Hallo,
NR is only used for speeds longer as 1/4 sec.
If NR is off you can shoot 6 frames continueslly, with NR only 5.
One space in the buffer is for the subtractive mask
Von: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NR is ISO independent and will cause no image degradation, it uses a real
time
I found out the so-called Sigma mount is in fact a PK mount. I am trying to
find out which Pentax wide-angle lens can be used on the Sigma SD10, which
has got a protective glass in front of the mirror so that protruding rear
elements cannot get in.
I am looking for a lenses in the 14mm range,
Hi,
I'm thinking about buying a Metz 54 MZ-3 flash for my Pentax *ist-D
Does anyone know that this flash(with 3702 adapter) supports P-TTL, HSS and wireless?
Thanks
On Feb 9, 2004, at 06:44, Cotty wrote:
Have I missed anything? I always do
I just recalibrated profiled my monitor last week. I generated
profiles for a target gamma of both 1.8 (Mac) and 2.2 (PC), and chose
to use 2.2 as my personal preference. BTW when calibrating you can
also choose
Hopefully I will be able to get me an *ist D maybe in a month or two.
Meanwhile, and as a backup/second kit, I will continue using my MZ5 (Maybe get me
another MZ body since the AF no longer works on the latter).
I already have the 500FTZ flash.
My question:
What does it take to get two flashes
What I was doing John was to encourage Arnie to continue his
experiment, nothing more.
It's your opinion that the blurring of the vehicle detracts
from the image. I think it makes a stronger, more realistic
image.
Anyway, he said he wanted to experiment and practice what he
was doing ...
John
Your opinion IMO, flash produces generic shots in this
instance. And as Arnie gets better by practice, his results
will improve, and the cars will blur less and less. But if
he starts to rely upon flash just to get the shot he won't
be practicing what he said he wants to practice, and will
Let me rephrase that: I think it can make a stronger, more
dynamic and realistic image.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I think it makes a stronger, more realistic
image.
BTW, when I get more of my negs scanned, I'll put up a bunch
of shots of moving vehicles at night. I've photographed a
lot more over the past 35 years than candid street shots,
John ...
BTW, I don't wear a hat ;-))
John Francis wrote:
With all due respect, Shel - you're talking through your
Metz doesn't support these features so far. The latest adaptor is SCA3702.
If you do not need the extra power, AF360FGZ is a better option. 54MZ3 is a
heavy flash.
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I'm thinking about buying a Metz 54 MZ-3 flash for my Pentax *ist-D
Does anyone
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Pentax SMCP-J-FA 18-35mm f/4-5.6 AL Lens (around AUD$350)
and
Sigma AF 18-50mm f3.5-5.6 DC Lens (around AUD$250)
I really don't want to spend alot of money as I would prefer to save it for
the 16-45mm, but I would like something fairly
I like titbits better.
On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 21:53, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
OMG, that is so funny - my smell checker just changed these things before I
posted - I PROMISE that I didn't type them like this:
Ok, gutta get to a screaming baby and put my face on - I am meeting Bob
Lasse,
I have been thinking about this for quite a while also, as whatever you decide
leads to quite a lot of money being spent - and of course what you really need
depends on the kind of shots you do.
Here are the options I considered (both the MZ5 and the *ist D will support all
setups):
1)
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
(Maybe get me another MZ body since the AF no longer works on the
latter).
How did this happen?
What does it take to get two flashes off either camera and to what functionality?
Have a look at the bottom of Boj's page:
Hello,
This is almost off-topic, but I hope the subject warns enough. My dad
has an old Zorki-4 (I think 4) rangefinder. Would the Pentax AF201SA
work on it (full manual), or will one destroy the other?
If the Pentax flash won't work, what should I buy him? We are a few
thousand miles apart
Some new accessories for the 645n/ii announced.
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/products/filmcamera/accessory/index645n2_f
inder.html#03
Does this mean there is still some mileage in this camera in Pentax's
eyes?
