Keith Whaley:
In the strictest sense, Halfway between 10.6 meters and infinity is
a statement without meaning.
If you take it to mean halfway between the 10.6 meter mark and the
infinity mark on the lens barrel then you don't have to worry about
infinity not being an existing point in space.
On 10/4/04, THE HUSTLER discumbobulated:
Outing #10 went pretty well. We had Christian, Stephen, Amita, Nate and #7
show up at Buffalo Billiards, and though the noise level was pretty high, I
think we had a good time of it. At least I did...
Once again, list folks are nice people in real life
Paul (and others)
The DOF-master calculator dial gives me 6.4 meter (21 feet) at 80mm (6x6) at
f22. This is the value for CoC = 0,030mm. My table gives me 5.3m (CoC =
0.055mm). For 0.055 the chart values match my table precisely. I guess CoC
should be different for each format (different
At 07:53 AM 11/04/2004, you wrote:
Hello.
I which to know what Pentax *ist D user find about the DSLR to be improved.
You don't want my list! (too long). Saying briefly: improve on Z-1p, you
took step backwards! Not a good idea! ;-(
(*)o(*)
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As of Thursday we have another *istD. One for me, one for my wife :-D
Are we the first to have 2 *istDs?
(*)o(*)
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
My opinions so far:
- pug.pdml.net I find appealing; simple names I like, but if it's not
on, hey-ho.
- I will contribute towards a lump-sum fee, and it does not matter
that:
. I don't use PayPal; there must be a way to overcome this
. I rarely ever submit to pug; and?
I vote
The old adage that there are no free lunches is applicable.
Somewhere, someone pays for what's on the net, that is seemingly free.
If you use it, don't think it's just availaable for the taking thereof.
Even if it's only time, the moderators, the site caretakers, folks
like that give of their
Jens Bladt wrote:
Not at all. Got one off ebay for about 25$. Of cource I would like one for
every one of my 5 lenses (30mm-180mm). Got to get the camera first, though.
Schneider lenses are considered the worlds best (for MF anyway). But they
are way too expensive. Actually the post war P6 was
You're right, of course. It was just a silly comment.
keith
Anders Hultman wrote:
Keith Whaley:
In the strictest sense, Halfway between 10.6 meters and infinity is
a statement without meaning.
If you take it to mean halfway between the 10.6 meter mark and the
infinity mark on the lens
Hi all.
Well the fields at the farm are a bit better to walk around on,so i went for a stroll
Saturday.I tend to
take a lot at this place.:-)
There is an old building that used to house a stable hand many years ago,in the bush
lot,
but its been
empty for 15 odd years and is falling apart.I'v
I think I agree John. IMO, the PDML community should pay for the gallery.
On a voluntary basis, of course.
The idea of pay-per-post to the gallery doesn't appeal to me at all. I
suspect, even if the fee was minimal (e.g.. $.50/posting), the gallery would
whither.
Cory Waters
- Original
Bigger buffer AND faster Wright speed.
Something to protect the image view screen when you're not using the camera.
Move the strap lug or CF card door.
Find another use for that AF button on the back...
Make the 4-way button just a smidge larger. While you're at it, make the
play trash
holy crap, man...
CW
- Original Message -
From: mapson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 4:59 AM
Subject: The family got bigger!
As of Thursday we have another *istD. One for me, one for my wife :-D
Are we the first to have 2 *istDs?
If there is general agreement on the submitters supporting the PUG, I
think a pay-per-post is a bad idea.
I think an annual or semi-annual fee is a good idea.
What is needed? And who will work it out? $20 semi-annually? Or
$20/annum? What?
There are costs involved, in one way or another, subtle
Robert wrote:
As of Thursday we have another *istD. One for me, one for my wife :-D
Are we the first to have 2 *istDs?
