Mike,
I'm, sorry, but I don't know anything about your education that wasn't
admitted here. If you go back
a couple of generations in this thread you will find that Marnie stated
that he had never heard
of the rule of thirds or the Golden Mean, or Section as it is often
referred to. Marnie
M Lenses aren't all that well sealed. On the other hand I've gotten a
couple of my M lenses fairly wet taking photo's in bad weather to no apparent
ill effects. Your lenses didn't go swimming did they, I would think that would
be bad.
At 06:17 PM 12/31/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
I have a
Nice toast for a photography list.
At 07:27 PM 12/31/2002 -0500, you wrote:
To all of my friends on the PDML, my wish for you for the coming year.
May you always have good light for whatever you wish to photograph
May you be in the right place at the right time with the right camera, lens
and
Hell, you take enough photo's you start to make your own luck.
At 02:31 PM 12/31/2002 -0600, you wrote:
IMNHO, this shot was as much luck as skill. At the instant the
photographer decided to press the shutter release, this soldier would have
been still on his feet. It was just a coincidence
- Original Message -
From: Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: flash suggestion for a pz-1p?
don't bother with the AF330 Rob. It's a good enough flash unit, but
doesn't bounce, tilt, or swivel. Spend some extra bucks and buy an
AF500. They are infinately better. I use one on
A punch drunk boxer.
At 07:56 PM 12/31/2002 -0600, you wrote:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 20:50:15 -0500, Altaf Shaikh wrote:
What is a PUG?
A type of dog
Sorry, couldn't resist :-)
Later,
Gary
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to
It's adequate for the purpose, I have one for times when I want a camera
which can use interchangeable lenses, but I don't want to risk an LX or MX.
I'm not in love with the camera, in my opinion it's viewfinder is barely
adequate a bit squinty, with low magnification and low apparent brightness
Not in my experience, you should be able to pick up a new ZX-M for about
$160 US.
I've not seen a ME Super for less than about $200, although prices have been
falling on e-bay lately, but the local camera stores usually sell very good
condition ME-Supers for abut $225.00.
At 07:31 PM 1/1/2003
I couldn't sleep for hours.
D
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 10:26 PM
Subject:
Catholic Schools are something I know a good deal about. I have written a
book on the subject. This thread should stop now. It is way out of line.
Please don't go on with this! I'll discuss it off-list with anyone who is
interested.
Don
Dr E D F Williams
I sit down and plan all my shots inside by the fire. When I've decided what
I'm going to do I put on two pairs of long woollen underwear. A denim shirt,
a jersey and two pairs of woollen socks. A quilted snowsuit goes over the
top. Finally a pair of boots with woollen liners and a fur hat. I
I was wondering what people were using to diffuse the
flash from the AF 280T. I couldn't find a Stofen unit
made for it. Would the universal model fit? Are there
other options that aren't bulky?
Mark
Hi Mark,
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/mods/reflectormod.html
HTH
Cotty
Hi,
http://www.morgancomputers.co.uk
Optio 330, 430 EI-100 EI-2000. All Pentax factory
refurbished stock, which may just mean new stuff repackaged.
330 = £180
430 = £250
100 = £70
2000 = £300
All plus VAT @ 17.5% for those who pay it.
mike
Hi,
Just got a roll back and the data imprinting is double exposed
for half of the film. Can't remember if this is one I half used
and then reloaded. It therefore might be as a result of
incorrect loading.
Anyone else?
mike
The difference between cameras and disposables g
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Peter Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not in my experience, you should be able to pick up a new ZX-M for about
$160 US.
I've not seen a ME Super for less than about $200, although prices have
been
falling on
Just to have a me to post. I'll second that about the 90-180.
At 10:11 AM 1/1/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Hi,
Don`t know if I`ve taken more pictures than you, but I lean
towards the Vivitar Series 1`s, 90/2.5 and 90-180/4.5. The
90-180 is sweet, sharp everywhere in the zoom range. Both
have a 3D
I use a universal Soften on my 280 the only possible disadvantage is that you have to
put the self-adhesive holder on top of the gun. It's small enough but may mark the
surface, I've never removed mine so I don't know for sure.
Anton
Winston Churchill on his changing parties between the world wars I believe.
At 01:32 PM 1/1/2003 +, you wrote:
Just remember, if you aren't a Liberal by the time you are 20, you have
no heart. If you aren't a Conservative by the time you are 40, you
have no brain. ;-) Just another
There are mac viruses, they can be especially destructive, I guess the authors
are frustrated by having so few targets.
At 08:30 PM 1/1/2003 -0600, you wrote:
I've heard of these virus thingies but have never seen one . . .
