Bucky and Gonz,
The pixels turned out to be 'hot' rather than 'dead'. I ran a test through a little
program called 'Dead Pixel Test' (freely
available on the web). An image is taken with lens and viewfinder caps on and then run
through the program. When I first ran an
image, it showed 132 hot
Another way would be (or have been) to incorporate the current 'green
button' function into the shutter release, IOW to stop-down-and-meter in the
instance before the shutter is released. This would add a small delay
between pressing the shutter release and the actual shutter operation but
would
on Japanese site:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2004/200412.html
Alta Vista translates that it will be available as a free download.
March 18 for Windows. Mid April for Mac.
Just a boring landscape, but it's on time this week :)
Sorry if the colours look a little off... I scanned with the wrong film
profile and tried correcting it by eye.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=13-Mar-2004
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
The postman yesterday brought a nice Refconverter M to my door.
A cute little thing...
The manual says that once the diopter is set to match your eyes, the setting
does not need to be altered when magnification is switched between 1x and
2x. This I think is either a mistake in the manual or the
For Free!
The shell of a 645 135/4 macro.
No optics. Just all the rear mechanics
and outer focusing helicoid.
Lots of nice small screws. Aperture bearing.
And, what someone was asking for (last year!), a small pulling spring!
REAR LENS CAP!
Just a couple bucks for shipping it.
Collin
One of the most evil men in history, Stalin, said that the death of one
person is a tragedy, however the death of thousands is a statistic (I'm
paraphrasing here).
When we're forced to deal with such irrational events as 200 dead in the
recent attack in Spain, it's all to easy to forget that
Hi!
Chris, according to your theory grin, I am starting on the second level then.
Attila, wonderful birds.
Second one is excellent. You got seeds is very, well, human-like.
Cruising seems like a winner.
Have you enlarged any of them?
Boris
Hey, he's got a Canajan flag, too!! Kewl!
I should get on of those things, Malcom (the tall bike, not a flag). What
it would lack in real world (or any-world) stability, would be made up by
the fact that I could look truck drivers in the eye, just before they run me
into the curb. vbg
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Shaun Canning
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
It would appear that the 'hot' pixels were noise, and as such the
*ist D's noise reduction function should take care of most of the
'hot' pixels.
The istD noise reduction isn't used for shutter speeds shorter
french military is kinda funny too, the first hit is
Did you mean: french military defeats.
HAR!!!
WW
- Original Message -
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 10:18 PM
Subject: Abusing Google again!
type the phrase miserable failure
- Original Message -
From: Boros Attila
Subject: Re[2]: those tests
I agree with you, doing the same. Right now I can't afford a DSLR
which would replace my MZ-6. There is nothing wrong with getting
prints the old-fashioned way, I even like the variety of films I
can
find, so I
- Original Message -
From: David Mann
Subject: semi-OT: framing
Does anyone else here do their own framing?
I'm after some tips regarding the glass. I was able to cut the
large
sheets (1220x920mm) to a more reasonable size, but cutting it to
fit
the frame was disastrous (it took
- Original Message -
From: Chris
Subject: So called pixel problems
Hi Shaun,I would have thought you might just have a slightly
soiled
sensor looking at the flower shot and the others.If after printing
the shots
you see the spots a light swab clean should do the trick.I have had
Except for the 917K (in Gulf Mirage livery), I agree with you, Mike. Funny,
but the CanAm Turbo 917 was one of the ugliest cars ever! Especially the
last version (can't remember the exact model designation), in Sunoco
colours, that Mark Donahue drove in CanAm, and in which he set the record
I saw this Brittish guy playing in the street on this cold winters day.
http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p3264919.html
Got him with my SONY F717 (5MP) at 200ASA 1/200 sec. F. 5.0.
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Hi,
Some of you may recall that I posted this to mixed reviews (being charitable
g) several weeks or a month ago:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2111661
Any thoughts on seeing it in bw?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2129161
You like better? Worser? Both equally
Kevin,
Here's my recovery attempt.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2203546size=md
If you'd like the full sized image just let me know.
--
Fred Widall,
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, frank theriault wrote:
I should get on of those things, Malcom (the tall bike, not a flag).
What it would lack in real world (or any-world) stability, would be made
up by the fact that I could look truck drivers in the eye, just before
they run me into the curb. vbg
If
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Bob W wrote:
Take care with canned air. If you use it wrong you can spray propellant
crap all over and it can be difficult to get it off.
Canned air isn't *all* bad, though. Turn the cannister upside down, spray
the propellant on paper, and it makes the paper transparent.
