Hello everyone again
Can anyone lend me their brain for 5 minutes so I can get a second
opinion of my problem?
Essentially what I'm trying to do is create a *generic* module that
links bi-directionally to other modules: send audio information and
also receive it with minimal time delay.
It is
for your help
K
On 5/15/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim Taylor wrote:
So I am stuck. Is there any way I can dynamically create/set a
delwrite~? It seems to be the only function that might work in this
no, you cannot dynamically change the [delwrite~] name, because
[delwrite
as well use send/receive and setting receive like
you did here, but s/r don't work at lower block sizes unfortunately :(
Thanks for your help anyway
K
On 5/15/07, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/05/2007, at 19.10, Kim Taylor wrote:
[set varname2(
|
[receive~ varname]
|
[delwrite
Thanks that was a well written explanation, it makes much more sense now.
I read the help for [block~] about the catch~/throw~ 'weirdness'.
And although it says...
Patches using send~/receive~ or throw~/catch~ to intercommunicate must
have the same blocking...
...If I create a patch with [throw~
Blocking is always done per canvas, that is, a [block~ X] in a
subpatch will reblock that subpatch and all its siblings, however it
will not reblock the surrounding parent patch. In the patch you've
posted, you have two subpatches both with [block~ 1], but the
surrounding patch still has the
OK- after realising that throw~ can be set to different destinations
and operate at lower blocksizes, I tried to make a 0 length feedback
system using throw~ and catch~
See attachment or this link:
http://www.zen26398.zen.co.uk/temp/throwcatchfeedback6.pd
In this patch, a triangular excitation
You cannot get a zero-size feedback delay in Pd at all, regardless of
subpatch ordering or creation order. The subpatch-stuff only is valid
for non-feedback connections. The best you can do is do a [block~ 1]
or [block~ 8]
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I used [block~ 1] objects within the
I have had success using throw~ and catch~, as the destination bus can
be changed by setting throw~, BUT- throw and catch use a minimum block
size of 64.
Hm? They don't, unless you do feedbacks, but then everyhting~ in Pd
has a delay of one block.
How true, I must have overlooked this...
Thanks for this, its cleared things up. Is there any purpose in the
$0-delline2 delay line though?
K
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Actually, sorry- I thought I understood this but I've got a problem
with this method
Considering the patch posted by Georg Holzmann (the same principle as
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques/latest/book-html/node121.html)-
Surely if the block size is default 64 samples, the delwrite atom will
Hi everyone
Here's my problem:
The project I'm working on requires the use of feedback loops,
something I am currently implementing by using delread~/write~ in Pd
with a 0 length delay. This also adds a fixed minimum delay of the
block size, but this can be reduced by using block~.
The problem
Excellent, works perfectly thanks
Kim
On 5/5/07, Peter Plessas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kim,
set is the magic word here:
[set 100
|
|
(numberbox)
sets the numberbox to 100 without causing it to output 100.
[set $1
makes the value variable.
lg, PP
Kim Taylor wrote:
Hello
Hello everyone
I have a little question which should be simple but I can't think of
how to do it.
In Pd, I have two number boxes and I want for them to be ratios of each other.
I want it so that If I change one then the value of the other changes
accordingly, also vice versa so that changing
on a similar topic the minimum delay loop time with this
is actually zero, so an extra [z] wouldn't hurt.
Andy
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:24:12 +
Kim Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, Kim, could you tell me what the feedback loop is? (what
kinds of operations are you using
Hi again all
I'm having a bit of trouble putting my program together. I'm trying to
implement a series of object blocks that form the synthesis framework, up
until now everything's been ok.
My problem is that on the top level of the program, I'm trying to connect
the blocks together, but the
By the way, Kim, could you tell me what the feedback loop is? (what
kinds of operations are you using? is it linear?...etc...) If
it's linear, you should be able to replace the feedback loop with an
equivalent operation, which circumvents the whole problem.
The structure I am implementing
Hi everyone, I'm new to the list (and pd) so I hope this posts OK.
I'm creating a series of patches that rely pretty fundamentally on delays-
and I've noticed that the function delread~ seems to have a minimum value of
delay time (1.48ms). Values below this point simply trim to 1.48ms.
Could I
17 matches
Mail list logo
