[PD] Message from the boss of Raspberry Pi Foundation !

2013-02-08 Thread Pierre Massat
Dear all, Please read below the message I received from Eben Upton, the boss of Raspberry Pi foundation. It looks like he was impressed by the video I made, and he says that there's a possibility of letting the GPU do some DSP computation. I guess you'll all agree that this is awesome news. I

Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)

2013-02-08 Thread Charles Goyard
Hi, thanks. Here's a PKGBUILD for pdsend/pdreceive alone, duplicating how debian packages are organized. Now it would be a good thing to have the pd, pd-extended and pd-l2ork drop these two binaries, so there are almost nothing left in conflict. And also have pd-l2ork install in /usr, not

Re: [PD] Message from the boss of Raspberry Pi Foundation !

2013-02-08 Thread Marco Donnarumma
That's awesome Pierre! Charles (Henry) was working on GPU related computation with Pd. Some pretty cool stuff. It would be relevant to see how his work developed so far, and whether it might be useful in this context. On a side note, I'm taking a studio session with CCRMA folks at the upcoming

Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)

2013-02-08 Thread Fero Kiraly
nice ;) we are on the way.. I think am am able to do the rest.. fk. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Message from the boss of Raspberry Pi Foundation !

2013-02-08 Thread i go bananas
sorry, i don't think this is the thread i should be asking this in, but how low latency can you get with pd on a pi ? ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Message from the boss of Raspberry Pi Foundation !

2013-02-08 Thread Simon Iten
pierre wrote in his blog that he can go as low as 10ms, later in the settings he writes about 16ms. On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:57 PM, i go bananas hard@gmail.com wrote: sorry, i don't think this is the thread i should be asking this in, but how low latency can you get with pd on a pi ?

Re: [PD] pix_opencv_blobtracker output

2013-02-08 Thread Dario Pedrioli
Hi Antoine, thanks i think you mean pix_opencv_blobtrack (without er) ? yes, sorry by the way, it's output follow the iem matrix standard : nb of row (=nb of blob) nb cols (6) followed for each blob by : ID x y width heigh state (valid or not) so, what's the right object to connect to

Re: [PD] pix_opencv_blobtracker output

2013-02-08 Thread Antoine Villeret
hi, pix_opnecv repos on my github is outdated ! i used it before having SVN access it is still there because there is one object (patreco for pattern recgnition) which is not yet port to the main repo it's kind of ARToolkit but the code is ugly... it's on my todo list... the uptodate repos is

Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)

2013-02-08 Thread Fero Kiraly
ok. I am preparing the new packages for pd, pdx, pdl and I met some errors. I have removed pdsend pdreceive also with man pages from pdx. When installing pd vanilla I ve encounter conflicting files: puredata: /usr/bin/pd-gui.tcl exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/m_pd.h exists in

Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)

2013-02-08 Thread Charles Goyard
Fero Kiraly wrote: ok. I am preparing the new packages for pd, pdx, pdl and I met some errors. I have removed pdsend pdreceive also with man pages from pdx. When installing pd vanilla I ve encounter conflicting files: puredata: /usr/bin/pd-gui.tcl exists in filesystem puredata:

[PD] New 0.43-4--Pd-extended GEM Error

2013-02-08 Thread Pagano, Patrick
When Running Gem in 0.43.4-extended on Windows 7 64 bit I gets L: invalid enumerant GL: invalid enumerant GL: invalid enumerant GL: invalid enumerant GL: invalid enumerant GL: invalid enumerant GL: invalid enumerant GL: invalid enumerant GL: invalid enumerant GL: invalid enumerant GL: invalid

Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)

2013-02-08 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 02/08/2013 07:14 PM, Charles Goyard wrote: Fero Kiraly wrote: ok. I am preparing the new packages for pd, pdx, pdl and I met some errors. I have removed pdsend pdreceive also with man pages from pdx. When installing pd vanilla I ve encounter conflicting files: puredata: /usr/bin/pd-gui.tcl

Re: [PD] Archlinux packages

2013-02-08 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On 02/08/2013 04:14 PM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote: On 02/08/2013 07:14 PM, Charles Goyard wrote: Fero Kiraly wrote: ok. I am preparing the new packages for pd, pdx, pdl and I met some errors. I have removed pdsend pdreceive also with man pages from pdx. When installing pd vanilla I ve

Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)

2013-02-08 Thread Fero Kiraly
ok. I get working pd-vanilla, pdx, pd-l2ork on one archlinux system. All in /usr/lib/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-vanilla/ - vanilla version (cannot rename to puredata, because on official repos is package with the same name) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-extended/ - binary

Re: [PD] Fwd: absolute vs relative filepath on oggread~

2013-02-08 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
- Original Message - From: Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu To: 'Hans-Christoph Steiner' h...@at.or.at; pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 4:18 PM Subject: Re: [PD] Fwd: absolute vs relative filepath on oggread~ But it doesn't give you the name of the patch itself