My initial impressions of the lens were positive. The sharpness was good,
and I was finding it harder to look beyond the jpeg compression as it looked
to me like the compression was holding the lens back, so I tested it with
some RAW images... It's incredibly sharp, incredibly good. The
Added sometime recently to the pentax USA page:
http://pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=196
Some text from page:
[snip]
PENTAX PLANS DIGITAL SLR FAMILY EXPANSION
June 8, 2004 (GOLDEN, CO) PENTAX Imaging Company, a division of PENTAX
of America, Inc. has announced it is developing
On Jun 9, 2004, at 12:54 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I can't think of a better place to turn than the diverse wisdom and
experience of this august group. My office is shopping for a new
copier. Does anyone know of web sites that contain user reviews and/or
durability statistics? I tried searching
Hello Butch,
Thanks. We are still trying to decide if they are cardboard cutouts
or not grin.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 10:49:36 PM, you wrote:
BB Great pic BTW.
BB I don't suppose you got model releases for the two fishermen as that image
BB would make a great vacation
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Joseph Tainter wrote:
was so dim that I was shooting ISO 3200, 1/30 second (handheld), with
the FA* 24 at f2.0. That's at the edge, obviously, and shows why the FA
20 f2.8 won't do. I will get the DA 14, but as you can see there will be
times when it is too slow.
Yes, but
Hi Amita,
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:25:07 -0400, Amita Guha wrote:
Does anyone remember who made a camera backpack with front-loading lens
drawers? I'm not talking about the Lowepro Trim Trekker. The interior
was yellow. I thought it was Domke but I think I was wrong.
I have seen two of them, both
Whats up Tom? Dont you like hearing about the GFM?
Antonio
On 9 Jun 2004, at 05:39, Tom C wrote:
What do you say that we set up a new list?
Those that want to discuss photography and Pentax. We'll just exclude
those who want to pretend they know what they're talking about? :-)
Tom C.
OK at this end.
A
On 9 Jun 2004, at 06:19, Tom C wrote:
Is it just me (using hotmail) or has the list been slow and spotty the
last several days? Numerous posts never come back to me even though
they are on the archives and other list members repsond to them.
I guess that means it's just me...
That filter's already in PSCS, Dave :)
Cheers,
Ryan
PS. If anything I wonder if PS9 will upgrade the sloppy thumbnail browser..
PSP8's got that ball
- Original Message -
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: OT;
on 09.06.04 1:34, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, everyone knows that in camera sharpening even on the highest
setting does practically nothing. All the image settings in camera make
very slight changes actually, and the sharpness is the most slight of them
all.
William Robb wrote:
You don't need to be up on the technical details of digital cameras
to see the flaw in a test procedure that uses several different
lenses and conversion algorithms to compare sensor sharpness between
camera brands.
I'm not interested at all in comparing sensors. Does
Tom C wrote:
Reread again... this is clearly not a valid test... you messed with the
image by resizing it, you messed with ithe mage by by saving it as a .jpg,
you messed with image by resizing again, you NEVER had the original image
out of the camera to start with, and you don't know how the
on 08.06.04 23:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are various other places that Pentax might be losing sharpness.
There's the anti-aliasing filter. The Nikon D2H apparently has better
apparent sharpness because the anti-aliasing filter is weaker.
There's the
Tom C wrote:
Sorry, you're just not making sense to me. First you refer to and complain
explicitly about the *istD compared to other cameras and now you're saying
you're referring to the image and the raw converter.
Because it was supposedly taken with that camera. Of course, you can do the
What would be the best size Zing camera case for an *ist D with the D-BG1
Battery Grip and the DA 16-45? Would the Pro Zoom model be too big?
The Pro and Pro Zoom are described as being designed for SLRs with a
bottom-mounted winder, and so would probably fit around the D-BG1
Battery Grip, but
Sorry just catching up with the list (still pre-GFM report!)
Up and at em tomorrow morning, on the Heathrow bus at 10am ish, airborne
about 3pm I believe. I must be one of the last to leave on this
pilgrimage.
Poor old Cotswold. Major fall-down of British air control computers
this
Dario,
(more wordy than I wished)
I think I (we) probably understand your concern, issue, desire for an
answer. It's just that there's virtually know valid way to compare images
taken with different cameras, sensors, lenses, settings and come up with a
meaningful result, or identify the reason
No... I was having a silly moment, that's all.
Tom C.
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New List!
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:12:17 +0200
Whats up Tom? Dont you like hearing about the GFM?
Antonio
On 9 Jun 2004, at 05:39, Tom C
Apparently, they have fixed some issues with the scratch disk and
screen refresh, see here:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=2552
Good light,
Frantisek Vlcek
There are a few web pages showing people doing just that.
