On Apr 7, 2004, at 05:32, Boris Liberman wrote:
Dan, as for the tiger. I must say, honestly and respectfully, that
blown out highlights make no good to this image. I am not as worried
by the eyes as Shel seems to be, but highlights distract me.
As far as I'm concerned any photo of a cat is art.
Back, oh, I don't know, six to eight months ago or longer, when we were
having a list discussion about BW v.s. color, someone, Herb I think, mentioned
that Ansel Adams also did color. Which was news to me. And that he thought his
color shots equaled and actually rivaled his BW shots.
Well,
Hi!
As far as I'm concerned any photo of a cat is art. Any photo of a
tiger is fine art.
g
Dave, what about cheetah and lion then? bg
Boris
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 3:34:17 AM, you wrote:
PS Hi folks,
PS I'm back from my work trip to LA. Since I was off list for more than
PS two weeks, I think I ought to show three PAWs.
Wellcome back Paul, it sounds you had a nice trip. So these photos are
some sort of presentation of
LOL I don't think her head is at all relevant to the
photo. Gives a new meaning to getting one's draws into a
knot ROTFLMAO
Boros Attila wrote:
PS http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2249276size=lg
Beautiful girl, but the cropped head is a bit distracting.
Hello Shel,
It is obviously not her head is the point of interest, but I think it
can't be just ignored. Her hair also looks nice. I like the photo but
I think a full length shot would be even better.
Attila
Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 10:48:24 AM, you wrote:
SB LOL I don't think her head is at
Nice bag... and the girl ain't bad either :-)
Antti-Pekka
---
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Computec Oy, Turku Finland
Gsm: +358-500-789 753
www.computec.fi * www.estera.fi
-Original Message-
From: Boros Attila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:13 AM
To: Shel
I really like the composition of the canyon shot, and the fact that you
have chosen a time of day when the light has been just right to show
detail in the shadows without overwhelming the highlights.
The beach shot appeals for primarily non-photographic reasons, and I never
noticed the cut-off
On 6/4/04, JOE discumbobulated:
Does anyone have this? If so, what are your impressions?
I have the 24mm f1.8 EX DG AF macro - I use it on a D60 as a street lens
sometimes - the macro facility is very good. I haven't used this on a
film body so don't know what it's like at the edge of the frame.
On 6/4/04, MY KINDA GUY discumbobulated:
Hi folks,
I'm back from my work trip to LA. Since I was off list for more than
two weeks, I think I ought to show three PAWs. I shot a lot of frames,
somewhere around 700. i like these three. They're very California. It
wasn't the most work intensive
You know Alan, I like you more and more...
César
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 9:17 PM
I take that a compliment. g
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
yes
Damn you Cesar Damn you all
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:17 PM
. The plan is to carry the *ist D and an LX (I will probably
snip
Though the 85/1.9 would be tempting.
What has the 85/1.9 got that the 85/1.8 does not? I know it is a
different
-original-- Begin
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 07:57:22 US/Eastern
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
There is a company out here in Mississauga which sells new and refurbed enlargers at
good
prices. If
the tax refund man is kind to
I have also cleaned some grease from shutter or aperture blades with a cotton
swab and some solvent. This works well, as long as you do not soak the whole
thing and as long as you understand that you are curing a symptom not the
cause. The grease did not just materialise on the blades, but came
Please don't copy the entire digest if you want to post on this list.
You can only subscribe, there is no way to unsubscribe. Da's nou toch
jammer.
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 12:33, Arjo Sinon wrote:
Op 7-apr-04 om 12:25 heeft [EMAIL PROTECTED] het
volgende geschreven:
Graywolf wrote:
Boy am I glad I am out of the work force. Did I ever mention
the time I got a bad work review, so I just quit trying to do
my job. Just came in, sat there, and was friendly to
everyone. Ignored the job description completely. Did no
actual work. They told me how much I
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2266143
I'm off next week so I'm submitting my PAW early.
Hope you guys don't mind.
