Hey Brendan
How nuts will they go when in as little as 2 months (in my experience) the picture
starts fading away to oblivion. Never mind I guess, just print another one. Someone
could make money out of this (I mean other than ink manufacturers) you could keep
selling the same picture to the
Lawrence Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Using] Sort by Threads [...] all Mike's responses would appear as
a new thread, instead of following the post he was replying to.
Yup. Same here. Annoying.
I found that the Reference: field header (which has the message ID
of the email you are
Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think [the mis-threading is] because I read, and respond to, the
Digest. Thus when I respond to a thread, I have to manually title
the reply. That probably breaks the chain.
Aha -- yeah, that would do it. In most of the other cases I've seen,
though,
Hello!
It's been a while since I promised the results of your MZ-S AF post in a
dutch photo news group. I had hoped to get thousands of replies, equally
devided among all camera brands, with a resulting table of scientificly
trustable data.
Must say that I do not have any of such. Even worse,
Hi,
Keith wrote:
a red-headed flea's fine curly hair apart, and axially aligned within a gnat's gn**
Having been educated on the cusp of metrication in the UK, I am
unfamiliar with these measurements. Are they the same as a
midge's pube?
mike
on 04.02.03 22:19, Raimo Korhonen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I´m not Mike but I have Practical Photography November 2000 issue in front of
me. In the test 90-105 mm macro lenses get the following points:
Canon AF 100/2.8 - 9/10
Minolta AF 100/2.8 - 9/10
Nikon AF 105/2.8D - 7/10
Pentax AF
Thanks Syb for your effort!
I don't got much feedback from my posting on other forums too. Maybe people
are getting used to the inaccuracy of AF at marco range, or people just
don't care about the performance of an unknown film camera called MZ-S from
a small ancient company called Pentax. I
yep, about as long as a bees d**k!
:):):)
Cheers
Shaun
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Keith wrote:
a red-headed flea's fine curly hair apart, and axially aligned within a gnat's gn**
Having been educated on the cusp of metrication in the UK, I am
unfamiliar with these measurements. Are they
--
Tom Rezek
Product Consultant
Net Infrastructure Systems
B u l l s . r . o .
Lazarsk 6, Praha 2
Czech Republic
Tel: 02/96330453, 0604/297840
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Mike Johnston wrote:
[...] The day is fast approaching when no more film flagships
will be coming down the pike at all. [...]
BTW (sorry if this news is redundant) Leica has just announced the
discontinuation of the M6 (in its various forms) after 18 years.
Well, that doesn't mean
I have a tote bag that I can sling over my shoulder and I carry my camera
and maybe an extra lens in there along with my wallet (or small purse),
keys, etc. No problems so far. It is inconspicuous insofar as no one would
guess there is a camera and lens in the bag.
kathy
- Original Message
Henry wrote:
I don't got much feedback from my posting on other forums too. Maybe people
are getting used to the inaccuracy of AF at marco range, or people just
don't care about the performance of an unknown film camera called MZ-S from
a small ancient company called Pentax.
Actually,
- Original Message -
From: Anton Browne
Subject: Re: I've converted to the dark ( digital ) side
Hey Brendan
How nuts will they go when in as little as 2 months (in my experience) the
picture starts fading away to oblivion. Never mind I guess, just print
another one. Someone
Jim Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was surprised by how sharp my prints are from my Canon Pro 90 IS ZLR.
However, I am a slide man and prefer them over prints. Someone suggested I
get an Infocus projector to show my digital stuff, but have you seen how
much those machines cost?
Well you
Except for the grin factor, yes.
keith
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Keith wrote:
a red-headed flea's fine curly hair apart, and axially aligned within a gnat's gn**
Having been educated on the cusp of metrication in the UK, I am
unfamiliar with these measurements. Are they the same as a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you assess working of SMC PENTAX-F AF Adapter 1,7x with manual lenses?
Very good indeed.
Is it accurate?
Accuracy really depends on the camera you're using it with. I've used it
with the PZ-1p and MZ-S , with which it's very accurate.
Fast?
Yes. The mass or
At 06:02 PM 2/4/2003 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you ever compared your A 200/4 ED macro lens with 105mm Nikkor or
Canon 100mm or 200mm macro Nikkor/4?
Do you think Pentax glass is better?
Have not used the other brands - from what I've seen, the Pentax 200mm
macros are among the best
Noon is also OK for me. Where is the other piece.
Bruce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys
Noon works for me. I just need to be back on the train by 5 (got Sound Tiger
tickets)
Butch
How do you carry a Pentax on a non-shooting project basis?