Good question? It's certainly something my wife and I have spoken of and
would guarantee me access to one. I can certainly appreciate why some people
have changed from film
My wife and I were out this morning taking photographs with an *ist D and an
LX. She loves the *ist D in the same way I love the LX.
And for us it was to enable us to go on separate assignments.
Enjoy your pair of *ist D's!
Thanks, I know we will! ;-D
Malcolm
(*)o(*)
Robert
Tanya,
Your guess is correct. I was in doubt whether or not to submit this to
the PUG, but it is so abstract that I thought it was probably OK.
Glad you like it.
Frits
On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 01:53, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Frits, is that somebody's bottom? Very cool shot! How clever you
Hi list,
please forget the idea of payment for each submission. I strongly reject
this notion, because it hinders people to submit. That's against everything
we intend with PUG. A space where Pentax users can submit their pics to be
seen and enjoyed. That's what it is made for.
I don't mind
True. I was just trying to link the use of the website with the charges for it.
Perhaps a fee to cover 10 entries would work.
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11/04/04 00:48:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I'd be happy to make a contribution and to know who else did, but can we just post a
page somewhere that says, We thank these members for their generous support of the
PUG. ...and leave it at that. Marking each submission is gonna be a pain in the a**.
Regards, Bob S.
John Francis writes:
I agree. Donations to the PUG should not be linked to submissions. That
being said, I will be happy to contribute $25 a year toward maintenance
of the PUG.
On Apr 10, 2004, at 11:47 PM, John Francis wrote:
I am quite strongly opposed to the idea that pug submitters should
be coerced in any way
I like it as presented. The sidewalk is light gray and shows texture.
There are some areas that are almost pure white -- the lower left thigh
of the woman on the right, the pages of her book, and her coffee cup --
but all show some detail. I would say that the contrast and range of
tones are
In a message dated 4/8/2004 2:23:07 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Folks -
I'm really happy to announce a new photo exhibit featuring 49 of my
images. Pulling the show together been a collaborative effort between
Boris Liberman and myself, and the show is located in
...and native 1/250 flash sync without an expensive extra flash
...convertor so I can use my existing remote release cables instead of
buying new ones
...white or red lamp AF assist without having to pop up or fire the
flash
..re-design the viewfinder info display with the over-under graph at
the
In a message dated 4/7/2004 10:19:10 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I still have a half-finished roll of E100SW from this trip that I'll be
getting developed shortly. This will likely end up being the last
totally-film-based shoot I do: I expect to be digital by weekend :)
There seems to be an argument over how to pay for the webspace . . .
. . . Faction A wants the PDML users to donate.
. . . Faction B wants users of PUG to donate.
. . . Faction C wants users of PUG to be charged to submit.
Personally, I see choice C as too overbearing. The whole idea behind
Hi Bill,
you wrote:
P.P.S. Doesn't it seem strange the decision was put up to an entire group
of individuals? I think we've lost sight of who is making the decision that
governs the PUG. Who is that right now? The PUGmiesters?
I agree to this vbg, and since I am the PUGmeister
In a message dated 4/11/2004 6:51:07 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
P.P.S. Doesn't it seem strange the decision was put up to an entire
group of individuals? I think we've lost sight of who is making the
decision that governs the PUG. Who is that right now? The
As always, I had a great time. Amita and Nate turned out to be regular
people (even thought they ARE from New York!) and as tv said, it's great to
meet new people from the list.
As for DCPDML #11, I'm already lining up babysitters so my wife can finally
come along and meet the Pentax crowd.
In a message dated 4/11/2004 7:09:17 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I agree to this vbg, and since I am the PUGmeister and it seems that I
should go on with it, forget about the payment thing for the time being.
As soon as I have an answer from John I see how we proceed from
In a message dated 4/11/2004 3:26:19 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pretty much straight out of the camera.
Enjoy
Dave
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/abandon2.jpg
I really like that. A lot. Straight out the camera is
In a message dated 4/8/2004 2:50:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
My wife bought them yesterday...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2271481size=lg
DagT
Nice!
