Re: [PD] Object to store images and movies.

2007-12-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Javier Garcia wrote: Wellcome Donal, i think you are speaking about a to much complex aplication to be and object (at least nowadays). ??? an object can have arbitrary complexity. you could make a [linux] object, that runs a virtualized full operating system. however, the power of Pd

[PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Nikola Jeremic
hi lis this is a big discussion :) im a long term pd user, and no max user I vote YES for the segmented patchcords. i belive that it is not good to use them ALWAYS but i came i the situatuon when they come in handy and the user have a chance to choose... if you dont like them do not use them :-),

Re: [PD] Object to store images and movies.

2007-12-06 Thread Thomas Mayer
Donal Carey wrote: Hi Derek Thanks for the reply - to follow on from your info, can I create the database in PD or would I have to use some other program and then read from that using PD ? One way to accomplish that would be using [textfile]s: file no1. contains the file names of the

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Chris McCormick wrote: I think the key point to take from the whole discussion is that Max/MSP users have a choice, whilst under Pd we have no choice. It's all very well justifying how great it is to not

Re: [PD] Object to store images and movies.

2007-12-06 Thread Thomas Mayer
Oops, forgot: Thomas Mayer wrote: [read file1( | [textfile] | [read $1] | [textfile] | [open $1( | [pix_film] | [pix_texture] | -- Prisons are needed only to provide the illusion that courts and police are effective. They're a kind of job insurance. (Leto II. in: Frank

Re: [PD] Object to store images and movies.

2007-12-06 Thread Derek Holzer
As Thomas implicitly suggests, it is often easiest to arrange your clips with names and directories which your database (i.e. [textfile], [coll], the iem_matrix objects etc) can easily point to, such as: /home/donal/clips/slow/ -clip1.mov

Re: [PD] Object to store images and movies.

2007-12-06 Thread alejo d
hi derek, thomas,, not sure, i havent read the whole thread but for clips and images lluis has some objects (i have to try but the suggested link is down and doesnt resolve for me since few weeks... though all is in CVS) there is a [videogrid] object gui that do exactly this. you can download it

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Olivier Heinry
Le jeudi 06 décembre 2007 à 08:21 +0100, Frank Barknecht a écrit : Hallo, Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Chris McCormick wrote: I think the key point to take from the whole discussion is that Max/MSP users have a choice, whilst under Pd we

Re: [PD] Object to store images and movies.

2007-12-06 Thread Olivier Heinry
PDMTL has a growing number of features going into that direction too, as well as a preset storage system. It also has very pedagogic aspects :-) ++ O. Le jeudi 06 décembre 2007 à 12:03 +0100, Derek Holzer a écrit : As Thomas implicitly suggests, it is often easiest to arrange your clips

[PD] making an Italian Version of pdpedia

2007-12-06 Thread Fabio Buda [mbutUbuntu]
Hello folks, I'm Fabio Buda and I study Electronic Music at Istituto Musicale V. Bellini of Catania (Sicily). I'd like to create an Italian Wiki of pdpedia: what can I do? Thanks Fabio [mbutUbuntu] Buda ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE

[PD] oscSend, pd argument types

2007-12-06 Thread Damian Stewart
hey, i'm trying to use oscSend to send some numeric data to another application. basically i've got a float between 0 and 1. the receiving application unpacks the packet, assuming it's a float. the problem is, oscSend packs 0 and 1 as an int, but 0.01 - 0.999 as a float. so on the

Re: [PD] VLC rc connection

2007-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I cc'ed the list since I think this is of general interest, also, other people can contribute there as well. On Dec 6, 2007, at 5:00 AM, wolfgang schwarzenbrunner wrote: The pdpedia can actually answer this question: http://wiki.puredata.info/en/Special:Search?

