On Nov 6, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote:
This problem has been 100% solved already:
http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/pylang/importstatement.html
The described way of doing things is a win-win for developers and
Miller Puckette wrote:
Well, what I want to be able to do is put max-compatible objects into Pd
vanilla (such as gate and scale) without breaking libraries. However, I
didn't realize there were libraries out there that named things the same as
Pd built-ins, with the intention of not ever
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 01:36:27PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote:
This problem has been 100% solved already:
http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/pylang/importstatement.html
The described way of doing things is a win-win for
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:39:51AM -0800, Miller Puckette wrote:
Well, what I want to be able to do is put max-compatible objects into Pd
vanilla (such as gate and scale) without breaking libraries. However, I
didn't realize there were libraries out there that named things the same as
Pd
Hallo,
Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote:
This problem has been 100% solved already:
http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/pylang/importstatement.html
The described way of doing things is a win-win for developers and for
users; both get maximum flexibility. I can't think
Roman Haefeli wrote:
hm.. only now, i see that overriding built-ins seems to be intentional.
yes, this has been calimed to be a feature:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2008-06/011846.html
i still don't believe it really is.
it might be better to add an explicit way to override
Roman Haefeli wrote:
hi all, hi IOhannes
after having installed pd 0.42.0test5, i assumed to have discovered a
behaviour change of [unpack] and [pack], until i noticed:
a) zexy comes with its own version of [pack] and [unpack].
why are they called the same? i really don't get that.
Well, what I want to be able to do is put max-compatible objects into Pd
vanilla (such as gate and scale) without breaking libraries. However, I
didn't realize there were libraries out there that named things the same as
Pd built-ins, with the intention of not ever getting instantiated under
the
hi all, hi IOhannes
after having installed pd 0.42.0test5, i assumed to have discovered a
behaviour change of [unpack] and [pack], until i noticed:
a) zexy comes with its own version of [pack] and [unpack].
why are they called the same? i really don't get that.
b) in pd 0.42.0test5 they seem
hm.. only now, i see that overriding built-ins seems to be intentional.
when starting pd with loading zexy, i get:
warning: class 'pack' overwritten\; old one renamed 'pack_aliased'
warning: class 'unpack' overwritten\; old one renamed 'unpack_aliased'
and pd's built-in [pack] can be
10 matches
Mail list logo
