Hi all.
'SMC PENTAX PF FILTER 112mm JAPAN'
I thought I would keep it for a rainy day but I can't see myself buying
another fast 300mm anytime soon.
What Pentax glass does this fit? A* 300/2.8? FA* 250-600/5.6?
If so, then I believe I'm interested.
On 6/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Bizarre may a good term for the whole thing, if it even really happened.
IMHO anyone with any common sense wouldn't have admitted to any alliance or
relationship with the jumper, but rather just happened to be in the right
place at the right time. I
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A red tail would not have the bands inside the tail feathers. The length
of the tail in proportion to the body, and the length of the outmost dark
band at the end of the tail in proportion to the tail length really
suggest
a
Alan Chan escribió:
To all F/FA*300/4.5 users, does the rear element group of these lenses
(F* FA*) wobbles (also can hear the sound) when shook up and down?
Thanks.
Alan:
I have the F* version, and the rear element group doesn't wobble at all.
That's weird. Because mine wobbles like the FA*24/2 where the rear element
group wobbles when shook. :-(
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Alan:
I have the F* version, and the rear element group doesn't wobble at all.
Alan Chan escribió:
That's weird. Because mine wobbles like the FA*24/2 where the rear
element group wobbles when shook. :-(
Alan:
I have the F* version, and the rear element group doesn't wobble at all.
Alan:
I have just run to fetch my FA* 24 mm. and have shaken it like you said
(now I
i had occasion to watch A Hard Day's Night and i'm wondering which model
Pentax Ringo walks around with snapping pictures when he is playing hookie.
i don't have a super clear view but it's a black body with Asahi Pentax
visible in white letters.
Herb...
I'm pretty sure it's a Spotmatic.
My *ist D has become a pain in the bum!I am continually having to clean the
innards of it due to little black spots appearing all over the shots.I have
placed a new focussing screen in it to no avail,checked and recked my
lenses(and cleaned them)to no avail.My blower has collapsed from over use.Am
On 7 Feb 2004 at 11:57, Carlos Royo wrote:
By the way, I remember
that some time ago you said you had noticed some cromatic aberration in
the FA* 24 mm., so far I have seen none, and have used the lens
extensively for more than 11 years.
I;ve had two and it's there, just not as pronounced
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Christian wrote:
There are several flash brackets by numerous manufacturers that are similar
to the Hot shoe Grip set up and not so large as the Stroboframes.
Great analysis snipped
Thanks for the very detailed answer Christian. I had figured all that
out from Boz's site.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, mike wilson wrote:
Not directly mounted on the HSG, no. But I think there is a 5-series
hotshoe connector that is dead (no connections) for use on studio
lighting stands. (Come to think of it, any proprietary connector would
work - Jessops?) That on the HSG, flash on the
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Alan Chan wrote:
You can actually use the split image screen for the MZ/ZX-M for this camera.
I believe it will interfere with multi-point metering.
Kostas
Rob Studdert escribió:
On 7 Feb 2004 at 11:57, Carlos Royo wrote:
By the way, I remember
that some time ago you said you had noticed some cromatic aberration in
the FA* 24 mm., so far I have seen none, and have used the lens
extensively for more than 11 years.
I;ve had two and it's there,
I was sitting on the bus, looking out the window, and saw this small group,
apparently saying goodbye.
Unfortunately, I didn't have a body loaded with black and white, but let me
know what you think:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2111661size=lg
thanks,
frank
The optimist thinks
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use Kodak's E200 from time to time as a general walking around
film. Grain is so-so, not on par with ISO 100 emulsions but better than
the Kodak 400 Emulsions. In terms of latitude, it is very easy to work
with - almost like print film. Scan-ability
My roomate, Karen, checked Sibley's and National Geographic Birds of North
America, and she rings in with juvenile female Cooper's.
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL
i find it more noticeable and objectionable on my film bodies unless i
compose to have no high contrast edges in the corners of the image.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 8:10 AM
Subject: Re:
accoding to my Kodak contacts, EliteChrome and the Ektachrome 100S series of
emulsions are identical except for when they pick them for shipping to their
buyers. the Ektachrome G series are different.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Mark Dalal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Hi all.
'SMC PENTAX PF FILTER 112mm JAPAN'
I thought I would keep it for a rainy day but I can't see myself buying
another fast 300mm anytime soon.
What Pentax glass does this fit? A* 300/2.8? FA* 250-600/5.6?
If so, then I believe I'm
On 7/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Hi all.
