If you need to stick to vanilla Pure Data you could try
https://github.com/eerne/Pd-Dom which handles DSP tree update and
loadbang for you as well as mass chaining of many abstractions.
[set 0 rythm(
|
|[chain sound sound sound(
| /
[pd-dom id]
| \
[adc~]
(hope my ascii art just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-03-23 14:21, Jeppi Jeppi wrote:
-When I instantiate dynamically an abstraction (not a pd native
object, but an abstraction), it does not receive a proper loadbang
message. And I should have a way to initialize dynamically created
On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 10:40 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com
To: pd-list@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] some issues with dynamic patching
On Sam, 2013-03-23 at 15:39 +0200
On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 17:20 +0100, Jeppi Jeppi wrote:
Many thanks to you all,
[initbang] seems just what I was looking for. As for individual,
dynamic firing with [loadbang], the problem with
[loadbang(
|
[send pd-foo.pd]
is that I have several foo abstractions and I would like to fire
On Sam, 2013-03-23 at 15:39 +0200, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
Concerning [loadbang] you should use [initbang] instead AFAIK. But
that's not vanilla.
There are two separate issues to be considered:
[initbang] should be used when you dynamically create xlets within an
abstraction, so that
.
Josep M
From: reduz...@gmail.com
To: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 12:25:35 +0100
Subject: Re: [PD] some issues with dynamic patching
On Sam, 2013-03-23 at 15:39 +0200, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
Concerning [loadbang] you should use [initbang] instead AFAIK. But
that's
- Original Message -
From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com
To: pd-list@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] some issues with dynamic patching
On Sam, 2013-03-23 at 15:39 +0200, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
Concerning [loadbang] you should use
Hi all,
just two questions regarding Pd's messaging system.
-When I suppres an object by using a find cut set of messages to pd, I get a
consistency check error. It is properly erased and nothing wrong seems to
happen but, could this error be avoided? Could it be eventually dangerous?
-When I
Concerning [loadbang] you should use [initbang] instead AFAIK. But that's
not vanilla.
Concerning the error, it might happen cause Pd is not built for dynamic
patching (even though some of us love it..), so you might be getting errors
that have no impact on your process, never mind them. There
From: Jeppi Jeppi jepp...@hotmail.com
To: pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 9:21 AM
Subject: [PD] some issues with dynamic patching
Hi all,
just two questions regarding Pd's messaging system.
-When I suppres an object by using
10 matches
Mail list logo
