I'll reply to all the responses at once:
Just about everyone has mentioned the lack of detail in the foreground
- and they're right... so I opened up the image again in Photoshop and
applied the highlight/shadow tool to lighten up the shadows a bit.
Bear in mind that it still might not be
Paul,
those are very good photos! I generally don't like photos of people eating but
everything else is so pleasing. Smooth colours, precisely framed - beautiful.
The kid with the dog makes me feel good - thanks!
Sven
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL
Paul Stenquist made me feel inadequate by, posting these links:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2399802
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2399804
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2399807
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2399808
One of the boxes appears to be bleeding styrofoam peanuts...
That's one of Tanja's. 'Huge Box of Styrofoam Peanuts - Bargain NR eBay
7373554167'
Only an Aussie ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
I was at a wedding a while back where the photographer was using a
digital. He shot a heck of a lot of pictures. So many, that he became
part of the wedding.
So many that the continuous flash bursts and noise was a nuisance.
You guys don't have videographers there? Photographers are no
If Paul is gonna send her a shot, and it sounded like he might,
I think he made the right choice. I've photographed a few women,
usually older than this one, and I've noticed that given a choice,
they inevitably pick the re-touched ones. I'm not surprised to
see your take, Shel, but I'm with
They _should_ be the Stanley green ones. These have been around
for years, and you can buy all replacement parts easily. I've had
two of 'em for years, and they're great. Not that expensive, either.
Butt-insky Lon
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Cotty wrote:
I would like to buy 3 very simple items,
I don't know what this looks like, but if it's just a surround,
I would try a bit of good old bar soap. Rub a bit on the rubber,
and it should slide in much easier.
Amita Guha wrote:
A couple of weekends ago I accidentally pulled out the piece of rubber
that protects the jack for the quick
Not only is the USB cable for the Pentax *istD proprietary, it's even different to the
one for the Pentax 43WR! I think it's Pentax that are the dickheads here.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
ERN, who always uses a card reader, promptly
On 30 May 2004 at 10:01, Nick Clark wrote:
Not only is the USB cable for the Pentax *istD proprietary, it's even different
to the one for the Pentax 43WR! I think it's Pentax that are the dickheads here.
Maybe they aren't. According to a link that Anders provided
http://www.deltaco.se/; the
William Robb wrote:
I am finding the 31 to be a gorgeous lens on the istD.
It could be either a bit smaller for it's speed, or a bit faster for
it's size.
The 58mm filter size is a pain, what with the non removable hood
requiring that filter size be used.
The only other lens I have that takes 58mm
Which would be the best fully manual SLR be to buy as a backup for use
in extremely cold temperatures. So I do not want any electronics or
batteries.
My K1000 has seen a number of Northern Canadian winters(usually -20 c during the
day)and
has
functioned well.If you have a light meter,the batteries in the K1000 for its meter can
be
removed.If you
want screwmount,i'd say the SV or S3 would be ok.
Dave
Of course there will be unretouched portraits. It all depends on what
the photographer wants to achieve. I would never retouch a man's
weather worn face nor that of an aging woman with character lines.
However, a young woman with zits gets photoshoped, nine times of of
ten.
Paul
On May 29,
Thanks Butch. I'm happy with it.
On May 29, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Butch Black wrote:
Nice job Paul. The before and after difference is striking and the
after is
totally believable.
Butch
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
Thanks Sven. That little dog made a lot of people happy. He's a three
month old German Shepherd pup.
On May 30, 2004, at 3:26 AM, keller.schaefer wrote:
Paul,
those are very good photos! I generally don't like photos of people
eating but
everything else is so pleasing. Smooth colours, precisely
Hi David.