Re: [PD] oscSend, pd argument types

2007-12-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Damian Stewart wrote: hey, is there any simple workaround? yes, use mrpeach's [udpsend]+[packOSC] objects; they allow you use typed OSC-messages and whatelse. mfga.sdr IOhannes ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

Re: [PD] oscSend, pd argument types

2007-12-06 Thread Martin Peach
Damian Stewart wrote: hey, i'm trying to use oscSend to send some numeric data to another application. basically i've got a float between 0 and 1. the receiving application unpacks the packet, assuming it's a float. the problem is, oscSend packs 0 and 1 as an int, but 0.01 - 0.999

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Dec 6, 2007, at 2:21 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote: Hallo, Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Chris McCormick wrote: I think the key point to take from the whole discussion is that Max/MSP users have a choice, whilst under Pd we have no choice.

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread marius schebella
I think some inlets take both, dsp and messages (throw~ for example). also, did you think about changing the look between edit and run mode? marius. Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Dec 5, 2007, at 4:46 PM, Phil Stone wrote: Martin Peach wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Color really

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Yes, definitely, I am thinking of something that combines the two, like a black box with blue inside. I am going to play with that more. The problem is that it's trickier to program that, hopefully it's not too tricky. .hc On Dec 6, 2007, at 10:48 AM, marius schebella wrote: I think

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread marius schebella
Michal Seta wrote: On Dec 4, 2007 10:09 AM, marius schebella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a big problem in max is that there is no undo for segmented patchcords. once segmented, you can only delete them and redraw to make them not segmented. That's not true. Ctl-click on a segmented patchcord,

Re: [PD] making an Italian Version of pdpedia

2007-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Just ask! :D I made the IT wiki, now create an account in it, and post your username here. Then I can make it admin: http://pdpedia.org/ I don't know if you have any contact with this group, but it looks like it would be good to get them to help too: http://puredata.bugslab.net/

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Dec 5, 2007, at 12:45 PM, B. Bogart wrote: Ah segmented patch coords again. How about a real solution to the problem of routing objects in diagrams? In PD this could mean a few things: 1. Best patching practise!!! Often you can choose not to overlap objects and connections just

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread marius schebella
Hi Andrew, I use both. I am in a graduate class at brooklyn polytech, where josh goldberg teaches real time video interaction. it is an advanced class, and there are only 6 people, 3 of them are passionate (professional?) jitter users, and 2 people started using max in this program, but are

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread marius schebella
marius schebella wrote: only iohannes and chris clepper are working on it and that means thank you very much! I am not sure how to really support the work you are doing? if you ever come up with a wishlist... marius. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread marius schebella
oh! it depends WHERE you click. thanks! marius. vade wrote: you have to command click on OS X - it works, and on patch coords with only one knee too. (select the half towards the inlet). On Dec 6, 2007, at 10:48 AM, marius schebella wrote: Michal Seta wrote: On Dec 4, 2007 10:09 AM,

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread vade
you have to command click on OS X - it works, and on patch coords with only one knee too. (select the half towards the inlet). On Dec 6, 2007, at 10:48 AM, marius schebella wrote: Michal Seta wrote: On Dec 4, 2007 10:09 AM, marius schebella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a big problem in max

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Patrice Colet
In reactable, objects are connected together when inlet/outlet matches the good kind of data, it would be possible to do it also with PureData, without breaking the rules. If a box is dragged nearly another box, the connection would happen when an inlet/outlet passes into the area of

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, marius schebella wrote: the most obvious and useful things are the tons of @arguments that each objects accepts. Having tons of @arguments is not necessarily a blessing. Wherever Jitter has four @arguments named red,green,blue,alpha, GridFlow has only one, which is a

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Nicely said, hopefully you can drum up more support for Gem. One thing I think it really great about Gem is that is remains strongly visual. When getting heavy into jitter, the patches look like you are writing in C++ with boxes around it. What I would really like to see is all those

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread vade
well, FYI in Jitter you do [jit.someobject @color r g b a] (for example), or can use a message named color. Ive never seen or used [jit.someobject @red r @green g @blue b @alpha a] and jitter also has just about every colorspace conversion possible, that I have ever seen or dealt with