Many even attempt to clean the scanner's mirror.
Me, I ain't got the nerve.
Andre Langevin wrote
Dust ON the film sure is a problem with scaners but has dust inside
the scanner ever been pointed as part of that problem? If so, would
it be
Tom, I like so much this message from you, because it is constructive and
helps me think.
You wrote:
I think I (we) probably understand your concern, issue, desire for an
answer. It's just that there's virtually know valid way to compare images
taken with different cameras, sensors, lenses,
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read Mike Johnston's latest over at Luminous Landscape.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-june-04.shtml
Notice he mentions the PDML :)
He also blush mentions this photo:
http://www.robertstech.com/graphics/pages/7d202806.htm
But he got the story
Jostein wrote:
This morning I rose with the sun
in hope to capture the Venus transit, and got lucky. The fog lifted just
in time to get the last part when Venus left the sun disk. Actually, the
fog turned to be an ally instead of an enemy, because the sun that shone
through was bleak and mute.
On Tuesday 08 June 2004 12:30, Ryan Lee wrote:
FJW Actually this was meant to be a test message, because about 3 posts over the
FJW past week haven't gone through. But well, just in case it -does- go through,
FJW thought it should look a bit more interesting than -testing testing-.
FJW
FJW So.
Hi Jostein,
on 08 Jun 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
Really cool shot, Heiko.
Thanks.
The extra mm's from 400 to 1000 really does the trick.
Yes, but it is really hard to focus.
We never saw Venus that far away from the edge of the sun here.
Next chance in 8 years ;-)
Cheers, Heiko
RS Herein lies the key to our differences in the perception of what's sharp and
RS what's not I guess. Did you notice that all the images were made with the
RS contrast on hard, the saturation high and the sharpening on hard? Even
RS discounting the CA they are dreadful examples IMHO.
Well,
Someone (with 0 feedback) has just listed an 'MZ-D' on eBay. Photos and
info in the ad are straight from an old dpreview news article. The MZ-D
(I *think* this was never an official name - it was an unnamed
prototype) was pentax's early attempt at a DSLR - a full frame 6mp based
around the
Yes Amita it was Domke. It is called the Outpack and I just
bought a used one
about three weeks ago. I always loved this camera bag and
wanted one but they
were very expensive. I found one used in mint condition.
They're quite large
but they hold a lot of gear. I like the drawer-type
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:53:11 +1000, David Nelson wrote:
Someone (with 0 feedback) has just listed an 'MZ-D' on eBay. Photos and
info in the ad are straight from an old dpreview news article. The MZ-D
(I *think* this was never an official name - it was an unnamed
prototype) was pentax's early
Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:53:11 +1000, David Nelson wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3820736785
I dare a PDMLer to bid q-:
I don't think I'll bid, but I have asked if the camera comes with the
instruction manual and firewire cable.
At the same time, I suppose.
Dario
I'm a weirdo. I use my right eye for video and my left eye for stills.
Pfft.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Be patient and look for an SMC F 28-80 f 3.5/4.5 zoom. Built like a tank and
good optically. Only negative is rotating front element.
Robert
- Original Message -
From: alex wetmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:48 PM
Subject: Giving up on the FA
In a message dated 6/9/2004 12:14:11 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it just me (using hotmail) or has the list been slow and spotty the
last several days? Numerous posts never come back to me even though
they are on the archives and other list members repsond to
One of the funniest parts of this weekend is that everyone is snapping
picture of each other. If you don't like having your picture taken, it
could have been unnerving. Of course, the homebrew helped considerably
in this regard.
It was also nice to see such a great collection of Pentax
That's good to hear, as the SMC-F 28 f/2.8 is the same lens formula
as the SMC-A version of this lens, which was a supposedly much
improved design from the SMC-M version of the lens. From my
experience and judging from others' comments, however, you may be
even more impressed with the SMC-FA
Doesn't work in the States any more. (But you can still ignore back
property taxes from another State
if you don't plan to go back).
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: GFM and Mark Roberts and Bill Owens
Now if I can just figure out how to get out of
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/6/04, GRAYWOLF, discombobulated, offered:
I wonder if the folks who think IS is so wonderful have
actually used it?
Today
at GFM Cotty was showing off his new Canon 70-200 IS. I
noticed that it
took something
tom wrote
snip
Anyway, IS helps so mush I use it for about 90% of the ceremony, and it's a
mush? Freudian slip?
