well there is quite many pd-related sites already, i thought
why pdpedia is needed ?
As a primo-supporter of the idea in France, let
me try to explain. There are main reasons:
1/ there is no dictionnary or lexicon about the
3000 objects/externals/abstraction usable in PD.
Most of the
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:54:13AM +0200, JNM wrote:
well there is quite many pd-related sites already, i thought
why pdpedia is needed ?
As a primo-supporter of the idea in France, let me try to explain. There
are main reasons:
1/ there is no dictionnary or lexicon about the 3000
With that site:
http://puredata.lynksee.com/wiki/Documentaci%C3%B3n_sobre_Pure_Data
we began with same idea but focused in spanish language. If pdpedia go
ahead we can add our documentation to new wiki.
Is a great idea.
5/ there is no tool to know which
object/external/abstraction is available
On 06/09/2007, at 10.54, JNM wrote:
ild0012 wrote:
why pdpedia is needed ?
As a primo-supporter of the idea in France, let
me try to explain. There are main reasons: (snip)
There a a lot of good ideas there - agreed. Just got a^Htwo questions.
Why can't those issues be solved by using
1) the help patches are not easily searcheable and 2) you can only
search for objects that are on your computer, but what if you search for
an object that has a certain feature and is maybe in a library that you
don't have yet.
3) pd patches cannot have meta information. it is more difficult to
Steffen a écrit :
On 06/09/2007, at 10.54, JNM wrote:
ild0012 wrote:
why pdpedia is needed ?
As a primo-supporter of the idea in France, let
me try to explain. There are main reasons: (snip)
There a a lot of good ideas there - agreed. Just got a^Htwo questions.
Why can't those issues be
Patrice Colet wrote:
Hello, I hope I'm not so far from the subject, but what about adding
clickable links option into the console for getting the documentation
of objects, and patches, at first creation, and first occuring error?
I think it would be to much console output, although some
On Sep 6, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Steffen wrote:
On 06/09/2007, at 10.54, JNM wrote:
ild0012 wrote:
why pdpedia is needed ?
As a primo-supporter of the idea in France, let
me try to explain. There are main reasons: (snip)
There a a lot of good ideas there - agreed. Just got a^Htwo questions.
