On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:04:47AM -0400, Kevin McCoy wrote:
what distro are you on?
Ubuntu Studio Feisty 7.04. I usually do load some GNOME things ocasionally
and I wonder if they are staying in the system... I'm running a P4 1.6 GHz
384 MB RAM so I need to keep the memory freed up.
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 16:16 +, ilya .d wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:04:47AM -0400, Kevin McCoy wrote:
what distro are you on?
Ubuntu Studio Feisty 7.04. I usually do load some GNOME things ocasionally
and I wonder if they are staying in the system... I'm running a P4
heppo
i'm fluxboxing too f.e. kdeinit in the .fluxbox/startup
minimizes startup time for kde programms.
On 10/6/07, Roman Haefeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 16:16 +, ilya .d wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:04:47AM -0400, Kevin McCoy wrote:
what distro
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:51:32PM -0400, Kevin McCoy wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kevin McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 4, 2007 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] linux - faster load first time
To: Andy Farnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use fluxbox WM, no hassle, no fancy
384MB ram seems a bit low.. (nowadays)
My old duron 800 has 1GB.
I've not noticed PD starting more slowly than it always has on my feisty
or etch machines...
you can always try oprofile to see what is using up what (CPU wise)
.b.
Kevin McCoy wrote:
what distro are you on?
Ubuntu
I notice this not only on Pd but on most programs... gnome-terminal
eventually starting taking so long to start up the first couple of times
that I gave up and started with xterm, for example. Firefox takes a long
time as well and I am using that every day...
km
On 10/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Kevin McCoy wrote:
I notice this not only on Pd but on most programs... gnome-terminal
eventually starting taking so long to start up the first couple of times
that I gave up and started with xterm, for example. Firefox takes a long
time as well and I am using that every
I use fluxbox WM, no hassle, no fancy bollocks. It's just
X with some coloured window bars and a program launcher menu.
The MS Windows philosophy seriously subverted peoples expectations
and understanding of what an Operating System and Desktop are.
MS Windows and its imitators are not
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kevin McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 4, 2007 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] linux - faster load first time
To: Andy Farnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use fluxbox WM, no hassle, no fancy bollocks. It's just
X with some coloured window bars and a program
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:51:32PM -0400, Kevin McCoy wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kevin McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 4, 2007 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] linux - faster load first time
To: Andy Farnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use fluxbox WM, no hassle, no fancy
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 00:48:39 -0400
Chris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS for people who want a nice middle ground between fluxbox's
minimalism and gnome/kde's user friendly funcitonality, xfce4 comes
highly recommended. It's very light, very fast, and very configurable
Yes. Xfce is a
Hmm, now has anyone noticed that Pd (first time after booting) starts up
progressively more slowly over the months you own a linux machine? I'm
suspicious that there's a correlation with how much software you have
loaded on the machine. Maybe having lots of shared libraries and programs
to use
one could avoid the dynamic linking by prelinking the binary ...
t
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 09:15 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
Hmm, now has anyone noticed that Pd (first time after booting) starts up
progressively more slowly over the months you own a linux machine? I'm
suspicious that
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:15:06AM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
Hmm, now has anyone noticed that Pd (first time after booting) starts up
progressively more slowly over the months you own a linux machine? I'm
suspicious that there's a correlation with how much software you have
loaded on the
14 matches
Mail list logo