Yes, you read that right. 112mm. I've got this filter sitting in my
drawer that's doing nothing. I originally got it from B and H in NY for a
Tokina 300mm f/2.8 as a front-element protector for $100US. It is in
Exc++ condition - the glass is clear
Perhaps you fiddle with it too much. If you are over-conscious of a
couple of pieces of dust, fiddling with the camera will only introduce
more dust, and it looks, from your description of your actions, that you
have been doing a lot of fiddling.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
My
If anyone tried to email me yesterday about any of the gear I'm selling,
please contact me again. An email server glitch yesterday afternoon
deleted all the day's mail before I could read it.
BTW: A PZ-1p went for about $320.00 on eBay a week ago.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
Speaking of birds... yesterday as I waled out my front door a bird flew
out of the bushes along side my driveway. Nothing unusual about that
except that after it gained some altitude and slowed down I could see it
was a raptor of some sort. Kind of surprising to see it in the shrubbery
here in the
Cotty wrote:
What Pentax glass does this fit? A* 300/2.8? FA* 250-600/5.6?
If so, then I believe I'm interested.
Good question - anyone know the filter sizes for the above lenses?
112mm according to Boz's site...
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/extreme-tele/index.html
S
-Original Message-
From: Christian Skofteland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Except that Tom said it was larger than a crow and
sharp-shinns are pretty small. Check your field guide again.
Red Tails have horizontal bands on the underside of their
tails (the red is on top) and a
Ok, so we're pretty sure it's not a peacock?
tv
I'd be willing to rule out hummingbird also.
HTH,
ERN
Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably just some fellow looking for stuff to decorate his motorbike with,
but I saw a sleek black roadbike emblazoned with a big fat pink PENTAX just
under its petrol tank. Wish I took a shot, but didn't have my camera with me
on my bicycle (here we go again
tom wrote:
Ok, so we're pretty sure it's not a peacock?
tv
You pick up on things quickly, Tom! :)
ann
Mark Cassino wrote:
Nice shot - but a bit hard to ID - how big was it?
Based on the shape of the tail, the markings on the beak, and the pattern
of the breast feathers my first guess would be a female sharp shinned hawk.
Should of been just under a foot long if that is the case.
Second
I have the F* version, and the rear element group doesn't wobble
at all.
Same here, with two F* samples.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: Chris
Subject: Spots on my Shots
My *ist D has become a pain in the bum!I am continually
having to clean the
innards of it due to little black spots appearing all
over the shots.I have
placed a new focussing screen in it to no avail,checked
and recked my
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Smith
Subject: RE: 6 x 7 Questions
William Robb wrote:
I have a light weight Manfrotto tripod, the 055 model,
which is junior under the 6x7.
It just doesn't cut it.
Wood tripods are very good with this camera.
I was just looking at getting
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then there is perception of size to muck it up - THe NGS
mentions maps goshhawks in winter in Tom's area... Coopers
not until Spring (not that the birds read the maps) - though
that was my first guess.
How MUCH
The sales department at work asked me if they could use one of my monster
truck photos in a presentation they're making for the client (Clear Channel
Entertainment).
It'll be an 8x10 matted in a frame with some type extolling the virtues of
this wonderful event and the fact that this year's
There have been DSLRs around for a while now, just not Pentax. How in
genral has the dust on the sesnosr pro=blem progressed for these Older
DSLRs? (if anyone knows.)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
Hi,
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I think I am getting there. What do you mean by any connector? My
understanding is that I am looking for a part that slides into the HSG
hotshoe and provides a hotshoe to be used just as a stand for the
flash. Am I right? I know all about the cables and the
Hi,
Cotty wrote:
On 7/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Hi all.
'SMC PENTAX PF FILTER 112mm JAPAN'
I thought I would keep it for a rainy day but I can't see myself buying
another fast 300mm anytime soon.
What Pentax glass does this fit? A* 300/2.8? FA* 250-600/5.6?
If
Hi,
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
as you said, Mark, a bit difficult - besides, we
all want it to
be something a tad more interesting than a plain
old red tail :)
Not so plain here 8-) Although it is rumoured that escapee Harris' are
now breeding in the UK. I've seen one here - but I do live in
Hi,
Looking through the pages at KMP and the Pentax download site, it seems
possible that the Off camera adaptor F (not the Hot shoe adaptor F) may
be what you need. It is not clear from the photgraph if it has the
ability to clip to a shoe. Eleanor?
You can also see what I mean about the
Mark Roberts wrote:
If anyone tried to email me yesterday about any of the gear I'm selling,
please contact me again. An email server glitch yesterday afternoon
deleted all the day's mail before I could read it.
