On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
Does it does type-punning? Does compilation give warnings about that?
That's my guess.
[blosc~] does type punning indeed, it uses type unsigned long in phase
conversion, blosc~.cc line 86/87. But there is no
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:26 AM, katja katjavet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
Does it does type-punning? Does compilation give warnings about that?
That's my guess.
[blosc~] does type punning indeed, it uses type unsigned
Here's the fix for the 64-bit Linux (and I suspect OSX as well).
Change around lines 33 or so:
typedef unsigned long long u64;
typedef unsigned long u32;
To:
#ifdef _WIN32
typedef unsigned long long u64;
typedef unsigned long u32;
#else
#include stdint.h
typedef uint64_t u64;
typedef uint32_t
Does anyone else have a problem with creb/blosc~ not outputting any
audio (its signal output is stuck at -0.5 and that's it). This is on
64-bit Ubuntu. The problem affects both pd-extended and pd-l2ork.
Any thoughts?
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
On 05/03/2012 09:24 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Does anyone else have a problem with creb/blosc~ not outputting any
audio (its signal output is stuck at -0.5 and that's it). This is on
64-bit Ubuntu. The problem affects both pd-extended and pd-l2ork.
Any thoughts?
Preliminary data suggests
On May 3, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
On 05/03/2012 09:24 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Does anyone else have a problem with creb/blosc~ not outputting any audio
(its signal output is stuck at -0.5 and that's it). This is on 64-bit
Ubuntu. The problem affects both pd-extended
That's great, thanks for posting this!
.hc
On Apr 30, 2012, at 1:17 AM, kiilo wrote:
Hi,
instead about complaining how to compile Pd-extended for amd64 for ubuntu
12.04 here it is:
* http://kiilo.org/pub/Pd-0.43.1-extended-20120430.deb
some recipes I used:
1) followed the BuildHowto
That's great! BTW, FYI, etc I plan to upgrade the amd64 autobuilder
box to 12.04. I'll wait some so that some bugs get ironed out, and of
course I'll need Hans to tell me when it's OK.
András
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 16:39, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
That's great, thanks for
It would be good to wait until we have a final Pd-extended 0.43 release out.
.hc
On 04/30/2012 02:02 PM, András Murányi wrote:
That's great! BTW, FYI, etc I plan to upgrade the amd64 autobuilder
box to 12.04. I'll wait some so that some bugs get ironed out, and of
course I'll need Hans to
Whatever you say Sir. I wanted to wait a few (4-5?) weeks, I guess
that's about fine for Pd-extended 0.43 too, isn't it?
András
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 20:11, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
It would be good to wait until we have a final Pd-extended 0.43 release out.
.hc
On
Hopefully. 0.43 is looking good on GNU/Linux, but there are some
serious bugs in Gem on Mac OS X that are well out of my knowledge to fix...
.hc
On 04/30/2012 02:23 PM, András Murányi wrote:
Whatever you say Sir. I wanted to wait a few (4-5?) weeks, I guess
that's about fine for Pd-extended
Hi,
instead about complaining how to compile Pd-extended for amd64 for
ubuntu 12.04 here it is:
* http://kiilo.org/pub/Pd-0.43.1-extended-20120430.deb
some recipes I used:
1) followed the BuildHowto for maverick:
* http://puredata.info/docs/developer/WorkingWithPdExtendedSources
*
12 matches
Mail list logo
