Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-17 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: Yeah, I meant closing it by clicking the x on that window. That closes the patch. If you want such a patch to be permanent, make it a subpatch of an otherwise-empty toplevel patch on which you do vis 0. In such a case, clicking the X never

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-16 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: I really like the idea of the prefs being a pd patch which gets loaded as a hidden patch like pd-_float (but doesn't get destroyed if you happen to vis it then close it so that one can view it from a menubutton). Sending vis 0 to a toplevel

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-16 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
--- On Sat, 7/16/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: From: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at Subject: Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer To: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca Cc: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com, PD List pd-list@iem.at Date: Saturday, July 16

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-10 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: One goal for me is to make it easy enough for all Pd users to write their own GUI plugins. Honestly, I think we can make GUI plugins replace the idea of preferences. Don't overestimate the users' capacity to (or will to) deal with Tcl

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-10 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
--- On Sun, 7/10/11, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca Subject: Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer To: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at Cc: PD List pd-list@iem.at Date: Sunday, July 10, 2011, 5:05 PM On Sun, 3 Jul 2011

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Jul 10, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: --- On Sun, 7/10/11, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote: From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca Subject: Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer To: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at Cc: PD List pd-list@iem.at Date

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-07 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Martin Peach wrote: (Also, someone could make this an XXX bits float can store a YYY bits integer a bit more clear as I personally still don't really understand it. Numbers in pd's binary float format are made of three parts : an int between 8388608 and 16777215 ; a

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-07 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Yes, it does loose a bit with the %g. AFAIK, the %g just simplifies a little bit, i.e. down to 6 decimal digits while the actual number format can represent about 6.5 decimal digits. log10(16777216) = about 7.22 decimal digits.

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-06 Thread András Murányi
2011/7/3 Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at On Jul 3, 2011, at 10:04 AM, András Murányi wrote: On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 20:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.atwrote: I just finished a big, long-overdue reorg of the

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-06 Thread András Murányi
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 00:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: I should, there is a specific question of whether these two are still needed: http://puredata.info/docs/**developer/64BitLinuxhttp://puredata.info/docs/developer/64BitLinux

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:36 +0200, András Murányi muran...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 00:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: I should, there is a specific question of whether these two are still needed:

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-06 Thread András Murányi
2011/7/6 Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:36 +0200, András Murányi muran...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 00:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: I should, there is a specific question of whether these two are still needed:

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:22 +0200, András Murányi muran...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/7/6 Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:36 +0200, András Murányi muran...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 00:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: I

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-06 Thread Martin Peach
(Also, someone could make this an XXX bits float can store a YYY bits integer a bit more clear as I personally still don't really understand it. I also remember vaguely some criticism of this system, that it is not very efficient? Matju? If you guys explain it here on the list I'll be happy to

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
-- Hans-Christoph Steiner mobile: +1 347 850 4872 work: +1 718 360 4872 On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:26 -0400, Martin Peach martin.pe...@sympatico.ca wrote: (Also, someone could make this an XXX bits float can store a YYY bits integer a bit more clear as I personally still don't really

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-04 Thread Jacob Lee
Thanks for doing this! I was just trying to compile pd-extended a week or two ago, and was pretty lost in the old instructions. I had actually been meaning to try to clean them up myself, but it appears my procrastination paid off :-). -- Jacob Lee artd...@gmail.com On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 6:41

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Since this is fresh on your mind, please do check out the update section to see if I actually improved the situation. I know I did remove a bunch of out-of-date info, but hopefully I replaced it with useful, up-to-date info ;). .hc On Jul 4, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Jacob Lee wrote: Thanks

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I should, there is a specific question of whether these two are still needed: http://puredata.info/docs/developer/64BitLinux http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuIntrepid 0.43 should work fine on all 64-bit systems (never tested Windows tho). .hc On Jul 4,

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-03 Thread András Murányi
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 20:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: I just finished a big, long-overdue reorg of the http://puredata.info/docs/**developerhttp://puredata.info/docs/developersection of the website. * Its now a wiki folder so it acts like a regular wiki, not like a

Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-03 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Jul 3, 2011, at 10:04 AM, András Murányi wrote: On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 20:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: I just finished a big, long-overdue reorg of the http://puredata.info/docs/developer section of the website. * Its now a wiki folder so it acts like a regular

[PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

2011-07-02 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I just finished a big, long-overdue reorg of the http://puredata.info/docs/developer section of the website. * Its now a wiki folder so it acts like a regular wiki, not like a weird plone mix of things. It also allows email subscripts to wiki pages. * I purged old pages and