On 12/16/2011 12:17 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Yes, on 10.6 and 10.7 it'll compile 64-bit by default. You can try this:
./configure CFLAGS=-arch i386 LDFLAGS=-arch i386
this will override all default CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, and the former might
be ignored by Gem's build process since
You'll also need the font library : ftgl,
that you can install with fink.
my configure line here on osx 10.6 is:
./configure
--with-pd=/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/include/pd/
--enable-fat-binary=i386 --with-ftgl-includes=/sw/include/
--with-ftgl-libs=/sw/lib/
that
Now with Hans' proposed method:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS=-arch i386 LDFLAGS=-arch i386
--with-pd=/Applications/Pd-0.43-0.app/Contents/Resources/
make
I get a different set of errors (attached) and it also fails.
Curiously, it builds fine without any flags.
any ideas?
best,
J
On Fri,
On 12/16/2011 10:59 AM, Jaime Oliver wrote:
Now with Hans' proposed method:
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS=-arch i386 LDFLAGS=-arch i386
--with-pd=/Applications/Pd-0.43-0.app/Contents/Resources/
make
I get a different set of errors (attached) and it also fails.
well, i told you that
and you did do a make clean before fuddling around with
--enable-fat-binary?
even better, I started with a fresh package.
J
fgamsdr
IOhannes
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
i cannot really imagine why an i386 build fails, unless apple really
updated the i386 headers for 10.7 to drop the deprecated functions.
Well, I know other people are using gem in 10.7 so they must have
compiled it in some way...
Nicolas?
best,
J
--
Jaime E Oliver LR
jo2...@columbia.edu
Maybe it's just a unneeded slash at the end of your configure cause we
can see your compile line is including:
-I/Applications/Pd-0.43-0.app/Contents/Resources//src
so I'd try:
./configure --with-pd=/Applications/Pd-0.43-0.app/Contents/Resources
--enable-fat-binary=i386
n
Le 16/12/11 10:48,
On 12/16/2011 12:14 PM, Jaime Oliver wrote:
i cannot really imagine why an i386 build fails, unless apple really
updated the i386 headers for 10.7 to drop the deprecated functions.
Well, I know other people are using gem in 10.7 so they must have
compiled it in some way...
maybe they are
maybe they are simply using the binaries provided?
Of course...
they are compiled on a 10.5 machine, but they should run on 10.7
I also have a 10.6 version I could use, but have this laptop right now...
do you have any special reason to compile it yourself?
well, I haven't gotten around
On 12/16/2011 12:57 PM, Jaime Oliver wrote:
maybe they are simply using the binaries provided?
Of course...
they are compiled on a 10.5 machine, but they should run on 10.7
I also have a 10.6 version I could use, but have this laptop right now...
do you have any special reason to
hi Everyone,
I just compiled Gem-0.93.3 in OSX 10.7 and with Pd-0.43-0 and I get
the following error when loading Pd and calling GEM:
/Applications/Gem-0.93.3/src/.libs/Gem.pd_darwin:
dlopen(/Applications/Gem-0.93.3/src/.libs/Gem.pd_darwin, 10): no
suitable image found. Did find:
Yes, on 10.6 and 10.7 it'll compile 64-bit by default. You can try this:
./configure CFLAGS=-arch i386 LDFLAGS=-arch i386
.hc
On Dec 15, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Jaime Oliver wrote:
hi Everyone,
I just compiled Gem-0.93.3 in OSX 10.7 and with Pd-0.43-0 and I get
the following error when
12 matches
Mail list logo