Sorry to comment on these paw's so late,but thats been the way lately,trying to cram
and
extra hour
into each day,but i'm in slow mode now.lol
I like this shot,mostly i think becasue i have never heard of or seen this creature. It
looks quite sharp
on my
Ermm, give me a chance to get rid of some of the thirty thousand bags under
me eyes first ok?!?
btw, Mr Cottrell, the photo that tom posted of that stuff that APPEARED to
be mine? Well, UNDERNEATH it all, was a number of boxes (almost as many as
mine!) that I noticed, were addressed to
Ok, I forgot to take a pic as I was just too wiped out, but I received this
really big box from BH. Knowing what was in it, I was kinda perplexed, and
when I opened it I found one very small, very FLAT packet of coloured studio
gels and enough air cells (packaging) to fill my suitcase. I know
Hey Jostein!
Have you arrived? How was your trip?!?!
tan.
Jostein writes:
Hi, gang.
Greetings from Kastrup airport, Copenhagen.
I left Oslo at 17:30 EST today, and right now I'm stuck at the gate on
Kastrup, waiting for clearance to board the flight across the Atlantic.
We're already
Hi Gang.
Well my 3 other cats have a new friend,although you would not know it from all the
growling.lol Ah,they
have gotten over this before.Usually takes 3-5 days and they settle down again. g
This is Sara,7 weeks old +-. Daughter brought her home
Totally under the gun --
I'm not going to actually unsubscribe until
tomorrow night but please
if you guys that are GFM'ing would put GFM in the
subject line
so I can stay in the loop on that I'd appreciate
it.
annsan
The *ist D cable is the same cable for the Optio 330 (probably 430 as well).
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Nick Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 5:01 AM
Subject: Pentax are dickheads (was Re: tan is a dickhead...)
Not only is the USB
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been giving Tom and Ashlee a crash course on Australian lingo. They
were particular taken when I referred to something as Daggy and tom is
campaigning to use it as their new band name! lol.
Don't forget to tell them the
I've taken an ME Super on mountaineering expeditions: it's a good choice
IMO due to its low weight and mechanical operation capabilities - it has
a battery and electronics, but can operate without them at 1/125, 1/2000
and B shutter speeds.
S
Brett Mckay wrote:
Which would be the best fully
Does anyone know why the SMC-F 28-80 f/3.5-4.5 zoom, which seems to
have a really good reputation (at least compared to the 28-80 powerzoom
that replaced it and compared to other A- and F-series Pentax 28-80
35-80 zooms) is so hard to find? Most SF1/SF1n and SFX/SFXn cameras on
eBay seem
Just a quick note to all who responded - you know who you are - to say
thanks very much for your generosity. I have it sorted now and hopefully
a very nice man in a very nice car full of Pentax gear will be toting
along some Thermoses for me ;-)
Once again the kindness of the people subscribed to
cheaper is probably the key word
- Original Message -
From: Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 9:55 AM
Subject: Question on Pentax SMC-F 28-80mm
Does anyone know why the SMC-F 28-80 f/3.5-4.5 zoom, which seems to
have a really good
If you want a camera that meets your specific requirements, you'll have to
get one without a built-in light meter. With Pentax, that puts you back
forty years or so, to pre Spotmatic days. Nikons are a good choice as they
have models that were meterless into the seventies, I believe. Meters
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You mention nothing of your budget, intended use of the camera, or
anything
else, so further suggestions would be difficult. Must you have an SLR?
There are some good rangefinder options out there.
Shel,
Any feedback on how rangefinders cop with
I would suggest the following:
MX
KX
K1000
All use batteries for the meter circuit but work fine as 100% manual cameras
without the batteries. A MX with a dead meter should be rather cheap. K1000's
tend to be overpriced for what they are. The KX is about the best
price/preformance ratio of any
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
There are some good rangefinder options out there.
As useless as a Nikon SLR body (for using Pentax lenses).
Mark Dalal wrote:
BTW: I'd always read that the Nikon FM/FM2 is THE extreme cold weather
SLR.
Of course, that doesn't help if one doesn't have Nikon lenses.
Personally, I think there is a little too much emphasis on digital
is easy by
some people.
Perhaps it's because digital is easy.
