Was he a pediatrician or a pediatrist?
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 3:01 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Coming to terms with *ist D lens mag factor?
On 23/12/03, [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
This is why I am giving colour print film 5 years before it mostly goes
away.
William Robb
Don't a lot of countries have a ten year support rule for newly sold
products? I thought that was the reason the LX is
But now I can't sleep for worrying how that back got distorted in the first place;
what horrendous blow buckled the back. What cruel owner dropped the LX from such a
height (with the back open mind you) for it to smash onto a concrete floor on its open
back. What damage was done to the shutter
Hi,
that would not be a very clever argument. It would imply that the
camera makers such as Pentax also had to be film makers. Or that
kitchen equipment makers also had to be food retailers; printer
manufacturers would have to be paper makers. Law-makers would have to
be Fagins. Cup makers would
Tanya Mayer wrote:
You know what - in this instance, I think I believe the poor
guy. I still wouldn't part with any $$$ BUT, it does make me
wonder if he wasn't completely genuine. I would say that his
main mistake was listing without a reserve price, having had
no feedback.
There
Not at all, Bob.
The specialist camera makers can shelter under the umbrella of the film and
camera manufacturers. So long as Kodak and Fuji sell film cameras the
~hardware only~ manufacturers can rest assured that film will be available
for the required period.
But on the day that no film
On 24/12/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Sorry Kenneth, I might be a bit lacking in the geography department here,
so
the joke hasn't hit its target... What is the name of the bridge that you
are referring to?
Um, well we in New YAWK actually call it the Brooklyn Bridge :)
I could
Hi,
no serious business is going to hang large parts of their future
income on that kind of fragile dependency or by sheltering under some
other company's umbrella. It would be impossible to plan for longer
than the very shortest term if they had to keep looking up to see if
Kodak Fuji were
I thought it was great!
You go in fully expecting to not be able to read it, and can't. I've
seen a ton of similar Japanese pages, and just look at the pictures, so
this didn't surprise me.
Until, all of a sudden I found I could read something! What?!
Then it all immediately became clear!
What a
highly unlikely for a long time to come. if they can make a full frame
sensor camera at an affordable price, they will be able to make an APS frame
sensor at a much cheaper price. if the sensor also delivers as low noise as
current APS sensors at about 8-10 megapixels, it will completely replace
This one time, at band camp, Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
highly unlikely for a long time to come. if they can make a full frame
sensor camera at an affordable price, they will be able to make an APS frame
sensor at a much cheaper price. if the sensor also delivers as low noise as
Bob,
No argument from me that film will be easy to find, it will be at the back
of the store or behind the counter in all likelihood, perhaps even by
special order only in many stores.
Did you read the article at
http://apnews.excite.com/article/20031223/D7VK80IO0.html that kicked off
this
Like I said, while Kodak and Fuji sell film ~cameras~, film
has ten years
minimum life expectancy.
regards,
Anthony Farr
But it might not be much of a life. Forcing the supply of film
doesn't mean it will be of the type and quality you want.
Hello,
if you think large chips are going to replace medium-format,
why then not make a body in MF-style (cubic body with perhaps
interchangeable backs for digi 35mm-film, interchangeable viewfinders
like prism and waistlevel of course) that takes 35mm lenses?
There once was the Rollei 3003 in
Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Y'know, it's funny how, when using other formats, rarely is it said that
an 80mm lens for a 6x6 is equivalent to a 50mm lens for a 35mm camera.
When's the last time you heard a 4x5 user ask What's that lens in
Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The future of film from Kodak Fuji:
http://apnews.excite.com/article/20031223/D7VK80IO0.html
Well, there's nothing in this article that's actually *wrong*, in my
opinion, but I think the time frames mentioned are very optimistic in
terms of how long
Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
highly unlikely for a long time to come. if they can make a full frame
sensor camera at an affordable price, they will be able to make an APS frame
sensor at a much cheaper price. if the
There is a town in Southern Germany called, Wank.
JFK got gently laughed at for his famous Ich bin ein Berliner line. (In
German a Berliner is a doughnut.)
It's a pity (insert name of least favourite politician here) doesn't go to
Wank and tell the world what they already know.
Peter
-
Hmm...
I've got an MX, and of late (as you all know), now an LX. It doesn't get
any better Pentax than that, does it? vbg
Thanks for the thoughts, Alin. All the best to your and yours.
merry Christmas,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears
Cotty wrote:
On 24/12/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
...