The *istD camera that I bought in Australia was assembled from Japanese
parts,in the Phillipines.Where are the US versions aaembled(any body
know?)and if they are assembled in Nippon they might be a better option than
the local one.Assuming they are made in Nippon.
Regards Christopher Kennedy
They are all assembled in the Phillipines.
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 February 2004 10:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *istD Manufacture
The *istD camera that I bought in Australia was assembled
from Japanese parts,in the
Tanya,
Do you have any suggestions as to where I can get a piece of carton
suitable for this?
Also tips for the anaesthetic are most welcome.
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 04:18, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Ok, so this is totally off topic - but things have been a bit subdued here
the past few
Could be some left over screens from the 645nII kits sold in Japan.
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Some new accessories for the 645n/ii announced.
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/products/filmcamera/accessory/index645n2_f
inder.html#03
Does this mean there is still some mileage in
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 03:09, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I suggest that we officially name it da lens -- as in da Bears
(Chicago's football team, for non-Americans).
I don't think non-Americans would call this football, right?
But anyway, thanks for your review, I own the 24-90 myself, and I am not
The Brits went higher last year though:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/gloucestershire/2971339.stm
And you gotta see what some people get up to:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2176024.stm
I found this fascinating when I first came across it a year or more ago!
And wow - a list member
I've done swish pans with second curtain flash. If the flash is
slightly under the overall exposure it doesn't really change the look,
it just crisps up the subject a small amount. In fact, if done
correctly, one can't even determine whether a flash was used. I don't
have an example handy, but
I left my cards at home and cannot complete checkout on some items
from a US dealer. I consider this an omen and ask those knowledgeable:
the items cost about $120 and are reasonably light but bulky (OC flash
equipment, as discussed in another thread). Will the customs take
interest and at what
Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Brits went higher last year though:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/gloucestershire/2971339.stm
And you gotta see what some people get up to:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2176024.stm
OK. Now I have two more items to add to my packing list for
- Original Message -
From: Sung Nee
Subject: PK mount lenses
I found out the so-called Sigma mount is in fact a PK
mount. I am trying to
find out which Pentax wide-angle lens can be used on the
Sigma SD10, which
has got a protective glass in front of the mirror so
that protruding
Trippy shot Jos- very nicely done. I haven't really looked into the
snowflake photography thing yet, but Mark's site is definitely on the
to-visit-in-the-near-future list.. Keep it up!
Cheers,
Ryan
Jostein wrote:
Gang,
This was _fun_!
Now if it only could start snowing again...:-)
Cheers,
Jostein
-
PLease don't hope for snow at GFM jostein -
though it would be fun to watch you do this...
fascinating techy virtuoisty and what a strange
looking snowflake!
Looks almost like
http://www.fifth-essence.com/archive/bestpix2003/index.htm
Don't know if this was mentioned before, these photographs are almost as
good as the PUG.
--
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just got one of these, and was wondering (from anyone who's got one or has
used one before) what lens combos have been known to show good results. On a
bit of a tangent- can it couple with a Sigma 70 200 2.8 to use just as a
1.7x teleconverter?
Cheers,
Ryan
Hey has anyone noticed this-
http://sigmaphoto.com/Html/pages/80-400os.htm
Sigma's version of IS.. compensates for horizontal and vertical shake in two
modes. And in the lens chart here:
http://sigmaphoto.com/Html/lenschart.htm
they're making it for Pentax too! (we know they skipped us with their
I could swear one of those eagles looks a lot like a swan... g
Norm
Herb Chong wrote:
i spent a good part of Saturday afternoon doing an American Bald Eagle
survey to count the number of birds roosting in the area. here are some of
the pictures from the day. all were taken with my *istD and Sigma
Hi Kostas,
As far as I remember, the Zorki 4 (I used to own one) doesn't
have a hotshoe, just an accessory shoe, which means that you'll
need a flash that can be connected to the PC socket.
Your father could be probably happier with a flash like the
Sunpak 383 or 144, or any other model that
Sorry to burst the bubble, but OS only works in previously IS bodies. I
think they said they were going to supply a NON-OS version in Pentax
mount later, but I don't see it listed on the second page you linked...