Photo taken with a Yashica FR-1 and 50mm lens. Film
was Fuji Superia 400.
Comments appreciated.
Thanks.
Francis
__
Do you
Please practice what you preach.
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
Please don't copy the entire digest if you want to post on this list.
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
Please don't copy the entire digest if you want to post on this list.
You can only subscribe, there is no way to unsubscribe. Da's nou toch
jammer.
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 12:33, Arjo Sinon wrote:
Op 7-apr-04 om 12:25 heeft [EMAIL PROTECTED] het
volgende geschreven:
On 7/4/04, ATTILA discumbobulated:
It is obviously not her head is the point of interest, but I think it
can't be just ignored. Her hair also looks nice. I like the photo but
I think a full length shot would be even better.
And a few from the front and side as well.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
Never mind front and side, what about top down and bottom up!
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 April 2004 14:48
To: pentax list
Subject: Re[2]: I'm back...with new pics
On 7/4/04, ATTILA discumbobulated:
It is obviously not her head is the
Please refer to this page for subscribing/unsubscribing:
http://www.pdml.net/dbrewer/p2.html
Attila
--- original - begin
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 15:14:45 +0200
From: keller.schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have also cleaned some grease from shutter or aperture blades with a cotton
swab and some solvent. This works well, as long as you do not
Not bad. But there´s a more powerful image in hiding. Maybe some cropping
could release it?
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http:\\www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
f:0.85???
It is clearly marked as f:2.8 - and this has nothing to do with front lens
diameter.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http:\\www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Thanks Attila,
I had recently changed to a different operating system and mail browser,
and along the way misplaced some folders with this information in it.
I have bookmarked that URL.
keith whaley
Boros Attila wrote:
Please refer to this page for subscribing/unsubscribing:
Today I got this thing (you call it solarium too, don't you) into my house.
Confirmed that it's working, turning it on directed away from me, since I don't have
any dedicated UV protection for my eyes.
Now, looking closer to it, it does look very useful, in that the box (some 3 feet
high, some
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Primo: As mentioned earlier, my idea is to exchange the UV tubes
for regular fluorescent tubes, or tubes best suited for photography.
At the back of this unit it reads: Philips Type HP 3127F. 240w 6
x TLK 40w/09. The tubes themselves carry the
Sorry we won't let you unsubscribe as long as you preform the
invaluable service of posting the entire digest to the list...
Arjo Sinon wrote:
Op 7-apr-04 om 12:25 heeft [EMAIL PROTECTED] het
volgende geschreven:
--
Content-Type: text/plain
pentax-discuss-d
Thanks for the comments Boris. I've used other methods to duplicate the
effects of sepia toning for this
one I tried the method posted at DP Review. I have to admit it looks to
my eye to more closely approximate
the efects of the chemical process on BW prints. That tends to
increase the
For the life of me I can't find my original attempt at correction and
when I tried again I just keep fading out the blacks...
Sorry.
frank theriault wrote:
So Peter,
Send it along! Post the url to your improvements. I'd be happy to
see 'em.
The darkness of his face is something I wasn't
I wonder if Paul,or anyone else for that matter,noticed all the hot pixels in that
shot.
Our was it just me.LOL
Dave
Never mind front and side, what about top
down and bottom up!
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
FA I'm off next week so I'm submitting my PAW early.
FA Hope you guys don't mind.
Of course we don't. Well, me at least g...
FA Photo taken with a Yashica FR-1 and 50mm lens. Film
FA was Fuji Superia 400.
Is this a range-finder camera? Pardon my ignorance...
Francis, it is a little soft
I've spent the last couple of days scanning the slides from my trip to
California a couple of weeks ago and I have those that made the third
'cut' online at http://www.robertstech.com/temp/index.htm
The first cut took place on the light table before scanning even began.
Then the less obvious
Oops! With a red face I humbly offer my apologies.
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 15:38, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Please practice what you preach.
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
Please don't copy the entire digest if you want to post on this list.
