You're the one who hijacked my email to unsubscribe me you twit.
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 1:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reagan cortege
Wow, smart boy managed to hijack my email address somehow.
Does this
Whenever I was losing a fight, say to 3 or more guys, I always ended up
hightailing it before I got seriously hurt actually. Yes, I have run from
fights I probably couldn't win... I once was walking down the street on
Saint Patty's, fairly intoxicated, but not falling down drunk, and the
unique
..
Your email is not hijacked, its just a very simple spoof using outlook. You
did it to me, I returned the favor. All's well that ends well, I won't use
your damn email anymore.
-Shawn
I did it for a good cause.
You did it to be an asshole.
Fuck off
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 11:04 PM
Subject: YAWN
..
Your email is not hijacked, its just a very simple spoof using
outlook. You
Ray Charles Ronbinson is dead !
8=((
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Shawn K. wrote:
PLONK (whatever the hell that means)
http://www.clueless.com/jargon3.0.0/plonk.html
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
Hi,
Friday, June 11, 2004, 3:47:42 AM, Shawn wrote:
Yeah Bob, you're just so witty and smart, because being witty equals being
smart, never mind all those things like SAT scores, and IQ scores, and what
have you I'm honestly not friendly, nor do I really like people, they
largely annoy
In that case plonk to you both.
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Anders Hultman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 2:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: reagan cortege - E-Dope Slap
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Shawn K. wrote:
PLONK (whatever the hell that means)
Oh, here's a word for you, its only used by me and the chipmunks, chatter,
chatter its a form of public ridicule, so devious, so maligned, that you
are heretofore cast into the lowest echelons of society simply by its
invocation!!
(Making the point that just because you can make up stupid words
Thatcher wrecked our pensions, public transport, health and education
systems. And we are still paying the price for her short sitedness to
this day. Laisse faire economics of the type preached by her and Reagan
does not work.
Antonio
On 11 Jun 2004, at 11:09, Keith Whaley wrote:
Maggie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/10/2004 11:16:58 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ray Charles Ronbinson is dead !
8=((
---
Yeah, bummer.
I keep wonder if any of my posts are getting through. I sent one about Sold
on Digital that never showed up. Not on
- Original Message -
From: Greg Lovern
Subject: Re: pentax-discuss-d Digest V04 #549
Any thoughts on the comment in the dpreview.com *ist D review that
Photo
Laboratory causes artifacts that look like Bayer interpolation
artifacts? The comment there is:
coment snipped becaus I don't
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Chris Stoddart
Subject: Re: reagan cortege - no political content!
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/reagan/040609-173122-6008.htm
shows a soldier in a bearskin hat. Do American regiments wear
these?
We are in the middle of an election here. The
didn't take the first time...
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:34 PM
Subject: PAW-Dome Shot
For the Olympics in 1996 NBC had this black shroud made to block out the
Sun
in the Georgia Dome so they could
Excellent call, Ryan!
Now William can sleep more soundly...and Chris has a proper answer to
his question. g
keith
Ryan Lee wrote:
Hi Chris,
Your post piqued my curiosity, and being obsessive, I embarked on a bit of a
tedious quest to match tv's photo:
Alex Nemerosky describes both the SMCP-A 200/4 and SMCP-M 28/3.5 at
http://home.att.net/~alnem/html/pentax_primes.html#28
I'm not sure I'd want to get an -A 200/4, nor pay that much: they are going
for between $40 [E] and $90 [M] on eBay. I'm also not sure that the -A is
better than the -M: all
Do you feel better now?
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: Reagan's State Funeral
Thatcher wrecked our pensions, public transport, health and education
systems. And we are still paying
This afternoon the new scanner arrived. Feeling like a kid on his birthday,
I immediately set about making some scans. The first thing I learned was
that it's not a bad idea to read the manual ;-)) This is the first scan
after so doing.
A couple of days ago a friend and I went to the San
On 11/6/04, TREENA, discombobulated, offered:
And for the record, just
because you describe yourself in an e-mail doesn't mean that's what you
really are. I could tell you I'm 21 and I look like Britney Spears but it
wouldn't make it true.
but are you and do you?
...sorry ;-)
Cheers,
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley
Subject: Re: reagan cortege - no political content!
I don't know how that's playing politics as you put it.
It is one country showing respect at the funeral of another
country's
statesman. A proper and acceptable conduct.
It wasn't just a
Thanks for your comments.
You are, of course, not alone in your beliefs.
