Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-14 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I think it would be a good idea to change the name while fixing the bug and kill two birds with one stone. (FYI: there are no changes to the declare stuff in Pd-extended AFAIK). .hc On Aug 12, 2007, at 2:56 AM, Miller Puckette wrote: I think it's got declare all over the place, but no

Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-14 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 22:23 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: (FYI: there are no changes to the declare stuff in Pd-extended AFAIK). am i right in thinking, that [declare] is included only in pd =0.40 extended, but not in 0.39-extended? roman

Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-14 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Aug 14, 2007, at 11:39 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 22:23 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: (FYI: there are no changes to the declare stuff in Pd-extended AFAIK). am i right in thinking, that [declare] is included only in pd =0.40 extended, but not in

[PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-11 Thread Roman Haefeli
hi i just figured out, that i don't know how to use [declare -stdpath]. the help-file mentions 'relative to Pd', though i cannot figure out, what this exactly means. this is on pd-vanilla 0.40.2. my pd: /usr/local/bin/pd and i wanted to load 'iemabs': /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/iemabs/ therefore

Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-11 Thread Miller Puckette
In vanilla at least, -stdpath and -nostdpath simpl turn on and off searching in the extra directory of Pd. It takes no argument. cheers Miller On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:26:05PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: hi i just figured out, that i don't know how to use [declare -stdpath]. the

Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-11 Thread Roman Haefeli
i was talking about [declare -stdpath], not about the command-flag '-stdpath'. the helpfile of [declare] says: -stdpathadd search path, relative to the Pd can you explain, where 'Pd' is meant to be? or is the helpfile wrong and [declare -stdpath] does the same as the command-flag

Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-11 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Miller Puckette wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:26:05PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: i just figured out, that i don't know how to use [declare -stdpath]. the In vanilla at least, -stdpath and -nostdpath simpl turn on and off searching in the extra directory of Pd. It

Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-11 Thread Miller Puckette
Oops, my mistake. In declare systax, -stdpath does take an argument... if you give it foo/bar, for example, the directory searched is .../pd/foo/bar. My bad for naming it the same as the command-line argument, which does something different. cheers Miller On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 04:38:31PM

Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-11 Thread Roman Haefeli
hi again from the help-file i got an idea, how about it is supposed to work, but i can't get it work. can you make me a working example? did you test this feature? here a real-world example (from my first post in this thread): location of pd: /usr/local/bin/pd and i wanted to load [bp2~] from

Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-11 Thread Miller Puckette
Aha.. it's buggy. You have to say declare -stdpath ../extra/iemabs (because, by mistake, it's relative to the pd/src directory!). I think I should fix this (hoping nobody else gets bitten in the opposite direction)... cheers Miller On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 12:59:22AM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:

Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-11 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 16:18 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: Aha.. it's buggy. You have to say declare -stdpath ../extra/iemabs (because, by mistake, it's relative to the pd/src directory!). ah, cool. i am glad to hear, that it is sorted out. I think I should fix this (hoping nobody else gets

Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-11 Thread Jaime Oliver
pdrp has it... On 8/11/07, Roman Haefeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 16:18 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: Aha.. it's buggy. You have to say declare -stdpath ../extra/iemabs (because, by mistake, it's relative to the pd/src directory!). ah, cool. i am glad to hear, that

Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?

2007-08-11 Thread Miller Puckette
I think it's got declare all over the place, but no declare -stdpath, which is the only source of trouble. cheers M On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:41:50PM -0700, Jaime Oliver wrote: pdrp has it... On 8/11/07, Roman Haefeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 16:18 -0700, Miller