Hi Alex
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 17:28 -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
get it here: http://sites.google.com/site/porres/pvoc-shifter.zip
I wish to officially release it along with some other tools I'm building
for my PhD, soon to be over...
Cool. Thanks for sharing.
Indeed, i find it
Hi Alex
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 16:33 -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Hi folks, I'm trying to implement a ring buffer with a table for a sampler
patch based on an array.
But I'm having the hardest time cause it always clicks when I start
writing back on the beginning of the array.
I
Hi Max
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 15:26 +0100, Max wrote:
dear list,
i was wondering what current developments with Pd and webstreaming are out
there.
...
http://radio.rumblesan.com/
I once read about it in irc, when the guy building it had some talks,
but missed to actually listen to it.
The opus could be written with a place for creativity, it depends on the
musician.
I agree, the artist keeps the control, theoritically.
What's happening when many artist (a grand majority in fact) cease
acting this artistic 'nature '?
Must the bulkys (the neo-archaic), to shout to the world
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 05:35:50AM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
by the way, I figured out a simple way of having an actual accurate loop
inside [expr] in a similar fashion.
something like
expr if ($f1 = end_$0, $f1 - end_$0, if ($f1 0, end_$0 + $f1, $f1))
and the after the
Le 2012-01-10 à 05:35:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
by the way, I figured out a simple way of having an actual accurate loop
inside [expr] in a similar fashion. something like expr if ($f1 =
end_$0, $f1 - end_$0, if ($f1 0, end_$0 + $f1, $f1))
Did you look at fmod() ? it's a
On 1/10/12, Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry, what dont you get?
I guess the shifter+mixer makes sense for the harmonizer--I just don't
see why it's running when I just want to hear the pitch shifting
effect by itself. Is that just a mistake?
This is unrelated, but when I
I dont have that here, just %, but it doesn't work as it rounds thing up.
cheers
2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Le 2012-01-10 à 05:35:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
by the way, I figured out a simple way of having an actual accurate loop
inside [expr] in a similar
hmm, the harmonizer is on at load time because of the arguments, but if you
toggle on and then off, it's just supposed to supposed to let the pitch
shifting work. It works fine over here.
cheers
2012/1/10 Charles Henry czhe...@gmail.com
On 1/10/12, Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com
Hi there,
yeah, the way it was, I didn't see a way to not use [bang~], so I asked to
see if there was something new for me. But then I just started working with
buffers that are multiples of block size, which is fine. Check the Phase
Vocoder harmonizer I shared over here. I made it that way.
And
Thank you both for your replies.
It seems like i'll stick to my laptop for some time...
Cheers!
Pierre
2012/1/8 katja katjavet...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Pierre Massat pimas...@gmail.com wrote:
There's also the Dream Plug
On 9 January 2012 12:05, katja katjavet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu wrote:
Hi all --
Peter Brinkmann and Michael Goggins did some related work recently:
http://nettoyeur.noisepages.com/2010/10/doppler-effects-without-equations/
but back
Le 2012-01-10 à 14:26:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Did you look at fmod() ? it's a function with two args in [expr].
I dont have that here, just %, but it doesn't work as it rounds thing up.
What I mean is something like [expr
I had tried it a different way... well, I didn't know there was this
function in expr, COOL!
thanks
2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Le 2012-01-10 à 14:26:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Did you look at fmod() ? it's a
by the way, that's a new expr function, right? when did it appear?
cheers
2012/1/10 Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com
I had tried it a different way... well, I didn't know there was this
function in expr, COOL!
thanks
2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Le 2012-01-10 à
Le 2012-01-10 à 16:27:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
by the way, that's a new expr function, right? when did it appear?cheers
I don't know. All the new expr functions are quite old...
__
| Mathieu BOUCHARD -
I guess I just missed it then.
By the way number 2, a couple of years ago shahrokh told me that the Sum
function wasn't working properly, and it seems it's still not working yet.
Or do you use it well?
cheers
2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Le 2012-01-10 à 16:27:00, Alexandre
although it says here http://crca.ucsd.edu/~syadegar/expr.html it's been
added to version 4... so I still suspect I studied previous versions and
missed it.
2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Le 2012-01-10 à 16:27:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
by the way, that's a new
It says that vline! is a high-precision audio ramp generator, how is it
better and more precise than line~ ?
Are there advantages for using it to read samples in a tabread4~ ?
thanks
alex
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and
On Jan 8, 2012, at 9:14 AM, katja wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Pierre Massat pimas...@gmail.com wrote:
There's also the Dream Plug
(http://www.plugcomputer.org/development-kits/dreamplug.html), which has a
faster (though totally unknown to me) CPU.
According to the processor
There's a flail about that in Techniques, chapter 3 -
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques/latest/book-html/node43.html
and
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques/latest/book-html/node52.html
cheers
Miller
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 06:39:08PM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
It says that
Looks like the crash is related to the codec you are using in a video. You
could try a different encoding of your video. Motion JPEG is generally
preferred for realtime video manipulation.
.hc
On Jan 8, 2012, at 9:51 AM, james murray wrote:
So, I've got an older computer that I've been
On the road to getting a release out, I've recently done some work making some
GUI stuff run stably (using apps like XYZee, for example), and I've included
Miller's GOP fixes. Give it a whirl and report back how it works for you:
http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/latest/
.hc
thanks, I'm gonna look into it.
I tried using vline~ instead of line~ in the phase vocoder patch, and it
kinda ruined it, which makes me more curious to study this.
cheers
2012/1/10 Miller Puckette m...@ucsd.edu
There's a flail about that in Techniques, chapter 3 -
I can't think of a better example of the vicious cycle of software lock-in than
this.
They don't have money to offer financial support, so they have to rely on the
tools
that they know, which are proprietary and expensive, thus making it even less
likely
that a composer would be able to
To avoid technical issues we choose the plattforms we already use in
our work or we are very familiar with.
This is the only reason.
If the selected composer can assure us to be available for the concert
the can be used any piece of software/hardware.
I hope this helps.
Many thanks
Not a bad point... but, or more likely because they are supporting only
those artists able to afford such things as expensive software, travel and
food.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
I can't think of a better example of the vicious cycle of software
No, there really are music students out there looking at what they need in
order to be successful, and
when most of the voices around them are aggressively (and often ignorantly)
suggesting only
proprietary tools that cost lots of money, these students save up their meager
resources in
I would not try to crack Max/Msp, nor do any of my students engage in such poor
practices
I took a Kyma class in Grad school, it sounded awesome but was way out of my
price range of course
From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Wilkes
Sent: Tuesday,
You're right Jonathan, I completely agree. I really shouldn't post things
until I've had breakfast. Or try to be light and ironic on topics that I
believe strongly in, i.e. cynicism != useful in most situations.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.comwrote:
No,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:18 PM, James Fenn geek...@jamesfenn.com wrote:
Have you looked at: https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/resample/ ? The
algorithm he describes sounds like what you are talking about, if I
understand correctly. He uses a massively oversampled filter kernel
and linearly
From: Pagano, Patrick p...@digitalworlds.ufl.edu
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com; Richie Cyngler glitch...@gmail.com
Cc: pd list pd-list@iem.at; Ben Baker-Smith bbakersm...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 6:33 PM
Subject: RE: [PD] no pd?? WTF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-01-10 23:40, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
thanks, I'm gonna look into it.
I tried using vline~ instead of line~ in the phase vocoder patch, and it
[vline~] is not a replacement of [line~], where you just replace the
latter with the
33 matches
Mail list logo