--
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
PJA Thanks for the comments Boris. I've used other methods to duplicate the
PJA effects of sepia toning for this
PJA one I tried the method posted at DP Review. I have to admit it looks to
PJA my eye to more closely approximate
PJA the efects of the chemical process on BW prints. That
Hi!
MC It was a real pleasure to shoot this with the *ist-D.
And I thought you were going MF... kidding...
MC har! the 6x7 is waiting for the full fields of wildflowers to show up!
Oh yes, silly me. Thinking of proper macro setup for 6x7 makes me
understand why you chose *istD instead g... Of
Actually Boris, that was a brainfart. The actual URL is at Photonet.
http://www.photo.net/photo/sepia/index
Hope you weren't looking for something different.
--Peter
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
PJA Thanks for the comments Boris. I've used other methods to duplicate the
PJA effects of sepia
Well Mark, I can't get to your URL. Hope it's only a transient problem...
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've spent the last couple of days scanning the slides from my trip to
California a couple of weeks ago and I have those that made the third
'cut' online at http://www.robertstech.com/temp/index.htm
Nor me...
keith whaley
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Well Mark, I can't get to your URL. Hope it's only a transient problem...
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've spent the last couple of days scanning the slides from my trip to
California a couple of weeks ago and I have those that made the third
'cut'
I got there just fine - IE 6
Bruce
Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 10:41:04 AM, you wrote:
KW Nor me...
KW keith whaley
KW Peter J. Alling wrote:
Well Mark, I can't get to your URL. Hope it's only a transient problem...
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've spent the last couple of days scanning the
Hmm. I got to it fine from the URL below. Maybe just a transient 'net
problem?
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nor me...
keith whaley
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Well Mark, I can't get to your URL. Hope it's only a transient problem...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Not working for me, used two browsers and tried three times
with each, spaced some time apart :-((
Mark Roberts wrote:
Hmm. I got to it fine from the URL below. Maybe just a transient 'net
problem?
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nor me...
keith whaley
Peter J. Alling wrote:
*
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:50:43 +0300
From: Raimo K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
f:0.85???
It is clearly marked as f:2.8 - and this has nothing to do with front lens
diameter.
All the best!
Raimo K
*
Good catch. I
Hi Gang
Its working for me. Win NT at work.
Mark,some nice stuff again.
Makes me feel kind of embarassed to post my x Canada work shots from old worn out
photos...But gona do it anyway.LOL...
Great job as usuall
Dave
Not
. The opinion(s) of the PDML is humbly
requested in helping me make the fourth and final cut to select what
goes up on the main part of my web site ;-)
Mark my personal favs are:
7d01033
7d00939
7d00519
7d00719
I still have a half-finished roll of
On 7/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] discumbobulated:
I wonder if Paul,or anyone else for that matter,noticed all the hot
pixels in that shot.
Our was it just me.LOL
Notice how all the girls have gone very quiet at the moment?
Let the boys have their fun ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Got it now...very nice, Shel.
keith
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Not working for me, used two browsers and tried three times
with each, spaced some time apart :-((
Mark Roberts wrote:
Hmm. I got to it fine from the URL below. Maybe just a transient 'net
problem?
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Boris,
I posted the original photo uncropped and unmodified.
It's a little bit better but not by much.
The FR-1 is not a rangefinder but a 35mm camera. Very
good camera with Aperture priority and manual
exposure.
I bought it prior to my acquiring Pentax bodies with
the intent of buying
I still have a number of 35mm cameras that are rangefinders, Francis.
I also have a number of 35mm camras that are NOT rangefinders.
keith whaley
Francis Alviar wrote:
Hi Boris,
I posted the original photo uncropped and unmodified.
It's a little bit better but not by much.
The FR-1 is not a
Cotty:
I find the focus ring, with its clutch-type push/pull affair flimsy,
and I'm not a big fan of Smegma lenses.
Not a typo then...
Andre
This guy might have the ring you need!