As many of your fellow countrymen feel the same way as you do, as those
who disagree with your opinions.
I don't know which viewpoint is correct.
I read all viewpoints, and try to understand...but all I know is what's
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tremendous photos, Marnie!!
You really captured the spirit of the event. They'd be even better in bw,
taken with film, on a Pentax. vbg
...as opposed to a Leica CL?
ebg
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Who are you asking, C.B.? Antonio or me?
keith
cbwaters wrote:
Do you feel better now?
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: Reagan's State Funeral
Thatcher wrecked our pensions, public
Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a perfectly functional (though well-worn) MG to trade for something.
But I don't know what. Make me an offer.
Well I don't have anything to offer in trade but TV's got a new dog...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Much obliged!
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: reagan cortege - no political content!
Excellent call, Ryan!
Now William can sleep more soundly...and Chris has a proper answer to
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Pentax converter is just fine, although a bit of a nasty
interface, providing you want to make prints, rather than look at
pixels at 72 DPI.
Hear hear.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Add another bozoid to the Twit List
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 3:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reagan cortege
What about the endless masturbation over the GFM? Not photos and not
Pentax
Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you could buy from a list member who has some quality 645 gear for
sale...
Yes I know. It's gonna cost me eventually...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Hello Shel,
Friday, June 11, 2004, 1:39:29 PM, you wrote:
SB This afternoon the new scanner arrived. Feeling like a kid on his birthday,
SB I immediately set about making some scans. The first thing I learned was
SB that it's not a bad idea to read the manual ;-)) This is the first scan
SB
Any thoughts on the comment in the dpreview.com *ist D review that
Photo
Laboratory causes artifacts that look like Bayer interpolation
artifacts? The comment there is:
coment snipped becaus I don't give a rat's ass about what they say,
and neither should you
They are a bunch of equiobators.
Cotty wrote:
On 11/6/04, TREENA, discombobulated, offered:
And for the record, just
because you describe yourself in an e-mail doesn't mean that's what you
really are. I could tell you I'm 21 and I look like Britney Spears but it
wouldn't make it true.
but are you and do you?
...sorry ;-)
I
Hi, Attila
Bill was using a rather pedestrian Pentax ME Super that day with an M
28/2.8.
Those aren't raindrops on the glass behind him. Rather, they are patterns
on the stone ledge below him. The shot was taken from above, looking down
one floor to Bill, and two floors to the OOF people
Thanks for your concern but wasnt actually feeling bad thanks.
A.
On 11 Jun 2004, at 12:34, cbwaters wrote:
Do you feel better now?
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: Reagan's State Funeral
Reminding us of Simon King's post sometime back (I may need to archive my
PDML folder about now..) about the dyslexic, agnostic insomniac who lay
awake in bed all night, wondering if there was a dog..
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
Graffiti in the Stockholm Underground:
http://anders.hultman.nu/pickup/DSC04321_(031127)_.JPG
Your first photo brings to mind the proposed ban on photography in the New
York City subway system. I read where about 100 photographers protested
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/images/onyx.jpg
Black labs are better than yellow!
(Ash went out and rescued a dog while I was at GFM, Phyllis wanted a look)
tv
Uh oh. The god portraits have started - I guess that mean's she's staying !!
Ash 1
Tom 0
Boy, what a Freaudian slip - that should
Arturo Medina-Chavez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
...
If you'd like to skip the lengthy, rambling text and just look at the
photos, go here: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/pages/0522.htm
I really want to see Mark's chronicle and pics, but when using
Netscape 7.1, it
Now I understand more completely, William...
Thanks for the education!
Weird stuff, politics...
keith
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley
Subject: Re: reagan cortege - no political content!
I don't know how that's playing politics as you put it.
It is one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/taste1.jpg
Yep, the facial expression definitely makes this photo work!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Love the photos. Great series on the climb.
On Jun 11, 2004, at 7:13 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Arturo Medina-Chavez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
...
If you'd like to skip the lengthy, rambling text and just look at the
photos, go here: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/pages/0522.htm
I
Most of us who couldn't go loved hearing about GFM . Very few want to
listen to your endless rants about subjects unrelated to photography.
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
What about the endless masturbation over the GFM? Not photos and not
Pentax discussion. At the end of the day politics is just
I loved hearing about them too - although none had anything whatsoever
to do with photography by the way.
You quote me out of context - my point was that there are many OT
topics on this list and it seems unfair that some are criticised wheras
others are not.