Tanya, there is also a country song in our part of the globe where there is a
line
I have ocean front property in Arizona
Time for you to google :)
annsan
Speaking of which, I could sell you a bridge in Arizona -d'oh! I
Snail mail cards? What are those? Somehow my snail-mail output has lowered
dramatically since I got a computer. Hooray for e-cards!
All the best to you and yours, E.R.N.!! See you @ GFM! g
merry Christmas,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
Uh, that would be Vic, of this list, who sold it to me...
The rest of the camera seems just fine, thank the Pentax Gods. Vic doesn't
recall any bad things happening to the camera, and I believe him. I think
that a camera (especially if it has a big lens on) would have enough weight
that if,
Hi,
Wednesday, December 24, 2003, 1:01:36 PM, you wrote:
More importantly to serious photography enthusiasts like ourselves is
the matter of *what* film remains available. As high-end photography
goes almost exclusively digital, I'd expect the film emulsions that
remain in production to be
Now that`s a digital camera! I wonder how big you could go with
that, 4ft.X 6ft.?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Mark Roberts
Heck, that's only a 24 x 36 mm sensor! That ain't nuthin' compared to
this 37 x 52 mm beauty:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0312/03121901fujifilmback.asp
What is Berliner Weisse, then?
Season´s Greetings!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Peter Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Päivä: 24. joulukuuta 2003 14:09
Aihe: Re: OT -
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Farr
Subject: Re: What do you think?
Don't a lot of countries have a ten year support rule for newly sold
products? I thought that was the reason the LX is still fully serviced by
Pentax but M and A series camera bodies are no longer serviced by
In the spirit of the season, regardless of your faith,
I extend to all best wishes and good fortune in the coming year.
Here is quick peak inside my home at our tree (decorated by the
kids themselves)
http://220.240.55.75/xmas.jpg
May your God bless you all
Kevin
--
__
- Original Message -
From: Bob Walkden
Subject: Re: What do you think?
I take a different view. Consumer photography, and probably most
professional photography, will quickly become exclusively digital,
for all intents and purposes. Film photography is likely to be more
like BW
I have decided to introduce a device which will double the focal length of any
135 format lens with no reduction of f-stop. I consists of a thin metal plate
with a 12x18mm hole in the middle. You simply insert it into the film gate under
the film in any 35mm camera.
'Nuff said?
--
William
Whether celebrating or not, I hope everybody has a good one tomorrow!
See y'all in the new year...
I wish you all a peaceful Christmas.
Lasse
Of course, in camera IS would only work with the digital cameras, but
that seems to be the way of the world right now.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
After speaking with Pentax USA and having no luck cleaning the contacts,
I'm going to send them the *istD body and the FA 50, FA 100 macro, and
the FA 135. Although it seems funny, they still think it might be the
lenses even though they work on the MZ-S and the ZX-7. What really
confused them
I would like to wish one and all a Very Merry
Christmas and a Wonderful New Year.
May the new year bring you lots of peace, joy,
happiness, wealth, and love.
And most importantly may it enable you to acquire your
Pentax pieces and keep shooting.
Francis M. Alviar
Hum? I figure that 127 is the equivalent of a 31mm on 135 camera. And the 105 is
the equivalent of a 46mm. I have always found it strange that people do this
stuff, because one works differently in different formats, one tends to use much
closer points of view with a large format camera and
Mark Roberts wrote:
There's an inexorable trend for sensors to increase in size and decrease
in price.
A 24x36mm chunk of silicon wafer will always be a 24x36mm chunk of
silicon wafer, and there's no real reason that I can see to expect the
price of silicon to plummet. Yields will probably go
I think you hit the nail on the head here,Bill(ohhh poor nailg)
So far my 2.74meg D1 is producing nice,saleable prints and my clients are very happyy
to
have same
hour service. Hopefully the D2H will live up to its claims if i can get one next year.
I
too am sticking with
BW film as i am not
50 years ago companies in the US were required to support their products for a
minimum of 7 years after production ceased. I do not think that is so any
longer. Strangely, we seem to have quietly done away with most of the consumer
protection laws here in the US during the past couple of
http://home.delfi.ee/tiikmaa/files/joul/
Raivo from Estonia :o)
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(earlier post snipped)
I did say mostly goes away, you seem to have translated that into
completely goes away in your post.
Anyway, it's seven years in North America, I believe.
But how is support defined?