Better keep asking that depressing question instead.
-Original Message-
Actually Frank, the emotions displayed by the subjects were good, I just
didn't like the composure...the lady to the far right is distracting,
the cars to the top left as well. (doing this from memory) My minds eye
sees this in BW with just the lady and child with the Canada bus in the
The lens does NOT appear to be available to Pentax according to the lens
chart. It shows a - under P for Pentax.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 9:28 AM
Subject: Sigma's version of IS is out?
Rob I believe I caught them while they were doing the update! I just
reloaded the page I pointed you to (the lens chart) and there isn't the 'o'
in the Pentax column like there was before. I know what I saw the first time
round because I followed the 80-400 OS row to the Pentax column to see an
Arggghhh - you must have jumped when you saw it there for a minute!
No wonder you posted here with glee. Obviously some cock-up on their
part... ...Or maybe just they loaded the post-PMA page too soon and
took it down again because Pentax don't want us to know OS is supported
in the new
Oops, I meant 'flanked by two 'o's..
I also remember the G (in the N** column) flanked by to 'o's on each side.
Jumped is exactly right.. I bumped my table with my leg to have my notebook
screen wobble! I don't think it was a cock-up though. They prolly were doing
a live update- but seriously..
Thanks Joe. I think I'll go for the faster lens. Power zoom isn't important
to me. I'm a zoom neophyte. I've been shooting with manual focus primes for
thirty years and will continue in that vein, but I thought I ought to have
an autofocus zoom for snapshots and lazy day walkarounds.
Paul
Joe
yes, you've been stricken. stop sending e-mails to the list!
;-)
Christian
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: test
Some jerk filled my inbox with huge attachments today, and I think I
Still here!! Egg-sellent!
Well, it's excellent for me, anyway. I guess the rest of you may not be so
thrilled. g
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree with the others on most points. One difference is that the AF
system D has cross sensors and the MZ-S doesn't, particularly the
central one. I tend to use the single central sensor setting, but have
found I have to tilt the MZ-S to get a lock sometimes. As noted on this
list, the D
The older I get, the more I realize that Monty Python wasn't humour. It was
a real reflection of English Life.
-frank, wondering why the Penguin's on the Telly
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Cotty
Perhaps they see Pentax and think its a toy camera.
Jim A.
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 11:34:44 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: photographer arrested
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004
Rob Brigham wrote:
The Brits went higher last year though:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/gloucestershire/2971339.stm
Yeah, they're the ones who broke our record :-) We still held the
record for the highest ironed summit, but even that's gone now. The
current record's 6,959m and is
Kostas,
I've found that if the equipment is used, fairly old (ie not current model)
and labelled as such, the UK Customs and Excise don't take much interest.
However, in theory you pay duty (I think about 3% on photographic gear) and
VAT at 17.5%.
It's probably best to assume that you will pay
I just shipped a lens to a list member in Germany. UPS wouldn't take it without
a declared value and the value had to match the amount I insured the lens for.
Germany charged customs and duty of $55 on a $120 lens. I felt bad about this,
but had no way of anticipating that it would happen.
Paul
Anyone familiar with the Minolta Scan Dual II? I have one (don't care for it
much, so haven't used it much.) Anyway, I was using it recently and found that
when I scan a strip of negatives the scans vary in density even though the
negatives are the same. In all cases, the #1 image is very dark,
In a couple of weeks, I'll be shooting a friend's band. A flash is right
out, due to type of music they play.
I really don't know what the lighting will be like, except it will not be
particularly bright. I'm thinking I'll need either 1600 or 3200. B W, of
course.
So, I'm thinking a 1600
I see Midwest Photo, in their new on-line PDF, has filters made by Pentax (49mm) for
sale for $4 each. Anyone interested might check them out.
CRB
--
--
Collin Brendemuehl
void C( JobAvailability )
char JobAvailability[30];
{
C( program run );
C( shop stop C
Never send anything by UPS.
