So, (on Fedora 2) what I get is that the five tables (assuming I
opened them before whacking the 440 button, e.g.) have all their points
fly far above the visible region of the window. The bug I then see
is the long-standing one, which is that for teh life of me I can't figure
out how to get the
Alas, the bug is different. If you open the properties window of the
table and adjust the y range to be from 1000 to 0. You will get
over that problem. Then you'll be able to see that only half the
table entries are updated. Also, the wrong values are in the slots
-- off by one.
Hmm, now that, on Fedora 2 at least, I can't reproduce. I think I
was unable to reproduce that on my Fedora 6 machine either when I tried
that, but will try it again when I can...
cheers
Miller
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:43:35PM -0500, David F. Place wrote:
Alas, the bug is different. If you
David F. Place wrote:
Alas, the bug is different. If you open the properties window of the
table and adjust the y range to be from 1000 to 0. You will get
so for simplicity i suggest you add the attached patch to yours. this
should properly initialize your table-ranges.
over that
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i cannot reproduce this.
oh, and i forgot: i am on debian(etch/sid) on an amd64 in i386 mode
are you by chance running a 64bit OS? (i guess FC3 does not support
x86_64 but who knows...)
does the problem still exist with pd-0.40? pd-0.41?
fmga.sdr
IOhannes
Hallo,
Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:
So, (on Fedora 2) what I get is that the five tables (assuming I
opened them before whacking the 440 button, e.g.) have all their points
fly far above the visible region of the window. The bug I then see
is the long-standing one,
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 20:19 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i cannot reproduce this.
oh, and i forgot: i am on debian(etch/sid) on an amd64 in i386 mode
are you by chance running a 64bit OS? (i guess FC3 does not support
x86_64 but who knows...)
On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:19 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
are you by chance running a 64bit OS? (i guess FC3 does not support
x86_64 but who knows...)
Yes, I am running a 64bit OS. I'll try upgrading to 0.41 too.
--o---o-o-o---o-o-o---
David F. Place
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:06 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
- your x-bounds seem to be wrong: you have 12 values, with x-
coordinates
0..11; therefore the x-bounds should be 0..11 too, instead of 0..12
(which will give you another empty slot; probably this is what you
mean by not getting
David F. Place wrote:
On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:19 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
are you by chance running a 64bit OS? (i guess FC3 does not support
x86_64 but who knows...)
Yes, I am running a 64bit OS. I'll try upgrading to 0.41 too.
this explains everything! (and tells us, how good it
On Feb 21, 2007, at 5:21 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
this explains everything! (and tells us, how good it is to tell the
architecture of your system - esp. when it is not yet mainstream)
your problem has only been fixed in 0.41
confirm
Confirmed! Thanks for your help.
11 matches
Mail list logo