The market is
Well, it has been Christmas day here for exactly 1 hour and 36 minutes. I
have finished playing Santa, blown up a jumping castle, wrapped many
presents, filled the Santa Claus Pinata, nibbled the cookies and tipped
Santa's milk down the sink, emptied the water left out for the reindeer
and we
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 10:13:03 -0500, you wrote:
After speaking with Pentax USA and having no luck cleaning the contacts,
I'm going to send them the *istD body and the FA 50, FA 100 macro, and
the FA 135. Although it seems funny, they still think it might be the
lenses even though they work on the
A very big if. More to the point. would they release a FF camera and
stop producing APS? I don't think of the APS sensor as a stop gap. I
think it's a new format thet will persist for a long time.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
Merry Christmas and a very Pentastic New Year. ...
Joyeux Noêl et bonne année à tous.
Bonjour de France
Michel
I'm a lurker here (but I have a Pentax Program Plus) and have been using
eBay for 3 years.
If your eBay buyer refuses insurance, he's on his own, then? I don't see
when you're responsible to make up for his cheapness. If you hadn't offered
insurance, then that would be different.
Did you keep a
This is what I believe. Manufactures like to have an experimental run that
can be walked away from in case of problems before committing to new
technology, and that's how I view the entire APS experiment - just proving
the manufacturing technology for future purposes. Yes they are rumoured to
have
And, thank you, Doug, for keeping the list going for all of us. Happy Yuletide.
Doug Brewer wrote:
Just a quick note to thank you all for your contributions to the list
and keeping me entertained for another year. Whatever your persuasion, I
hope this is a joyous season for you and yours.
Tanya Mayer Photography:
Well, it has been Christmas day here for exactly 1 hour and 36 minutes.
Over here, Christmas is almost over. We celebrate on the 24th you see.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
I don't see why this is implied by the APS sensor. 35 mm style bodies
can take both APS and FF sensors. They may make a 24x36 sensor back for
a 645 camera so that MF cameras can have both film and digital and so
that back will be cheaper than a full 645 sized sensor.
All I'm saying is that
I hope everyone has a nice holiday season.
And those of you that don't believe in Santa should check out the NORAD
Santa-tracking website at
http://www.noradsanta.org/
They dutifully report his appearance and progress through North
American air space every year.
Many thank to you, Doug.
Merry Christmas..
Otis Wright
Doug Brewer wrote:
Just a quick note to thank you all for your contributions to the list
and keeping me entertained for another year. Whatever your persuasion,
I hope this is a joyous season for you and yours.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: alex wetmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I called Pentax Service and just got a recording telling me to mail
the camera to them with a note of what went wrong and my return
address and a telephone number. Is this their normal service model?
Yeah. You can
You could not be more wrong - although wheat is correct.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Leonard Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Päivä: 24. joulukuuta 2003
I shot some B G portraits a little while ago at cost as a favor to a
photographer friend. I was very pleased with the pictures as were the B G.
I was going to give the B G the professional lab enlargements at cost too.
I hoped to get a few more portrait jobs out of the assignment through word
Hi,
Tom Reese wrote:
I shot some B G portraits a little while ago at cost as a favor to a
photographer friend. I was very pleased with the pictures as were the B G.
I was going to give the B G the professional lab enlargements at cost too.
I hoped to get a few more portrait jobs out of
-Original Message-
From: Tom Reese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
numbskull
(deleted much stronger verbiage) bride took the 5x5 proofs
to some jiffy
print outfit and scanned them then got enlargements made
from the scans to
save a few dollars.
I feel your pain.
I used to think
Not an easy thing to deal with. Cheap people are just cheap! One
route that I have gone is to quit trying to make money on the prints
and just charge up front for the job/time. I get no quibbles about
people valuing my time and skills.
One real problem of this digital age is that it has
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not an easy thing to deal with. Cheap people are just cheap! One
route that I have gone is to quit trying to make money on the prints
and just charge up front for the job/time.
The only quibble I have with this is
On Dec 24, 2003, at 8:01 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
More importantly to serious photography enthusiasts like ourselves is
the matter of *what* film remains available. As high-end photography
goes almost exclusively digital, I'd expect the film emulsions that
remain in production to be those made
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Processing availablity will be the killer for colour negative film, as you
say. As film volumes start to drop, players will start to get out of the
processing game. They won't have any choice. Processors require a certain
minimum volume of product to maintain
If memory serves me right, a 127 on a 4x5 is much tighter than a 31 mm
on a 35 mm camera.. But i'll have to get out both cameras and do some
visual comparisons to be sure. In any case, the reason photographers
tend to communicate in terms of 35mm focal lengths is because the
customers
I don't know if it applies to all US industries, but car companies have
to support product for fifteen years.