William Robb
If you think digital photography is easy, you aren't doing it right :-)
OK :-)
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: Fully manual SLR
Hi, Dario,
The guy never said a word about using Pentax lenses, just that he was
looking for an all manual SLR. He was given
And is he still alive, himself?
keith
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Paw:Look what we found
As always comments always appreciated.
Dave (this link works) Brooks
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/sara.jpg
We had a cat that looked
In a message dated 5/30/2004 8:51:52 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps it's because digital is easy.
William Robb
--
So, if it is, is this really a BAD thing? Do things have to be HARD or
REALLY, REALLY hard to be good or worthwhile?
I wonder
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
Brett Mckay wrote:
Which would be the best fully manual SLR be to buy as a backup for use
in extremely cold temperatures. So I do not want any electronics or
batteries.
No electronics? I'm _really_ fond of the S3 and the S1a in that
category. I haven't
Hey y'all! Just thought I'd introduce myself.
My name is Jon, and I'm a Pentax enthusiast from North
Carolina, USA. I got started with a K1000, and have
recently aquired (super cheap) an A3000. My current
selection of glass is as follows:
SMC Pentax-A 50mm 1:2
Sears 80mm-200mm 1:4
Vivitar
I'd go for a KX - has all the features like DoF preview and so on and is reliable. If
you want to save weight and size then an MX would be best.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Brett Mckay[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30/05/04 11:09:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I wonder if painters complained when they could buy oil paint in tubes rather
than having to mix/make their own?
nobody forced them to stop mixing their own - the option was still
there. The film option seems to be disappearing quite quickly for
photographers.
I watched an interesting
Welcome Jon.
It's nice that new people want to join this special bunch of funny, nice,
stupid, humorous, nirdy, intelligent, skilled, artistic, technocratic etc.
film and CCD users - not to mention users of Pentax gear - 50 years to 2
days old - of cource...
As fior the lenses, I don't know, but
Hello Jon, and welcome to the list!
If you want to unload the Vivitar cheap let me know, I need
some parts.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Jon M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 10:00 AM
Subject: Newbie to the list
You're right. The AF80C flash uses 49mm thread and works fine with the 100mm with the
58-49mm adaptor.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: William Robb[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's a bit annoying, as it looks like they could have made it a 49mm
thread mount had they wanted to.
- Original Message -
From: John Francis
Subject: Re: Darkroom or Digital for beginners
If you think digital photography is easy, you aren't doing it right
:-)
Or, I have worked with the alternatives long enough to know what is
easy, and what isn't.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Scott Nelson
Subject: Re: Fully manual SLR
In my experience, there are usually only two problems with shooting
in
cold weather. #1 is batteries,
Problem #2a is having to shoot without taking your gloves off.
And #3: The camera freezes up completely.
I
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley
Subject: Re: Paw:Look what we found
And is he still alive, himself?
Of course.
Cats are way more expendable than dogs.
Zowie was not a very nice cat anyway.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Darkroom or Digital for beginners
Perhaps it's because digital is easy.
--
So, if it is, is this really a BAD thing? Do things have to be HARD
or
REALLY, REALLY hard to be good or worthwhile?
I wasn't
Scott Nelson wrote:
Problem #2a is having to shoot without taking your gloves off.
Hey, on that subject, where can I find one of those small things that
you can screw on the MX?
The shutter release is too small to use with gloves.
/Henri
Wow, it must have been really cold (humid too?). I don't suppose it
make much difference what kind of camera you use with regards to that
particular problem.
Scott
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 08:40, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brett Mckay
Subject: Re: Fully manual SLR
Some people made a external battery compartment. I even remember reading
that a manufacturer made one. With a cord - so you can keep the battery in a
pocket or some other relativly warm place. You would need a screw-in contact
thing to put in the camera. I don't know how long the camera will work,
Hi!
