This e-mail maybe be coming a little late, but just wanted to add my
two cents, maybe for future list searchers.
I'm running Ubuntu Studio now, but have run vanilla Ubuntu as well and
didn't really notice a performance difference. I DID like having lots
of audio things preinstalled...I didn't
Hi,
The great advantage of using linux is that we can have a choice of
installed applications.
If there are many computers to setup and if ubuntustudio is compatible
with all the computers, the gain of installing time would be so relevant.
On a single computer, I don't see the point of
PSPunch(e)k dio:
What do you think might be the better approach, to use ubuntu normal, or
ubuntustudio? Roman told me that for a while there's no big difference,
because the -rt kernel comes with ubuntu. Is ubuntustudio more than a
bundle of software with nice backgrounds? (Note: I'll
I will try it at some point, just don't know yet how long it will take. If
something doesn't work, you'll get a whining mail for sure.
2009/1/4 Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 13:39 +0100, João Pais wrote:
btw, I also wanted to use the rme hdsp card on my desktop
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 01:38:58PM +0100, João Pais wrote:
Another note: what window managers do you advise? I find the simple,
low-cal approach of fluxbox / enlightenment better as the sugar-puffed
gnome etc. Any remarks against using any of these? By the way, one of the
things that
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 13:39 +0100, João Pais wrote:
btw, I also wanted to use the rme hdsp card on my desktop - must just get
a pci-pcmcia adapter. Does any of you has anything to warn against this?
a quick search showed me, that those adapters cost only a few bucks and
have support for
thanks for your replies.
I really don't have much free time (sometimes the free time is already
scheduled), and am not a bash/unix guru (although I'm not that dumb). but
I really don't have the time/pacience to go (again!!) to visit x forums to
know why this flag gives an error while
Hi!
If you are really lazy, take Ubuntustudio with LTS (8.04). And do not
change 8.04 to 8.10 (or other) untill next LTS release. Or switch to
8.10 when 9.04 will be near-ready. With normal release (not LTS)
you'll get pissed off twice a year just because you'll loose your
software untill someone
Hi,
finally got internet working on my ubuntu (desktop), so I might start
setting up stuff here to try to move from one system to the other. For
that I would like to ask some advice, if anyone has nothing better to do.
My system is:
- laptop thinkpad, i386 32b
- desktop thinkcentre i686 64b
What do you think might be the better approach, to use ubuntu normal, or
ubuntustudio? Roman told me that for a while there's no big difference,
because the -rt kernel comes with ubuntu. Is ubuntustudio more than a
bundle of software with nice backgrounds? (Note: I'll use the same setup
PSPunch escribió:
What do you think might be the better approach, to use ubuntu normal, or
ubuntustudio? Roman told me that for a while there's no big difference,
because the -rt kernel comes with ubuntu. Is ubuntustudio more than a
bundle of software with nice backgrounds? (Note: I'll
11 matches
Mail list logo
