Sounds like Thanksgiving to me. Toss a turkey in there somewhere and you
have it nailed!
Cory Waters
Wishing he was snowed-in in Lake Tahoe :)
- Original Message -
From: Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, not heartwarming, but hey.
Since in Argentina there's no Thanksgiving (it
Right now, we just came out of the outdoor jacuzzi we have here. Snow
everywhere, your body is warm in the water and your head freezes. Oh, we got
a few pictures of us there taken with the ZX-5n.
C'mon Juan - post 'em up! Never one to miss a chance of soem bear neked
flesh ;-)
Cotty
Hi folks
Club M42, originally in the yahoo clubs platform
(http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/clubm42) is moving.
I have set up the Club M42 in the yahoogroups platform
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ClubM42) ...
and over the course of the next few months, I hope to do a slow migration.
The Club
You may be right, John. James, it sounds like you weren't very happy at your job,
so maybe this is for the best.
That being said, it is still a hugely traumatic experience to be forced out of a
job at any time, and I'm sure this is a very difficult time for you, James.
All the best.
-frank
Hi Peter,
Welcome to the list!
When the indications in the finder twink it means that you are
reading an amount of light outside the possibilities of the Z-1p
meter.
I'm sure no camera can measure light in a way it can take the
Schwarzshild effect into account, BTW. The LX can expose for
Hi, Amita,
Sounds like you had a pretty good week. By some co-incidence, I just
got a Yashica Mat, for which I paid just under $50 US, on eBay. I
haven't received it yet, but like yours, the meter doesn't work. Can't
wait to run a few rolls through it.
But, the real reason I'm answering your
Cory wrote:
Anybody got any heartwarming Pentax/Thanksgiving stories to tell.
We had beautiful weather here. I ran a 10k race in the morning -- 36:14 :( --
and then Lisa and I took her parents out to a local park for a walk on the
trails. I took the MZ-S, FA*80-200/2.8, FA*24/2.0 and Tokina
I had my ZX-M with me while doing family Thankgiving visits and
took a few snapshots of nieces and nephews. Most of the snapshots
turned out fine (thanks to 400-speed print film, f/16 and a big
honking flash) but for the first time since I've had my camera I really
regretted having to focus
In a message dated 11/25/01 3:45:51 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One hindrance slowing digital down, is that it's closely associated with
computers. Not everyone wants or cares about them.
Precisely my point.
high percentage of people who buy digital cameras,
also
Mafud:
Not in ~my~ experiences with Photoshop.
Isaac:
How many years? What versions? How much per day? Any schooling?
Whew, these are truly pertinent questions. One of my writers at the magazine
was John Paul Caponigro, the son of the great landscape photographer Paul
Caponigro and a
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
Awful! Look at a better model: in Vietnam, AFAIK, taxes are not
extracted from individuals but from corporations. To NOT tax
corporations is just awful. The simple most externality producing
entity, a big corporation, doesn't pay for the externalities it
produces.
Geordie wrote:
Any
moment you have free time, jump outside and start shooting.
It works.
So true. Photography is like jogging: the more time you devote exclusively
to it, the greater the benefit you will reap.
I learned this when I was testing cameras. There were times when I'd just
Thank you for this answer, Gianfranco,
but why is it then still possible to set a seemingly right combination of
shutter speed (let's say 10 s) and aperture (maybe 5.6) at the zero point
thermometer scale in the viewfinder? That seems contradictory to me.
01-11-25 15.04, Gianfranco Irlanda at
- Original Message -
From: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 3:45 AM
Subject: Re: what I think of current digital cameras
I'm STILL going to go down, belly on the ground, pounding my fists and
kicking my feet.
Tom C.
E Aha! Bingo. I went to the BH site and there it is, complete with
E patterned focusing ring. Now of course, I question why would they be
E testing any camera with a soft focus lens?... Oh well, at least the
E mystery is solved.
Aha! Aha! Now PopPhoto goes to hell wrt accuracy of their
MCA Also if you have the strap attached using the battery grip lug then
MCA it is impossible to use the strap clasp's rod to press the mid-roll rewind
MCA button. What a poor plan.
