[PD] pvoc~ / classic vocoder

2011-12-09 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Hi, I've seen around this listed in a few pages as a pd object pvoc~ an additive synthesis phase vocoder is it out there somewhere for real? cant find it. Oh, by the way. is there some Classic old school frequency band vocoder implemented as a Pd patch somewhere around? I dont mean miller's

[PD] prevent PD of destroying speakers

2011-12-09 Thread haell muth
hi list! for a pjroject i am currently collecting some extrem sounds made with PD. facing the extremness of this sounds, i am afraid of blowing up my external speakers. so: how can i make my pd-patch not a speaker-destroyer? what is the stuff i have to be carefull about? -thx, haell

[PD] Detecting audio drop outs inside a patch

2011-12-09 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all Is there a way to detect DSP drop outs in a patch, respectively to get the information that is displayed in the Pd main window? The idea is to create a [metro]-like abstraction that runs in sync on several hosts. The first problem is getting them in sync, which can be done with a NTP-like

Re: [PD] integer (mis)calculator

2011-12-09 Thread Joe Newlin
Thanks Roman, Mathieu et al for the illuminating replies. On Dec 8, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: Le 2011-12-08 à 00:13:00, Joe Newlin a écrit : Can someone explain what's going on in the attached example? I'm getting 7.1 minus 7 equals .099. I need to split

Re: [PD] [spectrogram~] won't show anything

2011-12-09 Thread João Pais
Katja is right, the same happens to me in my nightly build from 0.43-ext 2011-11-03. In my pd-0.42.5-ext it still works. If you don't have a special reason to use 0.43 and need to use spectrogram~, you can go back to the stable version. João On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Caio Barros

Re: [PD] integer (mis)calculator

2011-12-09 Thread katja
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Eduardo Flores Abad m...@eduardoflores.de wrote: Hi Katja, tries to round this way: 100 * (7.1 - 7)   / 100  =  0.1 Did you try that, Eduardo? In Pd, you get: 100 * (7.1 - 7) / 100 = 0.099 But: ((100 * 7.1) - (100 * 7)) / 100 = 0.1 Or: ((10 * 7.1) -

Re: [PD] [spectrogram~] won't show anything

2011-12-09 Thread katja
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Caio Barros caio.bar...@gmail.com wrote: This bug in [sqrt~] was reported on the list some time ago. It is in nightly builds of Pd-extended 0.43.1. There is a bug report on the bugtracker. Consider adding a comment there with the build details.

Re: [PD] integer (mis)calculator

2011-12-09 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
Le 2011-12-08 à 00:13:00, Joe Newlin a écrit : Can someone explain what's going on in the attached example? I'm getting 7.1 minus 7 equals .099. I need to split two-digit integers, so this result is giving me problems. in fractional powers of two, 1/10 = 1/16 + 1/32 + 1/256 + 1/512 + 1/4096

[PD] pd~ for max

2011-12-09 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Hi there, where can I find the max version of pd~? couldn't find it... i'm curious if or how max users could use my patches in there. Thanks alex ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -

[PD] making/updating Pd translations

2011-12-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Hi all, I recently ran into transifex, its like a github for translations. So I just threw up all of the Pd files there, so if anyone wants to make new or improve translations, you can do it in transifex, or like before, just download Pd sources and use a .po file editor, like PO Editor.

[PD] Networking patches to utilize multiple cores

2011-12-09 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
Greets. Is there a proper or preferred method for using any of the networking objects in pd-extended to allow for realtime bi-directional communication between patches on the same computer, so as to utilize 2 or more cpu cores? I am currently trying to discover the best way to handle this. i

[PD] [PD-announce] The forty-fifth meeting of the PureData users group of Montréal

2011-12-09 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
.--. | pdmtl#45 | `-=´ | .-=---, | La quarante-cinquième rencontre du club d'utilisateurs de / | PureData de Montréal aura lieu le samedi 10 décembre 2011 ( | de 13h00 à 17h00 au FouLab.\

Re: [PD] Detecting audio drop outs inside a patch

2011-12-09 Thread i go bananas
what about measuring the [realtime] between outputs of [bang~] ?? ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] prevent PD of destroying speakers

2011-12-09 Thread batinste
On 09/12/2011 14:21, haell muth wrote: hi list! hi for a pjroject i am currently collecting some extrem sounds made with PD. facing the extremness of this sounds, i am afraid of blowing up my external speakers. so: how can i make my pd-patch not a speaker-destroyer? what is the stuff i

Re: [PD] Detecting audio drop outs inside a patch

2011-12-09 Thread i go bananas
scrap that, i tried, and it doesn't work at all ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pd~ for max

2011-12-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Its on Miller's site, I think. .hc On Dec 8, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: Hi there, where can I find the max version of pd~? couldn't find it... i'm curious if or how max users could use my patches in there. Thanks alex

Re: [PD] [spectrogram~] won't show anything

2011-12-09 Thread João Pais
I haven't tried in a while, but some versions are stable, others not. maybe if you ask around, or to HC Steiner, someone will say which are the stable versions. if you find a stable version, keep it around until you get proof that the newest one is as stable. Sorry, I always forget that.

Re: [PD] pd~ for max

2011-12-09 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
his site was the first place I looked I found this http://crca.ucsd.edu/~tapel/software.html but no [pd~] in it. website search usually ignores ~ and gives me back just pd. Miller, is it around somewhere? anyway, thinking of instead of building patches or coding obejcts for max about my

Re: [PD] pd~ for max

2011-12-09 Thread Miller Puckette
Damn, I don't seem to have a link up for this... anyhow, it's http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Software/pdmax-02.tgz ... or to get teh newest, just grab the source from the pd distribution and compile for Max. cheers Miller On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 11:52:13PM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: his