Ed Kelly wrote:
seems to be the combo of the iem filters with the [block~ 1] do you
really need that small blocksize?
Yes, because if you set the delay by pitch as well as by time. But
you're right - [block~ 4] works fine up to MIDI 112 (5274Hz - easily
high enough for most people). I think
Hallo,
Damian Stewart hat gesagt: // Damian Stewart wrote:
Ed Kelly wrote:
seems to be the combo of the iem filters with the [block~ 1] do you
really need that small blocksize?
Yes, because if you set the delay by pitch as well as by time. But
you're right - [block~ 4] works fine up to
On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 14:58 +0100, Damian Stewart wrote:
Ed Kelly wrote:
seems to be the combo of the iem filters with the [block~ 1] do you
really need that small blocksize?
Yes, because if you set the delay by pitch as well as by time. But
you're right - [block~ 4] works fine up to MIDI
On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 15:47 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Damian Stewart hat gesagt: // Damian Stewart wrote:
Ed Kelly wrote:
seems to be the combo of the iem filters with the [block~ 1] do you
really need that small blocksize?
Yes, because if you set the delay by pitch as
i played with it, and used all the different settings, and it didn't crash.
but then closing the patch caused pd to freeze up.
seems to be the combo of the iem filters with the [block~ 1]
do you really need that small blocksize?
___
Pd-list@iem.at