Antonio
On 11 Jun 2004, at
Ah so now you're confusing Iran and Iraq. Well here's a news flash.
Iran was ruled by fundamentalist Moslems and populated
primarily by Persians. Iraq by was ruled by fascist secularists and
populated mainly by Arabs. (Gee, I guess this is politically incorrect
so I want to say
right now
You did get several pics of Debbie, however, and she's the more
photogenic anyway.
Nice selection of shots.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Shel,
That's an example of good photography for sure. Good composition, good
focus/out-of-focus choice, everything works well. And monochrome also works
very well for this kind of pictures.
BTW, when you'll have occasion greet Bill for me (If he remembers me. If
not, just mention AOHC).
Peter,
Reagan was involved in affairs both in Iran and Iraq fyi.
Interesting way of having a discussion by the way - spurt out your
opinions then block the replies form the people you are talking too.
Sounds like YOU dont want to hear the truth. Regan was not all good. In
fact he had quite a
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Mark Dalal wrote:
I haven't really been playing close attention to the discussion on
converting RAW files from the *istD. The little bit I have read has given me
the impression that people aren't totally pleased with the Pentax converter
and have been happier with the
Freaudian slips are supposed to have some sort of meaning, Cotty you're
a strange man :-)
Cotty wrote:
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/images/onyx.jpg
Black labs are better than yellow!
(Ash went out and rescued a dog while I was at GFM, Phyllis wanted a look)
tv
Uh oh. The god
I got the first one. I didn't comment since I was never in the stadium,
with or without the shroud. Sorry to say it looks like any number of
large black ceilinged venues. I guess I just can't get past the subject
matter.
cbwaters wrote:
didn't take the first time...
- Original Message
And here I thought GFM had everything to do with photography and
especially Pentax... the ultimate list member get together ? I for
one have been pretty entertained when reading about it (here in
Finland). Maybe I will have the opportunity to join one year.
Please understand I am not writing
I like the composition. The lighting worked out very well, with the
slight emphasis on the camera. A
man and his machine.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This afternoon the new scanner arrived. Feeling like a kid on his birthday,
I immediately set about making some scans. The first thing I learned was
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
From: alex wetmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
Can someone explain the Giving up on the FA 28-70/4 subject to me, I have
one
in need of a clean (fungus) wouldn't want much for it, I'll keep it for
spares
yeah, if you say that, he'll start posting pictures of himself, eek, then
we'd be in trouble...
;-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 11 June 2004 9:11 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: inflammatory subjects
You can also see the guy following him is wearing a Marine hat.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 5:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reagan cortege - no political content!
Excellent call, Ryan!
Now William
Nice work Mark. Debbie and I got so close to McRae peak and then my
acrophobia kicked in. The funny part is that I like climbing up get
realy unnerved when I actually get to the top.
Antti, the GFM may have been a photo meet, but not many of the posts
here had anything to do with photography or pentax. As to the rest of
your comments I think that the list should not censor peoples reactions
to photos that are posted for feedback. In this instance the photos
were of a
In a message dated 6/11/2004 7:18:31 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can also see the guy following him is wearing a Marine hat.
tv
---
Very nice photos, tv! I especially like all the leg shots and the kid shots.
You really captured the event.
Marnie aka
Very original, very striking, and very well done. I love it!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..passing by my living room...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2435150size=lg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Gonz,
Talk to the flamers, not me. When people start making claims about
Reagan being a good president, etc. etc. then it is only normal that
those who disagree with that statement will voice their opinions too.
For what its worth, I was saddened to hear of his
Semper fi! He is indeed a USMC drum major.
tom wrote:
You can also see the guy following him is wearing a Marine hat.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 5:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reagan cortege - no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt it, probably not and I don't think so.
I don't know, I have my suspicions, but you may be right.
keith
Gonz wrote:
TMP wrote:
well, i'm a woman, and i can't say you are doing much for me right
now...
tan.
Tan, this Shawn person actually is a woman. With a
aren't showing up in the digests or the archive.
?
Doug, a number of us are having this problem.
Joe
My past few messages seems to have gone nowhere. Wonder if this
innocent one can slip through.
Yefei
Please tell us the tail. . . .er, tale.
Stephen Moore wrote:
A couple of thinlots right up there among the best
in capturing the little details that limn the humanity of the scene.
