A small page on the K2. (French)
And to repair a common problem:
unlock the rings of ASA setting
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/Photo/k2.htm
Michel
The number of bids says it all.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Päivä: 29. heinäkuuta 2003 13:36
Aihe: OT: A
I recently sold a lens on eBay, when the buyer received it he said there was a tiny
bit of fungus on the front element which could only be seen at the right angle and
that if he sold the lens he wouldn't get what he paid for it (a strange thing to say
in my opinion). I checked had the lens
Hi Doug,
on 29 Jul 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
that the Pentax body cost more than the Canon body. I was merely
curious about the price of the Canon AND LENS. If you want to compare
prices, then compare prices on similar deals.
FullACK. Additionally: At the moment we are comparing the street
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, frank theriault wrote:
Problem with Iceland is, I've heard, that air tickets there are
incredibly expensive.
I think Iceland is very expensive full stop :-( Absolutely astounding
place tho - I only stopped over for a day and I'd love to go back. No, I
didn't spot Bjork
I'm with Frank on this one!
You did offer a refund and he refused to do it, right?
Either - - or. No in between.
Give it back in exchange for his expenditures, or keep it as-is.
keith
frank theriault wrote:
Hi, Anton,
Did you sell the lens as is? If so, you have no legal obligations to
Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Cassino wrote:
I skimmed through the review so I may have just missed it - but is
interpolation in the camera supposed to produce a better result that
interpolation outside the camera? Anyone can rez-up a file (and the results
are often OK). But I
on 30.07.03 13:54, Alek Kozak at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder the optical performance.
Haven't heard bad word about it yet. But I'll check it myself :-)
Are you able to shoot hand-held?
At f16 and iso100 certainly not - flash will be neccessary - I should
construct similar bracket to the
Anton Browne wrote:
I recently sold a lens on eBay, when the buyer received it he said
there was a tiny bit of fungus on the front element which could only
be seen at the right angle and that if he sold the lens he wouldn't
get what he paid for it (a strange thing to say in my opinion). I
- Original Message -
From: Alek Kozak
Subject: Re: News from DPReview
Hi,
What enlargements have you done using your 67 Pentax?
I have gone as large as 40x60 inches for a store display. Didn't look the
greatest close up, about as good as an 11x14 from a 35mm neg, but from where
it
Though this was not included in your request, no matter how odd, I
wish you fast and complete recovery.
Boris
In like situations, I have found the full refund route (cancel by mutual
agreement) to be the most successful overall solution. Not always the
most profitable, but it will usually move you to high ground and often
put pressure on the buyer to play it straight. My recent daily work
routine
if Fuji offers RAW output on their camera then their own software for reading the RAW
files ought to.
Herb.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 08:16
Subject: Re: News from DPReview
I assume the
I see. Thank you.
So probably even at 15x21cmm or 18x24cm benefits of 67 easilly outperform
35mm. Sometimes I wonder if 645 is worth buying but a lot of people rather
advise to 6x6 or 67 system.
Alek
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Some of you may remember my yard sale Mamiya Super 23 and Metz 45 CT1. The
Mamiya has been converted into a 500mm mirror lens. Although it says
Quantaray, it's the Samyang Keppler mentions in the latest edition of Pop
Photo. I haven't had a chance to do more that play with it in the yard yet,
Yes indeed. But very recent data indicate that the threshold - that has been
accepted up to now as being okay - just ain't. Divide by 4 and you'd get a
closer approximation to what is considered not indicative of pathogenicity.
Sorry you have this problem. Two of my old colleagues have the same
If I remember correctly, UPS charges significantly more brokerage fee for
ground shipping. You can find out the exact amount on their web site. My
advice? Avoid UPS, simple as that.
regards,
Alan Chan
Another Email from Adorama indicates i can
Hi,
I am in Polska from 07/08/03 to 23/08/03. Mostly Krakow but also
Lublin, Nowy Sacz, Warszawa and places inbetween. Other venues
possible.
Anyone wants to meet, contact me off list for details.
Do zobaczenia,
duzygrubymichal
Hi all.
It cost me about $30.00 plus taxes and 1 sheet of Ilford Classic Pearl,but i decided
to do
an
experiment between a scan from the 2450 and an interneg done of the same subject,just
to
see what
if any is superior/cheaper etc.