What a sh*t of a camera! I will not buy it after reading your message!
(or maybe because I don't have
Also, the size of two 1.5V '44 batteries is one 3V lithium battery. I
don't remember the number, though. I have one as backup for my SR/LR
44 when there is really cold weather, as lithium batteries have AFAIK
best performance of the three types in cold weather (with alkaline the
worst, silver
a I've searched for several hours in the archives and my own saved stuff (I
a thought I saved it), but can't find it. It was within the last two weeks.
Oh, in that case, I am sorry but I can't help you, my archives date
mostly earlier than that. For about half the last year, I was reading
PDML
On Sunday, November 25, 2001, at 08:36 AM, Amita Guha wrote:
No, really,
he asked me a week ago Friday, then we spent
Saturday night/Sunday morning shooting the
Leonids, then Sunday afternoon we went to a camera
show here in the city, where I got a mint
condition Yashicamat, my very
On Saturday, November 24, 2001, at 06:53 AM, David Brooks wrote:
Aaron.I asume you buy the heads seperatly as for your needs?
Nah, most of the time I use it headless. ;)
I'm very much into horizontal composition.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
On Saturday, November 24, 2001, at 06:30 AM, David Brooks wrote:
Still plan to buy the bnig Adobe book.
I;m still learning PS but the students i employ to run
my computers at horse shows have shown me some tricks too.
If you have a full version of Photoshop, I heartily recommend the
Tom C. wrote:
One hindrance slowing digital down, is that it's closely associated with
computers. Not everyone wants or cares about them. Probably an
*extremely*
high percentage of people who buy digital cameras, also have computers.
The
rest, also a significant number, don't care and will
On Saturday, November 24, 2001, at 07:52 AM, David Brooks wrote:
It all boils down to what somw one else replied.Fast
and Instant,but its paying the bills.
I totally agree. Digital capture has its uses, that's for sure.
I imagine that the 8x10s look pretty good, too.
-Aaron
-
This message
Tom C. wrote:
Sorry, I'm not intending to argue or belabor the point.
Don't apologize! These are valuable things to discuss. They lead to better
understanding.
But is that always the case (that quality is subjective)? Let's compare
theoretical lenses A and B. We run them through the
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 10:34 AM
Subject: Shades of Photoshop
Mafud:
Not in ~my~ experiences with Photoshop.
Isaac:
How many years? What versions? How much per day? Any schooling?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: what I think of current digital cameras
In a message dated 11/25/01 3:45:51 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One hindrance slowing digital
On Saturday, November 24, 2001, at 06:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Aaron said, except I don't know what he meant by digital printing
rocks?
Just that I now prefer digital colour printing to chemical darkroom
colour printing. Our work here at the lab is rarely about quantity
Ignorance concerning taxes is appalling. Harboring the idea that
corporations actually pay any taxes levied upon them shows lack of critical
thinking about the subject. All corporations require net net profit (profit
after taxes on net profit) in order to survive, design and build new
products,
I'm moving and need to sell these items. I have a good ebay rating as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] See web url below for some pictures,
ignore prices on website. Also, check out my photography at
http://home.earthlink.net/~cmstringer/index.htm
Price includes USPS priority mail in US.
If they are not as
Mike Johnston wrote:
snip
And this is precisely what I have ALWAYS thought is total bullshit. To
decide which lens is of higher quality, we have to decide what
parameters
we're going to value. But scoring better in certain chosen parameters,
whatever they are, DOESN'T help the lens make
Thanks for your time and desire to help!
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: Where Do I Go...
a I've searched for several hours in the archives and my own saved stuff
Right now, you can walk into Wal-Mart, or Walgreen's drug stores
and you can find a Kodak printing machine. You can put your CD
or Compact Flash cards with your digital images on them into the
machine and make small prints up to 8 x 10 inches. You can do
cropping and brightness/contrast
Jerry wrote:
snip
Anyone who works in an office or goes to school MUST use a computer. I
don't know the statistics, but I think around half of the people in the US
and other industrialized countries have access to a computer.
