The time has come to sell my very lightly used AF280T. It was
purchased new by me and has probably not been used for more than a
roll or two. Just an occasional shot here and there. Comes with soft
case and original manual. In mint condition. US $100 or offer.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
ft Speaking of which, here they are:
ft http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4288507115congratulation_page=Y
Frank, it says I have to subscribe to something to be able to see
that... Is there other place where these photos can be seen?
Thanks.
Bors
Boris, I
On 24/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Geez, Anders,
It's me and Cotty talking here. Who the hell cares what we say? (Okay, not
to insult the erudite Mr. Cottrel: Who the hell cares what that theriault
guy says?)
Actually Frank, it's Cottrell with two Ls.
But you can call me sir.
Boris, I was wondering the same thing - don't like to go to sites
where I have
to sign in -
always fear one is going to get more spam :)
ann
Ann, I hope that Frank would be kind enough (as he seems normally to
be so) and answer my plead grin...
Boris
Hi,
By a very circuitous route, I have come into possession of a Pentax
Movie VHS camera recorder, model PV-C11E.
It has its plastic briefcase, charger/AC adaptor(110~240V, 50~60Hz) and
two batteries, one 800mAh, one 1500mAh. One 46mm W10 (light orange)
filter. One RF output adaptor (channel
I declined Sony's offer, as well.
They can pretty much do anything they want with any photos you load to
the site, and that didn't set well with me at all..
So, that also means I can't view any TOPDML photos on there, either, I guess.
Oh well,
keith whaley
frank theriault wrote:
Hi,
built like a tank, what an awesome lens!
I can't wait to see some pictures taken with it.
Anyone interested in a K 85mm f/1.8?
Frank
I have a challenge here.
As an Englishman living in Scotland, I am constantly barraged about the
clear superiority of the Scots over the English, much of which is based on
the bragging right that arose from Scotland beating England in a skirmish in
1314 (and no, that doesn't mean nearly quarter
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:40:02 -
Peter Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a challenge here.
As an Englishman living in Scotland, I am constantly barraged about
the
clear superiority of the Scots over the English, much of which is
based on
the bragging right that arose from Scotland
I have both. The A* 85/1.4 is truly awesome, however, it can scare small
children and make dogs bark, especially if it's hood is attached. I wouldn't
point it toward troops in Baghdad. Without a side view, they'll think it's
an anti tank weapon and may dispatch you. The K85 f/1.8 is also a great
Hi,
Da-Lite makes a good screen. I got lucky and was given a seven footer that
I hung on a beam in the living room.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 8:22 PM
Subject:
Great response Boris. I doubt that anyone can go further back than you!!!
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: Have I done something to upset you.
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:40:02
If there are images on the card, then the blue , then INFO should cycle
through histogram, image details, then back to just the image. If it
doesn't, you've probably got a defective *ist D.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:47:55 -0500
Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great response Boris. I doubt that anyone can go further back than
you!!!
Bill
For good or for bad I can go back twice, having received almost
complete Soviet education and having spent last 12 years of my life in
I like the model dial setup, sort of reminiscient of my MZ-30
(stolen).
Yikes. Better hold on tight to the *istD ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Peter Jordan
Subject: Re: Have I done something to upset you.
Do any other cultures have rivalries where one side can go further back to
prove superiority over another.
This might not be a particularly good topic for discussion here.
William Robb
What happened to everybody? Where are my 150 to 200 ppd?
Regards,
Bob...
--
Politically incorrect sig line deleted to prevent
socialists, statists, elitists and weekend golfers
[you know who you are] from receiving
discomforting enlightenment.
-Larry
On 25/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
f I understand your query correctly, you may not be in playback mode. In
capture mode the Info button shows current settings.
That seems to be the case. How do I get into playback mode?
I thought it was the bottom left button with the ||
I tried
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: System Burp
What happened to everybody? Where are my 150 to 200 ppd?
We pissed em all off Bob.
William Robb
Politically incorrect sig line deleted to prevent
socialists, statists, elitists and weekend golfers
[you know who you are]
Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked about the strap on his shiny new
*istD Anyone else notice the *istD strap still has the little plastic
buttons with
the protrusion that allows for a mid-roll film change/rewind?
I noticed that. I was slightly disappointed that they didn't just use the
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
f I understand your query correctly, you may not be in playback mode. In
capture mode the Info button shows current settings.