(I've got a funny story about the caparisoned horse that appeared
in the JFK funeral, but that's for another time,
On 11/6/04, LATER ALLINGATOR, discombobulated, offered:
Freaudian slips are supposed to have some sort of meaning, Cotty you're
a strange man :-)
Believe me, some people think dogs *are* gods - I know - my first
girlfriend was an obedience champ (the trainer, not the dog ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
While we're on the subject...you can see this guy -
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/reagan/040609-175432-6051.htm
Is a navy guy who passed out. 2 Navy guys in front of me passed out while
standiing at attention waiting for the caisson. Apparently people were
passing out left and right.
Well, some
Gonz, flame war? I think you are going a bit over the top mate. I have
said nothing inflamatory, just my opinions fairly conservatively put.
You may not agree with them, that is your choice, but to taint them as
some lesser form of vermin seems a bit extreme. I dont like a lot of
what you have
Hi everybody,
It seems I cannot stop buying new pieces of equipment as soon as
the opportunity arise...
I had the chance to buy a couple of demo lenses from the local
importer at a more than reasonable price.
One of the lenses is the FA 35/2 AL, a lens I was more than once
ready to buy new, but
http://www.altavista.com/image/results?q=pentax+mz3mik=photomik=graphicmi
p=allmis=allmiwxh=allstq=0
Dario Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 5:33 PM
Subject: mz 3/5n limited lenses
Was just scouring
Try:
http://www1.ocn.ne.jp/~y.kita/kizai/camera02.jpg
--Mike
Hi,
Friday, June 11, 2004, 7:04:46 AM, Shawn wrote:
I've seen you Bob, you're ugly, are you married, that would be a long shot,
proof that where there's one ugly dumbfuck, there's another ugly dumbfuck
that loves him...
I guess you have the better of me Shawn. Whereas you're handsome and
Hi,
PS. Hilarious fact: Regarding the difficulties encountered while searching
for a synthetic alternative to bearskin, They were also subject to static
electricity, which was rather embarrassing when they passed under
(electricity) pylons.
http://www.news-star.com/stories/081497/world2.html
Mark Roberts wrote:
Turns out my web host has some IP ranges blocked at *his* firewall, even
for web connections, due to Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. If you're
in one of these ranges I think you're out of luck.
Mark,
THX for the explanation.
Arturo
##
For those on the list that actually like to look at pictures and
discuss photography, I have culled down my GFM pictures to this
gallery. I present them for your enjoyment (or not). I'm sure they
are not perfect, but I find them at least pleasant to look at.
non-politcal comments welcome
1. Pentax-M 135/3.5 Excellent condition, caps. $35
2. Commercial Komura 210/5.6 #1 shutter (4x5) $150.
Covers 5x7 so provides good movements. 1/8 to 1sec are out.
Glass is clean and clear.
3. Ilex Paragon 7 1/2 (191mm) in Ilex #3 (4x5) $150.
Shutter works beautifully and lens is clean and
Quite pleasant to look at indeed! Thank you very much for posting them.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
For those on the list that actually like to look at pictures and
discuss photography, I have culled down my GFM pictures to this
gallery. I present them for your enjoyment (or not). I'm sure they
are not
Hi Dag,
Is that curvy thingy on the floor your fingernail?:-)
Yefei
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW: Venus - of course
Message-Id:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
..passing by my
Reminding us of Simon King's post sometime back (I may need to archive my
PDML folder about now..) about the dyslexic, agnostic insomniac who lay
awake in bed all night, wondering if there was a dog..
Cheers,
Ryan
Then there was the dyslexic devil-worshipper who sold his soul to Santa
Bob, there is this old saying, An eye for an eye leaves the world blind.
I'm pretty much sick of this insult fest, so I'm going to put an end to it
now by not returning the favor. I've had a few glasses of wine interspersed
over the past two years, so I'm not a drunk as you imply, I've never been
My g... how pathetic. It reminds me of some really bad B-movie.
This isn´t barbaric. The barbarians had a civilization, but you don´t.
DagT
På 11. jun. 2004 kl. 03.28 skrev Shawn K.:
You'd break your leg kicking my hard ass tough guy. I've fought
tougher
than you before, and would welcome a
Hey, wait a minute, what does this have to do with dogs?
John Francis wrote:
Reminding us of Simon King's post sometime back (I may need to archive my
PDML folder about now..) about the dyslexic, agnostic insomniac who lay
awake in bed all night, wondering if there was a dog..
Cheers,
Ryan
Hi DagT
Thanks for the comments.
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Dag T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reagan cortege
My g... how pathetic. It reminds me of some really bad B-movie.