On Dec 24, 2003, at 10:35 AM, graywolf wrote:
50 years ago companies in the US were required to support their
products for a minimum of 7 years after production ceased. I do not
think
Merry Christmas to you and yours Tanya. I was especially taken by your
remark that you will all be getting sunburnt. I spent New Years down
under one year, and it was just a mind blowing experience. It kind of
reverses one's whole perspective. Have a great day. I hope all your
children sleep
Whether you celebrate Christmas, Chanukah or another holiday, I hope
you have a great one. This is my fifth holiday season as a list member,
and I've come to enjoy the company of this cyberspace family very much.
Best wishes to all.
Paul Stenquist
I've been burned in a similar way many times. i don't give a shit. Let
them have crap if they want it. I make the pictures. If they want good
prints I'll provide them. If they want xerox copies, the hell with
them.
paul
On Dec 24, 2003, at 3:00 PM, Tom Reese wrote:
I shot some B G portraits a
Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
There's an inexorable trend for sensors to increase in size and decrease
in price.
A 24x36mm chunk of silicon wafer will always be a 24x36mm chunk of
silicon wafer, and there's no real reason that I can see to expect the
price of
On a wedding I do charge extra to deal with the order processing.
In general I have found little to no resistance to clients
understanding that they should be paying for a service. The service
is to take the wedding photos or family portraits. Most of them are
quite happy to see the breakout of
Leonard Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is Berliner Weisse, then?
Wheat flour used for making doughnuts?
Wheat is right, but it's beer, not flour. :-)
-tih
--
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo, Senior System Administrator, EUnet Norway
www.eunet.no T: +47-22092958 M: +47-93013940 F: +47-22092901
if you have sensor capable of full medium format quality, why would you want
to have an interchangeable back for 35mm film? the number of people wanting
such would be vanishingly small which means very high price.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Stach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
does high margin mean double, triple, or more for your cost of a roll of
film plus processing?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: What do you think?
I take a different view.
planning a several billion dollar experiment just to test the waters isn't
in the realm of what most corporations can afford, even spread over 10
years. RD costs are substantial and building a manufacturing line isn't
cheap. the Olympus E-1 is such an experiment and i think it is unlikely to
the incremental cost for a full frame sensor in medium format is a lot less
than for a 35mm system.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: Coming to terms with *ist D lens mag
think of the opportunities they never captured because they locked
themselves in to one FOV. i have 35mm lenses covering from 15mm to 500mm and
there are many things i do that are simply impossible without such a range.
i'm not a niche photographer.
Herb
- Original Message -
From:
what did your contract say? if your contract doesn't forbid this, you have
no legal recourse. if you have no contract doing work for hire
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 3:00 PM
Subject: how do
that to me says they don't know how to use their digital camera tools
adequately yet. if they are happy with the resolution of current digital
solutions, you can simulate the rest of film's characteristics digitally.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This one time, at band camp, Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
think of the opportunities they never captured because they locked
themselves in to one FOV. i have 35mm lenses covering from 15mm to 500mm and
there are many things i do that are simply impossible without such a range.
i'm not
I don't have this camera but usually the CF door should be easy to remove.
If you can do this yourself, it might be better to buy a new piece from them
and fix it yourself. Parts like this should be cheap.
Yours regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
My *ist D had an accidental meeting
On 24/12/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
The
numbskull
(deleted much stronger verbiage) bride took the 5x5 proofs
to some jiffy
print outfit and scanned them then got enlargements made
from the scans to
save a few dollars.
I feel your pain.
I used to think b+g's were just cheap, but I
For those who celebrate Christmas, have a happy one: for those who don't,
may this time of year be happy and joyful for you too. For all, now is the
time when family is the most important thing of all.
John Coyle
(This may be the first message written on Christmas Day itself, with the
advantage
On Dec 24, 2003, at 5:23 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
does high margin mean double, triple, or more for your cost of a roll
of
film plus processing?
I don't thinks so. The film manufacturers will still want to achieve
decent volume. And since they've eliminated RD, the technology is
already paid
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Whether you celebrate Christmas, Chanukah or another holiday, I hope
you have a great one. This is my fifth holiday season as a list member,
and I've come to enjoy the company of this cyberspace family very much.