Stan (from his Mac)
-
on 12/31/02 5:01 AM, Ken Archer at [EMAIL
Hi!
Sorry to say this, but I've deleted all the post related to the above
subject. But this one I am keeping...
---
Boris Liberman
www.geocities.com/dunno57
www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=38625
===8==Original message text===
I'm exhausted with this thread and propose
Hi!
That's an odd question I think. I mean, like how much salt do you like
in your soup? Well, it depends on salt brand and on soup.
Honestly, I use the DOF preview button if I am going no slower than
f/8. Though if there is a lot of light (landscape) I use DOF preview
on slower apertures.
The
Hi!
I am sorry to interrupt this talk. I am not that experienced in
scanners and stuff. But here is a little PS procedure that takes care
some of the scanner noise. I use it on every image I retouch...
1. Switch to Lab Coor Mode.
2. Apply some Gaussian Blur to both non-ilghtness channels (A and
waiting for the Pentax DSLR to come out and then somebody is
bound to sell all their older gear real cheap:) Looking for a nice
soft portrait lens, any own the Pentax soft focus 85mm lens? or do
you just use pantihose like I do.
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott [EMAIL
Maybe they shold put a health warning on the PDML like we have on
cigarettes.
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: What toys you have in 2002?
- Original Message -
From:
Have you tried a piece of sandblast vinyl over the front?
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:16 AM
Subject: Re: Diffusion options for 280T flash
I was wondering what people were using to diffuse the flash
Yes.
At 02:32 PM 12/31/2002 -0800, you wrote:
Many years ago, someone told me that brown belts make better karate
instructors than black belts because the brown belts still remember and can
still describe what they do. For the black belts, on the other hand, the
techniques have become
I just ran the scan, updated norton, and ran the scan
again, found 2 of these on my drive but they're gone now.
__
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Hi,
Mark D. wrote:
I was wondering what people were using to diffuse the
flash from the AF 280T. I couldn't find a Stofen unit
made for it. Would the universal model fit? Are there
other options that aren't bulky?
The universal fits. I found that it tended to fall off
Just looked at a N FM3A catalogue. At the last page, it said 'We take the world's
greatest pictures' which is also a registered statement (Is it a registered
trademark?).
Not challenge the validity of this statement. But what Pentax could say if they make
similar words!?
Hi,
Forgot to mention my emergency diffuser.
Take a translucent film tub. Discard cap, cut off the bottom.
Slit from top to bottom. It now fits nicely into the grooves on
the flash head which are meant for the AFT/AFW accessories.
Kodak tubs give a warm glow, Fuji make people look like
The MZ-M is not a replacement for the old manual
bodies IMHO but it does make a great little back up
camera for an AF body, I miss my MZ-M Alot to,
thankfully the student who has it is taking good care
of it.
__
Post your free
Really good insulated clothing, and don't stand in one place to long you
might freeze to
the ground.
At 10:23 AM 1/2/2003 +0200, you wrote:
I sit down and plan all my shots inside by the fire. When I've decided what
I'm going to do I put on two pairs of long woollen underwear. A denim shirt,
a
**
* WARNING: The Sturgeon General has determined that reading the PUG *
* Mailing List may be dangerous to your mental health, and can lead *
* to severe weight loss in your wallet as well as a depletion of *
* monetary
Hi Gang,
Some new listings on e-bay for you
http://cgi6.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsuserid=SCANNI01completed=0sort=2since=-1include=0page=1rows=25
Cheers
Shaun
Shaun Canning
Cultural
Pretty much they way I look at it.
At 09:16 PM 1/2/2003 +1100, you wrote:
The difference between cameras and disposables g
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Peter Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not in my experience, you should be able to pick up a new ZX-M for about
$160 US.
I've not seen a
Mark D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering what people were using to diffuse the
flash from the AF 280T. I couldn't find a Stofen unit
made for it. Would the universal model fit?
Mark,
When you order on Stofen's site (http://www.stofen.com) , Click On-Line
Store, click Omni-Bounce Units,
Hi,
Frankie Lee wrote:
Not challenge the validity of this statement. But what Pentax could say if they make
similar words!?
In the UK, Pentax is running double page ads. On the left, a
black page with a life size 6x4 of, say the Tour Eiffel or a
cute child. On the right (paraphrased,
Steve Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does a Pentax A 100/2.8 Macro go for these days?
Your wife and kids
Seriously, about $600 to $700. For that bread, you can get a Voigtlander APO
Lanthar 125/2.5 1:1, which Rob Studdart reports is even better.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I checked this one out. It is from a reliable source. There is a
virus out there called the Senile Virus that even the most advanced
antivirus software cannot stop. So be warned, it appears to
affect those who were born before 1958!