BTW: A PZ-1p went for about $320.00 on eBay a week ago.
--
Mark Roberts
At what point is it defined commercial? Just because your equipment looks
professional? You have to sell something or be proved to have intent to
sell something for it to be commercial in my mind.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07,
Hey, who's side are you one here! LOL :)
-
Anyone loitering at the DZ is likely to be
at least informed of this interesting if illegal activity, if not part of
it, and if I were a cop, I'd nick 'em!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
At 07:41 PM 2/6/2004 -0600, William Robb wrote:
MLU cameras have more than just that as an advantage. They
also beefed up the film transport at that time, which
cured some other ills.
I'll most definitely be looking for a body with MLU.
The 6x7 is actually easier to hand hold than a 35mm,
How's
At 04:08 AM 2/7/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Except that Tom said it was larger than a crow and sharp-shinns are pretty
small. Check your field guide again. Red Tails have horizontal bands on
the underside of their tails (the red is on top) and a rounded tail.
Sharp-shinned have a very squared off
Thanks - I had read that earlier and that was the source of my concern
(though I had lost the link to the article.) For now I really don't expect
to use telephotos so hopefully the mirror slap will not be a major problem.
- MCC
At 01:56 PM 2/6/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Most people shoot the 67
I had a dead mint example of the 55mm F3.5 SMC Takumar
and it was an OUTSTANDING lens. Only problem was the
100mm filter size. Beware of early non-smc versions.
I only paid $350 for mine and got $400 when I sold
it about 3 months ago.
JCO
Mike Wilson posted:
Looking through the pages at KMP and the Pentax download site, it seems
possible that the Off camera adaptor F (not the Hot shoe adaptor F) may
be what you need. It is not clear from the photgraph if it has the
ability to clip to a shoe. Eleanor?
In my other reply I
Commercial photography which rightly should require a permit is easy to id.
First clue, there is an equipment van. Second clue, there are 2 to 30 people
involved. Third clue is huge relectors and light blocking panals. 4th.. Props
and prop wranglers. Then there are all the talent hanging about.
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: Spots on my Shots
What kind of lenses do you use? How often do you change
them.
I haven't adjusted my technique for the new camera, which
may be contributing to the mess my sensor is in.
I routinely forget to turn the camera off
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino
For 6 x 7 users - how are you out putting your stuff? I
have a Microtek
flatbed scanner but assume that I'd need something
better for prints -
maybe a scanning service? The local lab charges $40 a
frame for a high res
scan - I hope they are on
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino
Subject: Re: 6 x 7 Questions
The 6x7 is actually easier to hand hold than a 35mm,
How's that? Looks like it would be pretty big...
Sure, it's big. It fills 2 hands for sure. It weighs close
to 7 pounds with a lens and meter prism.
But, all
Backwards in time to the guilty until proven innocent!
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: photographer arrested
the NPS service has, after many years, decided that it means you have
Hi,
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've decided that rather than spend the really big $$$ for a 4000 dpi
film scanner, I'll stick with the Scan Multi II for 12 x 16 and under
prints and pay for professional drum scans on the very rare occasions
that I want/need to go for really big prints. If that'll
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Wilson posted:
Looking through the pages at KMP and the Pentax download site, it seems
possible that the Off camera adaptor F (not the Hot shoe adaptor F) may
be what you need. It is not clear from the photgraph if it has the
ability to clip to a
John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the link Francis - the In-Cockpit video is particularly
impressive. The pilot's heart must have been in his mouth when he realised
he was too low for the manoeuvre.
Nah. Those guys are as cool as they come. Very well trained and
experience
Now
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've decided that rather than spend the really big $$$ for a 4000 dpi
film scanner, I'll stick with the Scan Multi II for 12 x 16 and under
prints and pay for professional drum scans on the very rare occasions
that I want/need to go for really big prints. If that'll work
tom:
I seem to recall a story of some national park where you basically couldn't
do any shooting with a nice camera without a permit. The hearsay was
basically that it was defined as commercial photography if you were using a
professional camera.
I've been to several pop concerts lately where it
Galen Rowell lost such a court case at least once. it was for a long time
prove you will never sell any of these photos and then we will give your
equipment and film back. if you could, sometimes, you got some of your
equipment back within a year. his climbing friends had lost several such
cases.
i have been told that in DC it is easy to get a permit. you just go to some
place in the morning and pay a nominal fee and you had a permit for the day.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 12:49 PM
Subject: RE:
Does anyone here have the *istD grip that can check on something for me?