They're jerks. I've never had anything shipped to me by them where they
haven't tried to screw me. I hate them.
Whenever I have something sent to me, I always specify, not by UPS.
Saying this, I recognize that you may have had no choice, Paul. Or that the
Looking at the Kodak site, it appears that T Max doesn't come in 1600, only
400 and 3200. Anyone ever use 3200? Have you pulled it to 1600? Did you
like it?
thanks,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
I have and use that scanner. I only use Vuescan software with it and
have not noticed anything like you mentioned. You might try a
download of Vuescan (www.hamrick.com) - trial software is free and see
if it makes any difference. If you still see the same problem with
that, I would guess you
Hello frank,
My favorite is Delta 3200 - I believe that it is actually a 1600 film
that can be pushed to 3200. Someone will correct me if I am wrong. I
tried Fuji Neopan 1600 and at least my lab processed it poorly - came
out way too contrasty.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, February 9,
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, frank theriault wrote:
So, I'm thinking a 1600 film, that's pushable to 3200 with no problems, so I
can take one film and use it at whatever speed the lighting dictates.
Did you read the article Shel advertised the other day on available
light weddings? The author seemed to
frank, i tried to send you an off-list email last week and it bounced -
maybe a similar thing happened then?
tan.
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:05 AM
Subject: test
Some jerk filled my inbox with
Frank Theriault asked:
I really don't know what the lighting will be like, except it will not be
particularly bright. I'm thinking I'll need either 1600 or 3200. B W, of
course.
So, I'm thinking a 1600 film, that's pushable to 3200 with no problems, so I
can take one film and use it
Wow, a question that I have direct and relevant experience with... :-D
Have a look at http://www.elvum.net/gallery/dk - all but the last three
were taken on Delta 3200 exposed at 1600 ('cos that's as far as the ME
Super goes...) and a mix of flash and available light (mostly the latter
- I
On 9 Feb 2004 at 16:31, frank theriault wrote:
Looking at the Kodak site, it appears that T Max doesn't come in 1600, only 400
and 3200. Anyone ever use 3200? Have you pulled it to 1600? Did you like it?
Hi Frank,
I regularly use TMZ (Tmax 3200) for shooting concerts. It is actually an
Take the brightest lens you have. I've done this type of thing and 1.4
is almost a must. If you have the 50mm 1.2, then thats a good one for
this type of thing. Otherwise you get alot of blur. And 1600 film is
good, a little grainy but good.
frank theriault wrote:
In a couple of weeks,
Hi Ryan,
I have used the AF1.7x + Sigma 70-200/2.8 combo (on a Z-1p -
just once, though).
The results were really good for the kind of situation (typical
PJ work, a subject around 7m in front of me, lens at 200mm and
flash), quite sharp and contrasty. I plan to do other testing of
the combo, but
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello frank,
My favorite is Delta 3200 - I believe that it is actually a
1600 film that can be pushed to 3200.
TMZ, D3200 and Neopan 1600 are all quite a bit slower then the box speed,
but they push well. If you
Jan,
Thanks for this information. Currently I can manage with the 24-90, but
I miss the wide end, so I think I would be happy with the 16-45mm. I
need to save a bit, it would help if I have a job again :-(
I looked at your site, nicely done with your USA trips layout. I see I
have been on a few
No, I don't think so, Tan. My inbox was no where near full last week,
AFAIK. I think that Hotmail's spamguard works too well sometimes. I get
pretty much no spam at all, but I seem to not get the odd e-mail in the
bargain. Which can sometimes be okay, depending who is trying to reach me
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
(Maybe get me another MZ body since the AF no longer works on the
latter).
How did this happen?
I don't know, it just sort of died on me. At first, when turning the
Thanks a lot for the info, Sven.
I guess I will look further into alternative #4.
Do you happen to have a rough estimate of the costs of the various options you listed?
Lasse
From: keller.schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lasse,
I have been thinking about this for quite a while also, as whatever you
I get a great deal on UPS shipping through work. For shipments within the US they're
great. I didn't know about their policy regarding
customs and duties. However, the recipient did save on the shipping cost.