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 4/9/2004 7:02:06 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dunno about Japan, Tanya, but when you get to GFM please don't forget to
get me Cotty's autograph.
Thanks,
Joe
---
So... Cotty's famous?
Doe aka Marnie ??? ;-)
Dag,
First of all, thanks for taking the time to comment on all of the PUG images
this month. I know, it's quite an undertaking!
And, thanks for commenting on my photo. It was really quite
tongue-in-cheek, but I have to say, I thought there was something a bit
different, or maybe even a bit
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley
Subject: Re: Zone Focus - what is it?
You're right, of course. It was just a silly comment.
I found a very deep philosophical meaning to it.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: mapson
Subject: Re: PENTAX *ist D : Things to improve
You don't want my list! (too long). Saying briefly: improve on
Z-1p, you
took step backwards! Not a good idea! ;-(
Must disagree. I found the PZ-1p to be a bloated pig with an unweildy
interface.
I
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And, Jostein, I love your car shot too! I wish we had places like that in
this country! Instead, all we have is eucalyptus trees and the bush, oh,
and
there's that big red rock in the middle of the country that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So... Cotty's famous?
He's been on TV, y'know.
S
Another nice batch of shots - I do like the curves on those old tug
boats. Nestled in a Cove is my favorite. I like the shot of the
beachcomber holding the net buoy - the background really puts the scene in
a good setting.
- MCC
At 09:41 PM 4/8/2004 +, you wrote:
For those who, like me, don't yet have Photoshop CS, there is a plug-in
that gives sliders to control shadows and highlights, and also allows
several other adjustments. It is called ColorWasher, and is available at:
http://82.165.8.183/products/photowiz/focalblade/index.htm
Click on Products,
Jostein, nice capture. I hope you worked it a little. I see other
possibilities with the same composition - like a neutral density filter to
bring out the dark foreground. If you're like me you wouldn't think of this
until after the fact.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jostein
Well, just like a high-volume retailer, who sells good products for a
low price, he depends on volume of customers to buy a lot of goods. Then
the small markup works, but only then.
This way, few people would miss $10 or equivalent, per annum, and it
would help pay for inevitable costs involved
All points well-taken.
keith
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Raimo K
Subject: Re: NEW_PUG - questions
I think it would be easiest to just have an annual membership fee -
a reasonable one.
And IMO it would have to be for a year because I subscribe and
unsubscribe
I do not think most of us feel that the decision was put up to us. I think most
of us feel that what was asked for was an exploration of possibities. 600 minds
should be able to come up with more ideas than one mind. Yes, in the end it is
the person who has to impliment these ideas who has to
I find I still enjoy film more despite all the advantages of digital. It's something
about the MZ-S which I find ergonomically superior to the *ist-D, although that could
be because I'm not yet used to the latter. I haven't yet got the lenses for the 1.5
multiplier sorted out yet - I prefer
Get real. We are more likely talking 20-30 contributers, $200-300 a year, which
would pay for the site, but no one is going to get rich from that. Of course it
is possible that lurkers who never would submit a photo might contribute, but I
would be very surprised at 100 total. In my opinion, it
Yeah, but can you do trailing curtain synch with it LOL
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The Shadow/Highlight
tool is great. Sort of like fill flash in a can gj.
I'd like a decent set of fast prime lenses matched to the sensor size. Say a 12mm
f1.9, a 30mm f1.7, and a 60mm f2.5 macro.
Nick
What's a mirror?
graywolf wrote:
What I can offer is to mirror the current PUG on my website, unfortunately there
is not room for an archive. Maybe a couple of others could do so as well. If we
have a few mirrors up, the PUG will not be so much at the mercy of the donor
site, nor soak up all
thanks for the information. i will have to think about this whole subject of
teleconverters for a while. you see, today, i just got myself an A* 400 f2.8
too and it's not quite long enough for birding even on the *istD, so i am
resigned to having to use a teleconverter on it quite a lot of the
He, he, he...
