to one meeting which was January 2009.
http://puredata.info/community/DeckSpace
if anyone knows of more, and/or wants to help organise, etc then please do.
i just thought i'd try and get something going.
r
http://ryanjordan.org/
http://a10lab.info/
hi there,
i'd like to have log-files of complete pd sessions - ideally with a time stamp
- so that i can kind of rerun the whole process of patch creation. i can get pd
with the debugging option to output all actions, but i unfortunately do not
know how to store (and timestamp) all that.
i'm
For example:
In Audition can you output with the ASIO driver with all channels? That's a
way to debug the issue... I have a MOTU Ultralite mk3 (which has no FFADO
support still for Linux) so I use it under Pd on Win XP, ASIO works fine and
I always use MOTU ASIO as the output then the dac object
On PD you can use the -verbose and - debug level options, for instance:
$ pd -verbose -d 2
If you start pd like that you be nlown away, it outputs everything, from
loading, to each object creation and even mouse movement (scary), try o use
diferent debug levels.
If you use debug level = 1 you get
On 2010-04-29 14:32, Pedro Lopes wrote:
On PD you can use the -verbose and - debug level options, for instance:
$ pd -verbose -d 2
-d 1 means core-gui traffic
-d 2 means gui-core traffic
-d 3 means both
but this doesn't give you time stamps.
i experimented a bit with using tcpdump, but when
Gil More wrote:
hi there,
i'd like to have log-files of complete pd sessions - ideally with a time stamp
- so that i can kind of rerun the whole process of patch creation. i can get pd
with the debugging option to output all actions, but i unfortunately do not
know how to store (and
Hi everybody,
I'd like to know if there's a bit crusher/ lo-fi/ sonic destructor abs.
somewhere out there. I'd like to take a look inside to see how it works, just
out of curiosity.
Thanks
D.S
http://www.flickr.com/photos/schafferdavid/
2010/4/29 Claude Heiland-Allen claudiusmaxi...@goto10.org
Gil More wrote:
hi there,
i'd like to have log-files of complete pd sessions - ideally with a time
stamp - so that i can kind of rerun the whole process of patch creation. i
can get pd with the debugging option to output all
Same here! Only i want to use it, too.
Pierre
2010/4/29 David Schaffer schafferda...@hotmail.com
Hi everybody,
I'd like to know if there's a bit crusher/ lo-fi/ sonic destructor
abs. somewhere out there. I'd like to take a look inside to see how it
works, just out of curiosity.
I'm using Pd version 0.42.5-extended-20100428 and Ubuntu Lucid 10.04 :-)
Am 2010-04-28 20:07, schrieb Thomas Holzmann:
Hello,
I'm using the latest pd-extended and have display problems when using
pd on a screen which is set to 120 dpi. Then most of the texts don't
fit into the boxes. When
Oli44 wrote:
Hello Pierre,
There is a FLOSS Manual about FLOSS Manuals that explains translation
a bit:
http://en.flossmanuals.net/FLOSSManuals/XchangeIntro
Is there also a FLOSS manual about the FLOSS manual about FLOSS manuals,
and in turn a FLOSS manual about the FLOSS manual about the
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 09:10:53AM -0700, Benoît Fortier wrote:
Thank you, I didn't knew about the one block delay. Problem solved very
elegantly indeed!
However the problem is not really solved, only delayed. :) Your phasor~'s
frequency will not change when it is at zero, but at least 1
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:54:18PM +0200, David Schaffer wrote:
I'd like to know if there's a bit crusher/ lo-fi/ sonic destructor abs.
somewhere out there. I'd like to take a look inside to see how it works, just
out of curiosity.
The rj library has some, check out the Effects section in
there's a very simple way do do 'sample rate reduction' (which is i think
the sound you're looking for)
[readsf~]
|[phasor~ 100]
|/
[samphold~]
|
instant lo-fi gratification :)
gr,
Tim
2010/4/29 Pierre Massat pimas...@gmail.com
Same here! Only i want to use it,
Alex Lucas wrote:
there doesn't seem to be
any visible clipping on the table. The audible clipping was present across
the frequency range but changing the multiplication on the phasor~ to 2048
has solved the problem.
it is not so much clipping, but a discontinuity in the waveform, which
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 08:03 -0700, Benoît Fortier wrote:
First time on this mailing list, so hello everyone! I started using pd
a couple of month ago and I'm completely addicted.
Ok I have a simple problem for which I'm looking for the most elegant
solution.
I need a phasor (in a looping
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Ryan Jordan wrote:
not that i know of. i've only ever been to one meeting which was January
2009. http://puredata.info/community/DeckSpace
if anyone knows of more, and/or wants to help organise, etc then please do.
i just thought i'd try and get something going.
Ah,
David Schaffer wrote:
I'd like to know if there's a bit crusher/ lo-fi/ sonic destructor abs.
a bit-reduction effect is quite easy to build:
multiply the signal by a (larger) number,
throw away the fractional part (by using expr~ int($v1), or building
something with wrap~)
and divide the
I'm happy that there is so much attention on the FLOSS Manual. Pure
Data has been long in need of documentation for human beings. However,
it needs a lot of writing and proofing before it will be ready for
translation. I may try to spend a little time in July working on it.