Subject was the 35mm slide picture i linked to
been there this spring. couldn't agree more with you. i still cry whenever i remeber
this 30-cents-a-beer city.
best,
mishka
I just received an SMC-FA 35mm f/2 from BH, new in the box. It's a
beautiful lens, and the manual focus feel and the width of the
focusing ring is a bit better than my FA 50/1.4 and 28/2.8, as others
have commented. My question is about mounting the tulip hood --
unless I'm missing something
Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if Fuji offers RAW output on their camera then their own software
for reading the RAW files ought to.
Right, but many consumers won't want to mess with RAW conversion
software. They just want to output JPEGs.
Herb.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave,
Agreed -
Printing out 8x10's from the inkjet (Epson 870) after scanning with the
2450 is decent.
I've had 120 Provia printed out to 20x24 from an Epson 7600 after Aaron
scanned it in on the polaroid (yes, it's 4000 dpi).
The quality is about the same based on the size.
This makes me
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:16:01 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Offer a full refund (as you did).
Tell the buyer that's how you do business and there are no other options.
Send it back or keep it, no partial refunds given!
(Oh, and by the way, just where was that defect so I can check for myself.)
You offered to take it back? Did you offer to refund the shipping too? If
you did, he has no complaint, and is just trying to get some money out of
you. You will probably just have to accept that he is going to give you a
negative feedback, and note on it that you offered a full refund. What more
-Original Message-
From: Frank Wajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I've been reading about flash compensation on this list but
it's not clear
to me what it means.
Flash compensation could be called flash adjustment. It's just setting
the power at a level other than the
-Original Message-
From: Alek Kozak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see. Thank you.
So probably even at 15x21cmm or 18x24cm benefits of 67
easilly outperform
35mm. Sometimes I wonder if 645 is worth buying but a lot
of people rather
advise to 6x6 or 67 system.
Here's a question about dialing in flash compensation, especially in
a situation like daylight fill flash and with a camera like the PZ-1p.
The TTL flash sensor measures basically like a centerweighted or
averaging meter, just measuring the reflection off the film itself,
correct? Assuming an
I just received an SMC-FA 35mm f/2 from BH, new in the box. It's a
beautiful lens, and the manual focus feel and the width of the
focusing ring is a bit better than my FA 50/1.4 and 28/2.8, as others
have commented. My question is about mounting the tulip hood --
unless I'm missing
In the last C d'I (some of you just stopped reading the post...) they
report the *ist is being pronounced i-s-t. I guess in french. Will
the anglo-saxons do the same once the camera in on the shelves and in
the hands of many? I-s-t a bit longer than ist, but it sounds better
to my ear.
AB,
It sounds to me like the seller is looking for a way to get 20
pounds less than he BID for it.
If you can live with paying for shipping both ways, get the lens
back from him and give him his refund. Relist the lens. You may even
want to tell the seller you'll only refund shipping
Hi!
Printing out 8x10's from the inkjet (Epson 870) after scanning with
the 2450 is decent.
I've had 120 Provia printed out to 20x24 from an Epson 7600 after
Aaron scanned it in on the polaroid (yes, it's 4000 dpi).
The quality is about the same based on the size.
This makes me consider the
Depends upon your quality demands. 2400dpi will give you a 8x print from
35mm at 300dpi, a 12x will only be 200dpi. Whether a print from a 200dpi
image will be good enough is for you to decide. Why not do one? Just resize
an image to 200dpi and print it out. That should tell you whether it will
Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a question about dialing in flash compensation, especially in
a situation like daylight fill flash and with a camera like the PZ-1p.
The TTL flash sensor measures basically like a centerweighted or
averaging meter, just measuring the reflection off
Hi!
It doesn't. TTL flash controls flash exposure by varying the
*duration* of the flash, not the power. So... During TTL flash exposure with
-1.5 stop compensation, the system will shut off the flash (this happens
in milliseconds) when the amount of exposure has reached 1.5 stops less
than
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't. TTL flash controls flash exposure by varying the
*duration* of the flash, not the power. So... During TTL flash exposure with
-1.5 stop compensation, the system will shut off the flash (this happens
in milliseconds) when the amount of
I've been using two very ordinary cable releases with my P30T since it
arrived and have had no problems. I guess they make electrical contact. The
manual say's use a Switch OR Cable Release 50 and adds cable release 30
won't work.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
Ladies and Gentlemen,
In the few days the new Cement Factory from HELL site has been up there
have been 1471 hits. I must have done something right. There are medical
links now and people have been going there.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
I'm still not sure I get it:
It doesn't. TTL flash controls flash exposure by varying the *duration*
of the flash, not the power. So... During TTL flash exposure with -1.5
stop compensation, the system will shut off the flash (this happens in
milliseconds) when the amount of exposure has reached
Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still not sure I get it:
From reading what you wrote below I think you have got it quite well.