I have each camera in a little neoprene sleeve from Zing, and each lens
has its own Zing pouch. That way I can put them in whatever bag I want
and they're protected.
For shooting, I have an ordinary backpack that I stuff all my gear
Very nice images from such a small camera.
Gee, looks like those lens elements line up after all.
g
--Mike
Hi,
Keith wrote:
Except for the grin factor, yes.
keith
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Keith wrote:
a red-headed flea's fine curly hair apart, and axially aligned within a
gnat's gn**
Having been educated on the
That's the reason. The References: header is not formally required
for email (it's a USENET News thing), so some email software doesn't
generate it. It's a bloody good idea, though, which is why most email
software does. :-)
I use MS Entourage, which came bundled with the MS Word that a
Ken wrote:
Casio is known well for their integrated chip design (among others who
produce small computers and cell phone etc) and providing Pentax with the
MCM (multi chip module) which I suppose is a stacked chip (flip chip etc)
rather than 2-D nature of ordinary chips wire bonded together
LOL
Ah, but has it done 1000 cycles yet, or just 999? ;-)
To be fair, Bruce does have a point. For once I give him some credit,
although he should have learned by now when to drop a subject rather
than rabidly pursue it. ANY moving part in a camera increses the
percentages of failure or
I have 2 pictures from the D1 printed with the Canon
BCI 6 archival(25 year)inks on my wall,no glass frame etc.They
have been up, in diffused light in my livingroom,for about
6 months and the other 8 months.No colour loss
fading noticed to date.These are my guinee pigs:)
However my printing
BTW (sorry if this news is redundant) Leica has just announced the
discontinuation of the M6 (in its various forms) after 18 years.
Well, that doesn't mean much. The M7 is their new film-based offering,
and it supercedes the M6 in several areas.
Boz,
I guess you aren't a Leica shooter.
Bruce,
Much as I often disagree with you, and the way you go about posting
here, I fully understand and largely agree with your points in this
case. I must apologise for the way that people have landed on you and
been (IMO) overly pedantic about the way you phrased your point.
I think we should
...and then you slide a group of elements in and out from the side a few
thousand times using a mechanism that can't cost more than a few bucks,
and tell me how many red-headed flea's fine curly hairs it shifted
from the time it rolled off the line.
Did you even look at the diagram of what's
yes, i am getting this one.
Herb
Excellent + condition, beautiful glass, includes original case (EX-
condition) and an off-brand bayonet I hood (bargain condition). Also
includes a printout of a .pdf of the manual.
Price: $225.
Shipping/insurance will be free to addresses in the continental U.S.
Joe
--
Joe Wilensky
Staff
All of this is pure speculation but I cannot see how Pentax could shrink
the
current 67 withough a thorough redesign of the mechanics.
Remember that patent design for a retro looking Pentax rangefinder? Could it
be a 67 rangefinder?
Bob S.
Hi,
And AF with converter is fast?Accurate?Does it deteriorate image quality a lot?
Alek
Uytkownik Rdiger Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
From Jostein
After also using it with many other lenses, I have found that AF with the
TC is very accurate with f/2.8 (or better) lenses. Precision with eg.
For anyone interested in an affordable entry into the Leica
rangefinder experience, my Leica IIIc/IIIf outfit (with 50mm f/2
Summitar) is still for sale. It's far more cumbersome to use
(separate rangefinder/viewfinder, knob wind, etc.) than the Leica M
series, but it is smaller ... E-mail for
Hi,
Could you be so kind and scan and send me Practical Photography November 2000 issue
concerning the test of macro lenses?
I would be very grateful.
Cheers
Alek
Uytkownik Rdiger Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Hallo Raino,
there are also test, where the FA 2.8/100 Macro gets very good marks.
It hardly matters, since this is how the camera is marketed: PENTAX
DEBUTS A HIGH-QUALITY ZOOM LENS DIGITAL CAMERA SO SMALL THAT IT FITS
INTO A TIN OF ALTOIDS®
from the Pentax press release here:
http://www.pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=138
It's all about the image it projects,
Bruce, I thought I would ignore your usual ever subtle shift in contentions
after taking hits from others, but cannot resist :-).
You are not contending that optical alignment is critical. Everybody knows
that. You are not the only one to know it.
You are not contending that any lens
Sylwester Pietrzyk a écrit:
on 04.02.03 11:19, Alin Flaider at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henry wrote:
IHC According to the patents, the new lens with K-AF3
IHC mount can be mounted onto old cameras via an adaptor.
I'll have to check this for myself. An adaptor implies a mechanical
change in
Will the mechanism break? Yes, but probably not at rates that will
create problems for Pentax. Will a lens that does this work optically as
well as one that doesn't? No.
