Re: [PD] improve find function

2008-05-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Surely it is possible to improve, it is just a matter of someone doing the work. Patches welcome! :D .hc On May 9, 2008, at 5:54 PM, marius schebella wrote: hi, I wonder if it would be possible to improve the find function in pd. first thing, the popup window should automatically get the

Re: [PD] improve find function

2008-05-10 Thread marius schebella
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Surely it is possible to improve, it is just a matter of someone doing the work. Patches welcome! :D Is the functionality included in g_editor.c and/or g_canvas.c? and where is the code for the tcl/tk windows? pd.tk? and how do they communicate? since there

Re: [PD] improve find function

2008-05-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On May 10, 2008, at 3:40 PM, marius schebella wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Surely it is possible to improve, it is just a matter of someone doing the work. Patches welcome! :D Is the functionality included in g_editor.c and/or g_canvas.c? and where is the code for the tcl/tk

[PD] improve find function

2008-05-09 Thread marius schebella
hi, I wonder if it would be possible to improve the find function in pd. first thing, the popup window should automatically get the focus in the search field. secondly, be able to search in this patch or in all patches and include sub patches. also be able to search for arguments, which is

Re: [PD] improve find function

2008-05-09 Thread Phil Stone
Yes! It is very annoying not to be able to find $0- sends/receives! (Trying to find with the literal value of $0 for the subpatch doesn't work either). Phil Stone pkstonemusic.com marius schebella wrote: hi, I wonder if it would be possible to improve the find function in pd. first

Re: [PD] improve find function

2008-05-09 Thread Matthew Logan
Yes, it seems so small, but this would be a HUGE improvement when debugging. I often get lost looking around for things in the endless layers of patches and this would streamline that process. On 5/9/08, marius schebella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, I wonder if it would be possible to improve