Re: [PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-16 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 12/16/2011 12:17 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Yes, on 10.6 and 10.7 it'll compile 64-bit by default. You can try this: ./configure CFLAGS=-arch i386 LDFLAGS=-arch i386 this will override all default CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, and the former might be ignored by Gem's build process since

Re: [PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-16 Thread Nicolas Montgermont
You'll also need the font library : ftgl, that you can install with fink. my configure line here on osx 10.6 is: ./configure --with-pd=/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/include/pd/ --enable-fat-binary=i386 --with-ftgl-includes=/sw/include/ --with-ftgl-libs=/sw/lib/ that

Re: [PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-16 Thread Jaime Oliver
Now with Hans' proposed method: ./autogen.sh ./configure CFLAGS=-arch i386 LDFLAGS=-arch i386 --with-pd=/Applications/Pd-0.43-0.app/Contents/Resources/ make I get a different set of errors (attached) and it also fails. Curiously, it builds fine without any flags. any ideas? best, J On Fri,

Re: [PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-16 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 12/16/2011 10:59 AM, Jaime Oliver wrote: Now with Hans' proposed method: ./autogen.sh ./configure CFLAGS=-arch i386 LDFLAGS=-arch i386 --with-pd=/Applications/Pd-0.43-0.app/Contents/Resources/ make I get a different set of errors (attached) and it also fails. well, i told you that

Re: [PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-16 Thread Jaime Oliver
and you did do a make clean before fuddling around with --enable-fat-binary? even better, I started with a fresh package. J fgamsdr IOhannes ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -

Re: [PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-16 Thread Jaime Oliver
i cannot really imagine why an i386 build fails, unless apple really updated the i386 headers for 10.7 to drop the deprecated functions. Well, I know other people are using gem in 10.7 so they must have compiled it in some way... Nicolas? best, J -- Jaime E Oliver LR jo2...@columbia.edu

Re: [PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-16 Thread Nicolas Montgermont
Maybe it's just a unneeded slash at the end of your configure cause we can see your compile line is including: -I/Applications/Pd-0.43-0.app/Contents/Resources//src so I'd try: ./configure --with-pd=/Applications/Pd-0.43-0.app/Contents/Resources --enable-fat-binary=i386 n Le 16/12/11 10:48,

Re: [PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-16 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 12/16/2011 12:14 PM, Jaime Oliver wrote: i cannot really imagine why an i386 build fails, unless apple really updated the i386 headers for 10.7 to drop the deprecated functions. Well, I know other people are using gem in 10.7 so they must have compiled it in some way... maybe they are

Re: [PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-16 Thread Jaime Oliver
maybe they are simply using the binaries provided? Of course... they are compiled on a 10.5 machine, but they should run on 10.7 I also have a 10.6 version I could use, but have this laptop right now... do you have any special reason to compile it yourself? well, I haven't gotten around

Re: [PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-16 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 12/16/2011 12:57 PM, Jaime Oliver wrote: maybe they are simply using the binaries provided? Of course... they are compiled on a 10.5 machine, but they should run on 10.7 I also have a 10.6 version I could use, but have this laptop right now... do you have any special reason to

[PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-15 Thread Jaime Oliver
hi Everyone, I just compiled Gem-0.93.3 in OSX 10.7 and with Pd-0.43-0 and I get the following error when loading Pd and calling GEM: /Applications/Gem-0.93.3/src/.libs/Gem.pd_darwin: dlopen(/Applications/Gem-0.93.3/src/.libs/Gem.pd_darwin, 10): no suitable image found. Did find:

Re: [PD] GEM in 10.7

2011-12-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Yes, on 10.6 and 10.7 it'll compile 64-bit by default. You can try this: ./configure CFLAGS=-arch i386 LDFLAGS=-arch i386 .hc On Dec 15, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Jaime Oliver wrote: hi Everyone, I just compiled Gem-0.93.3 in OSX 10.7 and with Pd-0.43-0 and I get the following error when