Totally invalid conclusions. Assuming facts not in evidence.
You may be right, you may be wrong. You really have no idea
Hi,
I must simple test some old lenses with different ways of metering.
And I should see how it works with different lenses.
Cheers,
Alek
Uytkownik Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
On the PZ-1, Pentax Function 1 (labeled AE) selects whether the
camera switches from matrix to spot or from
It's not a debating club.
I can't debate that. But if it were, your ineptitude at argumentation would
obviously not keep you away, since it *is* a Pentax club, and the fact that
you hate Pentax doesn't faze you.
--Mike
Bruce wrote:
BR It's all about the image it projects, rather than the one it records.
Now that I would call a comnplete slide replacement.
Servus, Alin ;o)
On 2/05/03 11:42 AM, Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't debate that. But if it were, your ineptitude at argumentation would
obviously not keep you away, since it *is* a Pentax club, and the fact that
you hate Pentax doesn't faze you.
Firstly to the fellow PDMLers,
I apologize for
Steve,
Swimming meets are the worst...
The light is bad. The contrast is low. And the water surface is impossible to focus
on. I had lots of trouble using the PZ-1 at meets.
Regards, Bob S.
Let me mention a situation where I did have AF problems with the MZ-S.
Last night I was taking
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 09:33 AM, Steve Desjardins wrote:
Let me mention a situation where I did have AF problems with the MZ-S.
Last night I was taking pictures of a swim meet. The pool area was dim
enough that I had to use my 50 at f1.4 to get 1/60 exposure time. (No
flashes
I would think you'd be able to manually focus a swimmer with a 50mm.
It's not like they're greyhounds, and you're probably not shooting
them head-on, are you?
If you MF shots are out of focus, you may need a little practice, no
offense.
tv
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thank you!
So how to work with the adapter?To set the old prime on infinity or what?
Start with the lens focused at infinity and if the AF converter doesn't
have enough range to bring your subject into focus, adjust accordingly.
It's really very easy and intuitive.
Sports photographer Max Earey has been a fulltime professional
photographer for 3 years and spent the preceding seven years as, what he
calls a 'semi-pro' building his stock and his experience.
He is an avid sports photographer but concentrates on adventure sports,
yachting and motor sports. His
Alek wrote:
But with K and M lenses you could not use matrix... just central or spot
and???
Do you have Pentax FA 200/4 ED macro lens? Or A200/4 ED macro?
If so which is better?
If pressed I think the FA* is slightly better but significantly larger and heavier.
What about competition
Heads up,
These auctions end tonight.
http://jcoconnell.com/JCO_AUCT.HTM
JCO
60-150mm Zoom Lens for Pentax ES ESII SP-F$49.99
$99.99
-
7 hours, 27 mins +
Pentax Spotmatic II ,SPII 35mm Camera, lens +$99.99
$149.99
Water movement is detected by all AF points and this greatly
increase AF latency. Set function no. 8 on 2 to prevent the camera
to use any adjacent focus sensor, then select the sensor that best
suits your framing. The two center sensors are the most sensitive.
Servus, Alin
P.S.
IMHO, they're pretty damned good for a small, consumer grade digital PS.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: Sample images of Optio S revealed
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at
Some of this is not rightly described.
I used plenty of M and K lenses on my PZ-1 from the first day I bought it new. The
camera manual poorly describes the special functions. It was not until I read this
list that I actually understood them with regard to spot, center weighted, and matrix
No question. I am certainly not practiced with the continuous focusing
needed for action shots. I find that the MZ-S and the FA 50 are harder
to focus manually, especially in low light. Also, some of my shots were
head on (my only clear angle) making it worse.
Steven Desjardins
Department of
This might be a good plan. thanks.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/05/03 01:56PM
Water movement is detected by all AF points and this greatly
increase AF
Hi,
Sebastiao Salgado's Exodus exhibition has finally made its footsore
way to this quiet backwater, London, after years touring such megalo-cities
as Salford. It will be shown at the Barbican Art Gallery from 13
February until 1 June.
It consists of photos drawn from his books 'Migrations' and
I do not have that but I have the test results issue 2/2003 of Foto Magazin (GER) and
they give the Pentax 100 macro 9.2 optically and 9.4 mechanically - and this is
approximately the best so far. The Voigtlander APO 2.4/125 gets 9.8/9.8, though.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography
Thats my opinion exactly.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 01:18 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
IMHO, they're pretty damned good for a small, consumer grade digital
PS.