You know where that 6, 10, 15 feet thing started? Press Cameras. It gives you
f32, f22, and f16 with a #5 flashbulb on ASA 100 film. I use those settings all
the time with my Graphic, and yes they give just enough DOF to cover the usable
exposure.
Still a useful technique in
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.nrg666.com/pdml/portraits/pages/FrankTheriault.htm
Is this available in milk chocolate?
Happy Easter, Frank and all PDMLers.
Malcolm
Nick Clark wrote:
I find I still enjoy film more despite all the advantages of
digital. It's something about the MZ-S which I find
ergonomically superior to the *ist-D, although that could be
because I'm not yet used to the latter. I haven't yet got the
lenses for the 1.5 multiplier
In a message dated 4/11/2004 10:50:29 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's a mirror?
--
A duplicate site. Mirrors the original. Except, the original is interactive
and the mirror is just that, a mirror. Files can be uploaded to the original
site, but not to the
It is a site with a duplicate of the original site on it, that is linked to
automatically update when the original is updated. They provide two things: 1. a
dupicate backup of the main site; 2. A secondary site so that by using the
mirror you avoid the bandwidth congestion on the main site.
--
Ditto!
--
Malcolm Smith wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.nrg666.com/pdml/portraits/pages/FrankTheriault.htm
Is this available in milk chocolate?
Happy Easter, Frank and all PDMLers.
Malcolm
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
In a message dated 4/11/2004 9:32:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree. After giving it all a rest and taking another look this
morning, I like the new image better as well. The Shadow/Highlight
tool is great. Sort of like fill flash in a can gj.
Paul
--
In a message dated 4/11/2004 10:01:48 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All you regulars know what's coming vbg:
http://www.nrg666.com/pdml/portraits/pages/FrankTheriault.htm
cheers,
frank
You know, frank, to update your look a bit, you should get a fuzzy
By the amount of mail I think that there are more members than that.
IIRC we have had 500 subscribers at best. Maybe more? Lurkers have to pay if
they want to see the posts.
All the best! Raimo
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lähetetty: 11.
På 11. apr. 2004 kl. 19.00 skrev frank theriault:
All you regulars know what's coming vbg:
http://www.nrg666.com/pdml/portraits/pages/FrankTheriault.htm
So
Where are the eggs?
Happy easter to you to!
DagT
Hi!
Shel, could be because I live in Israel and work in Tel Aviv (which
some call Los Angeles of Middle East), but this photo does not really
work for me.
I see people drinking their beverages, a boy probably about to pick up
his scooter or however these things are called, and a man just having
I need to get serious about freeing up some megabytes on my hard drive.
This means moving my photo files.
Are there any web sites where one can get reliable information on the
relative longevity of different brands of CD-R media?
Anyone done the research and have a recommendation?
Thanks,
Hi!
So, Mark, you seriously lean towards digital. That's very interesting.
I don't have much to say about the shots. They are very good and I
particularly like the rather slow waves on the moon shot...
I've been shooting here and there with all kinds of digi cams recently
as my friend who
That´s what I thought, but I wish you hadn´t told us :-)
DagT
På 11. apr. 2004 kl. 13.13 skrev Frits Wüthrich:
Tanya,
Your guess is correct. I was in doubt whether or not to submit this to
the PUG, but it is so abstract that I thought it was probably OK.
Glad you like it.
Frits
On Sun,
Hi!
So far this image has collected quite a successful feedback. One of
PDMLers looked at it and also liked it.
Again, I am rather asking for comments as to how to improve. Notice
that this is unposed candid shot. I did not have time to do all the
adjustments I might have wanted to do. But
På 10. apr. 2004 kl. 09.05 skrev Boris Liberman:
Hi!
