Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-27 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner


Hey El Jay,

The best thing to do would be to break up your makefiles into patches  
using either 'diff -uw' or 'svn diff' and submit them to the patch  
tracker.  They should be organized by library, since different people  
maintain different libraries.


.hc

On Sep 24, 2009, at 6:17 PM, el jay wrote:

hello i have recently built pd -extended for debian 64 unstable(sid)  
using 2.30 rt kernel--
 i can give you some advises.. pd builds without anyproblem.. the  
extended packages most build ok.. so of them require changing the  
flags...and some packeges directly didnt build...(i guess you can  
live with out them, i do :-) )  if you need help i can send you the  
altered make files...
  one problem i had wasnt able to compile a .deb file to install..  
so i had to manually install pd coping the files form the src folder  
to there respective /etc and /lib folders..


2009/9/24 Pierre pie...@314r.net
Hi,


thanks to this script :
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-extended-svn/pd-extended-svn/PKGBUILD
I have now pd-0.42.5-extended and a lot of libs running on x86_64 !  
nice :)



good to hear!

Yes !
and I can tell, for now, the performances seems very good ! I mean,  
really better than on my old system !
I've just tested with a patch I'm writing for an art installation (a  
kind of realtime and ajustable timelapse) and I had previously some  
lags (pd-extended nightly-build on hardy heron 32bit), lags which  
have disappeared now !

All image are saved and played back nicely without any lags. Great !

So, I must test more in depth but my first impression is very good :)


pierre



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list






  http://at.or.at/hans/


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-24 Thread Pierre

Hi,


thanks to this script :
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-extended-svn/pd-extended-svn/PKGBUILD
I have now pd-0.42.5-extended and a lot of libs running on x86_64 ! nice :)



good to hear! 
  


Yes !
and I can tell, for now, the performances seems very good ! I mean, 
really better than on my old system !
I've just tested with a patch I'm writing for an art installation (a 
kind of realtime and ajustable timelapse) and I had previously some lags 
(pd-extended nightly-build on hardy heron 32bit), lags which have 
disappeared now !

All image are saved and played back nicely without any lags. Great !

So, I must test more in depth but my first impression is very good :)

pierre



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-24 Thread el jay
hello i have recently built pd -extended for debian 64 unstable(sid) using
2.30 rt kernel--
 i can give you some advises.. pd builds without anyproblem.. the extended
packages most build ok.. so of them require changing the flags...and some
packeges directly didnt build...(i guess you can live with out them, i do
:-) )  if you need help i can send you the altered make files...
  one problem i had wasnt able to compile a .deb file to install.. so i had
to manually install pd coping the files form the src folder to there
respective /etc and /lib folders..

2009/9/24 Pierre pie...@314r.net

 Hi,

  thanks to this script :

 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-extended-svn/pd-extended-svn/PKGBUILD
 I have now pd-0.42.5-extended and a lot of libs running on x86_64 ! nice
 :)



 good to hear!


 Yes !
 and I can tell, for now, the performances seems very good ! I mean, really
 better than on my old system !
 I've just tested with a patch I'm writing for an art installation (a kind
 of realtime and ajustable timelapse) and I had previously some lags
 (pd-extended nightly-build on hardy heron 32bit), lags which have
 disappeared now !
 All image are saved and played back nicely without any lags. Great !

 So, I must test more in depth but my first impression is very good :)


 pierre



 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-23 Thread dmotd
Pierre wrote:
 Hi all,
 until now I have been using a 32bit system, but 2 days ago I installed a  
 brand new ubuntu '9.10' 64 bit. (And I want to keep it, this '9.10' 64  
 bit seems to me faster than '8.04' 32 bit)

 As Pd-extended for x86_64 is not auto-builded, I have some questions  
 about building a debian package :

 - is there a document describing the SVN directory structure ?

nothing clear for the svn itself, but its fairly 
self explanitory (most externals folders have 
their own readme/info)..

for the extended buildsystem look here:
http://puredata.info/docs/developer/PdExtendedBuildSystem
and
http://puredata.info/docs/developer/Debian

 - what are the differences between 'pd-extended' and 'pd-vanilla loading  
 all externals' ?

pd-extended is a patched version of pd, so it has 
some minor differences in operation - the 
externals should not be drastically effected 
regardless of the build target. some more low 
level ones maybe (toxy / iemguts)

 - what is the simpliest way to build pd-extended (a kind of 'nightly  
 build @ home') to produce a beautiful .deb package for x86_64

you can reproduce the autobuild fairly easily 
without too much hastle.