Shaun, your newest web page is quite heavy on scripting. Let's just
say that my std IE 6.0 under Win2000 in my office went belly up. He
thought your scripts had some bug and it wouldn't let go. Eventually
it just closed...
At home with IE 6.0 and Win98 and Proxymotron 4.5 it seems to work.
Hi!
I should say I never yet met a person whose name was Jon... I mean, I
feel like I am missing some h here g...
Well, my name is Boris. Pleased to meet you Jon. And I live in Israel
(Middle East g).
JM I've been considering the SMC Pentax-A 35mm-70mm
JM 3.5-4.5 macro as my next lens purchase,
The Pentax LX was specifically designed for environmental extremes. For
example, the motor wind battery case can be detached from the mechanics
(like the MX) and a cord used so that you can keep the battery warm in your
pocket. It was designed with the best seals of any camera ever made, save
If I had two pets, and one of them killed the other, I'd very soon have
zero pets. Then I'd have to go out looking for one or more replacements
with a better, more trustworthy disposition.
A pet that kills is potentially dangerous. Who decides the next victim
is just a worthless cat. The killer
Hi!
DJM Ther is an interesting photograph on the Astronomy Picture of the Day
DJM page for May 28:
DJM http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
I wonder how that would look as a part of this month's PUG. After all
sunsets are so cliche g...
Fascinating.
Boris
([EMAIL PROTECTED] or
Bad lubrication job...
I don't care who did it.
Regards,
Bob...
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Scott Nelson
In my experience, there are usually only two problems with shooting
in
cold weather. #1 is batteries,
Problem #2a is having to shoot without taking your
Any camera that is to be used in extreme cold should be CLAed and
reassembled with cold weather lubricants. A good camera repair shop
will know what to use and where to use it. Otherwise, you're libel to
end up with slow moving shutter curtains at high speed. MX would be
fine as would
I used the word Street only to indicate that I was trying to take a
studio type portrait on a street corner. I believe the gaussian blur is
roughly the equivalent of the soft focus filter, but it allows you to
apply it selectively. As Butch said, makeup, contact lenses, filtration
and careful
Hey John,
Welcome to the list.
Where in NC are you. I'm in Gastonia.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Jon M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 1:00 PM
Subject: Newbie to the list
Hey y'all! Just thought I'd introduce myself.
My name is Jon, and
I don't think it is a good idea to use *any* camera that relies on a motor
to transport film.
FWIW, the LX is specified to work electronically between -20 and +50°C. The
mechanical shutter speeds are specified to work up to -30° C (thats quite
cold but can happen in Russia).
The MX is specified
...still available: LX external battery chamber, Pentax order No 37352, EUR
39,00
Sven
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Mai 2004 17:38
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Fully manual SLR
I've always wondered. Is the main
I meant to say spoken by someone who once lost six rolls of film
shooting in -10F weather in Soldier's Field. By the way, I agree with
Bob that an LX with the external battery pack in a pocket would be
ideal. The electronic shutter is probably less susceptible to cold
weather problems than
Hear, hear!
And cats are far better companions than dogs IMO, but let's not go there as we all
have different opinions.
Nick.
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30/05/04 19:40:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Paw:Look what
Rob, Bob, thanks a lot for your input, I agree with all your points and I
will be going with the 3 section 1227M.
I also decided to go with the acratech ultimate ball head, this should
provide a super stable setup for all but the largest lenses.
Thanks everyone for your help, the ball head
On 30/5/04, 30,000 BAGS, discombobulated, offered:
btw, Mr Cottrell, the photo that tom posted of that stuff that APPEARED to
be mine? Well, UNDERNEATH it all, was a number of boxes (almost as many as
mine!) that I noticed, were addressed to Cotty and Steve Cottrell, so
there!
Never.
Glad
Hi,
Brett Mckay wrote:
Thanks to the people who have replied so far.
Just adding some details. I am after a Pentax camera that takes K-mount
lenses. I assumed people would talk about Pentax as it is on the Pentax
mailing list. These I have for my MZ-S. My worry is when I visit Russia
at the end
Oh I dream of being able to do weddings - we're *much much* worse
than
that in news!!!