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Max Neupert
i read your mail as a pledge for a bounty system - is that right? Am 06.12.2007 um 20:08 schrieb Kyle Klipowicz: And this is precisely the unfortunate reason why the open source world will (almost) always lag behind the commercial world of consumer software. When developers make their bread

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread vade
You can do both within jitter, anything that is an attribute is by virtue of being an attribute also a message - so you can send it via loadbang, loadmess or whenever/however you want, so its up to you to choose how you want your patch to work :) On Dec 6, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Hans-Christoph

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Daniel Wilcox
Now there's an idea! If some donations could be had to offer up bounty money, I'd say a few more of us would be inclined to pitch in. Also, has pd been in the Goggle Summer of Code? ... I'm unfamiliar with the dev setup but have there been any coding camps where people get together to just

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, vade wrote: well, FYI in Jitter you do [jit.someobject @color r g b a] (for example), or can use a message named color. Ive never seen or used [jit.someobject @red r @green g @blue b @alpha a] I forgot to say that it applies only to some of the classes in Jitter. For

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Kyle Klipowicz hat gesagt: // Kyle Klipowicz wrote: And this is precisely the unfortunate reason why the open source world will (almost) always lag behind the commercial world of consumer software. When developers make their bread and butter based upon if the consumer buys, they're

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread chris clepper
If I were running a commercial software firm and software made by random people in their spare time compared pretty well with my pricey software, I would be a little concerned. On Dec 6, 2007 1:08 PM, Kyle Klipowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And this is precisely the unfortunate reason why the

Re: [PD] Meaning of -noprefs

2007-12-06 Thread Peter Plessas
Hi, I think -noprefs should stop .pdrc as well, since it's in the spirit that is great news! Btw, is there a document on the available options in .pdsettings? For example: Does defeatrt: 0 imply -rt? Otherwise, how does one set -rt? Which Audio-API is which number? Let me take the opportunity

Re: [PD] Object to store images and movies.

2007-12-06 Thread Donal Carey
Thanks for all the info guys - will post the patch up if I get it working. Cheers Donal ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] italian infobox

2007-12-06 Thread Fabio Buda [mbutUbuntu]
hello folks, I've just translated the Firts Page of the italian wiki... here there is the IT translation of infobox # wikipedia terms $stub = matrice; $template = modello; $category = categoria; $infobox = casella informativa; # pdpedia terms $objectclass = classe di oggetti; # page headers

Re: [PD] Object to store images and movies.

2007-12-06 Thread Mike McGonagle
On 12/5/07, Derek Holzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you are using GEM, then look at [pix_image], [pix_film] and [pix_movie]. You'll need to develop some sort of rudimentary database to catalog and access the images and clips, of course... As far as the Database stuff goes, if you would

[PD] Bounties for Pd Features (was RE: segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX))

2007-12-06 Thread Kyle Klipowicz
Yes, a bounty system would be great. At this point, if you are not a student, Max/MSP/Jitter costs about $850 US. I think that (myself included) many Pd users would gladly shell out a few dollars to see features met. I for one have donated to Hans' efforts directly on his site via PayPal, because

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I also think that megaobjects that accept many messages/attributes become more like application preferences rather than programming, and that usually limits the possibilities. For example, in C, a function with more than 5 parameters starts to get quite ugly and unwieldy. In LISP, which

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Olivier Heinry wrote: Moreover, the code has already been desired and written, just not been implemented in vanilla. excuse me, which version of pd really allows you to edit and save cord segmentations? _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ...