That seems to be the case. How do I get into playback
No Doug is not going to remove anyone for what they say on the list, but bounced
mail from your address will automatically unsubscribe you. You need to fix the
problem, and then resubscribe.
However, Monday was apparently just a slow day.
--
Len Paris wrote:
That's ridiculous! To the best of
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:25:16 -0600
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Peter Jordan
Subject: Re: Have I done something to upset you.
Do any other cultures have rivalries where one side can go further
back to
prove superiority over another.
This might not
Aw hell, I didn't want to look at the stinkin' pictures anyhow (last time I
joined something I was stuck for 4 years and swore I will never join up again).
--
frank theriault wrote:
Hi,
Jeff T, formerly of this list, but now bereft of all things Pentax, sent
me these piccies of our latest
On Sunday, Nov 23, 2003, at 15:56 America/New_York, Herb Chong wrote:
if it doesn't show up after NR is engaged then i don't have to do
anything.
so what i care about is what shows up after NR is enabled. those are
the one
i have to do something about in PS.
That's true. It depends if you're
Yup. Game, Set and Match to Boris! vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Have I done something to
see above
annsan
I just found out PayPal recently modified their Terms of Service
(October 16). Unknown to me, they created a loophole which allows
them to take MY money and give it to a crafty and fraudulent buyer,
calling it a refund.
Here's the deal: any buyer can simply email PayPal and say they did
not
Differences in shooting style, I guess. I use my FA*85 f/1.4 on almost
every shoot. It, with it's dedicated hood, is probably as large as the
A*85. I can't get along without it with the PZ-1p. But, with the *ist
D, I find my favorite lens becoming the A*50 f/1.2, though the FA* 85
f/1.4 is
Hi, Boris,
Well, as I explained in the original post (you ~did~ read the whole post,
DIDN'T YOU? vbg), it was Jeff, the photographer of the pics in question,
who decided to upload them onto Sony ImageStation. I don't know why, but he
did. I'm just passing on the URL, but I did warn the list
Nope. Go away and stop bothering me.
-frank just joking
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ann, I hope that Frank would be kind enough (as he seems normally to be so)
I'm with Len. I prefer speed and short DOF.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Len Paris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Differences in shooting style, I guess. I use my FA*85
f/1.4 on almost
every shoot. It, with it's dedicated hood, is probably as
large as the
A*85. I can't get
To quote the Soup Nazi, from the infamous Seinfeld episode of the same name:
Don't push your luck, little man!
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually Frank, it's
I don't blame you, Keith.
My way of thinking, though, is that I registered just to look at that
gallery. I won't ever load any photos there myself, due to those very
copyright concerns. But, my thinking is that as long as I don't upload,
what harm can come of registering? Or am I out to
Hi,
Maybe, but you forget about those Neanderthals. Boy, are they inferior
- have you seen the state of their handaxes?!?! Sheesh! And have you
ever seen one trying to thread a fish-hook? Laugh? I nearly went
extinct.
Cheers,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, November 25, 2003, 10:56:02 PM, you wrote:
Peter Jordan wrote:
P.S. My spellchecker offers stud as an alternative to *istD, I guess we
don't want to go there either vbg.
I decided to play this game and offered my spell checker
*istD and *isdD
it substituted:
fisted and misdeed
annsan
That sounds like a pretty good and cheaper idea.
Is their any particular type of surface material I should be looking at? I
see different materials out their like matte and glass bead. I just don't
know much about it.
Pat
- Original Message -
From: alex wetmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi Brian,
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:11:10 -0800, Brian Dipert wrote:
I've copied Ed and Dave on this posting...I believe that someone (John
Francis?) mentioned that dcraw has some PEF limitations at the moment (white
balance-related?). I'm sure they'd appreciate the clarification if someone
more
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=355370
By popular demand (Ann, Boris, Keith, others), I went to the Gallery of the
Evil Empire (aka Sony ImageStation), and breaking virtually every copyright
law known to man, harvested Jeff's images, and then uploaded them onto my
galleries at
OUCH!!!
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I decided to play this game and offered my spell checker
*istD and *isdD
it substituted:
fisted and misdeed
annsan
frank theriault wrote:
So, if you guys don't say anything, I won't either. vbg
Huh?!?!?! About what? What was your name again? BSEG
--
Gary
--
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.203 / Virus Database: 261.3.0 - Release
To quote the Soup Nazi, from the infamous Seinfeld episode of the same
name:
Don't push your luck, little man!