This isn´t barbaric. The barbarians
These are really nice, did I mention that I hate you yet?
Bruce Dayton wrote:
For those on the list that actually like to look at pictures and
discuss photography, I have culled down my GFM pictures to this
gallery. I present them for your enjoyment (or not). I'm sure they
are not perfect, but I
I don't believe that I have been put on anyone's hate list yet for taking
a good pic. I'll certainly take that as a comliment. Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, June 11, 2004, 11:14:44 AM, you wrote:
PJA These are really nice, did I mention that I hate you yet?
PJA Bruce Dayton wrote:
not hearing your opinion isn't going to hurt him
arnie
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: reagan cortege
Peter,
Reagan was involved in affairs both in Iran and Iraq fyi.
Don't take the name of dog in vein!
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Hey, wait a minute, what does this have to do with dogs?
They are great pics.
I was showing my wife the pics and she commented that I *WILL* be going
to GFM next year, she really liked what she saw. Wow, I didn't even
have to bribe her. Then she saw the pic with the mountain lion and
changed her mind. LOL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those on
Good lord, Bruce. You actually took nature photos during the Nature Photo
Weekend? We may have to drum you off the list for that. Let me check the
by-laws. GRIN (for the humor impaired)!
I like the cougar shot.
--
Bruce Dayton wrote:
For those on the list that actually like to look at pictures
A few years ago when word came that Ray Charles would come to
a nearby city to perform, I bought the ticket right away
(50 bucks!) and went to see him perform in top form, and
snapped some shots. At the time I thought if I don't go to
a concert of his now, I might never see him in person
I was feeling kind of bad that I took nature photos instead of all
the shots back and forth of the gang. Hopefully it will help others
to know that the location was really beautiful.
Thanks,
Bruce
Friday, June 11, 2004, 11:29:56 AM, you wrote:
g Good lord, Bruce. You actually took nature
For those on the list that actually like to look at pictures and
discuss photography, I have culled down my GFM pictures to this
gallery. I present them for your enjoyment (or not). I'm sure they
are not perfect, but I find them at least pleasant to look at.
non-politcal comments welcome
Thanks. It is a beautiful setting and the company was great, too.
Can't top that. I am certainly going to make every attempt to get
back next year.
Fear not the lion - the Habitat is very safe for us humans - unless
you are lucky, you need a really long lens to get any shots of the
lions.
--
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
The Takumar 135/2.5 bayonet is a dog - best avoided,
A.
By whose word?
Are you testifying directly and personally that it's not a worthy lens?
How do you know? Have you personally tested one?
Or are you parroting someone else's opinion?
keith whaley
On 11 Jun 2004, at
is asking $50 for it
The Takumar 135/2.5 bayonet is a dog - best avoided,
Well, I would tend to disagree with the canine qualities. It's not
the best Pentax 135 out there, but I wouldn't exactly call it a dog,
either. Still, I do think that $50 might be a bit too high.
Fred
Hi,
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
I would like to ask those who used a big processor or lab or something
similar. I am using a Jobo, and am searching for something that would
kill the algae which invariably form in the waterbath. Chloride is,
according to Jobo, dangerous to the plastics or temperature
Hi,
graywolf wrote:
I only killfile people who are consistently abusive to others on the
list. That has been mercifully few, but there seems to be something in
the air this spring.
The saps are rising?
m
I believe glass separation has nothing to do with the manufacturing origin,
but the fact that those lenses were designed and manufactured to be cheap,
the FA28-70/4 in this case. Some even had aperture blades not working
properly. There are reason why some lenses were selling so cheap.
Aha, the opinion police are back!
I've owned it, it was a dog, I got rid of it. My opinion.
Antonio
On 11 Jun 2004, at 23:58, Keith Whaley wrote:
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
The Takumar 135/2.5 bayonet is a dog - best avoided,
A.
By whose word?
Are you testifying directly and personally that it's not
I'm not a huge believer that the country of manufacture has a big
difference with quality of the object. I own a VW TDI car and some
members of tdiclub.com (the forums for said cars) claim that the
German made ones are better than the ones made elsewhere. My wife's
Jetta Wagon TDI is German and
Okay! Fair enough. I accept your evaluation.
When I test mine, I'll report back, and we can compare the results...
keith whaley
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Aha, the opinion police are back!
I've owned it, it was a dog, I got rid of it. My opinion.
Antonio
On 11 Jun 2004, at 23:58, Keith Whaley wrote:
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
