hi
originally i wanted to write the following feature-request:
using [declare] to load libraries (e.g. [declare -lib mylib]) works nicely.
however, when i have several abstractions all depending on the same
library (and thus all have an instance of [declare -lib mylib]), i get
an error mylib:
No, I never tried, thinking, as I do, that it couldn't possibly work :)
Anyway, I can't imagine changing it so close to a release, since anything
that could be considered correct would take months of testing to get
working correctly, so, like it or not, I think I have to try to figure out what
it
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 10:54 -0800, Miller Puckette wrote:
No, I never tried, thinking, as I do, that it couldn't possibly work :)
Anyway, I can't imagine changing it so close to a release, since anything
that could be considered correct would take months of testing to get
working correctly,
good news!
if i can help you in anyway (e.g. documenting as accurately as possible
how [declare] behaves), i'd be glad to do so. i am very much convinced,
that [declare] is a useful class and worth a lot of effort to make it
work.
roman
Yeah, I find it very useful too. (even
I think very few people are using [declare]. I think Pd would be
much better off with a well functioning [declare] than just freezing
the current functionality.
.hc
On Jan 23, 2008, at 1:54 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
No, I never tried, thinking, as I do, that it couldn't possibly
work