Access to a computer does not translate to wanting to use it,
My whole point (I think) in this discussion is if you want the BEST image
possible, and that is the primary consideration, I don't think a digital
filmless camera is the way to go yet.
If there are other considerations which weigh in on the other side, then
digital by all means can be the answer
aimcompute wrote:
Access to a computer does not translate to wanting to use it, or skill in
doing digital processing. Most people just want to take photos and show
them to friends or send them to relatives. A computer can facilitate this,
or, if the reciving party does not have one, hinder
Going off on a tangent...
One thing I've done with my Mavica is take a picture of a painting or a
portion of it, like a watercolor or oil. Original painting is large wall
size. Then print it on card stock at 4 X 6 size. The result is marvelous.
Looks even better than the original.
One other
On 25 Nov 2001, at 16:32, Fred wrote:
Rob said:
I hope the 200/4FA* bokeh is better than the A*, I'm not all
that impressed with it.
Agreed. Although I am impressed by the superb sharpness of the A* 200/4
Macro lens, I have found its bokeh to be a little disappointing (not for
macro
Respectfully, It depends what your ends are, I guess. I'm not dismissing it
as, not good. I'm just not ready to heavily invest in it yet. Two - three
years ago I invested in a Sony Mavica for $800. I bought my Dad the better
one with higher res almost a year later for $1000. They are both
You are correct! I am curious, Bob, how did you figure this out?
It is the big secret we are not supposed to know.
I figured it out back in the sixties when I did something unthinkable. I
found out as best I could what the taxes were in this country; federal,
state, and local (I am sure I
If you are going to use llamas, you might as well go to 8x10. In fact, some
would say you need at least a 20x24 inch camera to justify investing in
llamas. Others say a 12x17 is adequate.
For a 4x5 all you need is a bicycle. How many here are aware that the famed
Speed Graphic was a derivative
I used to have a Banana Republic Guides Vest, (the one they stopped selling
after some gun editor said in print that people were using it to conceal
their handguns. Don't you just love politically correct companies). Any way
I finally wore it out (must have been the handgun g). Now I have a nylon
You are aware that at f16you could have set the camera for 7 feet and
everything from about 5' to 12' would have been acceptably in focus at 50mm?
Set for 10 feet everything from about 7' to about 25' would have been ok.
Set to 28mm and 10' there is problably nothing indoors that would need
Time for a TEAPARTY!!!
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discussion Malling List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bob
Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 6:44 PM
Subject: Taxes (Re: Depreciation of assets)
You are correct! I am
- Original Message -
From: aimcompute
Subject: Re: LLAMAS
Does anyone have a pack of llamas and a 4X5 to lend?
How about 2 Rotties and a Tachihara?
Will you promise to buy the results? :-)
You take Canadian $$? Right now they are trading
1,000,000,000,000,000 dollars to 1 Afghani.
Hi,
I'm trying to get a Spotmatic Everyready case in reasnoble condition. Is
there any one who would consider trading one for an MX everyready case.
Its for a friend of my fathers who has had a SP since new and has worn the
ever ready case out.
Thanks,
Paul Jones
-
This message is from the
Aaron Reynolds writes:
Man... $13,000 for the one that plays 33 and 45 rpm, and $20,000 for the
one that plays 78s as well...
If I was rich, I'd totally have one of these. ;)
I bet they're not much use to rappers... :)
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E. (Elec)
Aw, the taxes on tea are not bad. Can we just toss the corporations into the
harbor, along with the other tax collectors, and the politicians of course?
--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man
I shot a roll of Optima today for the first time. The color palette reminds
me of the old Agfachrome 64 from the 60's and 70's. I've shot quite a bit
of both HDC and Vista, but IMO, the Optima has a much more neutral palette.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the
In a message dated 11/25/01 8:43:52 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't sit around and dismiss it because it's not like the old tools you have
at hand.
One of the first things I learned back in 1982 when I was first introduced to
writing code for computers was the
50 matches
Mail list logo