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Bucky and Gonz,
The pixels turned out to be 'hot' rather than 'dead'. I ran a test
through a little program called 'Dead Pixel Test' (freely available
on the web). An image is taken with lens and viewfinder caps on and
then run through the
Thanks William, but it really does appear to be working fine.
I can live with 2 'hot' pixels out of 6.3 million.
Cheers
Shaun
Dr. Shaun Canning
Cultural Heritage Services
Lawrence Way, Karratha,
Western Australia, 6714
Mob: 0414-967 644
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.heritageservices.com.au
Thanks Alex, I'll try the extended test(s) tomorrow and see how it fairs.
Cheers
Dr. Shaun Canning
Cultural Heritage Services
Lawrence Way, Karratha,
Western Australia, 6714
Mob: 0414-967 644
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.heritageservices.com.au
-Original Message-
From: alex wetmore
Yes manual is wrong or yes refconverter is defective??
Thank you anyway - now I at least know it is either of those two
possibilities ;-)
Sven
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Hal Sandra Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Samstag, 13. März 2004 14:22
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is shocking until you examine further...
http://www.snopes.com/photos/surfer.asp
http://www.surfshooter.com/DolphinInfo.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Actually it's nicely composed, not particularly boring. I like it.
David Mann wrote:
Just a boring landscape, but it's on time this week :)
Sorry if the colours look a little off... I scanned with the wrong
film profile and tried correcting it by eye.
You want an explanation as to why that happens read this:
http://searchenginewatch.com/sereport/article.php/3296101
frank theriault wrote:
I get Michael Moore. Followed closely by G Dubya.
Now there's irony if I've ever seen it!
vbg
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all
I found this message at Dpreview, and followed the links to a set of
very nice travelog/vacation photos taken with Pentax gear by Dominique
Schreckling. Many with shot the *istD and 16-45. Have a look, if you
like pics of far away lands and want to see some DA 16-45 samples.
frank theriault wrote:
But, there was something about the 917K (not the long-tailed version with
the tailfins, the 917L - that was ugly, too) that really turns my crank.
Just one of those things, I guess.
I _might_ have agreed with you, except I think that peculiar
lightblue/orange livery
Hi all.
This is the one i intended to submitt,and thanks for all the kind words on the Reining
picture.
It was taken at the farm we have our horses at(as are 80% of my shots.lol) with the D1
last fall.Have a
series of them but it was hard to keep the AF on the small moving targets.Need
Hi Frank.
The colour one looks plain to me,nothing really snaps out.However the BW one makes it
look a little
more like a picture(dont ask me to explain that last comment,i'm not sure what i
mean.lol)Seeing as
how the shadows are not really dark black,a little more detail in that area might
My family and I are deeply saddened by the events in Spain. To Carlos
and our other PDML family members from Spain, please know our thoughts
and prayers, our sympathy and grief, are with you. It is so terrible,
so destructive, so inhuman, and so incomprehensible.
--
John Mustarde
Remember, we've seen your feet . . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/12/04 10:45PM
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL
There was an unfortunate feeling of deja vu when I saw this on the news.
All politics aside, I think we all have to wonder how this loss of life
makes sense to anyone.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
Both those statements were true.
They were fun, I used to carry a Demi EE1.7 as a sort of a notebook camera.
Loaded with Ilford's Autowinder film it had 144 shots available. It rode along
in a pouch on my belt sort of like digitals do today.
And 1/2 frame (actually it is single frame, normal
An excellent tale by another man on the news beat.
I see he was once affiliated with your parent organization. If I got the
lineage right, anyhow.
Yeah, small wonder he's plagued with back problems!
Good read, Cotty!
keith
Cotty wrote:
In the beginning, God made the photographer.
God saw the
There was a notice in the Los Angeles Times Business section about
Hotmail finally being back online. I didn't even know it was down!
Microsoft said it had found the cause and hoped full service would be
restored today.
No hint of what the cause really was, however...
keith
frank theriault
To Carlos and our other Spanish pdml readers, we send you our sympathy and
condolences. None of these people deserved to have their lives cut short by the
whim of some zealots. Frank said it well in a previous post.
Regards, Bob S.
Frank writes:
When we're forced to deal with such irrational
Just a little goofing around with hand coloring a BW print.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
My Snowdrops are trying to bloom, but it's quite cold today. Here's a
shot with the Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 macro on *ist-D. It's at 1:2.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2203947
I placed a detail crop here. The reflection in the drop of water is
kind of cool. The *ist-D's sharpness
I rather enjoy this shot.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: David Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 1:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: paw: Cave Stream
Just a boring landscape, but it's on time this
Heck, Frank, get yourself an ordiary (Penny-Farthing) and watch the wrecks as
they all forget they are driving in traffic and stare at you. (grin)
--
frank theriault wrote:
Hey, he's got a Canajan flag, too!! Kewl!