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread chris clepper
On Dec 6, 2007 10:46 AM, marius schebella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no real multitexture support for opengl. that is a must, if you want to work with shader languages like glsl. Multitexturing works fine. The only drawback is that only texcoords from the texture unit in the chain with the

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread vade
This is an interesting viewpoint - at what point does providing all of these options just get in my way and make me not think about creating my own solutions - and thus really really making it mine - while extending my knowledge Im not sure, I can tell you ive had to make plenty of my own

Re: [PD] Bounties for Pd Features (was RE: segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX))

2007-12-06 Thread marius schebella
Kyle Klipowicz wrote: I for one have donated to Hans' efforts directly on his site via PayPal, now it's out, YOU were the one... marius. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -

Re: [PD] pd 0.41.0 test07 font size

2007-12-06 Thread cyrille henry
hello, yes, test 09 look good. whatever the screen resolution is. (at least on my ubuntu computer) thanks Cyrille Miller Puckette a écrit : OK test09, hopefully, fixes it :) I've got a long list of bugs to try to fix... otherwise I'm probably not going to try to add any more features to

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread marius schebella
I have no idea how complicated this stuff really is. from the user's viewpoint it looked like some lines of code, that needed to be added. and I know that it is even harder if you are alone in your problem solving... marius. chris clepper wrote: On Dec 6, 2007 10:46 AM, marius schebella [EMAIL

Re: [PD] pd 0.41.0 test07 font size

2007-12-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Miller Puckette wrote: Well, not much has happened, but the test version is stable enough it seems better to work toward a stable version of teh present state than to try to add all the features I want to put in next :) that sounds even better! i'll get my wishlist engine running before soon

Re: [PD] pd 0.41.0 test07 font size

2007-12-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Miller Puckette wrote: OK test09, hopefully, fixes it :) I've got a long list of bugs to try to fix... otherwise I'm probably not going to try to add any more features to this release before canning it. i have jut assigned you some more patches in the patchtracker at sourceforge...;-)

Re: [PD] pd 0.41.0 test07 font size

2007-12-06 Thread Miller Puckette
Well, not much has happened, but the test version is stable enough it seems better to work toward a stable version of teh present state than to try to add all the features I want to put in next :) M On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:17:19AM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Miller Puckette wrote:

Re: [PD] pd and max (2)

2007-12-06 Thread marius schebella
oh, forgot find last error, even if this does not work all the time, it really helped me save a lot of time. plus find feature is also not implemented in max. marius. marius schebella wrote: hi, after all the complaining, here is a list of features that are special to pd. * open source: you

Re: [PD] Bounties for Pd Features (was RE: segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX))

2007-12-06 Thread Dafydd Hughes
hey... On Dec 6, 2007 5:50 PM, marius schebella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kyle Klipowicz wrote: I for one have donated to Hans' efforts directly on his site via PayPal, now it's out, YOU were the one... marius. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Chris McCormick
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:24:42PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Olivier Heinry wrote: Moreover, the code has already been desired and written, just not been implemented in vanilla. excuse me, which version of pd really allows you to edit and save cord segmentations?

Re: [PD] Bounties for Pd Features (was RE: segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX))

2007-12-06 Thread Jack
Le 6 déc. 07 à 22:05, Kyle Klipowicz a écrit : Yes, a bounty system would be great. At this point, if you are not a student, Max/MSP/Jitter costs about $850 US. I think that (myself included) many Pd users would gladly shell out a few dollars to see features met. I for one have donated to

[PD] pd and max (2)

2007-12-06 Thread marius schebella
hi, after all the complaining, here is a list of features that are special to pd. * open source: you can always dig into the deep universe of code to see how things are done. and change things according to your needs * no licencing: that means you don't pay money to be allowed to program in pd.

Re: [PD] pd and max (2)

2007-12-06 Thread Chris McCormick
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:45:41PM -0500, marius schebella wrote: * no licencing: that means you don't pay money to be allowed to program in pd. (the player is free also in max). but it also means that you don't have to fiddle around with the licence when you install (which usually takes a

[PD] freeverb~ roomsize / damping not working

2007-12-06 Thread patrick
hi, i compiled freeverb~ without any problem, but the controls are not modifying the sound. a theora video of the problem can be seen here: http://www.workinprogress.ca/pd/pdmtl/freeverbbug.ogg (vlc, mplayer etc...). i am on linux / pentium 4. freeverb~ v1.2 pat

