-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/05/2011 03:38 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On May 4, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Paul Brossier wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:18:04PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Using Pd-extended 0.43.1-20110430 on Mac OS X I don't see this
Hi again,just another question regarding the pd-msg system. Say I have two
parametrized abstractions [boo 1] and [boo 2] loaded in my patch. When I send a
message to them to dynamically create some objects inside, I send it as [obj 20
30 metro 100(---[s pd-boo.pd] which, of course, goes to
Hello,
next tuesday, 10th May, will be the next meeting of Pure Data users
in Berlin at NK (http://www.nkprojekt.de/) - Elsenstr. 52, 2HH 2Etage.
After some request, a small introduction to data structures in Pd will be
given by João Pais.
For more information, look up
Hi Jeppi,
2011/5/5 Jeppi Jeppi jepp...@hotmail.com
Hi again,
just another question regarding the pd-msg system. Say I have two
parametrized abstractions [boo 1] and [boo 2] loaded in my patch. When I
send a message to them to dynamically create some objects inside, I send it
as
[obj 20 30
On 05/05/11 10:31, Jeppi Jeppi wrote:
Hi again,just another question regarding the pd-msg system. Say I have two
parametrized abstractions [boo 1] and [boo 2] loaded in my patch. When I send a
message to them to dynamically create some objects inside, I send it as [obj 20 30
metro 100(---[s
On 05/05/11 11:56, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
On 05/05/11 10:31, Jeppi Jeppi wrote:
Adding prefix to the abstraction names is not elegant, as that would
require previously creating n abstractions, named [1_boo] , [2_boo]
and so on...clumsy
Just remembered there is a loader plugin out there
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 11:31 +0200, Jeppi Jeppi wrote:
Hi again,
just another question regarding the pd-msg system. Say I have two
parametrized abstractions [boo 1] and [boo 2] loaded in my patch. When
I send a message to them to dynamically create some objects inside, I
send it as
[obj 20
2011/5/5 Claude Heiland-Allen cla...@goto10.org
On 05/05/11 11:56, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
On 05/05/11 10:31, Jeppi Jeppi wrote:
Adding prefix to the abstraction names is not elegant, as that would
require previously creating n abstractions, named [1_boo] , [2_boo]
and so on...clumsy
On 05/05/11 00:28, Daniel Worth wrote:
I think as long as people are aware at what point they need to license the
patent then they should be fine. If you are making $100,000+ a year from my
music a $2,000 per year fee isn't the end of the world. Likely if you are
generating that kind of income
sorry, I replied to the wrong list!!!
Simon
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hello,
I would like to use this externals, but i have
/usr/lib/pd/extra/bufferoverride~.pd_linux:
/usr/lib/pd/extra/bufferoverride~.pd_linux: undefined symbol:
_ZN17flext_base_single4InitEv
Somebody know wath is this message?
Thanks.
Willy.
___
What I know is that you didn't give us much information... Are you
trying to compile this or trying to load it? What Pd version, platform,
etc?
The external uses the Flext library, so you need it to compile. Flext is
no longer in Pd-Extended, if that is what you are using.
D.
On 5/5/11
Forwarding your private reply to list. Maybe some Flext guru still lives
there...
D.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PD] old dfx-bufferoverride~
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 16:32:12 +0200
From: Willy WOLFF willy.wolf...@gmail.com
To: Derek Holzer de...@umatic.nl
I use pd-0.43
Hi,
Makefile for linux want to install VERSION.txt and CHANGELOG.txt but it
doesn't exist in the tarball.
Can you remove this from makefile, or add file?
Thanks.
Willy.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Hey, many thanks to all for such great trickshacks!
The trick to route messages to a named subpatch turned out to be a chicken-egg
problem if the subpatches are to be built dynamically as I need...thanks for
the nice idea anyway :)though obsolete (?) that [namecanvas] really solved my
problem.
2011/5/5 Jeppi Jeppi jepp...@hotmail.com
Hey, many thanks to all for such great trickshacks!
The trick to route messages to a named subpatch turned out to be a
chicken-egg problem if the subpatches are to be built dynamically as I
need...thanks for the nice idea anyway :)
though obsolete
On Thu, 05 May 2011 10:20 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/05/2011 03:38 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On May 4, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Paul Brossier wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:18:04PM -0400, Hans-Christoph
On 05/05/2011 09:15 PM, Jeppi Jeppi wrote:
Hey, many thanks to all for such great trickshacks!
The trick to route messages to a named subpatch turned out to be a
chicken-egg problem if the subpatches are to be built dynamically as I
need...thanks for the nice idea anyway :)
though obsolete (?)
I like this idea, since [udpreceive ] mirrors [receive], it makes
sense that it would act like it too.
I implemented something like this for [hidio] which never really made
it out of SVN. The code is there in externals/io/hidio for anyone to
see. Basically, the first instance will do
19 matches
Mail list logo