Paul
frank theriault wrote:
Never send anything by UPS.
They're jerks. I've never
Some jerk filled my inbox with huge attachments today, and I think I started
bouncing e-mails. Just wanted to see if I've been stricken from the list
yet.
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
Just picked this up from eBay
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2984661047
Looking forward to many hours back in the darkroom and some poster
size prints.
Kind regards
Kevin
--
__
(_ \
_) )
To be fair, Paul,
The only problems I've had with them have been with items shipped up from
the US. If you got a corporate rate, and didn't know of their reputation
shipping internationally, then you certainly aren't to blame (and I didn't
mean to attribute blame to you, btw).
There have
John Francis wrote
As for practicing and learning the subject - I'd have thought
that the photographer who was prepared to experiment with the
techniques involved, and see how they affected the resulting
images, was doing a better job of that than one who refused
to even consider one
FYI a place called Publishing Perfection (www.pubperfect.com) has
refurbished units of the Minolta Dimage Scan Multi, with 3 month warranties,
for $299. I ordered one and am very pleased. They also have the Scan Multi
II (ie Scan Multi with ROC and GEM software) for $399.
Looks like a nice deal there, Kevin.
Even that nice wooden grip and aluminium case!
Methinks you scored. g
congrats,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
In some neighbourhoods, the last thing you want to do at night when you have
a couple of thousand dollars of cameras and lenses hanging from around your
neck, is draw attention to yourself. vbg
Not to mention the fact that some folks, mistaking camera flashes for muzzle
flashes, get a bit
In light of some the recent discussion, I was tempted not to post these
anymore, except on Friday. But then I figured, even if I'm _not_ breaking
the rules, I may as well go ahead and post some more. So here we go:
That MX/LX Focusing screen I asked about earlier:
Well, it looks like you've said it all, John ;-))
How would you deal with the problems of flash distracting
drivers? That begs another question: how might the police
feel about such business?
John Francis wrote:
John Francis wrote
As for practicing and learning the subject - I'd
Do they set off a bright flash into the eyes of the drivers?
Rob Studdert wrote:
Y'know, I was thinking about just that early this morning
... it could be a very disruptive event and may even cause
an accident.
In Oz they are supposedly used to reduce the number of accidents, robotic
Oh, it's you again ... well, take a seat in the back and sit
quietly.
LOL
frank theriault wrote:
Still here!! Egg-sellent!
Well, it's excellent for me, anyway. I guess the rest of you may not be so
thrilled. g
Hi team,
A month or two back I mentioned to the list that I had tested the SMC Pentax-A*
135mm 1:1.8 against the Voigtländer Macro APO-Lanthar 125mm F2.5 SL on the *ist
D and that I would publish the results. Well I did format them to be posted to
the Pentax lens test site however I forgot
On 9 Feb 2004 at 17:38, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Do they set off a bright flash into the eyes of the drivers?
If you are in the on-coming lane yes, other wise you just see it in your rear
vision mirrors.
See the link WRT flash positioning.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
On 10 Feb 2004 at 9:28, Sung Nee wrote:
I thought I read that it was a K-Mount
I have no knowledge of the various mounts. I was informed by a lens adaptor
maker that it's PK mount and I managed to put my PK mount adaptor onto the
Sigma. Put a 120 Imagon and a Leica M 90 on it and both
When they tried it here in Ontario, Canada on an experimental basis several
years ago, the cameras and flashes were on top of poles, some 15 or 20 feet
in the air, and the flash fired after the car had passed, taking a photo of
the rear license plate.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is
Omg! Rob those results make the Pentax-A 135mm look like a piece of CRAP!!!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:48 PM
Subject: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtländer 125mm F2.5 SL
Hi team,
A
At 10:53 10/02/04, you wrote:
So how did you manage to fit a Leica M lens and what was the range of focal
distances?
Through a Pentax T2 focusing mount adaptor and a PK mount adaptor. The
adaptor maker made it for me to get the M lens on my R body.