-
focal length I love now.
tv
ha
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: long glass
tom wrote
snip
Anyway, IS helps so mush I use it for about 90% of the ceremony, and
it's a
Ok so it wasn't Real funny.
tom wrote:
ha
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: long glass
tom wrote
snip
Anyway, IS helps so mush I use it for about 90% of the ceremony, and
Despite the lowish power output, the GT6 was a nice little car. Light,
and close to the ground, so it seemed you were going fast, even if you
weren't!
John
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:32:20 -0400 (EDT), John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: mike.wilson
This I don't understand, the 24's are no more problematic than the
28's. The K 3.5 and 2.8 have excellent
reputations, the FA 2.0 also. The only one I've heard really bad things
about is the A 2.8 which has mixed
reviews, sample variations anyone?
The 135's are also given mostly high marks.
I have also been looking for a backpack. Is the Outpack still being sold? When I go
to the Domke Outpack website I find under Outpack only two bags, for long lense
(800mm) and dri packs. I cannot find info on the OutPack you describe or where to buy
one. Do you have a website of a dealer?
All I know is that somehow, I am going to make it to the next one.
William Robb
klingon grin
Ahhh! The challenge is made!
/klingon grin
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Damn I'm tired. Here are some pics from tan's *ist-D -
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tan/index.htm
Great pics, I'm sad I missed it.
What the hell did Tan do to Norm? :-)
Don't - you wake him up!
More to the point, ask Tan how she lost her cherry.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
People who do this for money are concerned with making images: photography
People who are hobbyists are more concerned with working machines: cameras
Clients don't give a rats ass how you get the image. Being a master
technician doesn't make you a good photographer.
BR
Wow, after all this time
All right, this I don't want to know, (I'll probably be disappointed
anyway).
Cotty wrote:
Damn I'm tired. Here are some pics from tan's *ist-D -
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tan/index.htm
Great pics, I'm sad I missed it.
What the hell did Tan do to Norm? :-)
Don't - you wake him
Ouch. (That's gotta hurt).
Cotty wrote:
People who do this for money are concerned with making images: photography
People who are hobbyists are more concerned with working machines: cameras
Clients don't give a rats ass how you get the image. Being a master
technician doesn't make you a good
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Damn I'm tired. Here are some pics from tan's *ist-D -
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tan/index.htm
Great pics, I'm sad I missed it.
What the hell did Tan do to Norm? :-)
Don't - you wake him up!
More to the
The ethical
standards have probably improved as the technical ability to get
what
you want without cheating has improved.
Umm, have you not been watching CNN lately?
I think the world as a whole is becoming less ethical, and
journalism, while not leading the herd, is certainly somewhere in
An interesting thing there, Dario, is that I prefer the Pentax images on your
webpages when looking at the pictures. Yes I see that when you move in the
others seem to be sharper, but at normal viewing distances for the whole photo
(and isn't that what is important?) I like the Pentax images
yeah, i lost my cherry in the back of the van, and cotty helped me to find
it again...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 10 June 2004 1:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT - GFM pics from tan and tv
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 12:13 AM
In a message dated 6/8/2004 7:55:39 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
We missed you on the last day.
Too little time with each person,
Cesar
Panama
Stan, Stan, Stan,
For those who were not at GFMtn, it seems our Stan is the consummate
salesman. If you would mention a lens, he would counter with another.
I was afraid to mention my house - he probably had one for sale :-)
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: Stan
Cotty wrote:
While staying at tvs, I did some channel-flicking and MY GOD what a
nightmare. Mercifully I was able to catch a bit of the BBC news on BBC
World. I don't understand how north America survives most news programmes.
Cheers,
Cotty
Easy - we who survive don't watch them
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Robert Leigh Woerner wrote:
I doubt the manual focus feel is any different on the SMC version. Does the
28-70 f4.0 fare better in this area?
I couldn't find the Takumar-F 28-80/3.5-4.5 that I own this morning
to compare. I remember it being really really loose though.
Now I know I'll be disapointed.
tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Damn I'm tired. Here are some pics from tan's *ist-D -
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tan/index.htm
Great pics, I'm sad I missed it.
What the hell did Tan do to Norm? :-)
Quite nicely, thank you.
Cil my Landlord.
Where's my chainsaw?
Everyone's gonna PAY.
Cotty wrote:
snip
I don't understand how north America survives most news programmes.
Oh, you can go pretty fast in one. A college friend of mine found that
out the hard way; he came round a bend on a country lane to find a group
of hikers spread out all across the road. He managed to avoid them all,
but was less fortunate in avoiding the tree branch hanging over the bank.
It
Cotty wrote:
I'll have to wait until next time as it was after sunset
here. I think
the next transit (8 years away) will be better for NZ provided the
weather is good.