Get in touch
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:15 +0200, tim vets wrote:
there's a very simple way do do 'sample rate reduction' (which is i
think the sound you're looking for)
[readsf~]
|[phasor~ 100]
|/
[samphold~]
|
instant lo-fi gratification :)
This is a crude way to
Try these:
rc-bitcrusher~-help.pd
Description: Binary data
rc-bitcrusher~.pd
Description: Binary data
rc-aliaser~_-help.pd
Description: Binary data
rc-aliaser~_.pd
Description: Binary data
rc-bitcrusher is a modified s-bitcrusher from s-abstractions and rc-alisaser~ is from an example
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Gil More wrote:
i'd like to have log-files of complete pd sessions - ideally with a time
stamp - so that i can kind of rerun the whole process of patch creation.
i can get pd with the debugging option to output all actions, but i
unfortunately do not know how to store
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:47 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:15 +0200, tim vets wrote:
there's a very simple way do do 'sample rate reduction' (which is i
think the sound you're looking for)
[readsf~]
|[phasor~ 100]
|/
[samphold~]
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Pierre Massat wrote:
I personnaly read the FLOSS manual first. I think it should be
translated first, because it's well referenced in google, and it's also
concise but quite comprehensive for beginners. This is just my opinion.
Should we vote?
There is no electoral
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote:
Reduced bit depth (which is what I think 'bit-crushing' means) can be
achieved by dividing the signal by x, pass it through something like
[int~], multiply it by x again. An [int~] can be implemented by using
[wrap~] and [-~], which are both vanilla.
I just noticed that you are trying to build 0.41.4. I think you'll
have better luck with 0.42.5, so try this:
http://puredata.info/docs/developer/GettingPdSource
Specifically, something like this in the Terminal:
rsync -av --delete rsync://128.238.56.50/distros/pd-extended/ pd-
extended/
I updated portaudio in Pd-extended 0.42.5, try a nightly build.
.hc
On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Pedro Lopes wrote:
For example:
In Audition can you output with the ASIO driver with all channels?
That's a way to debug the issue... I have a MOTU Ultralite mk3
(which has no FFADO support
There's also the loop~ object (in pd/extra) which I had to write for exactly
this reason. But I doubt it's general enough for every possible purpose :)
Miller
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 04:26:13PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 08:03 -0700, Beno??t Fortier wrote:
First time
On Apr 29, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Matt Barber wrote:
I'm using Pd version 0.42.5-extended-20100428 and Ubuntu Lucid
10.04 :-)
Am 2010-04-28 20:07, schrieb Thomas Holzmann:
Hello,
I'm using the latest pd-extended and have display problems when
using
pd on a screen which is set to 120 dpi.
good, thanks. I'll give it a try right now.
M
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.atwrote:
I updated portaudio in Pd-extended 0.42.5, try a nightly build.
.hc
On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Pedro Lopes wrote:
For example:
In Audition can you output with
Ok, now it's working everything fine, thanks for the help.
first Pd 0.42.5 -pa (asio) started recognizing all outputs, but to avoid
clicks I had to use a horrible latency i.e. 190ms... unusable.
thus I've got the brilliant idea of ASIO4ALL... (I know.. I could have
thought of it before).
Now I
Thank you, I just tried the loop~ object and it works very well for what I'm
doing (a looping sampler which allows to change the offset and the size of the
repeated segment without transposing it... rather simple stuff I suppose but
fun to work on when learning!). One more question came up to
Hello Hans,
Thanks for helping, unfortunately
i got errors :
cc -g -O2 -DPD -Wall -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused -Wno-parentheses
-Wno-switch -DDL_OPEN -DMACOSX -DUNISTD -I/usr/X11R6/include
-I../portaudio/include -I../portaudio/src/common
-I../portaudio/src/os/mac_osx/
On 2010-04-29 21:29, t'es in t'es bat wrote:
Hello Hans,
Thanks for helping, unfortunately
i got errors :
cc -g -O2 -DPD -Wall -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused -Wno-parentheses
-Wno-switch -DDL_OPEN -DMACOSX -DUNISTD -I/usr/X11R6/include
-I../portaudio/include -I../portaudio/src/common
Am 2010-04-29 17:44, schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
Could you guys try pd-gui-rewrite and see if it still has this
problem? The Tcl/Tk side has been entirely rewritten from scratch, so
hopefully it'll just work now. Otherwise, we can get the fixes in
that branch.
I'll try it.
How
Reduced bit depth (which is what I think 'bit-crushing' means) can be
achieved by dividing the signal by x, pass it through something like
[int~], multiply it by x again. An [int~] can be implemented by using
[wrap~] and [-~], which are both vanilla.
It is also worth considering adding a DC
wow cool. should try it then. haven't got the time to play, too busy at the
office.
Anyway, while we're at it, can i use a USB camcorder to get image and edit
it directly using GEM / Pd? I understand that USB web cam and Firewire based
camera are supported, but I haven't got any information
Hey Matt,
I've been on vacation the past few days, so sorry for the late reply.
But I just wanted to say that I very much like the idea of
table-abstractions in the vein of Csound's GEN routines. I don't think I
could be in charge of such a project either, but I would be happy to
contribute
Anything with a Quicktime vdig component will work in GEM. The range goes
from $10 webcams to $100k HD cams.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Adityo Pratomo quietdi...@gmail.comwrote:
wow cool. should try it then. haven't got the time to play, too busy at the
office.
Anyway, while we're at
43 matches
Mail list logo