I guess my question is, why doesn't the LX + AF280T problem happen,
in that the flash doesn't fire at all since the ambient light
exposure is so bright that
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:11:39 -0400
Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last C d'I (some of you just stopped reading the post...)
YeahC d'I is not terribly interresting. RP is, though, and is
responsible for pretty much all my skills in reading french :)
they
report the *ist
My largest so far is 24X30 on Portra 800. Looked very nice. I find
that from 4X5 on up, the 67 negs produce noticeably better images. I
have tons of 8X10's printed and there is a marked difference between
that and my 35mm even when shooting with FA* glass.
Bruce
Wednesday, July 30, 2003,
I think I have an explanation. Judging from the designs of other Pentax
prime lenses that I have disassembled so far, it is highly likely that the
bayonet mount portion of the lens is held by 3 screws from the front
(underneath the metal ring). The marked indicator could actually be
positioned
Tom,
I didn't realise that the great Norwegian had access to his website by
cellphone, so he is posting a wedding pic even as I write.
Thanks for the kind offer to my earlier request. Full explanation in
Scotland Day 4, shortly.
BTW, make sure you keep GFM NPW '04 weekend free? Let's make it
I wouldn't be so categorical about this. It's very common in
my experience, especially with eBay bulk sellers, that they
don't inspect or have the knowledge to examine the items
they sell properly. Compromising a settlement is perfectly
acceptable to me.
I once bought a winder which had its
I had a question about flash compensation. I ever took some pics in a museum using
PZ-1p @ HyP mode with flash. When I got the processed pictures back, I found people's
faces were over-exposured. I thought this is because the background was so dark and I
should use flash compensation to correct
I think it must be down to incomplete research.
The largest lake in Norway, Mjøsa, would come in 9th on that list
with it's 430 meters. There are at least 10 lakes in Norway deeper
than that. Also, there are some lakes in central Europe that should
be on the list I think, like lake Geneva and
Gang,
Cotty got himself married today.
The first official image can be found at:
http://www.oksne.net
Click the Scotland link, and you're there.
The image is taken with a Optio S.
There will be more official pics later, but they have to be processed
first; taken with a 645NII on portra 400VC.
Well folks, I haven't read the backlog of PDML digests, but full marks to
Wendy Beard for emailing me direct with the *triumph* clue (yes, the
Triumph Stag). [addendum: apparently also to Bob W for the bad jokes -
Jostein reading his real time posts as i write...]
Up early due to the din of a JCB
Hi Gang,
I've once again unwisely volunteered to do the pictures at the wedding of a
friend. He and she have both assured me the ceremony will be low key, etc.,
etc, but he's also just informed me that almost 40 relatives from her home
country of Belize will be here on Saturday-- so I do feel
What? 30 cents a beer?
I think our discussion is over. I change my vote to Barcelona. I'll change it when
someone finds a city with
cheaper beer.
thanks, mishka,
frank
Mike Ignatiev wrote:
been there this spring. couldn't agree more with you. i still cry whenever i remeber
this
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom,
I didn't realise that the great Norwegian had access to his
website by
cellphone, so he is posting a wedding pic even as I write.
Thanks for the kind offer to my earlier request. Full explanation in
Scotland Day 4,
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Up early due to the din of a JCB (tractor and backhoe to the yanks)
building next door at 07:35, but we made it to Inverness for our
important appointment. My S.O. of nearly 17 years, Alma, and I were
married at Inverness Registry
Gang,
Cotty got himself married today.
The first official image can be found at:
http://www.oksne.net
Click the Scotland link, and you're there.
The image is taken with a Optio S.
There will be more official pics later, but they have to be processed
first; taken with a 645NII on portra 400VC.
I'm by no stretch of the imagination a wedding photog, but...
I shoot candids at all the weddings I attend and find a zoom to be most
valuable since I don't have to spend time changing lenses. I usually have
the 28-105 PZ attached to the MZ-S.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Sid
Oh gosh, now that he's married, there goes the trip to GRM 04 :-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Letter from Scotland - Day 5
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL
Hi,
Wednesday, July 30, 2003, 10:19:28 PM, you wrote:
Gang,
Cotty got himself married today.
The first official image can be found at:
http://www.oksne.net
Click the Scotland link, and you're there.
The image is taken with a Optio S.
There will be more official pics later, but they have
Looks like June 4-6, 2004.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: Favour to ask
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom,
I didn't realise that the great
Hi,
Wednesday, July 30, 2003, 10:15:56 PM, you wrote:
What? 30 cents a beer?
