Re: [PD] [GEM-dev] yet another gem w32 binary

2008-04-16 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : i have finally managed to compile Gem on w32 with PBuffer (pix_vpaint) and libfidtrack (aka reactivision) support). That sounds cool for building a reactable, also may I ask if you manage to add libfprint? this is the first

Re: [PD] [GEM-dev] yet another gem w32 binary

2008-04-12 Thread pat
hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : i have finally managed to compile Gem on w32 with PBuffer (pix_vpaint) and libfidtrack (aka reactivision) support). That sounds cool for building a reactable, also may I ask if you manage to add libfprint? this is the first complete Gem-built for w32 in

Re: [PD] [GEM-dev] yet another gem w32 binary

2008-04-12 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : i have finally managed to compile Gem on w32 with PBuffer (pix_vpaint) and libfidtrack (aka reactivision) support). That sounds cool for building a reactable, also may I ask if you manage to add libfprint? cannot remember

Re: [PD] [GEM-dev] yet another gem w32 binary

2008-04-12 Thread pat
IOhannes m zmölnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could say right now that this binary is in need of two dll's: msvcp71d.dll, and msvcr71d.dll aren't they part of XP already? if not, i would suggest that they are to be downloaded from the wild internet... or: do

Re: [PD] [GEM-dev] yet another gem w32 binary

2008-04-12 Thread pat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I could say right now that this binary is in need of two dll's: msvcp71d.dll, and msvcr71d.dll if you haven't yet installed these files, would you mind trying the attached binary? it has been compiled without debugging support, so

Re: [PD] [GEM-dev] yet another gem w32 binary

2008-04-12 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've removed the dll's from the system, and loaded this attached version, it's running fine, now I'm testing examples, from the last to cool the begining, oh an error: with examples/02.advanced/21.basic_LSystem.pd [gemlist]: you should not bang the gemlist

Re: [PD] [GEM-dev] yet another gem w32 binary

2008-04-12 Thread cyrille henry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : ... I've removed the dll's from the system, and loaded this attached version, it's running fine, now I'm testing examples, from the last to the begining, oh an error: with examples/02.advanced/21.basic_LSystem.pd [gemlist]: