Re: [PD] [env~ ] vs [vsnapshot~ ]: which one is more cpu consuming?

2010-02-07 Thread ypatios
hello! By using [block~ 1], you're increasing the number of clock calls, and the arithmetic for finding an index is kind of wasted since the block is only one sample long. Maybe it would be best to avoid [block~] and bang vsnapshot~ with a metro set to 1/44.1 ms. You'd at least be reducing

Re: [PD] latency solutions... and then some

2010-02-07 Thread Pierre Massat
hi, I totally agree with Michal about the OS. I haven't tried MacOS but i know for sure that XP can't beat a good rt Linux kernel. That being said, I personnally spent about 6 months trying various Linux distros before i found a good match with my hardware. Although I have had very little luck

Re: [PD] [list] output

2010-02-07 Thread Matteo Sisti Sette
Jonathan Wilkes escribió: Now try hooking that symbol outlet up to some object like [print], or a symbol box, save all your important patches, and click the message box... I kind of guess what's gonna happen :) -- Matteo Sisti Sette matteosistise...@gmail.com http://www.matteosistisette.com

Re: [PD] [list] output

2010-02-07 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Jonathan Wilkes hat gesagt: // Jonathan Wilkes wrote: A list with one pointer element will trick [route]: [traverse some-canvas, bang( | [pointer] | [list append] | [route symbol] Is this crasher bug already reported on Sourceforge? You can crash Pd without the [list append]

Re: [PD] Http request

2010-02-07 Thread Marco Donnarumma
you could also take a look at Lily http://code.google.com/p/lilyapp/ I'm using php sockets to connect web to pd. Using TCP or UDP, you can send values that are sent via GET or POST. check fsockopen and fwrite :) hope to release soon a patch for php and pd to make it fun - ignacio

[PD] Ardour + Jack GUI patch

2010-02-07 Thread João Pais
Hello, I've made a patch to control ardour and jack directly from Pd. The patch works through osc and [shell], and was made in jaunty. I didn't test it on macOs, but it should work, I think. Just unpack the file somewhere (don't loose the icon folder) and tell me about it. Everything

[PD] [GEM]framebuffer vs pix_multiimage

2010-02-07 Thread colet . patrice
hello, attached doesn't need externals , just Gem, as the same problem as described before, only one pix_multiimage can do it's job in a framebuffer, why? patko#N canvas 619 4 654 539 10; #X obj 16 22 cnv 15 100 60 empty empty empty 20 12 0 14 -195568 -66577 0; #N canvas 0 0 450 300 gemwin 0;

Re: [PD] [GEM]framebuffer vs pix_multiimage

2010-02-07 Thread cyrille henry
hello, framebuffer are innocent here : the patch does not work better without framebuffer. it look like you can have only 1 pix_multiimage for a single gemhead. as a workaround, i suggest to use 2 gemhead. There is an example somwhere how to use multiples gemhead in a framebuffer. Cyrille

Re: [PD] [env~ ] vs [vsnapshot~ ]: which one is more cpu consuming?

2010-02-07 Thread Matt Barber
It would be nice though, to know also on a theoretical level. Which one should be more expensive and (maybe) why. I was just taking a look at d_ctl.c from source.  It looks like snapshot~ is cheapest because it's not trying to get any specific sample from the block.  vsnapshot~ gets the

Re: [PD] [list] output

2010-02-07 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
--- On Sun, 2/7/10, Frank Barknecht f...@footils.org wrote: From: Frank Barknecht f...@footils.org Subject: Re: [PD] [list] output To: pd-list@iem.at Date: Sunday, February 7, 2010, 12:48 PM Hallo, Jonathan Wilkes hat gesagt: // Jonathan Wilkes wrote: A list with one pointer element

Re: [PD] Http request

2010-02-07 Thread jim
you could also take a look at Lily http://code.google.com/p/lilyapp/ Thanks Marco, I had never seen Lily before. It looks great and easy to use if you know PD. Looks like development on it has slowed down which is too bad but super useful as it is now. Thanks again!! Jim I'm

Re: [PD] Http request

2010-02-07 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
yes i tried this already before, looks pretty advanced but alas!! not so much on linux .. it doesn't implement video... maybe it's really good for osx, seems their native platform jim wrote: you could also take a look at Lily http://code.google.com/p/lilyapp/ Thanks Marco, I had never