Oops.. that's a bug.
To work around it for now, add 1 (or a higher integer), then wrap...
cheers
Miller
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 09:40:53PM +0200, Steffen wrote:
On 07/05/2007, at 20.51, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Note: 0 - [wrap~] - 1, which is weird (and undesirable in my eyes).
Yeah.
Derek Holzer wrote:
end of the table)? [wrap~] doesn't do the trick, BTW.
i am sure it does.
try scaling the signal before sending it to [wrap~] and afterwards undo
the scaling.
[/~ 100]
|
[wrap~]
|
[*~ 100]
mfa.sdr
IOhannes
___
PD-list@iem.at
I tried this already, and it's not appropriate in this case. The idea is
to change the start of the loop to any place in the sample. If the
length of the loop is longer than what's left of the sample in the
table, currently I get silence. If I use [wrap~] the way you describe
it, the loop I
Test patch attached... see the [wraparound~] subpatch for the part which
doesn't work yet!
d.
Derek Holzer wrote:
I tried this already, and it's not appropriate in this case. The idea is
to change the start of the loop to any place in the sample. If the
length of the loop is longer than
Sorry, last patch was missing the tabread!
Use this one!
d.
Derek Holzer wrote:
Test patch attached... see the [wraparound~] subpatch for the part which
doesn't work yet!
d.
Derek Holzer wrote:
I tried this already, and it's not appropriate in this case. The idea
is to change the
hi derek
i attached a patch, that should do what you want. it is a modified
version of IOhannes approach, but it is still only a [wrap~] with
scaling functionality.
roman
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 19:00 +0200, Derek Holzer wrote:
I tried this already, and it's not appropriate in this case. The
Hi Roman,
and thanks. I implemented it in my patch, but it doesn't seem to work
right. The looping isn't seamless, in fact there's a hiccup at the
point where the loop wraps around. In my previous version, I had another
function to calculate the offset and start point, so what would work
Hallo,
Derek Holzer hat gesagt: // Derek Holzer wrote:
Test patch attached... see the [wraparound~] subpatch for the part which
doesn't work yet!
I added a [tabread4~ test_zample] and now it works. ;)
Now seriously: The forgotten tabread probably wasn't the error you
were looking for. But
Hi Frank,
thanks for helping. This is the solution I tried at first. However, with
this every loop starts at the beginning of the table, no matter where I
set the loop offset. I'm assuming you actually tested it before posting,
so are there different versions of [wrap~] perhaps?
d.
Frank
Hallo,
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Derek Holzer hat gesagt: // Derek Holzer wrote:
Test patch attached... see the [wraparound~] subpatch for the part which
doesn't work yet!
I added a [tabread4~ test_zample] and now it works. ;)
Now seriously: The
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the
offset to 95 and the length to 25, I would like to get a loop that
starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25.
The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through 0 to
25, und so
Sorry! Should read:
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the
offset to 95 and the length to 30, I would like to get a loop that
starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25.
The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through
Derek Holzer wrote:
Hi Roman,
and thanks. I implemented it in my patch, but it doesn't seem to work
right. The looping isn't seamless, in fact there's a hiccup at the
point where the loop wraps around. In my previous version, I had another
function to calculate the offset and start point,
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Derek Holzer wrote:
Hi Roman,
and thanks. I implemented it in my patch, but it doesn't seem to work
right. The looping isn't seamless, in fact there's a hiccup at the
point where the loop wraps around. In my previous version, I had another
function to calculate
Hi there,
I am not so terribly into that right now..
Just an idea.
What if you just shift the table and write it to a second one...
silly probably...
just an idea
Am 07.05.2007 um 20:25 schrieb Derek Holzer:
Sorry! Should read:
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and
Derek Holzer wrote:
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the
offset to 95 and the length to 30, I would like to get a loop that
starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25.
The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through
I fixed it so it works. Solution is attached. If you are interested in
samplers, loading multiple samples, having smooth loop points, sending
to multiple targets, etc, you should also check out the sample
section of the pdmtl abstractions:
On 07/05/2007, at 20.51, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Note: 0 - [wrap~] - 1, which is weird (and undesirable in my eyes).
Yeah. I still can't translate wrap~ gives the difference between the
input and the largest integer not exceeding it to that. The quote is
from the help file.
18 matches
Mail list logo
