Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-03 Thread marius schebella
ola yves, 1) you are wrong 2) the way in which you write is on a personal violating style. number 1 is not a problem. marius. Yves Degoyon wrote: hop, i dunno if i should be more honest here: i don't think we need any curator in a digital community like this, what is that introduced

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-03 Thread Yves Degoyon
marius schebella wrote: ola yves, 1) you are wrong it's a bit short here, i perfectly know what i say when i say a FLOSS community should _never_ be ruled by curators.. look at piksel, if you want, it's a perfectly running event without anyone named a 'curator', they are _part_ of the

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-03 Thread Yves Degoyon
marius schebella wrote: I think Pd community is not a closed circle, users only, and there is also not a first level pd user and second level pd user. ?? out of context.. a chairman is not a curator, he speaks for the interests of a community and not for his own. I think that it is a

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-03 Thread marius schebella
Yves Degoyon wrote: marius schebella wrote: I think Pd community is not a closed circle, users only, and there is also not a first level pd user and second level pd user. ?? out of context.. yves, these are three statements from your postings: what is that introduced arbitrary

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-03 Thread Martin Peach
marius schebella wrote: btw, who/what is khanawake? It's part of Canada's version of the apartheid system: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahnawake,_Quebec Martin ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-03 Thread Yves Degoyon
Martin Peach wrote: marius schebella wrote: btw, who/what is khanawake? It's part of Canada's version of the apartheid system: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahnawake,_Quebec Martin exactly ! wikipedia is very good indeed, but they have full-time people reviewing the texts... it's

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-03 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Martin Peach wrote: marius schebella wrote: btw, who/what is khanawake? It's part of Canada's version of the apartheid system: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahnawake,_Quebec While you are on Wikipedia could you please look up Apartheid and tell me wtf it has to do with

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-03 Thread Patrice Colet
Hello, Andrew Brouse a écrit : At the end of the day, I justified it to myself this way: free and open-source tools like Pd are increasingly essential for musicians and artists to do their work. As someone who used to work in sculpture with wood, stone and steel, I know intimately

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-03 Thread oyuki
Damm i always believe i was a high level pd user. :( On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 10:05:50 -0400, marius schebella [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I think Pd community is not a closed circle, users only, and there is also not a first level pd user and second level pd user. a chairman is not a curator, he

[PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-02 Thread Andrew Brouse
On 30-Sep-07, at 5:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeh i think people understand me when i complain about MB's spam, and also, about the fact that the pd convention was MB convention ( of course, when you're in the convention comittee and that you worked previously with all the curators out

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-02 Thread Yves Degoyon
ola, It really hurts. I'm sure the other members of the executive feel the same way. ok, i'm a bit sorry of this one, it was too easy and unfair to you... but, i dunno why someone should submit 4 papers (and also complain that his 4th one was refused ) when everything should have been

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-02 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Andrew Brouse wrote: ( of course, when you're in the convention comittee and that you worked previously with all the curators out there ), This was brought to my attention and I feel I need to respond to it. Please don't waste your time and energy and motivation worrying

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-02 Thread Yves Degoyon
hop, i dunno if i should be more honest here: i don't think we need any curator in a digital community like this, what is that introduced arbitrary judgements here ? ( of non practitioners ? ) yeh i don't want any curator to invite me, and i will not pay a beer to any of them... in fact, death

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-02 Thread Yves Degoyon
ola, yeh i don't want any curator to invite me, and i will not pay a beer to any of them... sorry, i should have said here 'suck one of them dick', is that polite enough? to prove you abuse all the time of slave artists? but two things : the real question was 'do you know khanawake??' and

Re: [PD] PDCon07 peer review process

2007-10-02 Thread Yves Degoyon
Yves Degoyon wrote: ola, yeh i don't want any curator to invite me, and i will not pay a beer to any of them... sorry, i should have said here 'suck one of them dick', is that polite enough? to prove you abuse all the time of slave artists? but two things : the real question was