Items for Sale by
kkluo( 1503)
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsuserid=kkluoinc
lude=0since=-1sort=3rows=50
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Andre Langevin
I have a couple of Oly 35SPs, G.Zuiko 1:1.7, 42mm.
That glass is phenomenal too.
keith whaley
Agree fully. SP surprisingly has spot metering. Have you been able
to use it successfully with an alcaline battery?
Andre
Cotty noted:
I wonder if Paul,or anyone else for that matter,noticed all the hot
pixels in that shot. Our was it just me.LOL
Notice how all the girls have gone very quiet at the moment?
Well, what I'd like to know is Paul, why would you lie to the list as such
when you know that you snuck off
I sat here for 10 minutes, trying to think of something witty for a
retort...
No matter what I thought of, if I'd have typed it, I'd have got meself
in trouble! g
keith
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Cotty noted:
I wonder if Paul,or anyone else for that matter,noticed all the hot
pixels in
In a message dated 4/7/2004 8:00:17 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Attila,
I had recently changed to a different operating system and mail browser,
and along the way misplaced some folders with this information in it.
I have bookmarked that URL.
keith whaley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still have a half-finished roll of E100SW from this trip that I'll be
getting developed shortly. This will likely end up being the last
totally-film-based shoot I do: I expect to be digital by weekend :)
Oh Oh another one:-)
Bwahahahahahaha!
--
Mark Roberts
From: Boros Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
PS http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2249276size=lg
Beautiful girl, but the cropped head is a bit distracting.
snip
Beautiful girl? How can you tell?
The only thing apparent to me is that she must be awfully uncomfortable. What
an
e) he can shoot subjects that don't involve bicycles...
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 6:24 PM
Subject: PAW #9: Apple Picking
This isn't really new, but I
Heh, heh, and I have a Wide E!
Small world!
keith
Andre Langevin wrote:
Keep us informed when you get to it. I am tempted to say that
discussions about these rangefinders are very acceptable here as Pentax
never provided any manual focus RF. It is a joy to have one of these
silent marvels
I've been remiss in leaving it this long, but Happy Passover.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
_
Free yourself from those irritating
I rarely comment on comments, rg.
But spooky? Unibomber? Are we looking at the same photo?
I know you're entitled to your opinion, and I'm not saying you're wrong,
'cause there's no right or wrong here.
But, that's just weird. vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all
That's just surreal! It's as if the leaves and twigs (or whatever) are
suspended, weighless over this golden glow. What a capture!!
I can't say what I'd have done differently, because this is so far afield
from what I do, it's like a completely different art form. Not that what I
do is art,
Yeah.
YEAH!!
I hate him too, Peter. I'll tell you a little secret, but you have to
promise not to tell anyone else (especially Ken): I've hated him for a
while. Ever since that Ice Flower thing.
Can we start a club? You can be president. I'll be treasurer (you can
trust me with your
Long story short: I live next to a 500+ acre reservoir in Maryland.
Everyday I drive past an old tree only a few hundred feet from my house that
is frequented by cormorants and birds of prey. Today I drove past and saw
this:
http://home.mindspring.com/~c_skofteland/id10.html
The light was
You captured a lovely moment there, Francis.
It's not a technically perfect photo, to be sure. It's a bit soft, but I
can live with that.
The softness is certainly overcome by the fact that some emotion has been
captured, and for me, this type of photograph is about emotion.
I like it.
Perfect. I can't see one single thing wrong with this photograph.
The composition is wonderful, the use of silhouette is perfect with this
light, and of course, the colour of the sky is perfect. I especially like
the changing colour from top to bottom.
Damn you, Christian! I'll have to
Only thing I can say is I wish I took it.
Good exposure @ composition.
900mm H.
Well done.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Christian Skofteland Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:12 PM
Subject: PAW - Yet ANOTHER bird
Long story short: I live next to a 500+ acre
Gorgeous!!
I can't comment on each of them individually, as there's not enough space,
but that one word (above) pretty much describes them all.
