On Dec 15, 2008, at 3:28 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 12, 2008, at 3:44 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Chris McCormick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:06:32AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
What about the idea of having a separate section
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 12, 2008, at 3:44 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Chris McCormick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:06:32AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What about the idea of having a separate section like /pure-data/svn-
externals?
hmm, i'm trying (not so)
Chris McCormick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:06:32AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What about the idea of having a separate section like /pure-data/svn-
externals?
hmm, i'm trying (not so) hard to remove the ./abstractions folder in
favour of a grand unified ./externals folder...
On Dec 12, 2008, at 3:44 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Chris McCormick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:06:32AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
What about the idea of having a separate section like /pure-data/
svn-
externals?
hmm, i'm trying (not so) hard to remove the
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:06:32AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What about the idea of having a separate section like /pure-data/svn-
externals?
I like that as it would solve my immdiate problem of people finding out
of date s-abstractions in the pd repo and not require me to do
On Dec 5, 2008, at 5:49 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:06:32AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
What about the idea of having a separate section like /pure-data/svn-
externals?
I like that as it would solve my immdiate problem of people finding
out
of date
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 3, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
I don't know about svn --ignore-externals, anyone care to expand on
that? (yes, I can RTFM, but I am talking real world experience as
related to Pd, which TFM will not tell me)
hmm, --ignore-externals
On Dec 4, 2008, at 6:10 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 3, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
I don't know about svn --ignore-externals, anyone care to expand on
that? (yes, I can RTFM, but I am talking real world experience as
related to Pd, which
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 2, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
is there any chance to sync the two repositories?
(personally i would still suggest an svn:externals link; but let's
keep
this for later :-))
sorry for re-starting the flame-war.
it was not my intention but
On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:56 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 2, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
is there any chance to sync the two repositories?
(personally i would still suggest an svn:externals link; but let's
keep
this for later :-))
sorry for
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
i think such workflow does more harm than not.
If you don't like this workflow you don't have to use it. For
what the...?
i am describing a real-world problem and the only answer you have to it
is: if you don't like it, don't use it?
Pd-extended, there
Hi Hans,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:41:46PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think it's time to have a IRC meeting about this. How about
Thursday? I am trying to be in #dataflow as much as possible these
days, if anyone wants to have an impromptu discussion.
I am happy to meet on
On Dec 3, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:41:46PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
I think it's time to have a IRC meeting about this. How about
Thursday? I am trying to be in #dataflow as much as possible these
days, if anyone wants to
On Dec 2, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:17:44PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Chris McCormick wrote:
You will almost certainly not like this solution, but you can use my
[s-totalrecall] and [s-tr-node] abstractions to record a full
session of
14 matches
Mail list logo