I should get on of those things, Malcom (the tall bike, not a flag).
What
Sven,
Bad news for you. The manual is correct, your converter has a problem. I
just double checked. If you mount the converter and bring the ground glass into
focus, it stays in focus as you switch from 1X to 2X. This is a very handy
feature as you use it with macro work. You can use the
And that's just _one_ of the things making living here an enjoyable
experience!
For some years I lived high above a stretch of beach in Malibu, and saw
dolphins regularly.
Many beach birds, too, as you might imagine. . . g
What the heck WAS that lens Kurt Jones was using?!
keith whaley
Cotty
http://www.pug.komkon.org/
Been down all afternoon.
B W works much better here I think. The bus is less distracting in this
mode. You guys were right before about it needing to be there to tell the
story, but if it could be toned down some. Maybe lighten the picture a bit
to get better shadow detail and burn the bus. My focus is on what I
The M42 adapter is sold.
I wrote the post from work, and forgot to add that the KX has 2 translucent smudges at
the bottom of the return mirror. It
doesn't affect function as far as I am concerned, but it might be of concern to some.
Sorry for not mentioning it earlier.
Aaron
Refconverter is defective.
- Original Message -
From: keller.schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 8:51 AM
Subject: AW: Refconverter M
Yes manual is wrong or yes refconverter is defective??
Thank you anyway - now I at least know it is either
Tiny flowers at the front door this morning...
http://members.aol.com/dontmailbob/PAW2.jpg
Resized, and cropped top/bottom from a Sony S85 1meg jpg
Regards, Bob S.
IMHO, a great choice, I doubt you'll be dissatisfied (at least until you
decide you gotta have larger print capability).
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Epson 2200, PS CS, *ist-D, Mac OSX 10.3.2
I decided to go for the Epson 2200
Graywolf wrote:
Heck, Frank, get yourself an ordiary (Penny-Farthing) and
watch the wrecks as they all forget they are driving in
traffic and stare at you. (grin)
Stopping and starting them is the problem. I had one success out of three
attempts at riding one twenty plus years ago (when I
I've noticed that a number of messages have the PAW or WOW
stripped from the subject line when comments are made about
the photos. The idea of putting PAW and WOW into the
subject line was to allow people to identify the messages
and to perhaps filter them in their mail system. Would
whoever is
Stripping PAW and WOW from subject
I've noticed that a number of messages have the PAW or WOW
stripped from the subject line when comments are made about
the photos. The idea of putting PAW and WOW into the
subject line was to allow people to identify the messages
and to perhaps filter them in
Shel, I noticed this on a recent post of mine.
When I hit reply the WOW: at the beginning disappeared. I believe it is
because the subject became WOW: Outlook stripped it out for me, I guess, with
the same algorithm that keeps subject lines from becoming something like
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE:
I'll reply to this and see if the WOW gets stripped.
OK. This seems to work better.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kevin Thornsberry
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 3:32 PM
To: PDML
Subject: WOW - Not really, just a test
I'll reply to this and see if the WOW gets stripped.
Interesting ... never though about that. Mabe on one's doing it then and some
mail programs just make their own decisions for us. ;-))
Kevin Thornsberry wrote:
Shel, I noticed this on a recent post of mine.
When I hit reply the WOW: at the beginning disappeared. I believe it is
because
Hi,
Saturday, March 13, 2004, 9:50:36 PM, Shel wrote:
Interesting ... never though about that. Mabe on one's doing it then and some
mail programs just make their own decisions for us. ;-))
if people would put it at the end of the subject, in lower case, then
it wouldn't happen. It would
Here's my attempt:
http://home.online.no/~jooksne/wow/wow3.html
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Thornsberry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 5:21 AM
Subject: WOW: Damaged Wedding Photo
WOWers,
Here's a bit of a challenge.
To all of you who haven't bookmarked the AutoPug, here's the direct link.
http://www.oksne.net/autopug/pugform.asp
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: zoomshot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 6:40 PM
Subject: PUG is down
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
To Carlos and our other Spanish pdml readers, we send you our sympathy and
condolences. None of these people deserved to have their lives cut short by the
whim of some zealots. Frank said it well in a previous post.
Regards, Bob S.