It's my understanding that the next transit will be in 2247
Wow! And we moan about Pentax introducing new models,
I got the first couple of rolls shot in earnest with my KX back yesterday.
They show 2 things: 1) M28/2.0 is fine at f/2.0 2) most of a stop of
overexposure. The overexposure helped the roll of fuji print film I shot,
but was a little hard on the velvia.
The most obvious cause of the problem
Well, using the 70-200/2.8IS, and just looking through it may be entirely
different things. AND, I can see it helping with the barn owl. GRIN
OTOH, I was using 100 speed film Friday around PDML (M100/2.8, 1/15sec at 2.8).
Only about 3 (out of 10-12) of the shots came out sharp enough in 4x6
I survive it by seldom watching it. There are good things happening in the
world, but you would never know from American TV News programing. Unfortunately,
many think the world is as bad a place as they portray it. I sometimes wonder
how many suicides a year they are responsible for.
--
Cotty
-Original Message-
From: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 9:05 AM
One of the funniest parts of this weekend is that everyone is snapping
picture of each other. If you don't like having your picture taken, it
could have been unnerving. Of course,
On 8/6/04, TANJASAN, discombobulated, offered:
Har! Wait until tom gets HIS pics back from his 645n Christian, I do
believe that tom took quite a few of my tootsies as well!
Who took the pic of your cherry?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
IMHO, FA*24/2 F/FA135/2.8 aren't that great optically. In fact, I found
the M135/3.5 to be sharper than the F/FA135/2.8 near wide open.
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
This I don't understand, the 24's are no more problematic than the 28's.
The K 3.5 and 2.8 have excellent
Also, I just wanted to say thankyou to Geoff Moes and his beautiful
girlfriend Wendy for their wonderful company during our road trip to GFM and
back, they were really great to travel with and were also very helpful in
keeping Cotty under control!
Tan, now that I'm totally turned back into
Also, I eagerly await the chance to view the VIDEO that Adehlaid was
shooting over the weekend. She seemed to be capturing every moment on that
very nice camera of hers and I am sure that there will be laughs a plenty
when we get to view it.
Yeah, especially when everyone sees the size of
Christian, I would like to contact Kerry off-list if that is ok to ask her
some questions about Aussies living in the US... Does she have her own
email address that I could contact her on?
I've like so gotta bad feeling about this :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
could it be that the middling
speeds of my KX are too slow, leading to overexposure of almost a stop?
Anybody else with a KX or similarly-shuttered camera (was there one?)
experienced this? Personally, I suspect a combination of the meter itself
and faulty tone-analysis on my part.
Certainly
Except the light-fall-off issue at wide open.
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
That's good to hear, as the SMC-F 28 f/2.8 is the same lens formula as the
SMC-A version of this lens, which was a supposedly much improved design
from the SMC-M version of the lens. From my experience
Subject says it all.
Tome Reece got an honourable mention with a superb shot of one of the
eagles in the habitat. Another eagle shot by a non-pdmler got 2nd (i
think) but IMO Tom's was better. The other shot was perhaps technically
better, but Tom's had more 'feeling' and conveyed a better
You could see a lake from the top of GFM, ie., the swinging bridge. Is
this that lake?
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adelheid and I are now at the Outer Banks on the coast of North
Carolina. We're staying at Kitty Hawk. This morning I rose with the sun
in hope to capture the Venus transit, and got lucky. The fog lifted just
in time to get the last part when Venus left the sun disk. Actually, the
fog turned to be
Too many people on the mountain that I wanted to spend more
time with, but no regrets to the quantity there,
That was my thought as well...I only got to hang out with Dayton and Jostein
for maybe 30 seconds total.
Maybe next year we should make appointments.
tv
Yeah, like you could do it
Anyone here ever consider the images from these lenses to be harsh? (A description
given by someone on rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
I haven't had this problem with a KX but my MX had shutter timing
problems. A CLA cleared it right up.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the first couple of rolls shot in earnest with my KX back yesterday.
They show 2 things: 1) M28/2.0 is fine at f/2.0 2) most of a stop of
overexposure. The
I don't have any direct evidence with the FA*24 or FA/F135 only what
others have said, once again I've seen mixed
reviews but the preponderance of these were favorable. Some of the
difference could be ascribed to different expectations
and some to sample variations. Besides which Alan I
Hey, I am awakeand I do actually remember being rudely awakened by someone, and
she who knows who she is
Norm
P.S. did you take any of that Off! back to England with you or would you like me to
send you some?