To get it on the Pentax the adaptor-maker said
Hey it's a while since we had a survey...
I'm interested in making an informal survey of the noise performance of our
*ist D cameras. Anyone with access to a PC who has permission to run the little
test app at http://www.starzen.com/imaging/deadpixeltest.htm can participate.
One exposure is
Frits wrote:
Tanya, Do you have any suggestions as to where I can get a piece of carton
suitable for this? Also tips for the anaesthetic are most welcome.
Frits, your average, run of the mill, refrigerator box should work (of
course, you'd need to buy a new refrigerator first, but it is little
On 10 Feb 2004 at 10:12, Sung Nee wrote:
Through a Pentax T2 focusing mount adaptor and a PK mount adaptor. The
adaptor maker made it for me to get the M lens on my R body.
To get it on the Pentax the adaptor-maker said just put on the PK mount
adaptor instead of the Leica mount adaptor.
On 10 Feb 2004 at 12:04, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Omg! Rob those results make the Pentax-A 135mm look like a piece of CRAP!!!
Hi Tan,
It's all in your perspective. It just proves that the V is superb but the P is
infinitely better at f1.8 too :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
Chris asked: P.S.Tan,are you seriously trying to get the rest of us to
believe life is anything but quiet in Northern Banana Benders Land?(Northern
Queensland for the unititiated).
QUIET?!?! In a house with 4 and 5 yo boys, and a 15 month old terror toddler
of a girl who has to make ALOT of noise
Herb wrote:
it sounds like the lamp is going. incidentally, how long do you let the
scanner warm up before using it. even with negatives, i would let it warm up
about 5 to 10 minutes before using it. that's a separate issue from your
problem. i noticed on my prior scanner, a Microtek 35t, that
Nice tests thanks. Drawback to using the istD is it wont reveal the
differences if any in the corners of the images when using film or
a full frame sensor. But that can wait for the istD-II I guess.
Id like to see the same tests but with the 120mm F2.8 SMCT or 120mm 2.8 SMCK
vs the VL 125mm F2.5!
this is the case. you can tell by the rear lens cap markings even if you
never have a Sigma mount lens or body. they use the same cap for Sigma and
Pentax K. the direction to tighten the cap is opposite for each.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
At 11:42 10/02/04, you wrote:
have
you any pictures of this set-up?
I'll try to get some done tonight. But I'll also have to figure out how to
post it to the site.
Best regards
Sung Nee
Hmmm, right you are Rob - the glass is half full! lol...
Now where can I get my hands on one of those Voightlander lenses... vbg
tan.
Hi Tan,
It's all in your perspective. It just proves that the V is superb but the
P is
infinitely better at f1.8 too :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
On Feb 9, 2004, at 9:49 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
I am in
Central, hot, dry, western QLD, no where near a beach or ocean (unless
you
count the cattle troughs...), and closer to Brisbane than I am to
Cairns! I
am located about 3 hours west of Mackay...
Are you close to Towomba? (I
I am surprised by the comparative performance of the Pentax - it looks
nearly unusable until f5.6, as opposed to the Voigtlander which is
fairly sharp at f2.5. Maybe the Pentax is optimized for a different
subject distance - or is that even possible?
Kevin,I have a Pentax Takumar Telephoto 300mm f4.-67 lens up for sale
shortly.Contact me if you are interested.It is being serviced at the moment.
Regards Chris Kennedy
p.s.I live in Sydney.
LOL! No Paul! QLD is a very big place. I am about 9 hours drive north-west
of Toowoomba.
Not sure of the small town you are referring to though...
We have ALOT of sunflowers around here, and lots of cotton too (looks like
snow when it is all in flower! lol)... My boys love to collect the dead
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:57:14 -0600, you wrote:
You want to do business with me, pick a shipper other than
UPS.
Thats my motto, anyway.
William Robb
You seem to feel as strongly about UPS as I now do about PayPal.
Wait till you sell something and get paid through PayPal, only later
to have
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
