On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 18:30 +0100, João Pais wrote:
Hi,
another chapter in this: I just tried out the same patch, using now
[metro] instead of Lyon's objects. The problem is that the results are
still quite simliar, i.e. I still get clicks (almost) every 125ms (the
beat duration), resulting
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:38:06AM +0100, João Pais wrote:
and here a link to a thread with iohannes and lyon:
http://markmail.org/message/7usetdchjlqyk3eu#query:+page:1+mid:7usetdchjlqyk3eu+state:results
Actually it's Frank and Eric. :) The thread still sums up what's important
here:
).
-Jonathan
From: João Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com
To: PD-List pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 4:50 PM
Subject: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging
Hi,
please look at the attached audio file. It's a recording of a sinus
tone
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:56:11AM +0100, João Pais wrote:
Ah, and I see in addition to your message you wrote vline~ in the
title! Oops.
I don't know what click2bang~ does-- is it aligning its bangs to block
boundaries? That's just a guess.
better to leave it to the author to describe
Hi Claude,
so you're saying that vline~ or other clock-aware objects [which, btw?]
is precise in itself, so the problem should come from E Lyon's objects,
which aren't, because of sig-mess conversion? (which is funny, because
apparently they were made to correct this, at least in max/msp)
and here a link to a thread with iohannes and lyon:
http://markmail.org/message/7usetdchjlqyk3eu#query:+page:1+mid:7usetdchjlqyk3eu+state:results
Actually it's Frank and Eric. :) The thread still sums up what's
important
here: It's not necessary to use Eric's objects in Pd. They may be useful
(presumably at a higher CPU cost).
-Jonathan
From: João Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com
To: PD-List pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 4:50 PM
Subject: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging
Hi,
please look at the attached audio file. It's
From: João Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com
To: PD-List pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 4:50 PM
Subject: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging
Hi,
please look at the attached audio file. It's a recording of a sinus
tone stored in an array
On 24/01/12 21:50, João Pais wrote:
maybe the messaging isn't precisely aligned with the audio.
For this patch I'm using E Lyon's samm~ and click2bang~
I'm not familiar with those externals, nor in inspecting the output of a
patch (which is on the large size) instead of the patch. But some
@iem.at; Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging
Hmm, I have to correct your message to get a more interesting answer from you
:)
the SR is 48K, and I'm using vline~ already. Theoretically with E Lyon's
10 matches
Mail list logo