DT Boris Liberman - In the sand
DT Strange curves in the sand. I don´t really understand it, but that
DT doesn´t matter. I think it would hav been better if the curves in
the
DT background had been repeated in the plant front. Or maybe
Quoting Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jostein, nice capture. I hope you worked it a little. I see other
possibilities with the same composition - like a neutral density filter to
bring out the dark foreground. If you're like me you wouldn't think of this
until after the fact.
Thanks
Thanks, John.
Jostein
Quoting John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gorgeous.
John
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:17:16 +0200, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In June last year I had a really great photo week-end at Rjukan, a small
town about as far inland as you can get in Norway. I decided to
På 9. apr. 2004 kl. 23.11 skrev Tanya Mayer Photography:
In regards to Dag T's PUG pic, Jostein wrote:
You're damn good with shapes, Dag. This one is no exception. I saw
something
in your shot that... erm... does not belong on a family list, and of
course
it's all in my dirty mind...:-)
I am
Hi Jostein,
it is a fantastic scenery, really. I like it a little more when it is
cropped to a panorama format losing a great part of the dark foreground.
Just my 2 cents ...
Best
Bernd
-original message--
a.. From: Jostein
b.. Subject: Jostein's PAW#4
c.. Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004
På 11. apr. 2004 kl. 16.34 skrev frank theriault:
Dag,
First of all, thanks for taking the time to comment on all of the PUG
images this month. I know, it's quite an undertaking!
Somebody´s got to do it :-)
And, thanks for commenting on my photo. It was really quite
tongue-in-cheek, but I
Well done! Of course now you need to hire a pair of
assistants, buy a couple more lenses... Still, a good
investment.
Stan
mapson wrote:
As of Thursday we have another *istD. One for me, one for my wife :-D
Are we the first to have 2 *istDs?
(*)o(*)
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Honestly, folks.
The PUG rose out of the need for a place for PDML members to share pictures with
each other and the world. It was supposed to be free from the beginning; as
free as PDML itself.
While there is no direct connection between the two, the PUG was conceived by
the PDML, and it is on
Finally got around to another PAW. The apple tree in our back yard is in
full bloom, so I took advantage with the *ist D and M100/4.0 Macro:
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=70
Comments appreciated
Bill
That's one of the many things that makes me smile and feel at home in this
great pdml-family!!
:-))
Best
Bernd
original message---
From: frank theriault
a.. Subject: HAPPY EASTER!!
b.. Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 10:00:52 -0700
Here's a sample of how the *istD responds to Infrared. This was shot with
28mm 2.8FA lens with 88A filter 4 seconds at f16.
http://tripodman.smugmug.com/gallery/65381/2/3401970/Large
Larry from Prescott
Years ago I was staying at Treetops in Kenya. In the morning I woke
early, just as the sun had turned the whole sky gold, but wasn't actually
visible.
Mount Kenya was a huge, jagged, black mass against the sky, except for the
snow, which glinted.
In the foreground, everything was dark except
Hi Boris ...
Your comments are always appreciated. If my photos worked
for everyone, I'd be very disappointed. There's no need for
you to apologize for your comments.
shel
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
[...] this photo does not really
work for me.
But these are my humble few cents... Hope
I would summarize what I have heard so far as follows:
a. many are willing to help out to keep the PUG alive.
b. the notion of a contributor's fee was raised but most do
not agree.
c. the notion of a voluntary contribution has been endorsed
by many. With maybe an acknowledgments page
Hi Bernd,
Interesting suggestion. I have been completely fixed on having that
reflection in the picture, but maybe not. Hmm...
Thanks for the comment, that's something to think about.
Cheers,
jostein
- Original Message -
From: Familie Scheffler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Smith
Subject: RE: The family got bigger!
I also prefer primes but I may well be in the minority with this
opinion.
Zoom lenses have their place.
For me, their place is gadget bag in the basement that is rarely
opened.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: CD Storage
I need to get serious about freeing up some megabytes on my hard
drive.