 - what is the simpliest way to build pd-'extended'-gui-rewrite for x86_64

x86_64 will not be any different to x86, and the 
gui-rewrite uses autotools, so it will work this 
out for you.

 - is there a simple way to have and manage differents pd (vanilla,  
 extended, gui-rewrite) with differents versions on the same computer ?

just compile without installing.. and launch pd 
from the command line using ./pd or something 
similar, for something more sophisticated choose a 
different install target for each build and build 
a script that chooses version at /usr/bin/pd

 Some informations about what I would like to do :
 - in fact I think I dont really need the whole pd-extended thing as I  
 often only use Gem with few (5, 6) others externals...

extended is mostly overkill if you know what you 
are wanting, and if you only use a handful of 
extra objects then maintain by hand.. it will take 
a lot of the pain out of the process.

 - but it can be very nice to try and be able to use ANY of the external  
 included in the svn (I'm always in a learning process)

it is nice, but if you need them, and need them 
badly you will find them and install them. 
otherwise you could attempt to use some extended 
binaries with a 32bit chroot account, then you can 
'try before you buy'!

 - I would like to use the latest sources, nightly build was just fine  
 for me on 32bit

better anyhow, the latest stable candidate of 
extended is not designed for 64bit and needs to be 
heavily patched.

 - but I also need to have a method to build a stable pd-extended release  
 if the latests sources give me pd crashes (I do Audio/Video live shows  
 and performance and stability are very important on scene...)

if you seriously want reliability then make a 
32bit partition and install 32bit ubuntu 9.0 (or 
better still try an older more tested version of 
ubuntu) besides a lot of array based objects that 
have not been thoroughly ported to 64bit, 64bit pd 
is not propperly tested and needs a bit more time 
and attention. for performance stability stick 
with the tried and tested approach.


 voila!
 any suggestion is welcome
 best regards,
 pierre

good luck.. if you seriously want to build for 
ubuntu 9.0 x86_64, be prepared for a bit of 
frustration.. heres some extra reading - albeit 
out of date:

http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuIntrepid
http://puredata.info/docs/developer/64BitLinux
http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-23 Thread Pierre

Hi dmotd,
many thanks for yours explanations !


- is there a simple way to have and manage differents pd (vanilla,  
extended, gui-rewrite) with differents versions on the same computer ?



just compile without installing.. and launch pd 
from the command line using ./pd or something 
similar, 
  

ok

I'll do that, don't install, and run ./pd from src directory
because :

for something more sophisticated choose a 
different install target for each build and build 
a script that chooses version at /usr/bin/pd


I think configuring '--prefix=' at each compilation will be too 
confusing for me.



- I would like to use the latest sources, nightly build was just fine  
for me on 32bit



better anyhow, the latest stable candidate of 
extended is not designed for 64bit and needs to be 
heavily patched.
  

ok , a bit sad
but I'll continue to try to compile and use the 64bit build


- but I also need to have a method to build a stable pd-extended release  
if the latests sources give me pd crashes (I do Audio/Video live shows  
and performance and stability are very important on scene...)



if you seriously want reliability then make a 
32bit partition and install 32bit ubuntu 9.0 (or 
better still try an older more tested version of 
ubuntu) besides a lot of array based objects that 
have not been thoroughly ported to 64bit, 64bit pd 
is not propperly tested and needs a bit more time 
and attention. for performance stability stick 
with the tried and tested approach.


  


ok
Until now I always used nightly-build or pd-extended release on 32bit, 
and I can easily come back to this solution :

I have an other 32bit debian lenny on the same laptop,
but I would prefer to use the same OS for test/create and performance...




good luck.. if you seriously want to build for
ubuntu 9.0 x86_64, be prepared for a bit of 
frustration.. heres some extra reading - albeit 
out of date:


http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuIntrepid
http://puredata.info/docs/developer/64BitLinux
  

ok

http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended
  


I'll retry using theses instructions
I read on this page that :
Download the source package for Pd-Vanilla 0.42.4, extract it, and use 
it to replace the Pd core source in the Pd-0.40.3-extended folder. I 
did this as the 0.41 pd-extended core does not (as yet) have the 64 
bit table bug resolved (tables are only read half way). Hopefully in 
the near future this step will not be necessary.


I'll try this method and try with the pd's svn source as well


thanks for your time and links !!
It is a bit more understandable for me :)

pierre



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-23 Thread sergio basbaum
Hi all,

I'm new in this community. I helped a little bit to organize the PDCon 09 in
São Paulo, and Iḿ getting more involved with Pd since.