Thanks again to all who have
Thanks Mark. I would have liked the 'in flight' shot to be a bit sharper, but you know
how fast these little buggers move. It was
more luck than good management. I'm pretty happy with the overall performance of the
*ist D though, even if I do have a couple of
'hot' pixels.
Cheers
Shaun
Dr.
On 11 Mar 2004 at 9:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's really only one jump now to the
highest equals 35mm film numbers I've seen, and there is no particular reason
to stop there. Sure, there are supposed to be physical limits of the
technology, but they said that about computers, too, and
Rob Studdert wrote:
I believe that 14MP 35mm full frame image sensors when mature, will deliver
quality that rivals all but the best films used under optimal taking
conditions. After which point there isn't much point forging to higher pixel
densities.
and why exactly there isn't much point? is
Hi Tanya,
I was thinking in US Dollars, sorry :(
But here in Estonia the cheapest DVD burners go for 1300EEK (137AUD). Sure, those are
DVD+R(W) writers. Quite good DVD+-R(W) is about 2000 EEK (210AUD). Check for NEC
ND-2500, for example.
But with used Pentax lenses the life is not so fun in
On 13 Mar 2004 at 17:49, Mishka wrote:
Rob Studdert wrote:
I believe that 14MP 35mm full frame image sensors when mature, will deliver
quality that rivals all but the best films used under optimal taking
conditions. After which point there isn't much point forging to higher pixel
When was that? (the name change).
Unfortunately, I could only see a 300D advert, on Discovery.
But if I go in the Pentax (Focus94, there is no such thing as Pentax
Romania) store I can see several cameras - including the *istD - and a lot
of lenses (most of them are Sigma, the only prime I can
Just got back from my weekend trek to Cord.
Gary has a couple of enlargers to dump.
#1. Omega D2, head, base, upright. Wollensak lens. $50.
This is the type that uses cones for lens mounting.
#2 Beseler 23CII. Condenser and color heads. $150
Lots of acc's. A couple of boxes of goodies.
This is the bike I ride.
http://www.haluzak.com/products/horizon.htm
The feature which attracted me to this particular model is user X-Seam
adjustment at the crank, not at the seat. (X-Seam is the distance from a
wall to your heel, when sitting on the floor with back against the wall and
legs
Hi guys,
Anyone willing too take part in a little experiment with your *ist D? I know how you
guys all love comparing lenses and gear from
time to time, so hopefully a few of you might help me out.
I want to compare the number of recorded 'hot' pixels with other owners to see if the
results
Cotty wrote:
On 12/3/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Curves
8-D
Oh boy.
Cheers,
Cotty
ohoh :)
annsan
Rob Studdert wrote:
and why exactly there isn't much point? is it because 35mm quality is
all anyone would ever need? like 640K of RAM? :)
We were talking 35mm format. So what would be the advantage of providing more
than 14MP density on a 35mm frame? You know that drawing an analogy to RAM
On 13 Mar 2004 at 18:55, Mishka wrote:
how about, to make 16x20 or bigger enlargements? i mean, using
35mm-sized gear,with all the bells and whistles? a lowly canon g2
makes decent 8x10 at iso 50. now, scale that density to 24x35mm sensor,
and that would become 40x50! of course, assuming your
That was my result too, from 1/30 through 2 sec no dead pixels, no hot
pixels.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: *ist D Pixel Comparison Test
I tried out mine, following this thread.
On 14 Mar 2004 at 7:39, Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Hi guys,
Anyone willing too take part in a little experiment with your *ist D? I know how
you guys all love comparing lenses and gear from time to time, so hopefully a
few of you might help me out.
For anyone who missed my post last month
Some of you may recall that a couple of weeks ago, I shot a very dim concert
with available light, using Neopan 1600 pushed to 3200. I got back the 4x6
proofs today, and I'm not entirely dissatisfied. Made lots of mistakes to
be sure, but I think (hope) I learned from them.
My friend
Carlos,
As I sat at my favourite cafe this morning, with my usual weekend espresso
and a newspaper, tears rolled down my cheeks, as I read of the incredible
courage of your countrymen and women.
Despite the all to real threat of further attacks, I read and saw photos of
millions of Spaniards
Rob Studdert wrote:
You can make a print as big as you like with a 4 pixel image, it depends upon
your threshold of acceptability :-)
done that -- you know, Black Square by Malevitch? -- that's an
oversharpened 1 pixel BW image, and costs more money that i will ever
see in my life :)
Noise,
I have to say I breathed a sigh of relief, having recently imported the
camera at a large discount against the going price in the UK. I might add
that the large discount was AFTER paying all taxes and duties at the full
rate. UPS made sure of that.
