: Tyler Leavitt thecryofl...@gmail.com
To: JF sainti...@yahoo.com
Cc: Dafydd Hughes dafyd...@gmail.com; pd list pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Friday, 27 July 2012, 2:50
Subject: Re: [PD] 2009-2010 Macbook Pro 2.2GHz Latency?
10ms is around the human-ear latency, so anything at that level or below
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Tyler Leavitt thecryofl...@gmail.com wrote:
10ms is around the human-ear latency, so anything at that level or below
should be good enough for guitar/drumming (this is anectodtal... Iḿ not sure
the exact science behind it). Ive never had a problem with my
Well from a musicians point of view (me) everything above 8ms is not very
playable. This is obvioulsy only true if the generated sound has instant
attack, otherwise latency does not really matter :-)
On Jul 27, 2012 2:30 PM, Charles Henry czhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:50
There's a threshold for distinguishing two discrete audio events of at
least 10ms or so, but that doesn't mean there are no audible artifacts
below that. A flanger effect is between 1 and 10ms so low latency can give
a static 'hollow' comb filtered sound when the dry and processed sound are
On Jul 27, 2012 6:19 PM, wrote:
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
For me this is an important metric. I've been using Pd with guitar at 10-12ms
latency for years with no problems ... 0 latency doesn't exist in real life ...
On Jul 27, 2012, at 11:58 AM, chris clepper wrote:
Also, consider that sound travels about a foot a millisecond so standing 10
feet
I'm on the market for a second hand 13 Macbook Pro circa late 2009 - early/mid
2010. I was wondering if anybody here has had experience of using the stock
internal soundcard for low latency for pd?
What kind of millisecond ballpark would I be looking at?
Thanks in advance,
John.
Hi John
I've been getting pretty reliable 128-sample buffers using JACK with my
mid-2010 15. I don't usually use 64 but when I've tried it's been no problem.
Can't remember what it translates to in ms, but 128 seems like instant to me,
somewhere between 5-10 I think. Others may be able to
Hughes dafyd...@gmail.com
To: JF sainti...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd list pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2012, 20:04
Subject: Re: [PD] 2009-2010 Macbook Pro 2.2GHz Latency?
Hi John
I've been getting pretty reliable 128-sample buffers using JACK with my
mid-2010 15. I don't usually use 64
--
*From:* Dafydd Hughes dafyd...@gmail.com
*To:* JF sainti...@yahoo.com
*Cc:* pd list pd-list@iem.at
*Sent:* Thursday, 26 July 2012, 20:04
*Subject:* Re: [PD] 2009-2010 Macbook Pro 2.2GHz Latency?
Hi John
I've been getting pretty reliable 128-sample buffers using
10 matches
Mail list logo