Ya know, religion has gone to hell in a handbasket. -- Bob Sullivan
Hey Cotty, come over next year and we'll have a Star Trek figurine hunt.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, I eagerly await the chance to view the VIDEO that Adehlaid was
shooting over the weekend. She seemed to be capturing every moment on that
very nice camera of hers and I am sure that
I take a look at about every third digest. Most of the threads sound like a bunch of
drunks rambling about nothing to do with photography. Quite a few threads sound like a
bunch of drunks rambling about cameras. The rest just sound like a bunch of drunks
rambling to their friend Harvey.
While
Just want to say thanks to the Owens for their wonderful hospitality and to Tom for
making it possible for me to show up... Had a wonderful time, what a great bunch of
people!
Norm
Landing a plane on an aircraft carrier is like having sex during a car wreck. ---
The List God
Cotty wrote:
Adelheid and I are now at the Outer Banks on the coast of North
Carolina. We're staying at Kitty Hawk. This morning I rose with the sun
in hope to capture the Venus transit, and got lucky. The fog lifted just
in time to get the last part when Venus left the sun disk. Actually,
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 23:13, graywolf wrote:
FJW I have written a short bit about GFM in my journal and included a link to a few
FJW snapshots.
FJW
FJW http://journal.graywolfphoto.com/summer-04.html#050604
FJW
I like the portrait of Mark very much, it has something that reminds me of the
It was great getting to see everyone on the mountain this weekend and put
faces to familiar names. A special thanks to everyone at pdml central for
making a lurker feel very welcome. I tried to post an update on Friday
afternoon to let everyone know who had arrived and what was going on but
You mean a computer whizz rather than a chemistry whizz don't you?
No.
Photography is not about chemistry.
It is about light.
William Robb
Like, so absolutely!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot a wedding last winter (I don't do them often, anymore). While
at the location we had chosen for our portraits, another photographer
was also working.
She had a couple of cheap studio flash units, I think they were the
low end Photogenics that aren't actually called
Bless her, I think she means *trawling* eBay.I hope.
Don't you know trolling ebay is dangerous!!! to your wallet that is! Your
sure to see all kinds of things you just have to have...lol 8).
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Amita Guha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gonz
Subject: Re: photography vs cameras
Interesting article. Do you think Laurenceau's work falls in that
category?
Heck no, I just like stirring the pot..
Trouble maker... ;)
But much of what he says it true, alot of the photos
Yo Frank
Whatever Cotty says about me isn't true. And, any compromising photos of me
have been photoshopped.
Oh boy I like so haven't even begun
Seriously, it was great to meet you Cotty. You're everything I expected and
more.
you mean I'm a longer streak a piss than you imagined!?!?
I
Frits,
I think Mark has both ears, though!
vbg
Seriously, I thought the same thing: the photo of Mark is stunning.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like
Mark Roberts is about 6 taller than I expected.
snif That's the nicest thing anyone's ever said about me!
;-)
His voice is like about 6 octaves higher than I expected ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 23:13, graywolf wrote:
FJW I have written a short bit about GFM in my journal and included a link to a few
FJW snapshots.
FJW
FJW http://journal.graywolfphoto.com/summer-04.html#050604
FJW
I like the portrait of Mark very much,
I am no longer denying that there will be a 67 in my future ;-)
So, what skin will your 67 have then? :)
Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday
Director of Development, eyeon Software
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts is about 6 taller than I expected.
snif That's the nicest thing anyone's ever said about me!
;-)
His voice is like about 6 octaves higher than I expected ;-)
So *that's* why all those dogs were barking...
Of course, everyone of us was barking (in
How did you know?
At the same time, I suppose.
Dario
I'm a weirdo. I use my right eye for video and my left eye for stills.
Pfft.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Thanks. I enjoyed both the entry and the pics. The shot of Mark is very
nice, ditto the Jostein shot.
Paul
On Jun 9, 2004, at 5:13 PM, graywolf wrote:
I have written a short bit about GFM in my journal and included a link
to a few snapshots.
:-)
Vincent only cut off the ear-lobe on one side though.
On Thursday 10 June 2004 00:19, frank theriault wrote:
FJW Frits,
FJW
FJW I think Mark has both ears, though!
FJW
FJW vbg
FJW
FJW Seriously, I thought the same thing: the photo of Mark is stunning.
FJW
FJW cheers,
FJW frank
FJW
FJW
I wonder if the folks who think IS is so wonderful have
actually used it?
Today
at GFM Cotty was showing off his new Canon 70-200 IS. I
noticed that it
took something like a second for it to kick in. I think it would
occasionally
be a
life saver and 99% of the time drive me crazy.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2431072
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