I noticed that one of the pins on my grip that connect to the body is
shorter than the others. I want to know if mine is defective or this is
normal.
I've been having problems with the grip such as it showing that it
Hadn't heard about that. The problem around here is that there are so many
jurisdictions...NPS, Capitol Police, DC Police, Military Police
tv
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Maybe it's just my mood today but...
Saturday, February 7, 2004, :49:59 AM, you wrote:
t The easy answer is if there's an exchange of money, but other situations may
t warrant it as well.
Just because your
equipment looks professional?
t The first question I'm always asked down at the
One of my pins is shorter also. It seems that when the power switches
between the body and grip, the readings can be odd. There have been
previous threads on this. If I get a low battery reading, I turn the
camera off and on and then it is ok again. Wish I could remember the
entire thread, but
Herb Chong:
i have been told that in DC it is easy to get a permit. you just go to some
place in the morning and pay a nominal fee and you had a permit for the day.
What are these permits for, really? To me it sounds very ironic that
you need a permit for photography in public places in the land
If you don't drink tea, perhaps this shot will convince you to try ;-)
http://www.elvum.net/gallery/barnes_flat/flat_chris
S
Hello,
I remember a thread from several weeks ago regarding FA 28-105 f/3.2 in
black finish. Looks like BH will be stoking an imported version some time
soon. Price is still unavailable at this time, though I anticipate that it
will not be too much higher than current price this lens in silver
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t The first question I'm always asked down at the monuments
is Is that
t a professional camera? The next question is Do you have
a permit?
No, sir, it is not a professional camera, see, it is a Pentax...
I scan my 6x7 negs on an Epson 3200, using the film holder. A 3200 dpi
scan in 48 bit yields a file of well over 200 megabytes. 18x13 prints
on my Epson 1200 are very finely detailed and extremely sharp. My only
bitch would be that the printer doesn't always handle shadows as well
as I'd like.
On Feb 7, 2004, at 11:57 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
I have a Manfrotto 3036 tripod and 3038 ball head, also old 3057 -
hopefully those will suffice.
Might need a new backpack, though...
I use the Manfroto 3036 tripod with my 6x7 (and my Speed Graphic) with
a 3047 three way head. I find the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not having a permit for what? Did they impute the whole offence to him
because
he was engaged in a common enterprise or something? it seems rather
bizarre to
me.
Hmm... You mean like conspiring to illegal parachuting?
I would say
Saturday morning and it's bright and breezy in deepest Oxfordshire. Stef
and I went down to the river to see how much flooding there was from
recent rains.
www.macads.co.uk/snaps/spare.html
Hope your Saturday is going/went well...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
One of my pins is shorter than the others. It's at the end of the
middle row.
Paul
On Feb 7, 2004, at 1:41 PM, Robert Gonzalez wrote:
Does anyone here have the *istD grip that can check on something for
me? I noticed that one of the pins on my grip that connect to the
body is shorter than the
TV , on National Parks Cameras, wrote:
The hearsay was basically that it was defined as commercial
photography if you were using a professional camera.
HAR! ... just point to the Pentax on the prism, then!
*everyone* knows that only Canon Nikon are professional
Shel wrote:
Flash! Gimnme a break ... inappropriate for this kind of
photo. Anyway, the shadow area plays an important part of
the picture. IT adds a little tension, makes it real.
... not to mention the back-reflction off the window
might blind everyone in the bus,
On 7/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Hey, who's side are you one here! LOL :)
-
Anyone loitering at the DZ is likely to be
at least informed of this interesting if illegal activity, if not part of
it, and if I were a cop, I'd nick 'em!
Yeah but if I were a cop I'd nick
On 7/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
There have been DSLRs around for a while now, just not Pentax. How in
genral has the dust on the sesnosr pro=blem progressed for these Older
DSLRs? (if anyone knows.)
I generally don't notice it - though I do clean about once every month or
so. It's
Anders Hultman wrote:
To me it sounds very ironic that you need a permit for photography
in public places in the land of the free.
another blink HAR! /blink is in order here .
... freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose
Bill
Thanks for sharing, Cotty!
I have spent a day learning how NOT to shoot snow crystals...:-)
And then playing some online chess...
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 8:24 PM
Subject: OT -
Hi,
i have been told that in DC it is easy to get a permit. you just go to some
place in the morning and pay a nominal fee and you had a permit for the day.
