Hi,
I'm working on a project where I use PD on a BeagleBone board,
so I have written an bitbake layer for pd/libpd:
https://github.com/errordeveloper/oe-meta-pd
Cheers,
--
Ilya
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Without seeing the patch this may be tricky to diagnose. If I had to guess,
I would say you are redundantly updating something too quickly.
FWIW, in pd-l2ork k12 mode every object is a gop abstraction with many
having live gui components. Even with dozens of such abstractions (I've
seen as many
This is just a guess... in s_inter.c, try replacing:
int sys_pollgui(void)
{
return (sys_domicrosleep(0, 1) || sys_poll_togui());
}
with:
int sys_pollgui(void)
{
return (sys_domicrosleep(0, 1) + sys_poll_togui());
}
It's possible that sys_domicrosleep(0 - which polls for input from GUI
Hi all
I have been wondering... Is there any AI implementation for PD? What have you
been using for it?
Best
Leandro
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
nice topic; these things happen to me too. Audio is prioritized and
GUI gets messy.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi all,
In my patch I am toggling between different sliders and changing their
values. I would like to display the value of the current slider I am
changing in a number box (Number2). Every slider's value will stay the same
when I leave it to change other sliders. I tried creating this, and i've
This is just a guess... in s_inter.c, try replacing:
int sys_pollgui(void)
{
return (sys_domicrosleep(0, 1) || sys_poll_togui());
}
with:
int sys_pollgui(void)
{
return (sys_domicrosleep(0, 1) + sys_poll_togui());
}
That's great! The hack seems to work really well.
I've
Why not just trigger each iteration with [bang~]?
-Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com
To: Pd List pd-list@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 4:51 PM
Subject: [PD] [nbuntil]: an non-blocking [until] replacement
Hi all
Audio
On 17/12/12 08:06, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Why not just trigger each iteration with [bang~]?
because with [bang~] you would get a single iteration per block, rather than as
many iterations as you have time for ... which seems to be the intention of
[nbuntil], and very useful where you might
I've seen similar things, like with the patches that Porres submitted. It
looks like what's happening is that when there are too many updates being
sent, a lot of them get dropped. Its pretty easy to get 250k per second of
Tcl code being sent to the GUI, so we're asking a lot of the Tcl parser
Hey,
I've been using the ANN library.
I'm not sure it's still updated nor mantained these days, but it does work
well for my purpose.
http://puredata.info/search?SearchableText=ann
That is, I've been using it to make my instrument (the Xth Sense [1])
detect a performer's muscle states
- Original Message -
From: Simon Wise simonzw...@gmail.com
To: pd-list@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] [nbuntil]: an non-blocking [until] replacement
On 17/12/12 08:06, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Why not just trigger each iteration with
12 matches
Mail list logo