Aw - the Soup Nazi... Mmmm - I love this episode :-)
ukasz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
www.fotopolis.pl
===
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=355370
snip
I further broke several Photo.net rules by attributing the photos to me.
Since I didn't want to register the camera used (DigiElph) to my name, I
said they were taken by my little
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember, ya can't own too many 85's - vbg. Seriously, the A*
and the K 85's are different lenses. They're both great, but they
are not both great in the exact same ways, and you might hold onto
the 85/1.8 for a bit before passing it along to some other lusting
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3232570.stm
Ping
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Wunsch
Subject: Re: Projector Screen Recommendations?
That sounds like a pretty good and cheaper idea.
Is their any particular type of surface material I should be looking at?
I
see different materials out their like matte and glass bead. I just
Why would any seller have a problem with it? Just make sure you add
the extra postage for the tracking # for all your final amounts.
This way the buyer pays for the added peace of mind. I think it's a
good move, for both, the seller and the buyer.
And, of course, for Ebay's PR.
Just make sure you
My way of thinking, though, is that I registered just to look at that
gallery.
However incredible this may sound, usernames foobar, foobar29 and foobar2901
as well as emails [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] are already taken! Somebody's
spoofing my id and email!!!
Mishka
- Original Message -
From: mishka
Subject: Re: PayPal Beware - seller tracking number mandatory for your
safety
Why would any seller have a problem with it? Just make sure you add
the extra postage for the tracking # for all your final amounts.
This way the buyer pays for the added
Does this go back far enough? In the 5th century, the Irish abolished
slavery, with the strong encouragement of Saint Patrick, a former slave.
It took most of the first world well over a thousand years to catch up to
that one, and some countries still practice slavery today.
Ironically, Irish
Whether or not you use paypal, it sure is a good thing to use tracking
slips - it only costs
the buyer another 50 cents - and if you tell them up front you are doing
it there should be
no problem. I only insist on the buyer paying insurance if I'm mailing
something breakable, though.
The
Blah blah blah blah blahcut to the next-to-last paragraph of the email
below for the 'meat' (this is a followup to John Mustarde's earlier posting,
which I forwarded on to Ebay/PayPal requesting clarification). I've deleted
the PayPal employee's contact info
Unbelievable. The seller has to
Hi,
I have two pentax smc k mount lenses. One is 100mm smc-m f/4 and the
other is a 50mm smc-a f/1.4. I assume the smc-m is a m lens and the
smc-a is an a lens from what I've read and seen. What kind of
markings do the k lenses have?
Thanks,
John
frank theriault wrote:
I don't blame you, Keith.
My way of thinking, though, is that I registered just to look at that
gallery. I won't ever load any photos there myself, due to those very
copyright concerns. But, my thinking is that as long as I don't upload,
what harm can come of
Hi,
I think I found the answer by carefully reading Boz's KMP page.
The K lenses only have SMC engraved on the lens surround and not
SMC-xx. Can anyone confirm this? Is there a jpeg of a SMC lens
I can view?
Thanks,
John
Hi, Lukasz,
NO SOUP FOR YOU!!
vbg
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: £ukasz Kacperczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The morality of
Hi, Pat,
I didn't know that St Patrick abolished slavery in Ireland. As if chasing
all the snakes out weren't enough, eh?
I'll always love the Irish, if for no other reason than their beers and
ales. I've always loved Guinness, along with Kilkenny. Lately, I've been
enjoying the healthful
- Original Message -
From: jmb
Subject: Question about m and k lens terminology
Hi,
I have two pentax smc k mount lenses. One is 100mm smc-m f/4 and the
other is a 50mm smc-a f/1.4. I assume the smc-m is a m lens and the
smc-a is an a lens from what I've read and seen. What
Hi!
ft Hi, Boris,
ft Well, as I explained in the original post (you ~did~ read the whole post,
ft DIDN'T YOU? vbg), it was Jeff, the photographer of the pics in question,
ft who decided to upload them onto Sony ImageStation. I don't know why, but he
ft did. I'm just passing on the URL, but
Well, anything I sell via Ebay is shipped insured. So it automatically has a
tracking number. Therefore, this is a non-problem to me. Shipping insurance does
not protect the buyer, it protects the shipper.
--
John Mustarde wrote:
I just found out PayPal recently modified their Terms of Service
61 matches
Mail list logo