John
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:23:17 -0500,
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We were talking 35mm format. So what would be the
advantage of providing more
than 14MP density on a 35mm frame? You know that
drawing an analogy to RAM
capacities is entirely inappropriate in this case.
Pass the coffee
Time for maths!
Great shot of the 917K, John. It gets my blood going just looking at one!
vbg
Unfortunately, I can't pull up the Can Am one, but I do want to come back
later and try again. What a brutal machine that was! Saw it race a couple
of times at Mosport, both with the RC Cola colours, and the
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Shaun Canning
Subject: *ist D Pixel Comparison Test
Hi guys,
Anyone willing too take part in a little experiment with your *ist
D? I know how you guys all love comparing lenses and gear from
time to time, so hopefully a few of you might help me out.
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Shaun Canning
Subject: RE: *ist D Photos
Thanks Mark. I would have liked the 'in flight' shot to be a bit
sharper, but you know how fast these little buggers move. It was
more luck than good management. I'm pretty happy with the overall
performance of
- Original Message -
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dr. Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: So called pixel problems
Hi Shaun,This site is extremely helpful even though it is a Nikonians site
it is about the same sensor and I think
- Original Message -
From: Tom Addison
Subject: Re: ye olde film v D debate, a bit long
Time for maths!
Figure out what it needs to be for 40 lpmm, which more closely
resembles what the finest lenses really churn out.
William Robb
On 13 Mar 2004 at 19:12, William Robb wrote:
Figure out what it needs to be for 40 lpmm, which more closely
resembles what the finest lenses really churn out.
That's easy *ist D delivers a system resolution with top end lenses of almost
45lpmm, a little more would be nicer but probably not
finest lens resolve far more than that.
even on film.
difraction limited lens can get 100 lp/mm at at f5.6, 50% mtf.
so the 40 lpmm is mostly limitation of the film, afaik.
mishka
William Robb wrote:
Time for maths!
Figure out what it needs to be for 40 lpmm, which more closely
resembles what
On Mar 13, 2004, at 7:49 PM, frank theriault wrote:
SPAIN WILL NOT STAND FOR ANOTHER ATTACK.
Yes, Spain has stood tall in the war against terror. A war that won't
be won with diplomacy, newspaper editorials, or UN debates.
Thanks William!
Dr. Shaun Canning
Cultural Heritage Services
Lawrence Way, Karratha,
Western Australia, 6714
Mob: 0414-967 644
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.heritageservices.com.au
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 14 March 2004 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL
Come on now, Bill. He just did it for 36 lpm. 40 lpm is an overall system
figure. The arial resolution of the lens is much higher, as is the film
resolution. Folks have explained all this on the list over and over. Still we
keep getting these outbursts of mumble-jumble. Tom gave the formula for
For anyone who missed my post last month its posted again below. A few *ist D
owners sent me results, maybe you would like to add yours then I'll have
enogh
data to post a page of results.
I have the pictures (BTW they look beautiful), when testing what should the
values for hot and dead
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: ye olde film v D debate, a bit long
Come on now, Bill. He just did it for 36 lpm. 40 lpm is an overall
system
figure. The arial resolution of the lens is much higher, as is the
film
resolution. Folks have explained all this on the
- Original Message -
From: Mishka
Subject: Re: ye olde film v D debate, a bit long
finest lens resolve far more than that.
even on film.
difraction limited lens can get 100 lp/mm at at f5.6, 50% mtf.
so the 40 lpmm is mostly limitation of the film, afaik.
Lens tests are
- Original Message -
From: Mishka
Subject: Re: ye olde film v D debate, a bit long
finest lens resolve far more than that.
even on film.
difraction limited lens can get 100 lp/mm at at f5.6, 50% mtf.
so the 40 lpmm is mostly limitation of the film, afaik.
On 14 Mar 2004 at 12:46, mapson wrote:
I have the pictures (BTW they look beautiful), when testing what should the
values for hot and dead pixel threshold be?
Default, hot threshold 60, dead 250
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
THANKS ROB!!!
Some absolutely gorgeous photographs there!
Regards
Albano
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Mar 2004 at 17:39, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Me Too!
Trent is the partner of Narelle Autio who won the
Leica Oskar Barnack award a
couple of years back with her
William Robb wrote:
If you want to know what the lens will really do in a pictorial
situation, toss the USAF chart, it's isn't worth the paper it's
printed on.
The best resolution test I have found is distant tree branches
against the sky on a still day.
William Robb
you are entitled to your
97 matches
Mail list logo
