Hi,
the discussion on licensing is quite new to me, hope this question
makes any sense...
Just wondering, now that PiDiP does not have a 'free' license, does
that mean I could get into trouble if I use [pdp_ctrack] and/or
[pdp_mgrid] in patches for potential use in a commercial theatre
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:38:27 +0100, ydego...@free.fr ydego...@gmail.com
wrote:
yeh classical ...
after having been called 'fascist' here on this list
or someone making useless shit, etc
i'm the one offending the others...
when did this happen exactly? do you have a link?
the only
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, João Pais wrote:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:38:27 +0100, ydego...@free.fr ydego...@gmail.com
wrote:
after having been called 'fascist' here on this list
or someone making useless shit, etc
i'm the one offending the others...
when did this happen exactly? do you have a
András Murányi wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:17 AM, ydego...@gmail.com
mailto:ydego...@gmail.com ydego...@gmail.com
mailto:ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
Bernardo Barros wrote:
2010/12/4 Mathieu Bouchardma...@artengine.ca
mailto:ma...@artengine.ca:
It's
Bernardo Barros wrote:
2010/12/4 Mathieu Bouchardma...@artengine.ca
mailto:ma...@artengine.ca:
It's because GPL is for hippies, or something.
It's the other way around. BSD is hippier:
Someone in Berkley smoked marijuana and said:
hey
ala,
Then you come and start to offend _people_ (WTF you think calling
people fascists???),
your message is totally non-sense,
_i_ was called fascist here for not wanting things to work on windows
and not recommending it
so read backwards, and please read before
releasing your [more than