Symptoms of Senile Virus
1. Causes you to send same
Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if we're talking about exactly the same thing. You see, I think
what you've done is an example of pure empiricism at work.
I think *all* the so-called rules are examples of pure empiricism at work.
That's why in my earlier post I used the term
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anybody know what is the least expensive
35mm film scanner that has 4000-4800 dpi
resolution?
the Canon seems to be the price leader. no Digital ICE though, something
called FARE instead, and some people report here that enabling that makes
the
Trust me I don't think there is an age limit to this
one, I know many born in the 60's and even late 70's
who are also afflicted.
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I
checked this one out. It is from a reliable
source. There is a
virus out there called the Senile Virus that even
the
- Original Message -
From: Dr E D F Williams
Subject: Re: Pish-posh and balderdash
Try a wooden tripod. They are not as cold to handle as metal.
My cold weather closthing is insulated (thermal) underwear and
socks, then heavy fleece pants and jacket (from Mountain
Equipment Co-op, the
William Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Butch Black wrote:
Actually, while the face is nicely in the vertical line I think that it is
too low for the horizontal line. The fact that a number of PUG images fell
into the area of near but not right on the intersection points illustrates
my point that
I have a lead on a used Poloroid Sprintscan 4000 ( not
the plus ) for about $300-$400, any ideas?
__
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Damn you
:-)
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:11:47 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Least exspensive 4000-4800 dpi scanner
Aaron is the lead it's his old scanner :-)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: Utility of 645 Format(was Re: 6x6 - Waste of Space? (WAS:
Re:Medium Format-Which one is best?))
John wrote:
I can honestly say that I have never seen any
Henry wrote:
Is digital back the only viable digital solution for 645? Pentax has always
been saying that 645 is designed as a superior FIELD camera.
I don't think a digital back as final 645 solution make much sense. Firstly, you can
cut 25% off the 645 size be removing the film insert.
John wrote:
Photographers come from many different backgrounds.
But there are really only two; the technician and the artist.
Not really, There are also everything in between. I don't think you can really
separate the artistry from the technique.
But the
artist sees the picture in the
David wrote:
Pal,
can you please set out with names of the professional photographers in the
UK that are currently using the Pentax 645? This will at least clear the
air and put this argument to rest if you can list them for us.
What kind idiocy is this? I cannot list the UK pro
John Whicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vic,
Photographers come from many different backgrounds.
But there are really only two; the technician and the artist.
Nonsense. There are an infinite number of different kinds of photographers.
Technician and Artist are the extreme ends of the long line
John wrote:
John wrote:
I can honestly say that I have never seen any professional photographer in
the UK using a Pentax 645.
I can honestly said that this only proves your complete ignorance.
So in which part of the UK do you live and work as a professional
photographer, and
Hi Mike,
I was given my first camera in 1961 at the age of seven, had my first
picture
published at the age of eight, and was being published regularly by the time
I was twelve, albeit in the local newspaper.
Now, at 48, I am just another mediocre hack.
What went wrong?
Well, at the age of 16,
No offense taken. We're all friends here, and adults. Well, except for one
or two people I won't name. g
--Mike
Mike,
I'm, sorry, but I don't know anything about your education that wasn't
admitted here. If you go back
a couple of generations in this thread you will find that Marnie
model # ?
I wont need ICE/FARE as I'll be scanning
new clean negs.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:23 AM
To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Least exspensive 4000-4800 dpi scanner
Message text
I've got 12 inches, but I never use it as a rule
Boom boom!
:-)
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
By the way -
how on earth can you stay outdoors for 2 hours at -40C?
I once went winter camping when it was significantly below 0 degrees F. I
woke up with my head (hair) frozen to the floor of the tent and stuck fast.
I have a feeling a similar experience would kill me today. I'm not very
JCO,
make sure that you're aware that the Canon FS4000 does not have an eject
button on the hardware and the negs/film strips can only be ejected at the
software level.
check discussion and the review at:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/SCAN/FS4000/FS40A.HTM
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wont need ICE/FARE as I'll be scanning
new clean negs.
JCO
that doesn't remove the need for them. at 4000dpi, you will see a lot of
stuff that shouldn't be there.
Herb...
Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will concede that I've been outpointed in this debate by the estimable Mr
Walkden, but as for the rest of you, only ONE person who has defended the
rules has so far had the guts to step forward and actually NAME any of
them.
I think a couple have
Oh dear...I started reading this thread, and after counting up my
acquisitions for this past year, I'm almost too embarrassed to list
them all!
