Re: [PD] default value for an abstraction's creation argument

2007-07-23 Thread robbert van hulzen
nice. thanks for that one. Frank Barknecht wrote: Arguments, that you don't specify, get initialized as 0. So instead of [moses 1] you could also use [select 0] and omit the [t b]. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

[PD] default value for an abstraction's creation argument

2007-07-22 Thread robbert van hulzen
dear all, i'm wondering how to get a default value for an abstraction argument that is not specified. eg: my abstraction [equality] can take 3 arguments, but i don't want to *have* to type the arguments, in which case the abs should use a default value. i came up with the following solution:

Re: [PD] default value for an abstraction's creation argument

2007-07-22 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, robbert van hulzen hat gesagt: // robbert van hulzen wrote: dear all, i'm wondering how to get a default value for an abstraction argument that is not specified. eg: my abstraction [equality] can take 3 arguments, but i don't want to *have* to type the arguments, in which case the abs

Re: [PD] default value for an abstraction's creation argument

2007-07-22 Thread robbert van hulzen
thanks, i'll have a look at that. (atm it seems there's sth funny with the paths--it creates, but the [test_dollarg] and [pp set] bits don't create.) cheers, robbert On 7/23/07 12:09 AM, Thomas O Fredericks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The best object for this is dollarg from iemlib. Check it out,

Re: [PD] default value for an abstraction's creation argument

2007-07-22 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Frank Barknecht wrote: Almost as elegant as possible with current Pd: Arguments, that you don't specify, get initialized as 0. That's not strictly true: if a dollsym gets expanded using nonexistent arguments, those parts do not get replaced. A_DOLLAR atoms are atoms