What are these permits for, really? To me it sounds very ironic that
you need a permit for photography in public places in the land of
Creativity is a personal thing, and what is or isn't right will vary
depending who you talked to. However if you look at my original post on
this, I mention something about a clear shot, referring to the window in
the way. However if Frank was on the ball, he would be prepared to take
another
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: photographer arrested
Commercial photography which rightly should require a
permit is easy to id.
First clue, there is an equipment van. Second clue,
there are 2 to 30 people
involved. Third clue is huge relectors and light
blocking
Robert,
Just took the D-BG1 Grip off my *ist D . . . one pin is definitly
about half the height of the others. It's the one in the middle row on
the left side as I look at it from the back.
IL Bill
On Saturday, February 7, 2004, at 12:41 PM, Robert Gonzalez wrote:
Does anyone here have the
Whew! Thanks all who responded. I guess the shorter pin is normal. I
need the grip for a shoot today and I thought I was going to have to
deal with a potentially flakey grip.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
One of my pins is shorter also. It seems that when the power switches
between the body and grip,
On 7/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Cotty wrote:
What Pentax glass does this fit? A* 300/2.8? FA* 250-600/5.6?
If so, then I believe I'm interested.
Good question - anyone know the filter sizes for the above lenses?
112mm according to Boz's site...
William Robb wrote:
My present heavyweight is the Manfrotto 028, which seems
good under the 6x7, though the Zone VI Standard is still
the best tripod I have used.
I am a big fan of wood tripods.
Having compared the specification between the 055 and 028, I can see why.
Now to compare
Hi Bruce,
on 07 Feb 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
There have been previous threads on this. If I get a low battery
reading, I turn the camera off and on and then it is ok again.
Yes, it's a known problem. It only occurs if you use rechargebles in the
camera _and_ the grip. AFAIK Pentax Japan is
I work in an ad agency. We sometimes shoot in public parks. We might
have three grip trucks, a camera truck, and a crew of 30 or so. It kind
of spoils the park for everyone else. That's why you have to have a
permit to shoot commercial photography in a public park. (For a big
shoot like that,
freedom is open to interpretation
Norm
Anders Hultman wrote:
Herb Chong:
i have been told that in DC it is easy to get a permit. you just go
to some
place in the morning and pay a nominal fee and you had a permit for
the day.
What are these permits for, really? To me it sounds very ironic
dito,
I started playing around with fancy website stuff. Learned some interesting
new features.
But nothing for PUG for the time being. But we'll see.
Cheers
Adelheid
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Samstag, 7. Februar 2004 20:41
To: [EMAIL
This must have been since 9/11 because in early 2001, we went to DC, and I
was all over the place with a couple of cameras and some nice, long lenses
and no one ever said a word. The only place no cameras were permitted,
inside or out, was our tour of the White House. However, my husband did get
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t The first question I'm always asked down at the monuments
is Is that
t a professional camera? The next question is Do you have
a permit?
No, sir, it is not a professional camera, see, it is a
Hi,
Already done in the case of the National Trust. No photography at all
allowed inside Trust buildings,
the same thing here in the National Maritime Museum - a complete ban
on photography - but no reasons given.
I've been stopped several times, and sometimes just 'reminded' even
though I
Most of these types of museum rules were intended to ban flash. Which could
possibly damage something (think flashbulbs here), or annoy other visitors. It
is another one of those rules that has been expanded unthinkingly. Of course, at
museum's that want to sell you their post cards and books,
tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe Tom could invite him/her back
I did, but he hasn't rsvp'd.
Well, he just showed up again-
mike wilson wrote:
Hi
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Also, I have about 150 polaroids from over 10
years ago stored away -
they are emitting a nasty odor when I open the
box...with no deterioration
of image.
What sort of odour? Vinegary? Sulphury?
Kinda smells like
did you see his tail when he flew away? ;-)
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:27 PM
Subject: RE: bird ID
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't forget that to plug the 5p cable into the camera you are going to need
the hot shoe adapter F or Fg.
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: Flash
Yeah, it had some feathers.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Christian Skofteland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 7:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bird ID
did you see his tail when he flew away? ;-)
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
duh! what color where the tops of the F*^$%%^ feathers! ;-)
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 7:09 PM
Subject: RE: bird ID
Yeah, it had some feathers.
tv
On 7 Feb 2004 at 11:57, William Robb wrote:
I haven't adjusted my technique for the new camera, which
may be contributing to the mess my sensor is in.
I routinely forget to turn the camera off before
dismounting the lens, almost always have the lens pointing
up when I remove it, and rarely
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