Bill
Sure, I agree, except for what's happening in the black area I
mentioned, they look great. I haven't tried printing it, so I don't
know how
Hi,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 2:07:10 PM, you wrote:
The M7 only works on two shutter speeds unless it has batteries. Very
un-Leica-like. Also, Leica requires just slightly less than the cost of an
MZ-S to add aperture-priority AE to their camera. This is not seen as a bad
thing by some
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henry,
Interesting photos! Any idea what is causing the mottling of the
black
background in the left half of ex_01.jpg?
Texture of side-lit, black velvet?
Jostein
Dan Scott wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 01:18 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
IMHO, they're pretty damned good for a small, consumer grade digital PS.
Bill
Sure, I agree, except for what's happening in the black area I
mentioned, they look great. I haven't tried printing it, so I
Dan,
I see no mottling either on my monitor or on an 8x10 print. The print was
done by resizing to 300 dpi using Genuine Fractals, sharpening on nik
SharpenPro and printing on an Epson 1270. For Joe Sixpack at 4x6 it would
be nearly impossible to tell from a typical minilab print. I hope to
I see no mottling on my monitor - SyncMaster 959NF. It's not jet black up in
the left hand top corner, but we don't know what the material is do we?
Black paper, cloth, velvet as suggested? The pictures are very good indeed.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
Hi,
I have 2 x 645 lenses on ebay:
FA 75/2.8
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3005686080
A 45/2.8
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3005685530
Thanks,
Paul
Mottling is barely visible on my Eizo F76 (calibrated with Adobe gamma
loader) too, but it's there.
Reason for me to suggest velvet was that I loaded the whole 1.7 Mb
image into Photoshop and looked at it with 200% magnification. To me,
it looks definately like some kind of fabric, and velvet was
Perhaps you all should issue a calendar -- The Women of PDML. A kind of
high-quality, niche market sort of publication.g
Of course you'd have to find 12 of you.
--
Bob Keefer
Keefer Photography
www.bkpix.com
The brain feels no pain, thats why they perform brain surgery with only a
local. Being shot in the neck is a whole different story. I have nothing
against hunting, I eat meat everyday, but I hope they find the hunter he
deserves everything they can do to him.
Feroze
- Original Message -
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps you all should issue a calendar -- The Women of PDML. A kind of
high-quality, niche market sort of publication.g
Of course you'd have to find 12 of you.
--
Bob Keefer
12 self-portraits, since we know they are all accomplished
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure, I agree, except for what's happening in the black area I
mentioned, they look great. I haven't tried printing it, so I don't
know how visible that mottling will be in a print, but on my monitor it
is visible.
Dan Scott
without having
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Keefer Photography wrote:
Perhaps you all should issue a calendar -- The Women of PDML. A kind of
high-quality, niche market sort of publication.g
Of course you'd have to find 12 of you.
Either that, or we can just dress Cotty up in a few different outfits and
flesh it
I'm glad you put hunter in quotes. A real hunter would not even attempt
such a shot. Looks like he/she needs considerable practice with a bow.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Feroze Kistan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 10:22 AM
Subject: Re:
Bob Keefer suggested:
Perhaps you all should issue a calendar -- The Women of PDML. A kind of
high-quality, niche market sort of publication.g
Of course you'd have to find 12 of you.
I think there were about 12 (I lost count, though) -- however, let's hold off
on the calendar until we see
My Z1 spot meters with all my pentax lenses, K,M,A,F,FA.
Regards,
paul
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: Overexposure of PZ1+
Bob wrote:
Spot metering: Not available with any M or K
Wasn't there a movie by Ed Wood called Glen or Glenda??
Pat White
I don't know. I'll go home and try it, but I remember trying to get my M's K's to
spot meter and they didn't. They will say SPOT metering is ON in the viewfinder, but
the exposure won't change.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My Z1 spot meters with all my pentax lenses,
I need to generate some cash to pay for my latest MF acquisition, so I'm selling
the following:
Super Program body in 9+ condition
A50/1.4 lens in 9+ condition
Winder MEII in 8 condition
280T in 8 condition
Looking for $330 US
Please contact me off the list if interested.
Jeff.
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 04:34 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mottling is barely visible on my Eizo F76 (calibrated with Adobe gamma
loader) too, but it's there.
Reason for me to suggest velvet was that I loaded the whole 1.7 Mb
image into Photoshop and
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 04:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there were about 12 (I lost count, though) -- however, let's
hold off
on the calendar until we see how well the Men of PDML calendar
sells.
[confused look] Which calendar am I supposed to pose for?
You get to
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 04:04 PM, Steve Desjardins wrote:
BTW, just to make it worse, there is this guy next me all night with an
F100, a D100, and some tan colored Sigma Tele (it looked about 300mm)
who, despite requests, was using this monster flash.