ROTFL
We expect you lot to be pig headed degenerates.
William Robb
The shame of it!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Hey y'all! Just thought I'd introduce myself.
My name is Jon, and I'm a Pentax enthusiast from North
Carolina, USA. I got started with a K1000, and have
recently aquired (super cheap) an A3000. My current
selection of glass is as follows:
SMC Pentax-A 50mm 1:2
Sears 80mm-200mm 1:4
Vivitar
But, that's just me. I wouldn't have a killing machine on the property...
Keith, don't talk about Bill like that.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Tanya Mayer wrote:
So I had like 7 hours sleep last night (tom and Ash are still snoring),
and I am now feeling SLIGHTLY human again (I am able to talk without
slurring my speech now!), although, it looks as though I am going to
have to spend a pretty large chunk of my spending money on a visit
I'd just like to wish those attending a fantastic time.
Enjoy yourselves. Tell us all about it later.
Malcolm
On 30 May 2004 at 12:01, William Robb wrote:
Or, I have worked with the alternatives long enough to know what is
easy, and what isn't.
Har, the large majority of us don't all have a calibrated mini-lab with an
operator we can trust at our disposal.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
On 30 May 2004 at 12:03, William Robb wrote:
And #3: The camera freezes up completely.
I have had both K1000 and LX shutters freeze open.
I recall some time ago a story that the service centres could apply low temp
lubes to alleviate these problems?
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
On 30 May 2004 at 21:14, keller.schaefer wrote:
The *ist D - surprise surprise - is not specified to work below freezing at all
(!) and only up to 40° C.
I would guess that it will still shoot if it was fitted with warm batteries but
the LCDs would likely not function until the cameras warms
Most fairly modern cameras have synthetic lubricants in them that should not be
a problem. I so know my MX's (when new) worked ok down to -20f with the factory
lubricants although the meters were a bit undependable at those temperatures.
--
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 30 May 2004 at 12:03, William
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley
Subject: Re: Paw:Look what we found
If I had two pets, and one of them killed the other, I'd very soon
have
zero pets. Then I'd have to go out looking for one or more
replacements
with a better, more trustworthy disposition.
A pet that kills
- Original Message -
From: keller.schaefer
Subject: AW: Fully manual SLR
The *ist D - surprise surprise - is not specified to work below
freezing at
all (!) and only up to 40° C.
I think this is typical of digital cameras in general. Manufacturers
are in CYA mode, if you use it
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: Fully manual SLR
Bad lubrication job...
I don't care who did it.
This was with brand new cameras, less than 2 months out of the box.
I was testing them under about the most extreme conditions possible.
It was something like -43C,
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Fully manual SLR
I recall some time ago a story that the service centres could apply
low temp
lubes to alleviate these problems?
One of the local newsboys I used to know had a low temp Nikon. It
spent half the year in the deep
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Darkroom or Digital for beginners
On 30 May 2004 at 12:01, William Robb wrote:
Or, I have worked with the alternatives long enough to know what
is
easy, and what isn't.
Har, the large majority of us don't all have a
Hi Paul,
Great work, as well as skill with the camera you obviously have a way
with people. Do you ever give out web addresses or any other details so
the people you shoot can see the results? Do they ever ask?
Cheers,
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL
In a message dated 5/30/2004 11:09:51 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wasn't commenting on that. I was merely commenting that digital is
pretty easy compared to the alternatives.
If you want to make a value judgement, that's your perogative.
William Robb
--
what's your heaviest load and what sort of head will you be using?
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Shawn K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 11:48 PM
Subject: Tripod Question: 3 section vs. 4 section
Well the title pretty much says it, is there a
On 30 May 2004 at 12:01, William Robb wrote:
Or, I have worked with the alternatives long enough to know what
is
easy, and what isn't.