Re: [PD] pd 0.41.0 test07 font size

2007-12-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 01:26 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: i'll get my wishlist engine running before soon with stuff like: - 64bit-pd (that is, not just run pd on an amd64; but have t_float/t_sample be *large*) does that mean, that every float in pd on an 64bit machine will have 64bit

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Dec 6, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Daniel Wilcox wrote: Now there's an idea! If some donations could be had to offer up bounty money, I'd say a few more of us would be inclined to pitch in. Patches welcome! ;) Seriously, if anyone wants to set this up, I think it could work. In the past,

Re: [PD] freeverb~ roomsize / damping not working

2007-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Perhaps it's an aliasing bug, I know freeverb has some non-strick aliases. Basically, you need to compiling it with less optimization. How about the freeverb included in Pd-extended? .hc On Dec 6, 2007, at 8:54 PM, patrick wrote: hi, i compiled freeverb~ without any problem, but the

Re: [PD] Max Pd

2007-12-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
So now the next step is building a system that lets you have the ease of jitter with the flexibility of Pd :D .hc On Dec 6, 2007, at 5:42 PM, vade wrote: This is an interesting viewpoint - at what point does providing all of these options just get in my way and make me not think about

Re: [PD] freeverb~ roomsize / damping not working

2007-12-06 Thread patrick
hi hans, it's the freeverb~ from pd-extended using: cd pure-data/packages/ make patch cd linux_make make install (a very recent checkout-developer-layout.sh http://pure-data.cvs.sourceforge.net/pure-data/scripts/checkout-developer-layout.sh?rev=HEAD) patrick

Re: [PD] segmented patchcords (was Re: PD MAX)

2007-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Chris McCormick wrote: On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:24:42PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Olivier Heinry wrote: Moreover, the code has already been desired and written, just not been implemented in vanilla. excuse me, which version of pd really allows

Re: [PD] pd 0.41.0 test07 font size

2007-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 01:26 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: i'll get my wishlist engine running before soon with stuff like: - 64bit-pd (that is, not just run pd on an amd64; but have t_float/t_sample be *large*) does that mean, that every float in pd

[PD] [tabread~~] (again)

2007-12-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
hi i wanted to play with [tabread~~] and checked out a fresh zexy and compiled and it went fine. when instantiating [tabread~~], i get an error though: load_object: Symbol setup_tabread40x7e_tild not found tabread4~~ ... couldn't create grep -d recurse setup_tabread40x7e_tild externals/

Re: [PD] pd and max (2)

2007-12-06 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, marius schebella wrote: find last error, even if this does not work all the time, it really helped me save a lot of time. Btw, find last error in DesireData works pretty much all of the time. In PureData, find last error relies on the good will of external (and internal)

Re: [PD] [tabread~~] (again)

2007-12-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Roman Haefeli wrote: hi i wanted to play with [tabread~~] and checked out a fresh zexy and compiled and it went fine. when instantiating [tabread~~], i get an error though: this is a bug in Pd's hexloader that has been fixed in the latest and greatest 0.41-test release. altenatively you

Re: [PD] pd and max (2)

2007-12-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Chris McCormick wrote: On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:45:41PM -0500, marius schebella wrote: In fact, Pd has such a free license that you can even fork it and make your own closed-source commercial product out of it if you want. The only requirement is that you include the license and copyright.

[PD] metastudio 0.2 released

2007-12-06 Thread Ed Kelly
Hi all, Metastudio v0.2 is released. Some bugfixes (e.g. the sequencers now copies the current pattern properly when new is banged) and some improvements - the demoresynthfx patch contains an explaination of some machines, and a new effect - tabmask~ - an FFT phaser. get it here:

Re: [PD] [tabread~~] (again)

2007-12-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 08:00 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Roman Haefeli wrote: hi i wanted to play with [tabread~~] and checked out a fresh zexy and compiled and it went fine. when instantiating [tabread~~], i get an error though: this is a bug in Pd's hexloader that has been