Re: [PD] gt~ and lt~ (similar to zexy ~, ~) and between~

2007-10-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Roman Haefeli wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 01:02 +0200, Derek Holzer wrote: Hi Enrique, Enrique Erne wrote: the ~ ~ seems to be pretty much standard, will they ever make it into pd-vanilla or is there a license issue? Actually, on some systems there's an object name issue. I've seen many

Re: [PD] gt~ and lt~ (similar to zexy ~, ~) and between~

2007-10-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Roman Haefeli wrote: though, i don't know if it would lead to any problems, if internals steal the names of externals. at least i cannot think of any, if the behaviour is the same. pd grabbed the name of zexy's [tabread4]; i have never heard of someone complaining. fgmasdr,. IOhannes

Re: [PD] gt~ and lt~ (similar to zexy ~, ~) and between~

2007-10-04 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Roman Haefeli wrote: personally, i think as well, that these objects are good candidates to be inlcuded to pd-vanilla, as well as these: [abs~], [sgn~] in desiredata i have just added [~] [~] [=~] [=~] [==~] [!=~]. later i will add some more. [sgn~] won't be added if i

Re: [PD] gt~ and lt~ (similar to zexy ~, ~) and between~

2007-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Enrique Erne wrote: hi community i patched a prototype for a gigatable abstraction to overcome the 16777216 sample limit http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-09/053479.html as a side product i got some abs that could be useful.. [between~] with 2 arguments to specify a

Re: [PD] gt~ and lt~ (similar to zexy ~, ~) and between~

2007-10-03 Thread Enrique Erne
On Mer Oct 3 8:45 , IOhannes m zmoelnig sent: Enrique Erne wrote: hi community i patched a prototype for a gigatable abstraction to overcome the 16777216 sample limit http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-09/053479.html as a side product i got some abs that could be

Re: [PD] gt~ and lt~ (similar to zexy ~, ~) and between~

2007-10-03 Thread Derek Holzer
Hi Enrique, Enrique Erne wrote: the ~ ~ seems to be pretty much standard, will they ever make it into pd-vanilla or is there a license issue? Actually, on some systems there's an object name issue. I've seen many cases on Windows, and some on OS X, where and cannot be used in a filename,

Re: [PD] gt~ and lt~ (similar to zexy ~, ~) and between~

2007-10-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 01:02 +0200, Derek Holzer wrote: Hi Enrique, Enrique Erne wrote: the ~ ~ seems to be pretty much standard, will they ever make it into pd-vanilla or is there a license issue? Actually, on some systems there's an object name issue. I've seen many cases on

Re: [PD] gt~ and lt~ (similar to zexy ~, ~) and between~

2007-10-03 Thread Derek Holzer
Hi Roman, Roman Haefeli wrote: just for the record: it will not create in pd-extended (or with externals compiled in libdir format), but it will with externals as library. Ah! That's good to know. And of course it makes sense, if zexy.pd_$OS has no or in the filename, there's no reason

Re: [PD] gt~ and lt~ (similar to zexy ~, ~) and between~

2007-10-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 13:03 +0100, Andy Farnell wrote: On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 01:16:03 +0200 Roman Haefeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: personally, i think as well, that these objects are good candidates to be inlcuded to pd-vanilla, as well as these: [abs~], [sgn~] roman Would get my

Re: [PD] gt~ and lt~ (similar to zexy ~, ~) and between~

2007-10-02 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 00:53 +0200, Enrique Erne wrote: hi community i patched a prototype for a gigatable abstraction to overcome the 16777216 sample limit http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-09/053479.html where is the prototype of the gigatable abstraction? or wasn't that