I like the older Pentaxes, and for years now have been using my trusty
MG, with a SMC Pentax-M 50mm f/2.0.
It all started with getting a backup MG body,
Bruce wrote:
No, I wasn't paying any attention to music is pure mathematics, and my
response had nothing to do with it.
I was the one who staed that music is pure mathematics. By this I don't mean that
music is only matematics, but that if you take the matematics out of music you are
left
I suspect that _all_ rules of competition may have been empirically
derived (or discovered). They are the result of critics separating out the
images (painting, watercolor, photography, whatever) that stand the test of
time and acclaim from those that are, well, mundane. The rules arose from
a
Pål,
The square format provides valuable versatility.
It would be a waste only if it offered little or
nothing in return for using more film than 645.
In practice, the versatility of 6x6 offers far
greater value than the tiny cost of what you say
it wastes. I regard it as an *investment* with
Sorry Tony but your explanation is way too simplistic. If only it were that
easy. There are artists and there are technicians so if you are not an artist
guys you may as well forget about ever trying to create a photograph that
even comes close to a piece of art. I think you are right in
I have used the Tamron SP 90mm f/2.5 and f/2.8 macro lenses for as
long as I can remember. [snip] The Tamron is not only a very
sharp macro lens, but it has outstanding bokeh, so it doubles as a
fine portrait lens.
Which Tamron macro (90/2.5 or 90/2.8) are you referring to in the
second
Hi,
Paal wrote:
The MZ-S prints on rewind so the roll has to have been rewinded twice.
Makes sense. The roll is doubled on the first part, with a
blank frame where it stops. I will try to see if the doubled
ones are overwritten with the same reading.
This will be why Pentax developed the
Good job, Peter!
keith whaley
Peter Alling wrote:
**
* WARNING: The Sturgeon General has determined that reading the PUG *
* Mailing List may be dangerous to your mental health, and can lead *
* to severe weight loss in
Mike I will put together my guidelines for composition when I have a little
time over the weekend. But like I said before, once I tell you, I may have to
kill you.(LOL)
Vic
What can they say?The point of any ad is to sell a product, and your
conclusion cannot be we are one of many fine camera brands available.
Even if skill is more important there is a reason why we on this list
buy Pentax instead of those other scurvy dawg brands (I love that
phrase.) Also,
I am not sure, but I do believe Mike Johnston is trying to get across the
same thing that I am. Rules kill creativity. They are paint by numbers, be
safe, avoid criticism, not reach out and grab folks by the guts art.
Tom,
I do believe we are.
Although Bob W. effectively skewered me by
Q: does a scanned film image that is heavily modified by photoshop
count as digital?
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had an Auto S3 for a while -- a beautiful camera and lens, though
it feels just a bit flimsier overall than a Canonet GIII, for example.
The S3 doesn't have TTL flash, but it does have a unique flash
feature to rangefinders of that era. Like most '70s rangefinders, it
uses guide number flash
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Mike Johnston wrote:
Well hats off to you. I always thought bike messengers had to be young (and,
er, crazy, no offense) to withstand the rigors of the job. My body feels as
if it's falling apart just doing more than sitting here typing!
Well, in his case old and crazy...
But since I've already made my contribution to the collective memory with
Bjork's name, I'll have to depend on someone else to supply the title of the
movie...I can't remember it :-(
Dancer in the Dark. My girlfriend's been hounding me to watch it for
awhile, it finally made it over
Somehow I have managed to collect a Tokina AT-X 90 2.5, a Pentax 100/f4 and a
Kiron 105/f2.8. I love them all and they were probably all made around the
same time. I think the golden age of fine photographic lenses with excellent
build quality was in the 70-80s. At least it was for me... There
No, I wasn't paying any attention to music is pure mathematics, and my
response had nothing to do with it. It was rules of composition, and
exercises. Are you going to be such a slippery weasel that I have to
find, and repost your specific comments on this issue?
Changing the subject also
It doesn't matter if you figured out yourself or someone did it for you 150
years ago...
Oh, but it does. It's the difference between derivative and original.
--Mike
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Mike Johnston wrote:
Well, be prepared. It packs an emotional wallop. Not exactly light Hollywood
fare. But the music is enchanting, especially the way that the songs work
their way into the main character's consciousness as fantasy, and found
rhythms excites her
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm going to start compiling a list.
#1 - sit down and plan all my shots
- Dr E D F Williams
;-)
focus on the subject.
Herb
You can stop playing the fool. This isn't a group of high school
students, and I don't need to be lead by some patronizing ass. You're
just another guy on the internet, that wet his pants with a 50mm Pentax
lens. Big deal.