I think our discussion is over. I change my vote to Barcelona. I'll change it when
someone finds a city with
cheaper beer.
Addis Ababa then!
--
Cheers,
Bobmailto:[EMAIL
Seriously thought Cotty, congratulations and we hope to see the whole family
at GFM 04. We've room for you all, even if we have to move Jerome and Cesar
to tents :-)
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:22
Sid,
Go with whatever camera you use the most and feel the most comfortable
with. I use a P67II with primes for almost all my wedding work
without any problem. Comfort and familiarity are the most important
things to not screw up the shoot. What you don't want to do is be
constantly thinking
I dunno about 30 cent beer. I remember drinks at the NCO club in RAF
Mildenhall in 1967 being 10 cents a shot during happy hour, 20 cents a shot
afterwards.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30,
-Original Message-
From: Yong Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had a question about flash compensation. I ever took some
pics in a museum using PZ-1p @ HyP mode with flash. When I
got the processed pictures back, I found people's faces
were over-exposured. I thought this is because
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the flash meter is set up that it is only metering
while the
flash is firing, which is not very long relative to the ambient
exposure.
So, the ambient that hits the film as the
-Original Message-
From: Sid Barras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Gang,
I've once again unwisely volunteered to do the pictures at
the wedding of a
friend.
You should know better by now.
The PZ 1, with the AF 500ftz so that I can have the best
possible range of
power and TTL
Congratulations Cotty!
(Good thing you've bought all the camera gear you're ever going to need
because there'll be no more of that discretionary spending from mow on!
g)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
The beer is free at GFM.
tv
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Barcelona
What? 30 cents a beer?
I think our discussion is over. I change my vote to
Barcelona. I'll
The beer in Prague is almost as cheap, and beyond doubt the best in the
world!
frank theriault wrote:
What? 30 cents a beer?
I think our discussion is over. I change my vote to Barcelona. I'll change it when someone finds a city with cheaper beer.
Jolly good show, old chap! Congratulations.
Jostein wrote:
Gang,
Cotty got himself married today.
I think that all over the world, figure like this get exaggerated by
folks promoting the local wonders.
Jostein wrote:
I think it must be down to incomplete research.
The largest lake in Norway, Mjøsa, would come in 9th on that list
with it's 430 meters. There are at least 10 lakes in Norway
Tom,
http://www.grandfather-mountain.com/events/nphoto.htm
June 4-6, 2004
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
I haven't gone to the pic yet, I wanted to jump right in and congratulate
you, Cotty! Terrific news. More comments may follow after I look at the
piccie vbg.
congrats,
frank
Jostein wrote:
Gang,
Cotty got himself married today.
The first official image can be found at:
Boris wrote:
The owner of closing photo shop in my area proposed to me to buy his 2
month old Canon Scan FS 2710 film scanner for $450.
Sounds pricey. It's an older model 2700 PPI scanner. It uses SCSI, so unless
you have a SCSI card in your computer already you would have to add one.
It's
On 29 Jul 2003 at 21:10, William Robb wrote:
Why don't we all descend on Kodachrome Basin?
William Robb
ummm.
What?
Speaking of Kodachromes, I suppose Switzerland is also an option! :-)
Jostein
--
Photos at: http://www.oksne.net
AutoPug author.
Submit your images at:
On 30 Jul 2003 at 8:51, Chris Stoddart wrote:
I think Iceland is very expensive full stop :-( Absolutely astounding
place tho - I only stopped over for a day and I'd love to go back. No, I
didn't spot Bjork :-)
Chris
Iceland is very expensive. Even for a Norwegian...:-)
Also, it has
On 29 Jul 2003 at 19:01, Doug Franklin wrote:
I can live with fall instead of spring. In fact, I think I'd prefer
it. And anything within reasonable S-bahn distance of Brussels,
Eindhoven, Arnhem is fine with me, too. The reason is I would like to
put the World PDML Party on one end of a
Oh gosh, now that he's married, there goes the trip to GRM 04 :-)
Bill
You must be joking Bill - see my other thread.
I have secret slush fund set up to cover costs.
Er, I *had* a secret slush fund set up
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Seriously thought Cotty, congratulations and we hope to see the whole family
at GFM 04
Hell, no! Can't clutter up the place with family. Can't have kids hanging
on demanding attention and food and Gameboys and whatnot while trying to
get some serious photography done. A man's gotta do what a
Hi, Bob,
I kind of walked into that one, didn't I? vbg
cheers,
frank
Bob Walkden wrote:
Addis Ababa then!