Best wishes to all.
Paul Stenquist
Very sweetly put,
Many thanks, Doug, for your work in maintaining this forum for a pretty
motley community of camera and photo enthusiasts. Your work is really
appreciated.
As well, best wishes to you and yours for a great Christmas and a wonderful
New Year!
Pat White
Thats a big if. Whats not a big if is that I have an *istD now with
no prime under 85mm and one zoom 15-30 that work with the camera. So I
don't need to buy a bunch of new lenses, I need at least one lens
somewhere around 28-50 mm to fill that gap.
rg
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at
Most wedding pros here only let the BG take away the proofs if they've
bought them. They select the ones for enlargement at the studio precisely
to discourage scanning and cheap copies. I assume your proofs had your
copyright stamp on the back. Most one-hour photo places won't copy
copyrighted
On Dec 24, 2003, at 6:25 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:.
back to the kitchen and the duck now...
annsan
Hi Ann,
Good luck with the duck. I love duck, particularly as served at Shun
Lee Palace on 53rd Street. I'm doing a goose this year. I've eaten
goose in Germany serveral times and always enjoyed
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Tom Reese wrote:
The numbskull (deleted much stronger verbiage) bride took the 5x5 proofs
to some jiffy print outfit and scanned them then got enlargements made
from the scans to save a few dollars.
This is illegal. No lab should ever make prints from wedding proofs if
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Anthony Farr wrote:
If you fancy too much to drink, please don't drive. If you need to
drive, please don't drink too much. I'll be drinking Hahn Premium Lite,
a low alcohol Lager brewed in Sydney, and I'll raise my first one to the
folks at the PDML in about eight hours
When I did a few weddings back in the 70's (along with my normal PR work),
he who paid for the job owned the copyright, but he who did the shooting
owned the negatives as part of the artistic process (without right to
reproduce, unless he had a model telease).
So I guess it comes down to what's
Been there, done that, never got no effing tee shirt.
I feel your pain, but found out it is lot better to work for people who say,
That's resonable. Not cheap, but reasonable. as did one of my first corporate
clients way back when. Just something one has to learn from experience, I guess.
--
graywolf wrote:
Old American joke. The Brooklyn Bridge between Manhattan island and Brooklyn was
started in 1867 just after the Civil War and not completed until 1883. There
were many people killed in the construction of it including the designer. Most
of them from a mysterious caission
What are you including in costs. Direct, burdened, GA, RD deprec. etc.
Otis Wright
Herb Chong wrote:
does high margin mean double, triple, or more for your cost of a roll of
film plus processing?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I recommend doing it as TV says, charge a service fee for you work, I charge
$1000 (or whatever) to shoot a wedding which covers my time, equipment, my
assistant, film, processing, and proofs. Then let them do what they want with
the negatives, one of the the options being for you to get
Hell, even the junk yards mostly don't support cars more than 7 years old
anymore. There are parts for my '94 S-10 Blazer that you can not get anywhere.
Couldn't get soom trim parts even 4 years ago and had to fabricate something to
substitute. Luckily most of the drive train parts are still
A friend just came home to visit from Japan. He showed me his new camera. A
digital? No. An APS camera. He loves the prints it makes. I couldn't
believe he hadn't gone digital since digital is all the rage nowadays.
Jim A.
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Farr
Subject: Re: What do you think?
I would expect to see a continuing supply of pro films from
them Fuji, for the statutory period of support.
I wouldn't, based on Fuji's history in the market. Fuji is a high volume
market company.
They
- Original Message -
From: Chris Brogden
Subject: Re: how do you protect your work from inferior copies?
How does the work for hire law work in Canada and the US? Does the
photographer automatically get copyright for her work, or does she have to
specify in the contract that she
- Original Message -
From: Dave Miers
Subject: Processing color negative film
Hi
All this talk of film getting harder and harder to get processing has made
me think that maybe I should pursue this idea of mine to process my own.
I
only need to process the film into negatives and
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: how do you protect your work from inferior copies?
I have come to the conclusion that the casual photographer can no longer
protect his copy rights in any meaningful way.
I haven't bothered trying for at least 10 years.
I just hand over the
JC,
Sorry for the late response, but I've only just been catching up on PDML
mails since Nov.
Love the 3200. No big issues with it, scans beautifully. Only minor
quibbles:
* Wish the 120 film holder could do strips instead of one frame at a time.
* The Epson photoshop driver could be better.
99 matches
Mail list logo