This is just to say that I've installed 64bit Ubuntu two months ago, because
I have a 64 Turion Acer notebook.

Nothing worked properly, so I've changed to 32bit version and everything
seems fine up to now. But the 64 version is very unstable, and for my
personal experience I really do not recommend...

best for all

s.

Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Pierre pie...@314r.net wrote:

 Hi dmotd,
 many thanks for yours explanations !


  - is there a simple way to have and manage differents pd (vanilla,
  extended, gui-rewrite) with differents versions on the same computer ?



 just compile without installing.. and launch pd from the command line
 using ./pd or something similar,

 ok

 I'll do that, don't install, and run ./pd from src directory
 because :

  for something more sophisticated choose a different install target for
 each build and build a script that chooses version at /usr/bin/pd


 I think configuring '--prefix=' at each compilation will be too confusing
 for me.


  - I would like to use the latest sources, nightly build was just fine  for
 me on 32bit



 better anyhow, the latest stable candidate of extended is not designed for
 64bit and needs to be heavily patched.


 ok , a bit sad
 but I'll continue to try to compile and use the 64bit build


  - but I also need to have a method to build a stable pd-extended release
  if the latests sources give me pd crashes (I do Audio/Video live shows  and
 performance and stability are very important on scene...)



 if you seriously want reliability then make a 32bit partition and install
 32bit ubuntu 9.0 (or better still try an older more tested version of
 ubuntu) besides a lot of array based objects that have not been thoroughly
 ported to 64bit, 64bit pd is not propperly tested and needs a bit more time
 and attention. for performance stability stick with the tried and tested
 approach.




 ok
 Until now I always used nightly-build or pd-extended release on 32bit, and
 I can easily come back to this solution :
 I have an other 32bit debian lenny on the same laptop,
 but I would prefer to use the same OS for test/create and performance...



  good luck.. if you seriously want to build for
 ubuntu 9.0 x86_64, be prepared for a bit of frustration.. heres some extra
 reading - albeit out of date:

 http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuIntrepid
 http://puredata.info/docs/developer/64BitLinux


 ok

 http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended



 I'll retry using theses instructions
 I read on this page that :

 Download the source package for Pd-Vanilla 0.42.4, extract it, and use it
 to replace the Pd core source in the Pd-0.40.3-extended folder. I did this
 as the 0.41 pd-extended core does not (as yet) have the 64 bit table bug
 resolved (tables are only read half way). Hopefully in the near future this
 step will not be necessary.


 I'll try this method and try with the pd's svn source as well


 thanks for your time and links !!
 It is a bit more understandable for me :)

 pierre




 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




-- 
-- Prof. Dr. Sérgio Roclaw Basbaum
-- Coord. Tecnologia e Mídias Digitais
-- Pós-Graduação Tec.da Inteligência e Design Digital - TIDD (PUC-SP)
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-23 Thread sergio basbaum
Hi IOhannes,

Maybe Iḿ too new in this so, I I haven't been able to find the solutions at
that time, but I could not make my wireless connection work, and PD extended
also was not working, and my memorie is that I've lost precious time during
the conference re-installing it to 32 bit and making it work.

Probably if I was more experienced it would have worked out better. However,
as un-experienced as I may be, when I installed the 32bit version everything
is working fine -- Iḿ mostly working on Ubuntu in all my activities,
including Pd.

best

s

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:23 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.atwrote:

 sergio basbaum wrote:

 Hi all,

 I'm new in this community. I helped a little bit to organize the PDCon 09
 in
 São Paulo, and Iḿ getting more involved with Pd since.

 This is just to say that I've installed 64bit Ubuntu two months ago,
 because
 I have a 64 Turion Acer notebook.

 Nothing worked properly, so I've changed to 32bit version and everything
 seems fine up to now. But the 64 version is very unstable, and for my
 personal experience I really do not recommend...



 what do you mean by nothing that worked properly? what did you change to
 32bit?
 ubuntu?
 Pd-extended?
 Pd?

 because i have been using Pd on Debian/amd64 for years and have not
 encountered so many problems that i would say nothing worked properly.


 fgmasdr
 IOhannes




-- 
-- Prof. Dr. Sérgio Roclaw Basbaum
-- Coord. Tecnologia e Mídias Digitais
-- Pós-Graduação Tec.da Inteligência e Design Digital - TIDD (PUC-SP)
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-23 Thread dmotd
Pierre wrote:
 thanks to this script :
 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-extended-svn/pd-extended-svn/PKGBUILD
 I have now pd-0.42.5-extended and a lot of libs running on x86_64 ! nice :)


good to hear! 