And you are...?
g
--Mike
On Thursday 02 January 2003 10:37, Steve Desjardins wrote:
Q: does a scanned film image that is heavily modified by photoshop
count as digital?
Steven Desjardins
Wouldn't just a scanned image be digital? Why would it need to be modified
in any way since it has already been digitized by
David wrote:
I'm merely asking for a backup to your statement. If you claim that
someone is ignorant because they don't know anyone who is a professional
photographer in the UK using a Pentax 645,
No. Someone claimed that his lack of knowledge about something proved some point
(which
Bruce wrote:
Mike's originally stated that there were no rules. He didn't qualify his
statement in any way. Your view is that one type of rule is different
than another, based on semantics, Mike didn't make any distinction.
I'm not aware of the laws of physics so that gravity doesn't
Mike wrote:
I will concede that I've been outpointed in this debate by the estimable Mr
Walkden, but as for the rest of you, only ONE person who has defended the
rules has so far had the guts to step forward and actually NAME any of
them. I think this discussion will have to end here unless
Rules are rules. Empirically derived, or otherwise. Try to pick a story
and stick to.
...it?
Try to pick and sentence structure and write to.
--Mike
John wrote:
In practice, the versatility of 6x6 offers far
greater value than the tiny cost of what you say
it wastes. I regard it as an *investment* with
an especially good pay-off, and I feel sure that
most 6x6 users would agree it's worth paying for.
Definitely *not* a waste!
And
Mike wrote:
Oh, but it does. It's the difference between derivative and original.
Nope. You can point your camera in any direction; shooting wildly and be creative and
experiment. However, those image that works will comply with some rule someone else
figured out long ago. Litterally billions
Hi,
gfen wrote:
Well, in his case old and crazy... :)
Well, you decide:
http://www.nrg666.com/pdml/portraits/pages/FrankTheriault.htm
(I know, I know, I drag this one out every so often, but it just seemed to fit the
comment made about me vbg)
-frank
--
The optimist thinks this is the best
What I got in 2002:
ZX-L
AF360FGZ
FA 24mm f2.0
FA 35mm f2.0
FA 50mm f1.4
F 100mm macro f2.8
Sigma 28mm f1.8 (sold)
Plans for 2003:
FA 200mm f2.8, I don't know, we'll see.
Paul
_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months
Suck it up guy! You were the one who stated that there weren't any
rules: prove it! Be the first one to prove a negative. I know your ego
is up to it.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will concede that I've been outpointed in this debate by the estimable Mr
Walkden, but as for the rest of you,
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:
And thats what I'm saying. It is a waste but many find it worth paying for.
Then its NOT a waste for them, now is it?
Its a waste to you based on how you use your camera. It was a waste to
me based on how I used my camera. It makes perfect
When you won't address the content, throw sand. Chump tactic.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...it?
Try to pick and sentence structure and write to.
--Mike
--
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas.
Experience the convenience of buying online with
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Paul Eriksson wrote:
What I got in 2002:
Wow, I wouldn't even know where to begin.. I got lots of things, some of
them useless, some of them not useless.. but most importantly, the three
items that stand out was a gifted 4x5 camera, a Pentax 645, and AF280T.
Now I can
Mike Johnston wrote:
Frank,
Well hats off to you. I always thought bike messengers had to be
young (and,
er, crazy, no offense) to withstand the rigors of the job. My
body feels as
if it's falling apart just doing more than sitting here typing!
Seriously, every now and then I will pull
H:
From what I can remember:
Bodies:
MX with Winder MX (did I buy that from you this year, Bill? I think
so...)
Leica CL
MV (which I still have to mail to someone - damn, I keep forgetting)
K mount lenses:
Takumar 2.5 135 (bayonet) (yes, the dog - but I like it anyway)
Pentax SMC M 2.0 50
I was given my first camera in 1961 at the age of seven, had my first
picture
published at the age of eight, and was being published regularly by the time
I was twelve, albeit in the local newspaper.
Now, at 48, I am just another mediocre hack.
What went wrong?
Well, at the age of 16,
I thought this month's PUG was supposed to be digital image. That's why I
submitted the image I did. Three shots photoshopped into one... When I saw
the PUG I realized I was either wrong or a scanned image counts as digital..
Vic
In a message dated 1/2/03 10:49:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike I will put together my guidelines for composition when I have a little
time over the weekend.
Vic,
Great! I'll be interested to hear.
--Mike
Hi Pål,
The MZ-S prints on rewind so the roll has to have been rewinded twice.
Does this mean, that the MZ-S stores the exposure data and prints it
only when the film rewinds? I would have assumed that the MZ-S imprints
the data immediately after the exposure was made.
Regards, Heiko
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