This means moving my photo files.
Are there any web sites where one can get reliable information on
the
relative longevity of different brands of
Happy easter, Frank!
And to the rest of PDML too.
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 7:00 PM
Subject: HAPPY EASTER!!
All you regulars know what's coming vbg:
The AutoPug site could very well serve as a mirror. I'd be able to hold 1-2
galleries backwards.
cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Adelheid v. K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: NEW_PUG -
I shot a couple of gigs of pictures last night in the studio.
I was trying to make use of some of the features of the camera that I
have ignored up to now, such as the autofocus.
For portraiture, the selectable AF area function is really quite
nice. The sensor locations are pretty good, though the
Hi Stan,
Substitute your hyphen with the word if, and your paraphrasing is much
closer. :-)
Anyway, I was just iterating what Adelheid said earlier. See the archives
at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pentax-discuss%40pdml.net/msg176389.html
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin
ROTFLMAO!!!
-knarf
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cormorant times - or Cotty has toomuch time on his hands...
At 01:53 PM 4/11/2004 -0400, you wrote:
thanks for the information. i will have to think about this whole subject of
teleconverters for a while. you see, today, i just got myself an A* 400 f2.8
too and it's not quite long enough for birding even on the *istD, so i am
resigned to having to use a
Hi Boris -
So, Mark, you seriously lean towards digital. That's very interesting.
Aside from a couple of rolls of Tri-X, I have not shot shot any 35mm film
since I got the *ist-D. I have lots of 35mm film languishing in the
freezer - but I'm sure I'll use it sooner or later.
But, I'm still
Adelheid,
I see there are many many answers already, and I haven't read any of them
yet. Will do so now.
But, I'll answer your queries in order:
1) No. I don't want to be PUGmeister. I don't know enough about 'puters,
and in fact don't even own one (I use my roomates). I do hope that
The lighting is good - it presents a general contemplative mood. The
weakest part of the photo for me is the girl's hand obscuring her
face. It would be good to wait and watch for some change there.
Also, but of lesser importance is the guy's right hand. It is in an
odd position, but less
H...
I can't handhold much less that 1/125th. What's that say about me?
vbg
Glad you had such a great time, Stan!
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the next several months I will be purchasing a new SLR body. I have
two questions that I need help answering. Currently I own two Pentax bodies,
a MX, and a ME Super. I also own several K-mount SMC lenses. The only
problem I have is that soon I would like to venture into some professional
There was a movie about that. Heavy water factory in Norway somewhere.
Heroes of Telemark? Something of Telemark? Don't remember much else but
the heavy water, and they had to ski to get there (the saboteurs, that is).
But I digress...
Glad you all had such a great time! Look forward to
Cool!!
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exhibit
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 17:17:03 -0400
Hi Folks -
I'm really
Hi Boris ...
I looked at this a couple of times, and I like it the way it
is. While the woman's hand over her mouth seems to bother
some people (and I do agree that it might have been a good
idea to take some more shots of these people), I think it
adds to the mystery of the photo. What is the
Don't worry Clint... You can use your M lenses on the *istD very nicely...
It does take K mount lenses... and with the speed Pentax is going
forward...there is no worry at all...
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Clint Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 11:25 AM
Hi Boris ...
Paul has summed it up succinctly, although it goes a little
further than that.
Let me think about explaining the photo on the list. I'll
probably pass on that opportunity as there doesn't seem to
be much interest in the photo, and, frankly, people need to
see what's in a photo
A good site and photos are taken using Pentax gear.
http://www.blevinsphoto.com/equipment.htm
Do not whether he is list member
Thanks
Ramesh
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
- Original Message -
From: Clint Austin
Subject: which way would you go...
Should I stay with Pentax?
Good question.
If you are planning on shooting professionally, you pretty much have
to be considering digital, and probably an SLR.
Because of the format change, your lenses have
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