 What is the best method to reports bugs/crashes etc etc ?
 this list ?
 irc #dataflow ?

if there are issues relating to running parts of 
that script we'd like to hear about at the 
archlinux aur, you might need to subscribe but its 
painless..

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22509

---

if something seems wrong with the builder itself 
then post to hans and this list.. 

if you are having problems with an external try 
contacting the author and cc this list, and the 
same goes for pd itself (which also has a 
bugtracker too)

and for anything where you want some kind of 
instant response then irc works well, and there 
are often a few folks there that work on areas 
above.. 


 pierre



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-23 Thread Pierre

Hi Hans, dmotd

As far as I know, there are no 64-bit issues with the core of 
Pd-extended 0.41.4.  Not all libraries work at 64-bit yet though.  


good to know !
the fact that some libs don't work is (I think) not a big problem for me...


The more people who use 64bit means more people finding and reporting 
bugs, so they can be fixed, so I am glad you are taking this project on.


yes, and also it would be very good if pd-extended was avalaible in 
x86_64 platforms





You could start with Pd-extended 0.42.5, which has not been released 
yet, and is a bit rough.




thanks to this script :
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-extended-svn/pd-extended-svn/PKGBUILD
I have now pd-0.42.5-extended and a lot of libs running on x86_64 ! nice :)


- to build pd-extended do i need to download all svn repository ? 
(~6Go ) - what is the simpliest way to compile pd-extended on x86_64



First setup your machine with the packages you need:

http://puredata.info/docs/developer/Debian

Then do this:

  svn co 
https://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pure-data/branches/pd-extended/0.41 


  cd 0.41/packages/linux_make
  make install
  make package

Then you'll have a .deb to install.  Also, search puredata.info for 
64 bit, there are some specific wiki pages about that topic.



Ok If i see that 0.42.5 is not stable enought to do a live show I'll 
return to 0.41

But for now I'll continue testing my patches with 0.42.5


thx all, for your work !

What is the best method to reports bugs/crashes etc etc ?
this list ?
irc #dataflow ?


pierre



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-23 Thread András Murányi

 thanks to this script :
 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-extended-svn/pd-extended-svn/PKGBUILD
 I have now pd-0.42.5-extended and a lot of libs running on x86_64 ! nice :)


Sounds hot! Could you explain how to use this script?

Thanks, Andras
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-23 Thread dmotd
András Murányi wrote:
 
 
 thanks to this script :
 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-extended-svn/pd-extended-svn/PKGBUILD
 I have now pd-0.42.5-extended and a lot of libs running on x86_64 ! nice 
 :)
 
 
 
 Sounds hot! Could you explain how to use this script?

andrás, the 'script' is an archlinux PKGBUILD, 
distributed in the arch-user-repository. its 
simply a set of build instructions used by the 
arch-build-system to assemble a package which can 
then be installed with the archlinux packager 
'pacman'. all this is similar to *bsd ports or 
gentoo ebuilds and every linux distribution has 
its own helper instructions for packaging - this 
ones just for archlinux.

i suggested pierre take a look at it, to 
demonstrate what is involved for building 
pd-extended from svn.

relevant info:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ABS_-_The_Arch_Build_System
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22509

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64

2009-09-23 Thread András Murányi
2009/9/24 dmotd inaudi...@simplesuperlativ.es

 András Murányi wrote:
 
 
  thanks to this script :
 
 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-extended-svn/pd-extended-svn/PKGBUILD
  I have now pd-0.42.5-extended and a lot of libs running on x86_64 !
 nice :)
 
 
 
  Sounds hot! Could you explain how to use this script?

 andrás, the 'script' is an archlinux PKGBUILD,
 distributed in the arch-user-repository. its
 simply a set of build instructions used by the
 arch-build-system to assemble a package which can
 then be installed with the archlinux packager
 'pacman'. all this is similar to *bsd ports or
 gentoo ebuilds and every linux distribution has
 its own helper instructions for packaging - this
 ones just for archlinux.

 i suggested pierre take a look at it, to
 demonstrate what is involved for building
 pd-extended from svn.

 relevant info:
 http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD
 http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ABS_-_The_Arch_Build_System
 http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR
 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22509


Oh, I see. I thought it was part of new straightforward process to build
pd-extended for 64 bit. I understand that the process is still not so
straightforward, is it?
Andras
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list