--
Cheers,
Bobmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it
is true. -J. Robert
The other thing that seems counterintuitive about the whole exposure
scenario is that 2nd curtain sync would allow more ambient to hit the
sensor then in 1st curtain sync. At longer shutter speeds the
difference would be an entire stop, more or less.
tv
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another problem with the whole exposure scenario (I think) is that
there would be an artificial weighting of objects on the side of the
frame that the curtains start from. In other words, the metering
wouldn't quite be center weighted since the flash would always be
Could we send them to the bear habitat and let them play with the bears? :-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: Letter from Scotland - Day 5
Seriously thought Cotty,
- Original Message -
From: Sid Barras
Subject: Need advice from the wedding photogs-- PLease!
Sid;
I presume the 35-105 is not a constant aperture zoom? If it isn't, then your
backgrounds will be all over the place exposure wise as you zoom the lens
back and forth, if you are using
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:03:18 +0200, Jostein wrote:
On 29 Jul 2003 at 19:01, Doug Franklin wrote:
[...] I would like to put the World PDML Party on one end of a
trip to the battlefields of Operation MARKET-GARDEN (the movie
A Bridge Too Far).
Do you have any idea on how to pull this one
At 11:13 AM 7/30/2003 +0200, you wrote:
I've been reading about flash compensation on this list but it's not clear
to me what it means. I also cannot find anything in the manual of my MZ-5n.
Is it the same as fill-flash with the flash at lower output so it won't
completely
fill in the shadows?
Congratulations and best wishes, Cotty!
Pat White
35/2, 50/1.7 and 35-105 on the PZ1. If you can MF well the 35-105 would
be most useful, otherwise stick to the AF primes. A zoom is most useful
at the reception, but that is also where AF is most useful. Small groups
the 50, big groups the 35. Portra UC is the film. Putting the flash on a
You mean the jerk has been living in sin all this time? HAR!
Congrats to the bunch of you; bride, groom, and the kids.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:19 PM
Variable aperture zooms - Robb said he didn't like them because the
background exposure changes as you change focal length. True for
aperture ring controlled lenses, but not body controlled ones. I set my
28-105/3.5-4.5 to f8, via the body control, and that's what it will
always shoots at.
BR
Karl Mengele aka Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
Variable aperture zooms - Robb said he didn't like them because the
background exposure changes as you change focal length. True for
aperture ring controlled lenses, but not body controlled ones. I set my
28-105/3.5-4.5 to f8, via the body control, and
And no it was not due to the Dogfish :')
-- -Original Message-
-- From: T Rittenhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 4:35 PM
--
-- You appear to have developed a list to starboard.
--
-- Ciao,
-- Graywolf
-- http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
--
--
--
You see, it is not just women who like the look of the new skins :-)
César
Panama City, Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:30 AM
--
-- Ugh.. the lizard skin looks horrible but I'd be more worried
-- about
Frank,
Definitely an eye catcher!!! And it comes with two backs so you can
minimize the skinning :-)
It does bring to mind that I have considered taking one of my screwmount
cameras and getting one of them re-skinned. The question is with which one?
Thanks for the link - got the gears
ROFLOL!!!
César
Panama City, Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:43 PM
--
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Bill Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
-- Late next month I'll be receiving radioactive seed
--
Wouldn't it mean that you would not get peoples hopes up - i.e. Pentax
tells me the *ist D will have a certain feature and the final camera does
not... Stating that the specifications are subject to change without notice
will not make me feel any better. Everyone would put out the same
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 6:18 PM
--
-- On 25 Jul 2003 at 19:18, Doug Franklin wrote:
--
-- OK, based on Jostein's response, and Mr. Cotty, and some
-- of the other
-- meanderings here on the PDML, I hereby propose
Welcome to the club, Cotty very big broad winky grin.
Optio S is not bad at all. Now we demand more pictures, don't we?
I've got some pictures from my M 35/2.8. Man, it's a great lens, at
least my instance of that class grin. I'll post some later.
Nevertheless, my congratulations to the
Cesar posted:
As the, as some have pointed out, roving PDML ambassador I will feel
obligated to attend this. Name the place and time and I will try my best to
get there.
I think perhaps the person best qualified to suggest time and place would be --
Cesar
..
Hi Cotty,
Aino and I have been married for 30 years. Are you going to manage
something like that? But perhaps you should start counting from the
beginning. Good luck and a long happy life together. Give the lass a hug for
me.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
You have far too much free time Mr Whaley.
D
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30,
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
