Quoth Mario Mey, on 07/08/2013 20:32:
/./ Ready-to-use, 2 FXs on: *26%* (there are 2 FXs always on, although
they are muted)
Are the effects that are always on [freeverb]? This could consume CPU,
see these threads:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg27143.html
Hi, I resume this old thread because I compiled pd with Miller's advices
to disable MIDI buffering.
I tested it with a patch (attached) and this configuration:
vkeyb-MidiOUT(ch1) - pd-MidiIN
pd-MidiOUT - pd-MidiIN
so, every time I play a note, I see how much time it takes to pass
through pd. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-08-07 15:12, Colet Patrice wrote:
Le 07/08/2013 08:15, pured...@11h11.com a écrit :
hi all,
i have more than 50 OSC messages to [routeOSC], i would like to
avoid having to cut and paste click and drag. what are my
options here?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-08-07 08:15, pured...@11h11.com wrote:
hi all,
i have more than 50 OSC messages to [routeOSC], i would like to
avoid
btw, you might want to hierarchic structure of your OSC messages,
rather than having 50 flat labels in [routeOSC].
when
Does anyone have an example of Pure Data controlling SuperCollider Via OSC?
Thanks in Advance
pp
Patrick Pagano, B.S, M.F.A
Assistant in Digital Arts and Science
Digital Media Projection and Audio Design
Digital Worlds Institute
University of Florida, USA
(352)294-2020
On 08/08/2013 03:24 PM, Pagano, Patrick wrote:
Does anyone have an example of Pure Data controlling SuperCollider Via OSC?
which part of SuperCollider? sclang? scsynth??
the main thing to be aware of, is that SC uses a fixed port for
OSC-communication.
fgmadt
IOhannes
signature.asc
Either, but hopefully Scsynth on 57120 for an instrument!
-Original Message-
From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of
IOhannes zmölnig
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 9:40 AM
To: pd-list@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] Pure Data Controlling SuperCollider via OSC
The FX that are on are not always the same. The system lets you select 2
FX (one FX for each Console. It can be complex, having more than one.
Eg: Delay/HPF). And, when the system starts, LPF are in both Consoles.
And no, I'm not using Freverb~. For reverb, I use st-pureverb, from DIY2
hi,
a somewhat related question:
I'm trying to do something like this:
[routeOSC /*/ID]
but that doesn't seem to work
Is it at all possible to use wildcards with routeOSC?
help patch only mentions [set /*( this will match any OSC message...
thanks,
Tim
2013/8/8 IOhannes m zmoelnig
Hi list,
Anyone know about this:
http://noflojs.org/
Wikipedia says flow based is a subset of dataflow, but I'm not sure exactly
how it relates. Nevertheless it sounds like it might be something like Pd's
DSP graph.
-Jonathan___
Pd-list@iem.at
I'm using my integrated soundcard:
00:14.2 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SBx00 Azalia
(Intel HDA) (rev 40).
I know that Pd is processing on CPU and I don't need more than 2 inputs
and 2 outputs channels. So... I think that there's no need to buy an
external one.
Is
Hi Mario
The number one reason for having an external sound card is noise
isolation. The card's proximity to the power supply and motherboard are
bad for EM noise. Also, a computer power supply and a good audio power
supply for recording have much the same relationship--there's more noise in
Hi,
Today I remembered one performance where I saved an abstraction with
many instances, bringing things to a halt. So I benchmarked this
scenario and some similar ones - some seem to scale very badly.
pure-data.git gcc-4.8.1 GNU/Linux/Debian/Wheezy amd64 64bit
Pd-0.45.0 (test) compiled
As far as I know, you can't match multiple levels at once, you'd need to do:
[routeOSC /*]
|
[routeOSC /ID]
On Aug 8, 2013, at 3:26 PM, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote:
From: tim vets timv...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PD] routeOSC - dynamic routing?
Date: August 8, 2013 2:54:57 PM EDT
To:
Hi List,
More Pd Preferences Dialog improvements:
* color preset object names lined up vertically
* improved colorchooser on Windows
* better placement of audio and midi options
* multi-device checkbutton for simpler UI
* multi-device greyed out if hardware can't handle do it (thought I
On 08/08/2013 04:57 PM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Hi,
Today I remembered one performance where I saved an abstraction with
many instances, bringing things to a halt. So I benchmarked this
scenario and some similar ones - some seem to scale very badly.
pure-data.git gcc-4.8.1
Here's a guess - I think each copy of the abstraction binds itself to
a symbol, pd-name. Binding is fast bt unbinding is linear-time in the
number of things bound to the symbol... ouch.
There's a good reason to bind toplevels and named sub-patches to ther names,
but I think there's little reason
17 matches
Mail list logo