I just couldn't figure out
http://www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/firstlook/pentax/optioS/
pentax_OptioS_uk.html has a first up on the Optio S. Haven't read it
yet, but that's what I'm doing after I hit send.
Dan Scott
Just to second what Jeff said:
I've seen the items listed, and they look great. I'd say 9+ is conservative for the
body and lens. Buy with confidence! Plus, if he stiffs ya, I'll find him and have
a little chat with him, on your behalf (for a modest fee, of course!). vbg.
cheers,
frank
Jeff
About as often as threads on dictionaries, beer, politics, guns and how
great the 50/1.4 SMC Pentax lenses are do.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how often this question comes up on Canon lists?
Which is what makes PDML such an ~interesting~ place...vbg
-frank
Dan Scott wrote:
I wonder how often this question comes up on Canon lists?
Dan Scott
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:53:23 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
http://www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/firstlook/pentax/optioS/
pentax_OptioS_uk.html has a first up on the Optio S. Haven't read it
yet, but that's what I'm doing after I hit send.
I REALLY loved the comment telling Canon to start
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 04:12 PM, tom wrote:
Here's the cover image:
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/images/mag_cover.jpg
Sales have been a disappointment, probably due to Mr. December (Bruce
R.) mooning the camera.
tv
Did they unwrap the rest of the mummy?
Dan Scott
Dear Keith,
The US patent database can be accessed via the search page:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html
Please enter the patent application no. into the relevant search field.
Regards,
Henry Chu
6/2/2003
Can you provide a URL for that patent?
I don't know where to
Thanks for the vote of confidence, Frank.
BTW, the 280T comes with an AFT-1 snout and a 135 fresnel lens. Never used it,
but I presume it's a tele adaptor.
Jeff.
frank theriault wrote:
Just to second what Jeff said:
I've seen the items listed, and they look great. I'd say 9+ is conservative
At 05:28 PM 2/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
As the Pentax-M 28/3.5 was also available as a XR Rikenon with a 52mm
filter size I was wondering: could the Rikenon 24mm be a rebadged Pentax
(without SMC)?
Putting the two lenses side by side, they appear to be different. For
starters, the Rikenon has
Sorry, I have to pull that one out every couple of years for those who
haven't had the pleasure.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Christian Skofteland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 6:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Women of PDML
Good lord tom,
At 05:50 AM 05/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Ah, just the person to ask: On my wish list is a 28-105/3.2-4.5 for use w/ a
Zx-5n. Is the 24-90 (costs more than I can afford at this point), much larger
on the Zx-5n?
Thanks,
Pat in SF
I just looked and surprisingly, it isn't much bigger, it just
At 05:50 AM 05/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
This prompts me to ask the other sisters:
How do you carry a Pentax on a non-shooting project basis? Say that you were
carrying one SLR body of your choice plus one lens (be it zoom or prime) and
were just going about your daily business (work, school,
Pat White asked:
Wasn't there a movie by Ed Wood called Glen or Glenda??
Yes there was, which amuses several of my friends. And it's
reported to have been inspired by Wood's own gender issues,
which is why one of my computers is named Wood. ;-)
The movie is somewhat corny, but you kind of
Do you have a diagram that shows which contacts to mask off on the K and
M lenses?
You can check out this page and determine exactly which part of the lens
mount (not camera mount) to mask (just use a ruler to measure the distance).
You need to use a little imagination on how to do it. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit:
But with K and M lenses you could not use matrix... just central or spot
..
Yes, K/M lens could use matrix metering, see:
http://www.robertstech.com/matrix.htm
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/Photo/multizone.htm
Michel
I just did more tests (using Kodak grey cards) with my A70-210/4 M135/3.5
lenses with my MX Z-1p (centre-weighted). Here are what I have found.
M135/3.5: requires -1EV compensation on Z-1p
A70-210/4: requires -1/3EV compensation when the lens is set to 'A'
A70-210/4: requires -2/3EV
To those who want to know how Casio squeeze the electronics into the
ultra-compact body of Optio S, here is the answer:
http://www.zdnet.co.jp/news/0301/17/l_exilim6.jpg
The SD memory card is directly inserted into the chip that contains the CPU.
Regards,
Henry Chu
6/2/2003
Dear all,
I am sorry that I have misinterpreted the diagram. The SDRAM is not the SD
memory card.
Regards,
Henry Chu
6/2/2003
To those who want to know how Casio squeeze the electronics into the
ultra-compact body of Optio S, here is the answer:
97 matches
Mail list logo