Thanks, Mark.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
Thanks frank!
It was shot this evening just after I got home. about 7:30pm EDT
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:28 PM
Subject: RE: PAW - Yet ANOTHER bird
For a big man, Paul's got a surprisingly tiny rear end. vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That was paul's underwear she was wearing!?! No wonder it
didn't
Thanks Ken. apparently frank hates us both now.
btw, the vibration with the 300mm + 2x was horrible. I took about 50 shots
but most showed visible camera shake. next time I must remember the cable
release...
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth
Great!
Christian Skofteland wrote:
http://home.mindspring.com/~c_skofteland/id10.html
I change my mind. I think maybe a bit of fill flash would have brought out
the bird's plumage just a bit. Maybe put a bit of sparkle in the eyes, if
you know what I mean. Maybe the use of trailing curtain synch...
vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
I set up myself for that one didn't I?
What I meant to say was that the FR-1 is a SLR instead
of a rangefinder.
Whew!
Francis Alviar
--
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 12:30:51 -0700
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW: Gillian
lesee, the bird was at least 100m away, so yeah, the built-in-flash on the D
would have given perfect fill lighting and really enhanced the feather
detail. He's in breeding plumage so the yellow bits under his beak would
have been striking
smartass
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris, you know we could form our own club - the He Hates Me Club. I seem
to remember an NFL player who had He Hates Me on the back of his jersey
where a name would be.
Kenneth Waller
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: PAW - Yet ANOTHER bird
Thanks
At 06:40 PM 4/7/2004 -0400, you wrote:
That shot of the Ivanhoe reminds me of the Beachcombers! (only Canadians
of a certain age will understand that reference). Where's Bruno Gerussi
(Nick?) when you need him!! vbg
LOL - I used to love that show - and I'm not Canadian (though I used to get
Oh but Kenneth,
That was the XFL. And it wasn't so correct as to be He Hates Me. He Hate
Me is a good as they could get.
He's an NFL player now (I forget his name and for which team) since the XFL
folded.
Cory
just wanted to be contrary for a second.
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth
It's not gonna work, guys.
To quote from the final album (The Wonderful World of...) of Canada's
greatest rock band that no one's ever heard of, The Pursuit of Happiness:
I hated you first
cheers,
frank
ps: I remember that guy, btw. Wasn't he forced to remove the offending
words on pain of
smartass...
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e) he can shoot subjects that don't involve bicycles...
Yeah, you read it right. When I first saw the pic, and the guy's cap,
which is camo style, plus the longish hair, two thoughts hit my head
immediately:
1. Ted Kazinsky (or whatever his name is) unibomber
2. Woodstock.
But then after that microsecond, his smile broke those unusual thoughts,
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:06 PM
Subject: Re: PAW #9: Apple Picking
smartass...
Touché
Christian
Hi!
Mark, this is one amazing choice of photographs... I really cannot
pick my favorite - they are all too good. I liked those with moon and
flying birds on them but others are excellent as well...
If you need to choose few out of this multitude of excellent images,
then perhaps you'd need to
Hi all,
the insect season is abot to begin...
last yeaars I have used rather medium
format for macro shots, but now there's
a time to get good macro lens for my
Z-1p. Sigma lens prices have lowered
here lately (Pentax prices stand
firm...). I want this lens also for
normal photography, so the AF
Hello ernreed2,
etn Beautiful girl? How can you tell?
By fractal analysys and 3D reconstruction, of course vbg
Attila
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have this? If so, what are your impressions?
I too would be interested to hear impressions of this lens as I am
still looking for a replacement for my 28/1.4 for DSLRs. It's not really
that I need f/1.4 that often, but that I'd like my $1400
PS http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2266884size=lg
This is simply amazing. I don't understand why you used manual focus
and how could you get the water that sharp. For me that part is that
makes this photo, it feels like the surfer is 'cutting' the water.
It's not like you can't
88 matches
Mail list logo
