-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2014-03-11 01:31, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
well, I assume they can be more efficient, but my only point here
is what I said already and that you agree with - peak level should
be available,
do you mean that Pd should come with a set of
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 21:31 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
What is the difference between using
an abstraction or a compiled class?
well, I assume they can be more efficient, but my only point here is
what I said already and that you agree with - peak level should be
available,
well, lets see if we can get this to a closure
So, basically you are saying it is less trouble
to make an external than an abstraction?
Nope, never said it. Not sure why you took it that way. Maybe because I
mentioned efficiency. But that was supposed to mean computer efficiency,
and as a
On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 22:32 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Why not an abstraction in my point of view? Well, looks kinda
cumbersome for that particular goal.
I am with you in that I think it makes sense to extend [env~]. Regarding
abstractions, I don't see what is cumbersome. What is
What is the difference between using
an abstraction or a compiled class?
well, I assume they can be more efficient, but my only point here is what I
said already and that you agree with - peak level should be available,
seems like lots of trouble to need to make an abstraction for it. I know
As far as Vanilla goes it does seem like a great solution. Thanks a lot for
that, seems to do the trick!
But was really hoping for or even asking for a [peakenv~] like object.
I didn't find anything and I thought I wouldn't be missing it if there was,
but came here to ask anyway.
Maybe an
Hi all -
I've been wanting to add this as an option to env~. Unfortunately the
last time I thought carefully about it I ended up geting stuck in design
decisions I don't know how to make. But I'll get back to it someday!
cheers
Miller
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 12:23:15PM -0300, Alexandre Torres
On Son, 2014-03-09 at 12:23 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
As far as Vanilla goes it does seem like a great solution. Thanks a
lot for that, seems to do the trick!
But was really hoping for or even asking for a [peakenv~] like
object.
Why does it have to be an extra class and why
By the way - I just looked, and you can save a great deal of trouble
using the array max object (new in Pd 0.25) - no need for 'until'
horror.
(just put the abs~ of the signal into the table).
But env~ seems incomplete to me if it's only going to compute
RMS.
cheers
M
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at
On Son, 2014-03-09 at 14:05 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
By the way - I just looked, and you can save a great deal of trouble
using the array max object (new in Pd 0.25)
You mean 0.45, I guess(?)
- no need for 'until'
horror.
Oh, that is great! Thanks for the reminder, I haven't looked at
env~ seems incomplete to me if it's
only going to compute RMS.
Glad you feel how I do :)
But wondering where you'd be stuck at, seems like something not too
complicated. Anyway, waiting for it someday ;)
Why not an abstraction in my point of view? Well, looks kinda cumbersome
for that
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu wrote:
But env~ seems incomplete to me if it's only going to compute
RMS.
Can we get the values in dBFS, please?
Chris
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and
hmm, that's an idea for another built-in option, so it's completely
compatible to [vu] right out of the box :)
2014-03-09 23:35 GMT-03:00 Chris Clepper cgclep...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu wrote:
But env~ seems incomplete to me if it's only
13 matches
Mail list logo