Har, the large majority of us don't all have a calibrated mini-lab
with an
operator we can trust at our disposal.
Lets make sure the playing field is
Win 2000 IE 6 and I'm having no problems with Shaun's site!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 3:36 PM
To: Shaun Canning
Subject: Re: Website v3.0
Hi!
Shaun, your newest web page is quite heavy on scripting. Let's just
say
i agree. moreover, modern cameras of the higher end types don't need any
treatments for cold weather. they already are designed to handle very cold
conditions out of the box. for film cameras, the film may break during
wind/rewind or get static. batteries are the only thing that hold back
modern
Just because dogs don't like cats...or in my Rotty's case even other dogs,
has nothing to do with their disposition towards people. The only time my
Rotty would ever try to hurt you, is if you tried to hurt the baby first!
He just adores people in general, possibly because he truly has no idea
there are a lot of people who have published their work done using Canon
DSLRs at -40 for entire days. pretty much any modern upper end SLR will work
in such conditions without special preparation but with good warm batteries.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: keller.schaefer [EMAIL
I would agree 100% with the CLA ahead of time thought. Furthermore I note
no one has mentioned the Ricoh cameras which for the most part are available
quite reasonable, many are totally manual except for a light meter that
serves no necessary function. The best part is they take Pentax lenses!
Hi!
JM Jon is short for Jonathan.
Oh, now I see it. Well, I've just learned a bit b
JM The 50mm is a very nice lens, sure is alot brighter
JM than anything else I've used. However, it isn't the
JM ideal lens for everything, which is why I was
JM considering a 35-70 zoom in addition to the 50mm,
Hi!
Would I be better off getting an assortment of primes
as opposed to 1 or 2 zooms? And which primes would be
best?
WR Buying prime lenses is dangerous. You soon realize that you never
WR actually have as many as you want/ need.
WR This mailing list is a very bad place to be asking these
For some reason, I didn't get Boris' original posting. To answer your
question Boris, I'm not 'in need' of feedback. I just want to make sure
that the site works as I intended, as everyone has very different PC
setups. I am certainly no expert when it comes to HTML work, so I just
have to 'suck it
Hi!
MS I'd just like to wish those attending a fantastic time.
MS Enjoy yourselves. Tell us all about it later.
Malcolm I sure join you. I am sure that we will read here many
fascinating stories either. I am not going to start even imagining
what can they be g...
Cheers and let the light be
Jon,
Welcome to the list.
We're a friendly bunch and all started in about the same place as you are today. Many
of us favor prime lenses over zooms. My personal favorites are the M series of
lenses. They are small and light enough to carry 2 or 3 around instead of a zoom and
the quality
Hi!
SK here are some pics of my sister:
SK http://www.bluehorizon3d.com/cgi-bin/IB3/ikonboard.cgi?s=a19f3f68eb3431e7f72
SK 72ed206a7d7b5act=STf=9t=1st=#entry1
They are quite excellent. Have you printed them big and let her have
the prints?
Boris
([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: David Miers
Subject: RE: Paw:Look what we found
Just because dogs don't like cats...or in my Rotty's case even
other dogs,
has nothing to do with their disposition towards people. The only
time my
Rotty would ever try to hurt you, is if you tried to hurt
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Darkroom or Digital for beginners
Okay, point taken. Often it sounds like on this list that people
are saying
easy and making a value judgment when they say that.
Of course, you aren't one of those. ;-)
Horsehockey. I am
Bill,
So you tested them in April in Regina, then?
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
I was testing them under about the most extreme conditions possible.
It was
Thanks, Malcolm,
That we'll have a good time is, I think, a given.
Whether ~all~ the stories get out of GFM alive is another story. I'm sure
you'll hear most of them...
vbg
thanks,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: Fully manual SLR
Bill,
So you tested them in April in Regina, then?
Har.
Christmas day. I think 1988.
William Robb
snip
I was testing them under about the most extreme conditions
possible.
It was something like -43C,
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
