Georg Bosch wrote:
Am 19.05.2009 um 15:22 schrieb Martin Schied:
My idea was, to use a kind of delayline which is big enough to
contain the whole signal and then copy the entire content of this
delayline in one moment, so in effect no time has been wasted for
delaying the signal. It could
Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi Martin,
although i don't fully understand your intentions, you could use
xrecord~ and xplay~ (part of xsample) for implementing a circular buffer.
gr~~~
Hi,
I didn't try xplay~ and xrecord~ yet, but I'll do so when I have more time.
to explain my intentions: for
Am 19.05.2009 um 15:22 schrieb Martin Schied:
My idea was, to use a kind of delayline which is big enough to
contain the whole signal and then copy the entire content of this
delayline in one moment, so in effect no time has been wasted for
delaying the signal. It could save 11ms in this
Hi Martin,
although i don't fully understand your intentions, you could use
xrecord~ and xplay~ (part of xsample) for implementing a circular
buffer.
gr~~~
Am 19.05.2009 um 15:22 schrieb Martin Schied:
Hi!
is there already something like a 'circular buffer' external or
abstraction for
Hi!
is there already something like a 'circular buffer' external or
abstraction for dsp blocks?
I want to detect onsets / attacks of 512 sample long signals using
[fiddle~ 1024] and write them in arrays of 1024 samples.
for now my patch looks like this:
the signal is going to [fiddle~
